Characterization of a third ghrelin receptor, GHS-R3a, in channel catfish reveals novel expression patterns and a high affinity for homologous ligand

The ghrelin receptor GHSR has two efficient agonists in the lobe-finned fish Latimeria chalumnae

The peptide hormone ghrelin (an agonist) and LEAP2 (an antagonist) play important functions in energy metabolism via their receptor GHSR, an A-class G protein-coupled receptor. Ghrelin, LEAP2, and GHSR are widely present from fishes to mammals. However, our recent study suggested that fish GHSRs have different binding properties to ghrelin: a GHSR from the lobe-finned fish Latimeria chalumnae (coelacanth) is efficiently activated by ghrelin, but GHSRs from the ray-finned fish Danio rerio (zebrafish) and Larimichthys crocea (large yellow croaker) have lost binding to ghrelin. Do fish GHSRs use another peptide as their agonist? In the present study we tested to two fish motilins from D. rerio and L. chalumnae because motilin is distantly related to ghrelin. In ligand binding and activation assays, the fish GHSRs from D. rerio and L. crocea displayed no detectable or very low binding to all tested motilins; however, the fish GHSR from L. chalumnae bound to its motilin with high affinity and was efficiently activated by it. Therefore, it seemed that motilin is not a ligand for GHSR in the ray-finned fish D. rerio and L. crocea, but is an efficient agonist for GHSR in the lobe-finned fish L. chalumnae, one of the closest fish relatives of tetrapods. The results of present study suggested that GHSR might have two efficient agonists, ghrelin and motilin, in ancient fishes; however, this feature might be only preserved in some extant fishes with ancient evolutionary origins.

LEAP2 is a more conserved ligand than ghrelin for fish GHSRs

Recently, liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP2) was identified as an endogenous antagonist and an inverse agonist of the ghrelin receptor GHSR. However, its functions in lower vertebrates are not well understood. Our recent study demonstrated that both LEAP2 and ghrelin are functional towards a fish GHSR from Latimeria chalumnae, an extant coelacanth believed to be one of the closest ancestors of tetrapods. However, amino acid sequence alignment identified that the 6.58 position (Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering system) of most fish GHSRs are not occupied by an aromatic Phe residue, which is absolutely conserved in all known GHSRs from amphibians to mammals, and is responsible for human GHSR binding to its agonist, ghrelin. To test whether these unusual fish receptors are functional, we studied the ligand binding properties of three representative fish GHSRs, two from Danio rerio (zebrafish) and one from Larimichthys crocea (large yellow croaker). After overexpression in human embryonic kidney 293T cells, the three fish GHSRs retained normal binding to all tested LEAP2s, except for a second LEAP2 from L. crocea. However, they displayed almost no binding to all chemically synthesized n-octanoylated ghrelins, despite these ghrelins all retaining normal function towards human and coelacanth GHSRs. Thus, it seems that LEAP2 is a more conserved ligand than ghrelin towards fish GHSRs. Our results not only provided new insights into the interaction mechanism of GHSRs with LEAP2s and ghrelins, but also shed new light on the functions of LEAP2 and ghrelin in different fish species.