Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity as a biomarker in the field of transplantation

The Application of Inosine 5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity Determination in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Monitoring Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome

In pediatric nephrotic syndrome, recommended mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics are higher than those for transplant recipients. In MPA therapeutic monitoring, inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity may be useful. We modified the method established for renal transplant recipients and determined IMPDH activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers and children (4-16 years) with nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). From children, four blood samples were collected, and MPA concentrations were also determined. IMPDH activity was calculated using xanthosine monophosphate (XMP) normalized with adenosine monophosphate (AMP), both determined with the HPLC-UV method. The modified method was accurate, precise, and linear for AMP and XMP within 0.50-50.0 μmoL/L. Mean IMPDH activity in volunteers was 45.97 ± 6.24 µmoL·s^-1·moL^-1 AMP, whereas for children, the values were variable and amounted to 39.23 ± 27.40 µmoL·s^-1·moL^-1 AMP and 17.97 ± 15.24 µmoL·s^-1·moL^-1 AMP before the next MMF dose and 1 h afterward, respectively. The modified method may be applied to IMPDH activity determination in children with nephrotic syndrome treated with MMF. IMPDH activity should be determined after one thawing of PBMCs due to the change in AMP and XMP concentrations after subsequent thawing. For children, the lowest IMPDH activity was observed concomitantly with the highest MPA concentration.

Mycophenolic acid in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: From humans to dogs

Mycophenolic acid (MPA), a noncompetitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), is an immunosuppressive agent that has a long history in medicine. Mechanistically, the inhibition of IMPDH leads to the selective and eventual arrest of T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), the first MPA-based product to receive marketing approval over two decades ago, was originally indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in human transplant patients. Given its broad immunosuppressive properties and ability to selectively inhibit lymphocyte division and effector functions, the clinical utility of MPA was subsequently explored in a host of autoimmune diseases. Human clinical studies have shown MPA to be safe and effective and support its off-label administration for immune-mediated diseases such as lupus, myasthenia gravis and atopic dermatitis. MMF became generically available in the United States in 2008, and its clinical utility is increasingly being explored as a treatment option for dogs with immune-mediated diseases. This review summarizes the available literature for MPA pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the current status of MPA as a treatment for client-owned dogs diagnosed with immune-mediated diseases.

Optimization and application of an HPLC method for quantification of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of mycophenolic acid in Chinese renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive agent mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a non-competitive, reversible inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). Thus, IMPDH activity can serve as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker to optimize dosing of MPA.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 2 mL blood samples and an in vitro enzymatic reaction was subsequently performed for 120 min. To determine IMPDH activity in Chinese healthy volunteers and renal transplant patients, a high performance liquid chromatography assay was established and validated by subtracting adenosine monophosphate (AMP) from blank samples for eliminating exogenous AMP interference.

RESULTS

The accuracy of our method ranged between -0.8% and 12.5%, and the precision ranged between 0.7% and 6.3%. The mean value of IMPDH activity across 11 healthy volunteers was 46.60 ± 14.28 μmol/s/mol AMP. A negative relationship between MPA concentration and IMPDH activity was observed in four renal transplant patients treated with MPA 13 days post-transplantation, while the inhibitory rate of IMPDH activity ranged from 24% to 42%.

CONCLUSION

A bioanalytical assay for IMPDH quantification was optimized and evaluated. The differences in the pharmacodynamics of MPA between Asians and Caucasians may provide some evidence for dosing differences among ethnicities.

De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation are associated with impaired graft outcome independently of their C1q-binding ability

Many aspects of post-transplant monitoring of donor-specific (DSA) and non-donor-specific (nDSA) anti-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival are still unclear. Differentiating them by their ability to bind C1q may offer a better risk assessment. We retrospectively investigated the clinical relevance of de novo C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies on graft outcome in 611 renal transplant recipients. Acute rejection (AR), renal function, and graft survival were assessed within a mean follow-up of 6.66 years. Post-transplant 6.5% patients developed de novo DSA and 11.5% de novo nDSA. DSA (60.0%; P < 0.0001) but not nDSA (34.1%, P = 0.4788) increased rate of AR as compared with controls (27.4%). C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies did not alter rate of AR in both groups. Renal function was only significantly diminished in patients with DSAC1q⁺ . However, DSA significantly impaired 5-year graft survival (65.2%; P < 0.0001) in comparison with nDSA (86.7%; P = 0.0054) and controls (90.7%). While graft survival did not differ between DSAC1q^- and DSAC1q⁺ recipients, 5-year allograft survival was reduced in nDSAC1q⁺ (80.9%) versus nDSAC1q^- (90.7%, P = 0.0251). De novo DSA independently of their ability to bind C1q are associated with diminished graft survival.

The compelling case for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil therapy

We have reviewed current evidence on the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in relationship to drug efficacy and safety. The relationship between actual MPA exposure and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose has been shown to be weak in children and adolescents. The TDM of MPA exposure should ideally be performed using full pharmacokinetic profiles or limited sampling strategies. Recent evidence has provided some rationale for using the post-dose trough level as a single measure. In terms of short-term efficacy, there is strong evidence that a MPA area under the time-concentration curve of >30 mg × h/L reduces acute rejection episodes early after renal transplantation, and there is evolving evidence that aiming for the same exposure over the long term may be a viable strategy to reduce the formation of donor-specific antibodies. Strong evidence also supports the existence of important drug interactions and age/developmental dependent differences in drug metabolism that may necessitate the need for TDM of MMF therapy. Based on these findings and given the substantial inter- and intra-patient variability of MPA exposure, it would appear that MMF therapy should be subject to TDM to avoid over- and under-dosing. This may be a viable strategy to reduce treatment-emergent adverse events and to increase the effective pediatric transplant survival rates.

Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation

With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Drug target molecules to guide immunosuppression

The individual and interindividual variability of response to immunosuppressants combined with the prevailing concept of lifelong immunosuppression following any organ transplantation motivates the search for methods to further individualize such therapy. Traditional therapeutic drug monitoring, adapting dose according to concentrations in blood, targets the pharmacokinetic variability. It has been increasingly recognized, however, that there is also a considerable variability in the response to a given concentration. Attempts to overcome this variability in response include the efforts to identify relevant targets and methods for pharmacodynamic monitoring. For several of the currently used immunosuppressants there is experimental data suggesting markers that are relevant as indicators for individual monitoring of the effects of these drugs. There are also some clinical data to support these approaches; however what is generally missing, are studies that in a prospective manner demonstrates the benefits and effects on outcome. The monitoring of antithymocyte globulin by lymphocyte subset counts is actually the only well established example of pharmacodynamic monitoring. For drugs such as MPA and mTOR inhibitors, there are candidates such as IMPDH activity expression and p70SK6 phosphorylation status, respectively. The monitoring of CNIs using assays for NFAT RGE, either alone or combined with concentration measurements, is already well documented. Even here, some further investigations relating to the categories of organ transplant, combination of immunosuppressants etc. will be requested. Although some further standardization of the assay is warranted and there is a need for specific recommendations of target levels and how to adjust dose, the NFAT RGE approach to pharmacodynamic monitoring of CNIs may be close to implementation in clinical routine.

No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study

AIMS

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) suppresses lymphocyte proliferation through inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibition. Two formulations have been approved: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Pantoprazole (PAN) inhibits gastric acid secretion, which may alter MPA exposure. Data from healthy volunteers suggest a significant drug-drug interaction (DDA) between pantoprazole and MPA. In transplant patients, a decreased MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) may lead to higher IMPDH activity, which may lead to higher acute rejection risk. Therefore this DDA was evaluated in renal transplant patients under maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

In this single-centre, open, randomized, four-sequence, four-treatment crossover study, the influence of PAN 40 mg on MPA pharmacokinetics such as (dose-adjusted) AUC0-12 h (dAUC) was analysed in 20 renal transplant patients (>6 months post-transplantation) receiving MMF (1-2 g day(-1) ) and EC-MPS in combination with ciclosporin. The major metabolite MPA glucuronide (MPAG) and the IMPDH activity were also examined.

RESULTS

MMF + PAN intake led to a lowest mean dAUC for MPA of 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.38, 50.54], while MPA exposure was highest for EC-MPS + PAN [dAUC: 46.30 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 37.11, 55.49)]. Differences in dAUC and dose-adjusted maximum concentration (dCmax) were not significant. Only for MMF [dAUC: 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 32.38, 50.54)] and EC-MPS [dAUC: 43.39 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 33.44, 53.34)] bioequivalence was established for dAUC [geometric mean ratio: 101.25% (90% CI 84.60, 121.17)]. Simultaneous EC-MPS + PAN intake led to an earlier time to Cmax (tmax) [median: 2.0 h (min-max: 0.5-10.0)] than EC-MPS intake alone [3 h (1.5-12.0); P = 0.037]. Tmax was not affected for MMF [1.0 h (0.5-5.0)] ± pantoprazole [1.0 h (0.5-6.0), P = 0.928). No impact on MPAG pharmacokinetics or IMPDH activity was found.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole influences EC-MPS and MMF pharmacokinetics but as it had no impact on MPA pharmacodynamics, the immunosuppressive effect of the drug was not impaired.

Pharmacogenetics and immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation

The transplantation literature includes numerous papers that report associations between polymorphisms in genes encoding metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and pharmacokinetic data on immunosuppressive drugs. Most of these studies are retrospective in design, and although a substantial number report significant associations, pharmacogenetic tests are hardly used in clinical practice. One of the reasons for this poor implementation is the current lack of evidence of improved clinical outcome with pharmacogenetic testing. Furthermore, with efficient therapeutic drug monitoring it is possible to rapidly correct for the effect of genotypic deviations on pharmacokinetics, thereby decreasing the utility of genotype-based dosing. The future of pharmacogenetics will be in treatment models in which patient characteristics are combined with data on polymorphisms in multiple genes. These models should focus on pharmacodynamic parameters, variations in the expression of drug transporter proteins, and predictors of toxicity. Such models will provide more information than the relatively small candidate gene studies performed so far. For implementation of these models into clinical practice, linkage of genotype data to medication prescription systems within electronic health records will be crucial.

Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase expression and activity are significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is a target of the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid (MPA). A 12-hour clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was conducted to compare IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 gene expression, IMPDHI and IMPDHII protein levels, and enzyme activity between kidney transplant recipients with respect to diabetes status.

METHODS

Nondiabetic (ND, n = 11) and diabetic (D, n = 9) kidney transplant recipients and on nontransplant nondiabetic (n = 10) and diabetic (n = 10) volunteers were included in the study.

RESULTS

Area under the effect curve values for gene expression: IMPDH1 [ND: 22.1 (13.8-31.3) versus D: 4.5 (2.3-6.5), P < 0.001] and IMPDH2 [ND: 15.3 (11.0-21.7) versus D: 6.1 (4.6-8.6), P < 0.001], protein level: IMPDHI [ND: 1.0 (0.5-1.3) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.7), P = 0.002] and IMPDHII [ND: 1.0 (0.6-1.6) versus D: 0.7 (0.6-0.8) P < 0.001] and enzyme activity [ND: 180 (105-245) versus D: 29.9 (15.3-35.6) µmole·s(-1)·mole(-1) adenosine monophosphate, P < 0.001] was significantly lower in transplant recipients with diabetes. Similar results were observed in nontransplanted volunteers. Kinetic studies of MPA-mediated suppression of IMPDH activity in nontransplanted individuals revealed an approximately 2.5-fold lower half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) for diabetic as compared with nondiabetic [ND: 50.2 (49.8-50.7) versus D: 15.8 (15.6-16.3) nmole/L, P = 0.004] volunteers. This difference was not related to several IMPDH gene variants.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates a significantly lower IMPDH gene expression, protein level, and enzyme activity in diabetic patients. Further clinical studies in a larger number of patients are warranted to verify whether MPA dosing must be optimized for kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.

Concentration-controlled treatment of lupus nephritis with mycophenolate mofetil

Background:

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has recently been established as a potent drug in maintenance treatment for lupus nephritis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal dosing regimen because of a high inter-individual variability of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effect of an individualized dosing regimen through concentration-controlled treatment on MPA exposure and renal outcome in patients with lupus nephritis.

Methods:

Sixteen patients with lupus nephritis and treatment with low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by MMF were included. MPA area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (MPA-AUC0–12) was assessed within a month after MMF initiation. After determination of MPA-AUC0–12, MMF doses were titrated to achieve a target MPA-AUC0–12 of 60–90 mg*h/l. After on average six months, MPA-AUC0–12 measures were repeated to assess the effect of dose adjustment.

Results:

One month after introducing MMF, MPA-AUC0–12 was low and showed a high inter-individual variability. Dose adjustment with a target MPA-AUC0–12 of 60–90 mg*h/l resulted in individualized MMF dosing, significantly higher MPA-AUC0–12 levels, and a non-significant reduction in variability of MPA-AUC0–12. Adverse effects were reported by 37.5% of patients, which resulted in a switch to azathioprine in two patients. There was no significant relationship between the occurrence of adverse effects and MPA-AUC0–12. At 12 months of follow-up 87.5% of patients had achieved either partial (18.7%) or complete (68.8%) remission.

Conclusion:

Concentration-controlled dose adjustments with a target MPA-AUC0–12 of 60–90 mg*h/l was associated with optimized MPA exposure and an excellent renal outcome at 12 months of follow-up in a small sample of SLE patients with lupus nephritis.

Monitoring of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity and expression during the early period of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in de novo renal transplant patients

Measurement of inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity or gene expression was used as a further approach in pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD)-guided mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy. Forty-four de novo kidney transplant patients were enrolled; 35 of these completed the study, and were followed for 24 weeks for clinical status, PK parameters, IMPDH activity and IMPDH1/2 gene expression. IMPDH activity and expression were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before transplant and at week 2,4,12 and 24, drawn before (t0) and 2 h (t2 h) after MMF administration. No significant correlation was found between IMPDH activity/expression and PK parameters. For both genes, significant enhancement in t2 h expression was observed, then decreases towards week 24 with a trend following steroid dosages. Seven patients experienced acute rejection (AR) and exhibited significantly higher pre-transplant expression of both IMPDH1 (median 3.42 vs. 0.84; p=0.0025), and IMPDH2 genes (135 vs. 104; p=0.0218) with respect to non-rejecting patients. A significant association was also found between pre-transplant IMPDH1 mRNA and haematological complications (p=0.032). This study suggests that high steroid dosages may influence IMPDH1/2 expression, hampering their use as a PD biomarker, particularly during the early post-transplant period. The measurement of pre-transplant levels of IMPDH1/2 may contribute to prediction of individual drug responsiveness to improve the clinical management of patients in MMF therapy.