Molecular characterization and tissue distribution of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator isoforms, ARNT1 and ARNT2, and identification of novel splice variants in common cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)

The AHR1-ARNT1 dimerization pair is a major regulator of the response to natural ligands, but not to TCDD, in the chicken

The activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) occurs through the binding of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) or natural ligands. In this pathway, the AHR-ARNT (AHR nuclear translocator) heterodimer serves to regulate critical physiological functions, such as immune responses and the metabolism of xenobiotics. Birds have three AHR isoforms (AHR1, AHR1β, and AHR2) and two ARNT isoforms (ARNT1 and ARNT2). However, how AHR and ARNT dimerization pair in birds regulates the AHR signaling pathway in an isoform-specific manner remains unknown. In this study, we initially sought to clarify the major chicken AHR-ARNT (ckAHR-ckARNT) pairs by estimating the mRNA tissue distributions of various ckAHR and ckARNT isoforms. Our results indicated that the ckAHR1-ckARNT1 represented the major dimerization pair in most tissues except the brain. We then measured the transactivation potencies of various ckAHR-ckARNT pairs by natural ligands and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), in in vitro reporter gene assays using COS-7 and LMH cell lines. Our results from the in vitro assays demonstrated that the ckAHR1-ckARNT1 pair was strongly activated by the five natural ligands, namely, 6-formylindolo [3,2-b]carbazole, L-kynurenin, kynurenic acid, indoxyl-3-sulfate, and 1,3,7-tribromodibenzo-p-dioxin, but not by TCDD. In in silico ligand docking simulations with ckAHR1 homology models, all the natural ligands showed a interaction pattern that was distinct from that observed with anthropogenic DLCs, including TCDD. In conclusion, our findings indicate that the ckAHR1-ckARNT1 may be the most important dimerization pair in most tissues for regulating the physiological functions driven by natural ligands, although it was less reactive to TCDD.

Molecular and functional characterization of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 1 (ARNT1) and ARNT2 in chicken (Gallus gallus)

Our previous studies have provided evidence that birds have two isoforms of aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AHR1 and AHR2) and AHR nuclear translocators (ARNT1 and ARNT2) that potentially mediate toxic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. We have also shown that while both in vitro-expressed chicken AHR1 (ckAHR1) and AHR2 (ckAHR2) exhibit binding affinities to TCDD, only ckAHR1 but not ckAHR2 showed a TCDD-dose-dependent transactivation potency of chicken cytochrome P450 1A5 (ckCYP1A5) in in vitro reporter gene assays. To explore the molecular mechanism of functional difference in the two ckAHRs, the present study investigated the molecular characteristics and function of chicken ARNT (ckARNT) that is a potential dimerization partner for the activation of ckAHR. The full-length ckARNT1 and ckARNT2 cDNAs were isolated and their alternative splice variants were also identified. The ckARNT1 transcript was ubiquitously expressed in various tissues, but ckARNT2 showed restricted expressions in brain, kidney and eye, indicating a similar expression pattern to mammalian ARNTs. The expressions of tagged-ckARNT1 and -ckARNT2 were confirmed in a chicken hepatoma LMH cells by western blot analyses, and their interactions with each ckAHR and a specific recognition DNA element, xenobiotic response element (XRE), were examined by gel shift assays. The result showed that ckARNT1 and ckARNT2 dimerize with each ckAHR isoform and bind with the XRE in a TCDD-dependent manner. Hence, we conclude that functional loss on the dimerization with ckARNTs or the XRE binding is not the major cause of the deficient TCDD-dependency of ckAHR2 for the transactivation. Furthermore, in vitro reporter gene assays showed that transfected ckARNT1 failed to modulate the transcriptional induction of ckAHR-mediated ckCYP1A5 gene by TCDD in COS-7 and LMH cells, whereas ckARNT2 could potentiate the TCDD-dependent response in COS-7 but not in LMH cells. This suggests that ckARNT2 has a distinct role from ckARNT1 in AHR signaling pathway and in a cell-specific mode of action.

Molecular and functional characterization of Aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor from the chicken (Gallus gallus): interspecies similarities and differences

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) repressor (AHRR) has been recognized as a negative feedback modulator of AHR-mediated responses in fish and mammals. However, the repressive mechanism by the AHRR has not been investigated in other animals. To understand the molecular mechanism of dioxin toxicity and the evolutionary history of the AHR signaling pathway in avian species, the present study addresses chicken AHRR (ckAHRR). The complementary DNA sequence of ckAHRR encodes an 84-kDa protein sharing 29-52% identities with other AHRRs. High levels of ckAHRR messenger RNA were recorded in the kidney and intestine of nontreated chicks. In hepatoma LMH cells, the 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) 50% effective concentration value for ckAHRR induction (0.0016nM) was the same as that for chicken cytochrome P450 1A5 (ckCYP1A5), implying a shared transcriptional regulation of ckAHRR and ckCYP1A5 by chicken AHR (ckAHR). In ckAHRR transient transfection assays, ckAHRR repressed both ckAHR1- and ckAHR2-mediated transcriptional activities. Deletion and mutation assays revealed that basic helix-loop-helix/Per-ARNT-Sim A domains of ckAHRR, particularly 217-402 amino acid residues, are indispensable for the repression, but the AHR nuclear translocator sequestration by ckAHRR and SUMOylation of ckAHRR are not involved in its repressive mechanism. Additionally, subcellular localization assay of ckAHR1-enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion protein showed that ckAHRR did not affect nuclear translocation of the ckAHR1. Furthermore, ckAHRR inhibited the TCDD- and 17β estradiol-enhanced ckCYP1A5 transcription through AHR-estrogen receptor α (ERα) cross talk. Taken together, the function of AHRR is conserved in chicken in terms of the negative regulation of AHR and ERα activities, but its functional mechanism is likely distinct from those of the mammalian and fish homologues.

Endocrine disruption in the context of life cycles: perception and transduction of environmental cues

Environmental and social stresses have major impacts on the life cycles of organisms. Furthermore, habitat disturbance/destruction, global climate change, and existence of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) due to human activities are increasingly likely to pose additive and synergistic stresses that could have potential deleterious effects on physiological function in vertebrates. Central to an organism's life cycle is the ability to respond to environmental cues, physical and social. Environmental signals may act directly on endocrine tissues, but most act through neural pathways, and neuroendocrine and endocrine secretions that affect changes in morphology, physiology and behavior. While most investigations focus on endocrine secretions and their effects, we know much less about perception and transduction of environmental signals. Additionally, some populations of vertebrates, from fish to mammals, temporarily resist environmental and social stresses, and breed successfully. However, many show varying degrees of failure, sometimes resulting in marked population decline. There is potential for EDCs to act at all levels of the response systems to environmental cues. Because animals live in diverse habitats, there is variation in susceptibility to disruption of response systems to environmental cues. Although this may be partly due to genetic differences at a level of receptors and/or metabolism, fundamental differences in how species perceive environmental cues and respond to them may also be major factors. Here we discuss how EDCs may interact with the perception and transduction of environmental cues that are important for all organisms in their natural world. This may introduce a new perspective on the effects of environmental endocrine disruptors.

Analysis of Ah receptor-ARNT and Ah receptor-ARNT2 complexes in vitro and in cell culture

ARNT and ARNT2 proteins are expressed in mammalian and aquatic species and exhibit a high level of amino acid identity in the basic-helix loop-helix PER/ARNT/SIM domains involved in protein interactions and DNA binding. Since the analysis of ARNT2 function at the protein level has been limited, ARNT2 function in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-mediated signaling was evaluated and compared to ARNT. In vitro, ARNT and ARNT2 dimerized equally with the AHR in the presence of 2,3,7,8-tetracholorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and ARNT2 outcompeted ARNT for binding to the AHR when expressed in excess. In contrast, activation of the AHR with 3-methylcholanthrene or benzo[a]pyrene resulted in predominant formation of AHR*ARNT complexes. ARNT2 expressed in Hepa-1 cell culture lines with reduced ARNT protein resulted in minimal induction of endogenous CYP1A1 protein compared to cells expressing ARNT, and mutation of the putative proline residue at amino acid 352 to histidine failed to produce an ARNT2 that could function in AHR-mediated signaling. However, the expression of ARNT2 in wild-type Hepa-1 cells reduced TCDD-mediated induction of endogenous CYP1A1 protein by 30%, even though AHR*ARNT2 complexes could not be detected in nuclear extracts. Western blot analysis of numerous mouse tissues and various cell culture lines showed that both endogenous ARNT and ARNT2 could be detected in cells derived from kidney, central nervous system, and retinal epithelium. Thus, ARNT2 has the ability to dimerize with the liganded AHR in vitro and is influenced by the activating ligand yet appears to be limited in its ability to influence AHR-mediated signaling in cell culture.