Midgut fluxes and digestive enzyme recycling in Musca domestica: A molecular approach

Sequence analysis and function of mosquito aeCCC2 and Drosophila Ncc83 orthologs

Dipteran insects have genes that code for two different Na⁺-dependent cation-chloride cotransporter (CCC) paralogs. Aedes aegypti aeNKCC1 is an ortholog of Drosophila melanogaster Ncc69, a bumetanide-sensitive Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporter (NKCC). Aedes aegypti aeCCC2 and aeCCC3 are orthologs of Drosophila Ncc83. Prior work suggests that the transport properties of aeCCC2 differ from canonical NKCCs. In particular, Xenopus oocytes expressing aeCCC2 have increased Na⁺-dependent membrane currents compared to controls, whereas NKCCs are electroneutral. Here, we further evaluated the function and localization of aeCCC2 and Ncc83. In oocytes expressing aeCCC2 or Ncc83, membrane potential (V_m) hyperpolarized upon Na⁺ removal; following hypotonic exposure the change in V_m was greater than it was in controls. In voltage-clamp experiments, membrane currents were concentration dependent on Na⁺ with an apparent affinity (K_m) of approximately 4.6 mM. In Malpighian tubules of larval and adult mosquitoes, aeCCC2 was localized along the basolateral aspect of principal cells. Sequence comparisons among transporters from Drosophila, Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex revealed 33 residues within the transmembrane domains (TMDs) that are fully conserved within paralogs but that differ between orthologs of NKCC1 and orthologs of aeCCC2/Ncc83. These residues are distributed across all 12 TMDs. Our results provide a foundation for further exploration of the structural basis for functional differences between insect Na⁺-dependent CCCs.

Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of the underlying mechanisms of digestion of triacylglycerols and phosphatides and absorption and fate of fatty acids along the midgut of Musca domestica

Most dietary lipids are triacylglycerols (TAGs) and phosphatides that are digested by TAG lipases and phospholipases (PLIPs), respectively, originating fatty acids (FA). The genome of Musca domestica has genes coding for phospholipases A1 (1PLIP), A2 (2PLIP), B (BPLIP), and acid lipases (ALIP), as for proteins involved in activation, binding, and metabolism of FA, which expression in the larval midgut was evaluated by RNA-seq. Some of the codified proteins were identified in midgut microvillar-enriched membrane by proteomics. 1PLIPs are the most expressed PLIPs, mainly in anterior midgut whereas 2PLIPs, and BPLIP in middle and posterior midgut, and ALIPs between middle and posterior regions. Absorption of FAs is putatively accomplished by proteins involved in FA activation (acyl-CoA synthetases) found in microvillar-enriched membrane preparations. Furthermore, FA uptake could be enhanced by proteins that bind FAs (FA-binding proteins) and its activated form (acyl-CoA binding proteins) mainly expressed in posterior midgut. Activated FAs could have different fates: synthesis of diacylglycerol (DAG) and TAG through monoacylglycerol and glycerol-3-phosphate pathways; synthesis of phosphatides; energy source by β-oxidation. Most genes coding for enzymes of those routes is expressed mainly at the end of posterior midgut. Data suggest that phosphatides are digested in anterior midgut by Md1PLIPs, releasing lysophosphatides that emulsify fats to be digested by MdALIPs in the middle and posterior midgut. Most resulting FAs is absorbed in the posterior midgut, where they follow the synthesis of DAG, TAG, and phosphatides or are oxidized along the midgut, mainly in highly metabolic middle and posterior midgut regions.

Evolutionary trends of digestion and absorption in the major insect orders

The spatial organization of digestion, which corresponds to the steps by which the ingested food is hydrolyzed in the different regions of the gut, was described in insects from the major insect orders. The pattern of digestion and absorption in the midgut shows a strong phylogenetic influence, modulated by adaptation to particular feeding habits. Based on this, basic digestive patterns were recognized and were proposed to represent the major ancestors from which the different orders evolved. The putative ancestors chosen to represent different points in the evolution from basal Neoptera to more derived orders were: Neoptera, Polyneoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera-Panorpoidea (Diptera-Lepidoptera), Lepidoptera, and Cyclorrhapha. The basic plan of Neoptera was supposed to be alike that of Polyneoptera, which was hypothesized from studies performed in grasshoppers, crickets and from stick insects. For Holometabola, the basic plan was initially proposed from studies carried out in beetles, bees, nematocerous flies, common flies and also from moths. This review updates the physiological data supporting the putative midgut basic patterns by discussing available data on insects pertaining to different taxa and details the evolutionary trends of midgut function among the major insect orders. Furthermore, by using recent genomic and transcriptome data, this review discusses the few insects for which the spatial organization of midgut absorption is known.