Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: Analytical evaluation for validation of a cytopathic effect assay

Intact bioactivities and improved pharmacokinetic of the SL335-IFN-β-1a fusion protein that created by genetic fusion of SL335, a human anti-serum albumin fab, and human interferon-β

Recombinant human interferon beta (rIFN-β) has long been used as a first-line treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), and any attempt to develop a long-acting rIFN-β is desirable since only one pegylated version of long-acting rIFN-β-1a (Plegridy) is currently available in clinics. Previously, we reported that SL335, a human Fab molecule specific to serum albumin, exhibits an extended serum half-life via utilizing the FcRn recycling mechanism. With the ultimate goal of developing a long-acting rIFN-®, we generated a fusion construct by linking human IFN-β cDNA to the C-terminus of the SL335 H chain at the DNA level followed by expression of the fusion protein, referred to as SL335-IFN-β-1a, in Chinese hamster ovary-S (CHO-S) cells. In its N-linked glycosylated form, the resulting fusion protein was easily purified from the culture supernatant via a three-step chromatography process. In vitro functional assays revealed that the fusion protein retained its intrinsic binding capabilities to human serum albumin (HSA) and interferon α/β receptor (IFNAR) that were almost identical to those of parental SL335 and rIFN-β-1a (Rebif). In addition, the fusion protein possessed an antiviral potency and anti-proliferation activity comparable to those of Rebif. In pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses using Lewis rats and cynomolgus monkeys, SL335-IFN-β-1a exhibited at least a two-fold longer serum half-life and a significantly reduced renal clearance rate compared to those of Rebif. Finally, a four-week repeated dose toxicity study revealed no abnormal toxicological signs. In conclusion, our results clearly demonstrated that SL335-IFN-β-1a is worthy of further development as an alternative long-acting IFN-β therapeutic.

Anti-Interferon Alpha Antibodies in Patients with High-Risk BCR/ABL-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treated with Recombinant Human Interferon-α

Background

The objective of this study was to characterize the incidence and impact of immunogenicity to interferon-α (IFN-α-2a, IFN-α-2b, and Peg-IFN-α-2a) over a period of 12 months in patients with BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Material/Methods

A total of 131 patients from an observational prospective cohort were selected. Antidrug antibodies, in serial serum samples obtained monthly after initiation of therapy, were measured by ELISA and WISH/VSV CPE assays. The association between antidrug antibodies and treatment response and adverse effects was evaluated.

Results

Among patients who completed 12 months of follow-up, binding antibodies (BAbs) were detected in 53% of those receiving IFN-α (69 of 131) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detected in 19% (25 of 131). NAbs-positivity was correlated with poorer clinical response, and Bab-positivity was associated with more adverse events. Almost all BAbs and NAbs appeared within 8 months after treatment began (≥95%). Complete remission (CR) rate was 62% for patients who were BAbs-positive and 69% for patients who were BAbs-negative; however, the CR rate of patients with NAbs(+) (24%) was obviously lower than in patients with NAbs(−) (75%). Patients with BAbs(+) had more immune adverse effects (including fever, myalgia, skin reaction, and stomatitis) than BAbs(−) patients, and NAbs to IFN-α had no obvious influence on the adverse effects rate.

Conclusions

The development of BAbs and NAbs can adversely affect IFN-α treatment in patients with MPN.

Clinical practice of analysis of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta and natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients in Europe: A descriptive study of test results

Antibodies against biopharmaceuticals (anti-drug antibodies, ADA) have been a well-integrated part of the clinical care of multiple sclerosis (MS) in several European countries. ADA data generated in Europe during the more than 10 years of ADA monitoring in MS patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ) and natalizumab have been pooled and characterized through collaboration within a European consortium. The aim of this study was to report on the clinical practice of ADA testing in Europe, considering the number of ADA tests performed and type of ADA assays used, and to determine the frequency of ADA testing against the different drug preparations in different countries. A common database platform (tranSMART) for querying, analyzing and storing retrospective data of MS cohorts was set up to harmonize the data and compare results of ADA tests between different countries. Retrospective data from six countries (Sweden, Austria, Spain, Switzerland, Germany and Denmark) on 20,695 patients and on 42,555 samples were loaded into tranSMART including data points of age, gender, treatment, samples, and ADA results. The previously observed immunogenic difference among the four IFNβ preparations was confirmed in this large dataset. Decreased usage of the more immunogenic preparations IFNβ-1a subcutaneous (s.c.) and IFNβ-1b s.c. in favor of the least immunogenic preparation IFNβ-1a intramuscular (i.m.) was observed. The median time from treatment start to first ADA test correlated with time to first positive test. Shorter times were observed for IFNβ-1b-Extavia s.c. (0.99 and 0.94 years) and natalizumab (0.25 and 0.23 years), which were introduced on the market when ADA testing was already available, as compared to IFNβ-1a i.m. (1.41 and 2.27 years), IFNβ-1b-Betaferon s.c. (2.51 and 1.96 years) and IFNβ-1a s.c. (2.11 and 2.09 years) which were available years before routine testing began. A higher rate of anti-IFNβ ADA was observed in test samples taken from older patients. Testing for ADA varies between different European countries and is highly dependent on the policy within each country. For drugs where routine monitoring of ADA is not in place, there is a risk that some patients remain on treatment for several years despite ADA positivity. For drugs where a strategy of ADA testing is introduced with the release of the drug, there is a reduced risk of having ADA positive patients and thus of less efficient treatment. This indicates that potential savings in health cost might be achieved by routine analysis of ADA.

Variability in detection and quantification of interferon β-1b-induced neutralizing antibodies

BACKGROUND

Interferon-beta (IFNB) therapy for multiple sclerosis can lead to the induction of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFNB. Various methods are used for detection and quantification of NAbs.

METHODS

Blood samples from 125 IFNB-1b-treated patients, which were tested NAb negative or NAb positive after conclusion of a clinical study, were retested three years after first being assessed in four different laboratories that offer routine NAb testing to practicing neurologists. The myxovirus protein A (MxA) induction assay, the cytopathic effect (CPE) assay (two laboratories), or the luciferase assay were used. Intra- and inter-laboratory agreement between assays with respect to NAb detection and NAb titer quantification were evaluated.

RESULTS

High agreement for NAb detection (kappa coefficient, 0.86) and for titer levels was observed for the intra-laboratory comparison in the laboratory using the MxA induction assay performed three years ago and now. A similarly high agreement for NAb detection (kappa coefficient, 0.87) and for titer quantification was noted for the MxA assay of this laboratory with one of two laboratories using the CPE assay. All other inter-laboratory comparisons showed kappa values between 0.57 and 0.68 and remarkable differences in individual titer levels.

CONCLUSIONS

There are considerable differences in the detection and quantification of IFNB-induced NAbs among laboratories offering NAb testing for clinical practice using different assay methods. It is important that these differences are considered when interpreting NAb results for clinical decision-making and when developing general recommendations for potentially clinically meaningful NAb titer levels.

Prevalence of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta has decreased since routine analysis of neutralizing antibodies became clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon beta (IFNβ) lead to loss of treatment efficacy in multiple sclerosis patients. The seroprevalence of NAbs in multiple sclerosis patients treated with IFNβ during 2003-2004 was 32% in a cross-sectional analysis of routine data.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the seroprevalence of NAbs, the levels of NAb titres and the IFNβ preparations used for treatment of multiple sclerosis patients had changed in 2009-2010.

METHODS

This study included 1296 patients, analysed for NAbs with the myxovirus resistance protein A gene expression assay in 2009-2010.

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of NAbs had decreased to 19% in 2009-2010, which is significantly lower compared with the previous study in 2003-2004 (p<0.0001). This decrease was attributed to the IFNβ-1a preparations only, not to IFNβ-1b. The frequency of patients with high positive titres decreased the most, from 16% to 7% (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

NAb seroprevalence has decreased since NAb monitoring became clinical practice in 2003, especially for patients with high NAb titres. This might be due to the stricter monitoring of NAb titres that prompt NAb positive patients to stop treatment, to preferential use of less immunogenic drugs and to alteration of drug formulations.

Determination of interferon beta neutralizing antibodies in multiple sclerosis: improvement of clinical sensitivity of a cytopathic effect assay

INTRODUCTION

Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against interferon beta (IFNbeta) reduce treatment efficacy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

We used the cross-reactivity of NAbs against IFNbeta-1a or IFNbeta-1b for improving the sensitivity of NAb measurement.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The study included sera from 185 MS patients treated at least 12 months (T1) with IFNbeta-1a (Rebif; n=62 or Avonex; n=61) or IFNbeta-1b (Betaferon; n=62). NAbs were measured by CPE in all the sera using the WISH cell line infected by the bovine stomatitis vesicular virus. NAb titres were expressed in ten-fold reduction (TRU)/mL. NAb-positive titres at T1 were also measured 3 to 6 months later (T2).

RESULTS

At T1, with the classical CPE assay using the IFNbeta type (1a or 1b) according to the molecule administered, 29/180 (15.7%) patients had positive NAb titres: 9/62 (14.5%), 14/62 (22.6%) and 6/61 (9.8%) subjects were treated with Betaferon, Rebif and Avonex, respectively. When IFNbeta-1a (Rebif or Avonex) was used, NAb-positive results were found in 33/185 (17.8%) patients. They included the 29 patients previously found positive with the classical CPE method and 7 other subjects treated with Betaferon and NAb-negative against IFNbeta-1b. All the 33 NAb-positive patients at T1 were positive 3 to 6 months later.

CONCLUSION

IFNbeta-1a should be used for the NAb determination for an optimal evaluation of NAb-positive patients in MS patients treated with IFNbeta.