Chimerism detection by short tandem repeat analysis when donor and recipient genotypes are not known

Practical informativeness of short tandem repeat loci for chimerism analysis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Short tandem repeat (STR) loci are most frequently used for chimerism analysis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the practical informativeness of STR chimerism by integrating theoretical and analytical points.

METHODS

Theoretical and practical informativess of 16 STR loci were evaluated from 1249 pairs of recipients and donors who were prepared for HSCT.

RESULTS

Theoretical informativeness was influenced by genetic diversity including allele frequency and heterozygosity, and was higher in the unrelated HSCT group (90.5±5.3%) compared to the related HSCT group (66.2±4.4%). Practical informativeness was lower than theoretical (6.1±1.7%) because several STR loci were excluded due to stutter peaks and less reliable results, especially in type II-2 donor-recipient match pattern with no recipient-specific allele. We simulated an efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis. Eight informative STR loci were required to analyze chimerism with at least one practically informative locus in the related HSCT group (D18S51, FGA, D2S1338, D13S317, D8S1179, D21S11, D16S539 and D7S820) while only three loci were needed in the unrelated group (D2S1338, FGA and D18S51). A minimum set of 2, 4 or 7 STR loci were required to provide at least 1, 3 or 5 practically informative loci in 95% of the unrelated HSCT group while 3, 8 or 12 loci were required in the related HSCT group.

CONCLUSION

We deducted the practical informativeness of STR chimerism, identified the major influencing factors on the practical informativeness of each STR locus, and successfully simulated the efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis.

Rapid single nucleotide polymorphism based method for hematopoietic chimerism analysis and monitoring using high-speed droplet allele-specific PCR and allele-specific quantitative PCR

BACKGROUND

Chimerism analysis is important for the evaluation of engraftment and predicting relapse following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We developed a chimerism analysis for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including rapid screening of the discriminable donor/recipient alleles using droplet allele-specific PCR (droplet-AS-PCR) pre-HSCT and quantitation of recipient DNA using AS-quantitative PCR (AS-qPCR) following HSCT.

METHODS

SNP genotyping of 20 donor/recipient pairs via droplet-AS-PCR and the evaluation of the informativity of 5 SNP markers for chimerism analysis were performed. Samples from six follow-up patients were analyzed to assess the chimerism via AS-qPCR. These results were compared with that determined by short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR).

RESULTS

Droplet-AS-PCR could determine genotypes within 8min. The total informativity using all 5 loci was 95% (19/20). AS-qPCR provided the percentage of recipient DNA in all 6 follow-up patients without influence of the stutter peak or the amplification efficacy, which affected the STR-PCR results.

CONCLUSION

The droplet-AS-PCR had an advantage over STR-PCR in terms of rapidity and simplicity for screening before HSCT. Furthermore, AS-qPCR had better accuracy than STR-PCR for quantification of recipient DNA following HSCT. The present chimerism assay compensates for the disadvantages of STR-PCR and is readily performable in clinical laboratories.

Chimerism analysis in transplant patients: a hypothesis-free approach in the absence of reference genotypes

INTRODUCTION

During routine analysis of chimerism in bone marrow transplant patients pre-transplant genotype of the recipient or the donor might lack. We aimed to develop a new method to analyze DNA results suitable when reference genotypes are not available.

METHODS

The method was based on the balance between heterozygotes. It was implemented in a standard computer spreadsheet, and considered the hypothetical donor-recipient genotype combinations. Hypotheses with peak height ratios and allele sharing tendency above a critical threshold were accepted. The results were compared with those obtained with prior knowledge of reference genotypes.

RESULTS

The algorithm predicted correctly the proportion of donor/recipient chimerism, even in the absence of reference genotypes. In fact, the predicted values were closely correlated (r(2)>0.98) and free of systematic bias (slope 0.98-1.04), in comparison with the reference values obtained with prior knowledge of the donor and recipient genetic profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

This study constitutes a proof-of-concept of the application of the heterozygote balance for the quantitative study of chimerism. The algorithm computes post-transplant chimerism in an easy and time-efficient way, even when the donor and recipient reference genotypes are unavailable. Therefore, it can be a useful tool for laboratories involved in chimerism analysis.

Evaluation of the sensitivity of two recently developed STR multiplexes for the analysis of chimerism after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Forensic-oriented kits analysing short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms are widely used to determine the proportions of donor and recipient cells after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The sensitivity of this technology is crucial for the early detection of relapse and, in consequence, the adjustment of the treatment to enhance donor-origin haematopoiesis in transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of two recently developed STR multiplex kits, AmpFℓSTR(®) Identifiler(®) Plus PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems) and Investigator™ IDplex(®) (Qiagen), in the analysis of chimerism. Fifteen STR loci were amplified with both kits in 26 peripheral blood samples of transplantated patients showing chimerism. Peak amplitude threshold, detection limit (%DL), per cent donor chimerism and efficacy of each multiplex and STR were determined, and the results with both kits were compared. The %DL and the estimated per cent donor chimerism were similar with both kits. On the other hand, Identifiler(®) Plus kit allowed chimerism identification only in 24 (92%) of the 26 cases with chimerism detected by using the Investigator™ IDplex(®) when only 'type 5' allelic constellations (i.e. without potential interference by stutter peaks) were taken into account. However, IDplex(®) efficacy was somewhat lower than that of Identifiler Plus when only the most informative loci (D2S1338, D21S11, D18S51 and FGA) were considered. Therefore, although each system had some particular advantages and disadvantages, overall both STR multiplexes showed similar performance in qualitative and quantitative chimerism analysis.