Procarboxypeptidase U (TAFI) and the Thr325Ile proCPU polymorphism in patients with hereditary mucocutaneous hemorrhages

Plasmin generation analysis in patients with bleeding disorder of unknown cause

ABSTRACT

Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC) is a diagnosis of exclusion after evaluation of plasma coagulation and platelet function. Patients with BDUC (n = 375) recorded in the Vienna Bleeding Biobank were analyzed in comparison with healthy controls (HCs; n = 100) in this case-control study. Plasmin generation (PG) parameters were analyzed using calibrated fluorescence detection in citrated plasma. Turbidimetric plasma clot formation/lysis of 293 (78%) patients with BDUC and confocal microscopy of clots from representative patients with BDUC (n = 6) and HCs (n = 9) were assessed. In the PG analysis, patients with BDUC exhibited lower velocity and peak plasmin levels but a higher endogenous plasmin potential than HCs. Peak plasmin levels correlated with maximum clot absorbance but not with clot lysis time. Clot absorbance is an indicator of clot fiber density. Confocal microscopy analysis revealed a tendency towards thicker fibers in clots of patients with BDUC, which negatively correlated with peak plasmin (r = -0.561; P = .030). Peak plasmin correlated weakly with factor XIII, but not with other fibrinolytic factors (alpha2-antiplasmin, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, or plasminogen activator inhibitor 1) or bleeding severity. A model comprising fibrinogen and parameters of PG yielded high predictive power in discriminating between patients with BDUC and HCs across a fivefold stratified cross validation (80% of data; mean area under the curve [AUC], 0.847). The model generalized well to unseen data (20% of data; AUC, 0.856). Overall, patients with BDUC counterintuitively exhibited reduced peak plasmin levels, potentially related to altered clot structure.

Utility of Global Hemostatic Assays in Patients with Bleeding Disorders of Unknown Cause

Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC) is a diagnosis of exclusion after exhaustive evaluation of plasmatic coagulation and platelet function. This review explores the utility of global hemostatic assays as confirmatory tests and in elucidating the pathophysiology of BDUC. Unlike traditional hemostatic tests that focus on coagulation factors, global assays are conducted both in plasma and also whole blood. These assays provide a more comprehensive understanding of the cell-based model of coagulation, aid in the identification of plasmatic factor abnormalities that may reduce hemostatic capacity, and allow for the assessment of impaired platelet-endothelial interactions under shear stress, as well as hyperfibrinolytic states. While clinical tests such as skin bleeding time and global assays such as PFA-100 exhibit limited diagnostic capacity, the role of viscoelastic testing in identifying hemostatic dysfunction in patients with BDUC remains unclear. Thrombin generation assays have shown variable results in BDUC patients; some studies demonstrate differences compared with healthy controls or reference values, whereas others question its clinical utility. Fibrinolysis assessment in vitro remains challenging, with studies employing euglobulin clot lysis time, plasma clot lysis time, and fluorogenic plasmin generation yielding inconclusive or conflicting results. Notably, recent studies suggest that microfluidic analysis unveils shear-dependent platelet function defects in BDUC patients, undetected by conventional platelet function assays. Overall, global assays might be helpful for exploring underlying hemostatic impairments, when conventional hemostatic laboratory tests yield no results. However, due to limited data and/or discrepant results, further research is needed to evaluate the utility of global assays as screening tools.

Fibrinolysis and bleeding of unknown cause

Patients with bleeding of unknown cause (BUC) present with a variety of mild to moderate bleeding symptoms, but no hemostatic abnormalities can be found. Hyperfibrinolysis is rarely evaluated as the underlying cause for bleeding in clinical practice, and well-established global assays for abnormal fibrinolysis are lacking. Few patients with definitive fibrinolytic disorders, including α2-antiplasmin deficiency, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 deficiency, or Quebec platelet disorder, have been reported. This review aims to summarize data on established fibrinolytic disorders and to discuss assessments of fibrinolysis in prior bleeding cohorts. Furthermore, we review available global tests with the potential to measure fibrinolysis, such as turbidity fibrin clot assays and rotational thromboelastometry, and their relevance in the workup of patients with BUC. We conclude that, due to the lack of adequate global tests, hyperfibrinolysis might be an underdiagnosed cause for a bleeding disorder. The diagnosis of hyperfibrinolytic bleeding disorders would improve patient care as effective treatment with antifibrinolytic agents is available.

Bleeding of unknown cause and unclassified bleeding disorders; diagnosis, pathophysiology and management

Bleeding of unknown cause (BUC), also known as unclassified bleeding disorders (UBD), has been defined as a clear bleeding tendency in the presence of normal haemostatic tests. There are challenges in the diagnosis and management of these patients. BUC/UBD encompasses a heterogenous group of disorders which may include undiagnosed rare monogenic diseases, polygenic reasons for bleeding; and patients without a clear bleeding disorder but with a previous bleeding event. Nevertheless, these patients may have heavy menstrual bleeding or be at risk of bleeding when undergoing surgical procedures, or childbirth; optimizing haemostasis and establishing a mode of inheritance is important to minimize morbidity. The bleeding score has been used to clinically assess and describe these patients, but its value remains uncertain. In addition, accurate distinction between normal and pathological bleeding remains difficult. Several studies have investigated cohorts of these patients using research haemostasis tests, including thrombin generation and fibrinolytic assays, yet no clear characteristics have consistently emerged. Thus far, detailed genetic analysis of these patients has not been fruitful in unravelling the cause of bleeding. There is a need for standardization of diagnosis and management guidelines for these patients. This review gives an overview of this field with some suggestions for future research.

Laboratory evaluation of patients with undiagnosed bleeding disorders

The evaluation of patients with a bleeding tendency represents a challenge as the routinely available tests for evaluating bleeding disorders are limited, complicating the laboratory determination of the clinically observed bleeding tendency. As a result, some bleeding disorders remain undiagnosed. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether global coagulation tests would contribute to the laboratory analysis of patients with undiagnosed bleeding disorders. Patients were evaluated for coagulation and fibrinolysis activities by thrombin generation test and euglobulin lysis time. In addition, plasma activity of factor XIII, plasminogen, α-2 antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor was also obtained. Forty-five patients were included. Eight per cent presented a mild bleeding disorder and 20% a moderate bleeding disorder. The thrombin generation test results were similar between patients and controls. Euglobulin lysis time results, however, were lower in patients than in controls, both before (median 175 vs. 250 min, respectively; P = 0.003) and after (median 145 vs. 115 min, respectively; P ≤ 0.001) arm constriction, suggesting that they were experiencing hyperfibrinolysis. Interestingly, patients' median thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity was higher than in controls (21.2 vs. 19.46 μg/ml; P = 0.016). However, plasminogen, α-2 antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and factor XIII activities did not differ between the groups. Global coagulation and fibrinolysis tests proved to be limited in detecting the hemostatic disorders in some patients with a relevant bleeding tendency and may not be adequate to address their bleeding risk. Bleeding scores are currently the available medical approach for the evaluation of these patients.

Fibrinolysis in patients with a mild-to-moderate bleeding tendency of unknown cause

In more than 50% of patients with a mild-to-moderate bleeding tendency, no underlying cause can be identified (bleeding of unknown cause, BUC). Data on parameters of fibrinolysis in BUC are scarce in the literature and reveal discrepant results. It was the aim of this study to investigate increased fibrinolysis as a possible mechanism of BUC. We included 270 patients (227 females, median age 44 years, 25–75^th percentile 32–58) with BUC and 98 healthy controls (65 females, median age 47 years, 25–75^thpercentile 39–55). Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA-) antigen and activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), tPA-PAI-1 complexes, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), α2-antiplasmin, and D-dimer were determined. While PAI-1 deficiency was equally frequent in patients with BUC and controls (91/270, 34%, and 33/98, 34%, p = 0.996), tPA activity levels were more often above the detection limit in patients than in controls (103/213, 48%, and 23/98, 23%, p < 0.0001). We found lower levels of tPA-PAI-1 complexes (6.86 (3.99–10.00) and 9.11 (7.17–13.12), p < 0.001) and higher activity of TAFI (18.61 (15.80–22.58) and 17.03 (14.02–20.02), p < 0.001) and α2-antiplasmin (102 (94–109) and 98 (90–106], p = 0.003) in patients compared to controls. Detectable tPA activity (OR 3.02, 95%CI 1.75–5.23, p < 0.0001), higher levels of TAFI (OR 2.57, 95%CI 1.48–4.46, p = 0.0008) and α2-antiplasmin (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01–1.05, p = 0.011), and lower levels of tPA-PAI-1 complexes (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.86–0.95, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with BUC in sex-adjusted logistic regression analyses. We conclude that the fibrinolytic system can play an etiological role for bleeding in patients with BUC.