Urinary sediment mRNA level of extracellular matrix molecules in adult nephrotic syndrome

Urinary Sediment mRNA Level of CREBBP and CYBA in Children With Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

Background

This study aimed to evaluate gene expression patterns in urinary sediment samples of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

Methods

The messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of 770 immune-related genes were detected using a NanoString nCounter platform. To verify the NanoString results, quantitative analysis of nine gene mRNAs was performed using real-time RT-PCR in more samples.

Results

Firstly, compared with the steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) group (n=3), significant changes were observed in the mRNA level of 70 genes, including MAP3K14, CYBA, SLC3A2, CREB-binding protein (CREBBP), CD68, forkhead box P1 (FOXP1), CD74, ITGB2, IFI30, and so forth, in the SRNS group (n=3). A total of 129 children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), 15 with acute glomerulonephritis, and 6 with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) were enrolled to verify the NanoString results. Compared with patients with IgAN, those with INS had significantly lower levels of FOXP1 (P=0.047) and higher levels of CREBBP (P=0.023). Among SSNS, the mRNA level of ITGB2 was significantly lower in the non-relapse group than in the non-frequent relapse and frequent-relapse groups (P=0.006). Compared with the SSNS group, CREBBP was significantly elevated in the SRNS group (P=0.02). Further, CYBA significantly decreased in the SRNS group (P=0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) for CREBBP and CYBA was 0.655 and 0.669, respectively. CREBBP had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 49.4% and CYBA had a sensitivity of 58.3% and a specificity of 83.1% to rule out SSNS and SRNS. The diagnosis value was better for CREBBP+CYBA than for CREBBP or CYBA alone, indicating that the combination of CREBBP and CYBA was a more effective biomarker in predicting steroid resistance (AUC=0.666; sensitivity=63.9%; specificity=76.4%).

Conclusions

This study was novel in investigating the urinary sediment mRNA level in children with INS using high-throughput NanoString nCounter technology, and 70 genes that may relate to SRNS were found. The results revealed that the urinary sediment mRNA level of ITGB2 was significantly lower in the non-relapse group than in the non-frequent relapse and frequent-relapse groups. Meanwhile, CREBBP was significantly elevated and CYBA was significantly lowered in the SRNS group compared with the SSNS group.

Biomarkers of Chronic Renal Tubulointerstitial Injury

Progression of renal parenchyma injury is characterized by increasing interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, irrespective of the cause. Histopathologic assessment of renal tissue obtained by biopsy remains the gold standard for determining the presence and extent of tubulointerstitial scarring. Discovery of robust non-invasive means for capturing a snapshot and for longitudinal monitoring of parenchymal deterioration has been the focus of intense multimodal effort by investigators within the renal community and beyond. Research in this field has included the use of in vitro and in vivo experimental models and has fostered the development and evaluation of tissue and biofluid assays for novel analytes with potential translation to the diagnosis and prognosis of kidney disease. Here, we examine recent advances in the search of "biomarkers" for detection of renal tubulointerstitial scarring and prediction of renal outcome in human renal disease.

Blood and urine biomarkers in chronic kidney disease: An update

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a silent disease. Most CKD patients are unaware of their condition during the early stages of the disease which poses a challenge for healthcare professionals to institute treatment or start prevention. The trouble with the diagnosis of CKD is that in most parts of the world, it is still diagnosed based on measurements of serum creatinine and corresponding calculations of eGFR. There are controversies with the current staging system, especially in the methodology to diagnose and prognosticate CKD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to examine studies that focused on the different types of samples which may serve as a good and promising biomarker for early diagnosis of CKD or to detect rapidly declining renal function among CKD patient.

METHOD

The review of international literature was made on paper and electronic databases Nature, PubMed, Springer Link and Science Direct. The Scopus index was used to verify the scientific relevance of the papers. Publications were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULT

63 publications were found to be compatible with the study objectives. Several biomarkers of interest with different sample types were taken for comparison.

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers from urine samples yield more significant outcome as compare to biomarkers from blood samples. But, validation and confirmation with a different type of study designed on a larger population is needed. More comparison studies on different types of samples are needed to further illuminate which biomarker is the better tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of CKD.

Urinary miRNA profile for the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy

Background

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. Urinary micro-RNA (miRNA) level is increasingly reported to as non-invasive markers of various kidney diseases. We aim to identify urinary miRNA targets for the diagnosis of IgAN.

Methods

In the development cohort, we performed complete miRNA profiling of urinary sediment in 22 patients with IgAN and 11 healthy controls (CTL). Potential miRNA targets were quantified by a separate validation cohort of 33 IgAN patients and 9 healthy controls.

Results

In the development cohort, we identified 39 miRNA targets that have significantly different expression between IgAN and CTL (14 up-regulated, and 25 down-regulated). Among the 8 miRNA targets chosen for validation study, urinary miR-204, miR-431 and miR-555 remained significantly reduced, and urinary miR-150 level was significantly increased in the IgAN as compared to CTL. The area-under-curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for urinary mi-204 level for the diagnosis of IgAN was 0.976, and the diagnostic performance of combining additional miRNA targets was not further improved. At the cut-off 1.70 unit, the sensitivity and specificity of urinary miR-204 was 100 and 55.5%, respectively, for diagnosing IgAN.

Conclusions

Urinary miR-150, miR-204, miR-431 and miR-555 levels are significantly different between IgAN and healthy controls; urinary miR-204 level alone has the best diagnostic accuracy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1267-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Urinary mitochondrial DNA level in non-diabetic chronic kidney diseases

BACKGROUND

Mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We study the relation between urinary mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels and renal dysfunction in non-diabetic CKD.

METHODS

We recruited 32 CKD patients (20 had hypertensive nephrosclerosis, 12 had IgA nephropathy). Urinary supernatant mtDNA level was measured and compared to baseline clinical and pathological parameters. The patients were followed 57.8 ± 30.5 months for renal function decline.

RESULTS

The average urinary supernatant mtDNA level was 222.0 ± 210.3 copy/μL. There was a modest but significant correlation between urinary mtDNA level and proteinuria (Spearman's r = 0.387, p = 0.035), but not any other baseline clinical or pathological parameter. Urinary mtDNA level had a significant inverse correlation with the slope of GFR decline (r = -0.402, p = 0.023). Urinary mtDNA level is a predictor of renal survival even after adjusting for baseline proteinuria with multivariate Cox analysis. In this model, every increase in urinary mtDNA by 100 copy/μL confers a 25.0% increase in risk of doubling of serum creatinine or need of dialysis (95%CI, 0.7% to 55.1%).

CONCLUSION

Mitochondrial DNA is readily detectable in the urinary supernatant of non-diabetic CKD, and its level correlates with the rate of renal function decline and predicts the risk of doubling of serum creatinine or need of dialysis. Further studies are needed to determine the value of urinary supernatant mtDNA level as a prognostic indicator of non-diabetic CKD.

Acute kidney injury in patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT for suspected venous thromboembolism: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether intravenous iodinated contrast material administration increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

Patients with nephrotic syndrome undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were retrospectively identified (n = 701). Control group consisted of patients with nephrotic syndrome receiving non-contrast CT (n = 1053). Two different 1:1 propensity score matching models using three or 10 variables were developed for each estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) subgroup. Incidence of post-CT AKI for the two groups was assessed and compared by standard AKI criteria and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria.

RESULTS

After matching with three variables, the AKI incidence in the contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast CT groups was 2.7% vs 2.5% (standard AKI criteria) and 4.2% vs. 6.7% (AKIN criteria) (p = 1.00 and 0.05), respectively. After matching with 10 variables, AKI incidences were 3.1% vs. 2.6% (standard AKI criteria) and 4.1% vs. 7.4% (AKIN criteria) (p = 0.72 and 0.03), respectively. AKI incidences of each eGFR subgroup in the contrast-enhanced CT group were not higher than in the non-contrast CT group (lowest p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous contrast material administration during CT was not found to be a risk factor for AKI in this large cohort of patients with nephrotic syndrome.

KEY POINTS

• AKI incidence of contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast CT had no difference. • AKI incidences of eGFR subgroup in contrast-enhanced CT were not increased. • Studies without a non-contrast CT control group may overestimate CIN incidence.