A comparative study of viscoelastic hemostatic assays and conventional coagulation tests in trauma patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate

Point-of-care, goal-directed management of bleeding in trauma patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to consider the clinical value of point-of-care (POC) testing in coagulopathic trauma patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients suffering from severe TBI or TIC are at risk of developing pronounced haemostatic disorders. Standard coagulation tests (SCTs) are insufficient to reflect the complexity of these coagulopathies. Recent evidence has shown that viscoelastic tests (VETs) identify haemostatic disorders more rapidly and in more detail than SCTs. Moreover, VET results can guide coagulation therapy, allowing individualised treatment, which decreases transfusion requirements. However, the impact of VET on mortality remains uncertain. In contrast to VETs, the clinical impact of POC platelet function testing is still unproven.

SUMMARY

POC SCTs are not able to characterise the complexity of trauma-associated coagulopathy. VETs provide a rapid estimation of underlying haemostatic disorders, thereby providing guidance for haemostatic therapy, which impacts allogenic blood transfusion requirements. The value of POC platelet function testing to identify platelet dysfunction and guide platelet transfusion is still uncertain.

Viscoelastic testing: Critical appraisal of new methodologies and current literature

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved viscoelastic testing (VET) methodologies have significantly changed in the last 10 years, with the availability of cartridge-based VET. Some of these cartridge-based methodologies use harmonic resonance-based clot detection. While VET has always allowed for the evaluation of real-time clot formation, cartridge-based VET provides increased ease of use as well as greater portability and robustness of results in out-of-laboratory environments. Here we review the use of VET in a variety of clinical contexts, including cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplant, obstetrics, and hypercoagulable states such as COVID-19. As of now, high quality randomized trial evidence for new generation VET (TEG 6s, HemoSonics Quantra, ROTEM sigma) is limited. Nevertheless, the use of VET-guided transfusion algorithms appears to result in reduced blood usage without worsening of patient outcomes. Future work comparing the new generation VET instruments and continuing to validate clinically important cut-offs will help move the field of point-of-care coagulation monitoring forward and increase the quality of transfusion management in bleeding patients.

Guided blood transfusion of trauma patients with rotational thromboelastometry: a single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a blood test used to measure in vitro clot strength as a surrogate for a patient's ability to form clots in vivo. This provides information about induction, formation, and clot lysis, allowing goal-directed transfusion therapy for specific hemostatic needs. We sought to evaluate the effect of ROTEM-guided transfusion on blood product usage and in-hospital mortality among patients with a traumatic injury.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational cohort analysis of emergency department patients in a Level 1 trauma center. We compared blood usage in trauma patients in whom ratio-based massive hemorrhage protocols were activated in the twelve months before the introduction of ROTEM (pre-ROTEM group) to the twelve months following the introduction of ROTEM (ROTEM-period group). ROTEM was implemented in this center in November 2016. The ROTEM device allowed clinicians to make real-time decisions about blood product therapy in resuscitation for trauma.

RESULTS

The pre-ROTEM group contained 21 patients. Forty-three patients were included from the ROTEM-period, of whom 35 patients received ROTEM-guided resuscitation (81% compliance). The use of fibrinogen concentrate was significantly higher in the ROTEM-period group (pre-ROTEM mean 0.2 vs. ROTEM-period mean 0.8; p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the number of units of red blood cells, platelets, cryoprecipitate, or fresh frozen plasma transfused between these groups. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the pre-ROTEM and ROTEM-period groups (33% vs. 19%; p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of ROTEM-guided transfusion at this institution was associated with increased fibrinogen usage, but this did not impact mortality rates. There was no difference in the administration of red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, platelet, and cryoprecipitate. Future research should focus on increased ROTEM compliance and optimizing ROTEM-guided transfusion to prevent blood product overuse among trauma patients.

[The chapters "Stop the bleed-prehospital" and "Coagulation management and volume therapy (emergency departement)" in the new S3 guideline "Polytrauma/severe injury treatment"]

The S3 guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies was updated between 2020 and 2022. This article describes the essence of the new chapter "Stop the bleed-prehospital" and the revised chapter "Coagulation management and volume therapy".

Association between Functional Parameters of Coagulation and Conventional Coagulation Tests in the Setting of Fluid Resuscitation with Balanced Crystalloid or Gelatine: A Secondary Analysis of an In Vivo Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

Functional point-of-care tests (POCTs) have evolved into useful tools for diagnosing disorders of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. We aimed to describe the in vivo association between standard and functional parameters of coagulation and fibrinolysis in the setting of acute hemodilution induced by an infusion of balanced crystalloid or synthetic gelatine solutions. This prospective randomized crossover in vivo study included healthy male volunteers aged 18–30 years. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned to receive either the Optilyte^® or Geloplasma^® infusion. Laboratory analysis included conventional coagulation parameters and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) assays. A total of 25 healthy Caucasian males were included. ROTEM viscoelastic assays presented moderate to strong correlations with conventional coagulation tests, regardless of the fluid type utilized. Irrespectively of the extent of hemodilution, significant correlations remained unaffected. The strongest associations were found between the ROTEM clot formation and clot strength and the fibrinogen concentration and platelet count, and between the ROTEM clotting time and the APTT and PT. This in vivo experimental study in healthy male volunteers demonstrated that ROTEM may be used as a credible alternative to standard laboratory tests to assess blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in the setting of fluid resuscitation with both crystalloid and colloid solutions. The study was registered online in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT05148650).

Intraoperative thromboelastography-guided transfusion in a patient with factor XI deficiency: A case report

BACKGROUND

Factor XI (FXI) deficiency, also known as hemophilia C, is a rare bleeding disorder of unpredictable severity that correlates poorly with FXI coagulation activity. This often poses great challenges in perioperative hemostatic management. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a method for testing blood coagulation using a viscoelastic hemostatic assay of whole blood to assess the overall coagulation status. Here, we present the successful application of intraoperative TEG monitoring in an FXI-deficient patient as an individualized blood transfusion strategy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 21-year-old male patient with FXI deficiency was scheduled to undergo reconstructive surgery for macrodactyly of the left foot under general anesthesia. To minimize his bleeding risk, he was scheduled to receive fresh frozen plasma (FFP) as an empirical prophylactic FXI replacement at a dose of 15-20 mL/kg body weight (900-1200 mL) before surgery. Subsequent FFP transfusion was to be adjusted according to surgical need. Instead, TEG assessment was used at the beginning and toward the end of his surgery. According to intraoperative TEG results, the normalization of coagulation function was achieved with an infusion of only 800 mL FFP, and blood loss was minimal. The patient showed an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 8.

CONCLUSION

TEG can be readily applied in the intraoperative period to individualize transfusion needs in patients with rare inherited coagulopathy.

First-Line Administration of Fibrinogen Concentrate in the Bleeding Trauma Patient: Searching for Effective Dosages and Optimal Post-Treatment Levels Limiting Massive Transfusion-Further Results of the RETIC Study

Fibrinogen supplementation is recommended for treatment of severe trauma hemorrhage. However, required dosages and aimed for post-treatment fibrinogen levels remain a matter of discussion. Within the published RETIC study, adult patients suffering trauma-induced coagulopathy were randomly assigned to receive fibrinogen concentrate (FC) as first-line (n = 50) or crossover rescue (n = 20) therapy. Depending on bodyweight, a single dose of 3, 4, 5, or 6 g FC was administered and repeated if necessary (FibA10 < 9 mm). The dose-dependent response (changes in plasma fibrinogen and FibA10) was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis regarding the need for massive transfusion and correlation analyses regarding fibrinogen concentrations and polymerization were performed. Median FC single doses amounted to 62.5 (57 to 66.66) mg·kg⁻¹. One FC single-dose sufficiently corrected fibrinogen and FibA10 (median fibrinogen 213 mg·dL⁻¹, median FibA10 11 mm) only in patients with baseline fibrinogen above 100 mg·dL⁻¹ and FibA10 above 5 mm, repeated dosing was required in patients with lower baseline fibrinogen/FibA10. Fibrinogen increased by 83 or 107 mg·dL⁻¹ and FibA10 by 4 or 4.5 mm after single or double dose of FC, respectively. ROC curve analysis revealed post-treatment fibrinogen levels under 204.5 mg·dL⁻¹ to predict the need for massive transfusion (AUC 0.652; specificity: 0.667; sensitivity: 0.688). Baseline fibrinogen/FibA10 levels should be considered for FC dosing as only sufficiently corrected post-treatment levels limit transfusion requirements.

Viscoelastic monitoring in trauma resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury results in both physical and physiologic insult. Successful care of the trauma patient depends upon timely correction of both physical and biochemical injury. Trauma-induced coagulopathy is a derangement of hemostasis and thrombosis that develops rapidly and can be fatal if not corrected. Viscoelastic monitoring (VEM) assays have been developed to provide rapid, accurate, and relatively comprehensive depictions of an individual's coagulation profile. VEM are increasingly being integrated into trauma resuscitation guidelines to provide dynamic and individualized guidance to correct coagulopathy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the search terms viscoelastic, thromboelastography, thromboelastometry, TEG, ROTEM, trauma, injury, resuscitation, and coagulopathy using PubMed. Particular focus was directed to articles describing algorithms for management of traumatic coagulopathy based on VEM assay parameters.

RESULTS

Our search identified 16 papers with VEM-guided resuscitation strategies in adult patients based on TEG, 12 such protocols in adults based on ROTEM, 1 protocol for children based on TEG, and 2 protocols for children based on ROTEM.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents evidence to support VEM use to detect traumatic coagulopathy, discusses the role of VEM in trauma resuscitation, provides a summary of proposed treatment algorithms, and discusses pending questions in the field.

The strengths and weaknesses of viscoelastic testing compared to traditional coagulation testing

Optimized acute bleeding management requires timely and reliable laboratory testing to detect and diagnose coagulopathies and guide transfusion therapy. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) are inexpensive with minimal labor requirements, but CCTs may have delayed turnaround times. In addition, abnormal CCT values may not reflect in vivo coagulopathies that require treatment and may lead to overtransfusion. The use of viscoelastic testing (VET) has been rapidly expanding and is recommended by several recent bleeding guidelines. This review is intended to compare CCT to VET, review the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, and evaluate and summarize the clinical studies that compared CCT-based and VET-based transfusion algorithms. Most studies of CCT vs VET transfusion algorithms favor the use of VET in the management of massively bleeding patients due to reductions in blood product utilization, bleeding, costs, and lengths of stay.

The role of viscoelastic testing in assessing peri-interventional platelet function and coagulation

We carried out a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE literature databases to provide a concise review of the role of viscoelastic testing in assessing peri-interventional platelet function and coagulation. The search identified 130 articles that were relevant for the review, covering the basic science of VHA and VHA in clinical settings including cardiac surgery, cardiology, neurology, trauma, non-cardiac surgery, obstetrics, liver disease, and COVID-19. Evidence from these articles is used to describe the important role of VHAs and platelet function testing in various peri-interventional setups. VHAs can help us to comprehensively assess the contribution of platelets and coagulation dynamics to clotting at the site-of-care much faster than standard laboratory measures. In addition to standard coagulation tests, VHAs are beneficial in reducing allogeneic transfusion requirements and bleeding, in predicting ischemic events, and improving outcomes in several peri-interventional care settings. Further focused studies are needed to confirm their utility in the peri-interventional case.

Effect of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin on the clotting of platelet-reduced whole blood: an in-vitro study utilizing thromboelastography

Treatment of venous thromboembolism with concomitant thrombocytopenia is challenging. The platelet threshold for safe administration of anticoagulants is under debate, with minimum platelet count of 50 × 109/l being recommended as the safe cutoff. However, some evidence suggests administration of anticoagulants may still be safe at platelet levels of 30 × 109/l. Therefore, we developed an in-vitro thromboelastography (TEG) study to examine the effect of therapeutic or prophylactic levels of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on the clotting profile of platelet-reduced whole blood. Using magnetic bead-based antibody chromatography, platelets were removed to achieve platelet-depleted blood (<10 × 109/l of platelets). Platelet-depleted blood was then mixed with whole blood to produce blood samples with platelet counts of 30 × 109, 50 × 109 and 150 × 109/l. These blood samples were incubated with therapeutic or prophylactic levels of UFH or LMWH in disposable TEG cups. Clotting was initiated with 10 mmol/l calcium and optimized tissue factor levels for each anticoagulant used (2.25 pmol/l for UFH and 2.05 pmol/l for LMWH). Clotting was monitored by TEG at 37 °C for 180 min. The following TEG parameters were evaluated: R (time to clot), maximum amplitude (strength of clot) and area under the curve in 15 min (overall speed and strength of the clot at 15 min of clotting). No statistically significant differences were observed between platelet counts of 30 × 109 and 50 × 109/l for R, maximum amplitude or area under the curve in 15 min for most of the therapeutic and prophylactic doses of UFH and LMWH tested in this study. Use of anticoagulants compromised all of the TEG parameters relative to a normal platelet count of 150 × 109/l, in a dose dependent manner. The current study demonstrates that in-vitro clotting is impaired with use and increasing doses of anticoagulants. Despite this observation, we did not observe a significant difference in clotting between platelet levels of 30 × 109 and 50 × 109/l. Overall, this work provides further insight in the debated use of anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and concomitant thrombocytopenia, and provides support for possible use of anticoagulants at lower platelet thresholds.

Hemostatic defects in massive transfusion: an update and treatment recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Acute hemorrhage is a global healthcare issue, and remains the leading preventable cause of death in trauma. Acute severe hemorrhage can be related to traumatic, peripartum, gastrointestinal, and procedural causes. Hemostatic defects occur early in patients requiring massive transfusion. Early recognition and treatment of hemorrhage and hemostatic defects are required to save lives and to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses current evidence and trials aimed at identifying the optimal treatment for hemostatic defects in hemorrhage and massive transfusion. Literature search included PubMed and Embase.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with acute hemorrhage requiring massive transfusion commonly develop coagulopathy due to specific hemostatic defects, and accurate diagnosis and prompt correction are required for definitive hemorrhage control. Damage control resuscitation and massive transfusion protocols are optimal initial treatment strategies, followed by goal-directed individualized resuscitation using real-time coagulation monitoring. Distinct phenotypes exist in trauma-induced coagulopathy, including 'Bleeding' or 'Thrombotic' phenotypes, and hyperfibrinolysis vs. fibrinolysis shutdown. The trauma 'lethal triad' (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis) has been updated to the 'lethal diamond' (including hypocalcemia). A number of controversies in optimal management exist, including whole blood vs. component therapy, use of factor concentrates vs. blood products, optimal use of tranexamic acid, and prehospital plasma and tranexamic acid administration.

"TEG talk": expanding clinical roles for thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry

Viscoelastic assays (VEAs) that include thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry add value to the investigation of coagulopathies and goal-directed management of bleeding by providing a complete picture of clot formation, strength, and lysis in whole blood that includes the contribution of platelets, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors. Conventional coagulation assays have several limitations, such as their lack of correlation with bleeding and hypercoagulability; their inability to reflect the contribution of platelets, factor XIII, and plasmin during clot formation and lysis; and their slow turnaround times. VEA-guided transfusion algorithms may reduce allogeneic blood exposure during and after cardiac surgery and in the emergency management of trauma-induced coagulopathy and hemorrhage. However, the popularity of VEAs for other indications is driven largely by extrapolation of evidence from cardiac surgery, by the drawbacks of conventional coagulation assays, and by institution-specific preferences. Robust diagnostic studies validating and standardizing diagnostic cutoffs for VEA parameters and randomized trials comparing VEA-guided algorithms with standard care on clinical outcomes are urgently needed. Lack of such studies represents the biggest barrier to defining the role and impact of VEA in clinical care.

Rotational thromboelastometry results are associated with care level in COVID-19

High prevalence of thrombotic events in severely ill COVID-19 patients have been reported. Pulmonary embolism as well as microembolization of vital organs may in these individuals be direct causes of death. The identification of patients at high risk of developing thrombosis may lead to targeted, more effective prophylactic treatment. The primary aim of this study was to test whether rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) at admission indicates hypercoagulopathy and predicts the disease severity, assessed as care level, in COVID-19 patients. The study was designed as a prospective, observational study where COVID-19 patients over 18 years admitted to hospital were eligible for inclusion. Patients were divided into two groups depending on care level: (1) regular wards or (2) wards with specialized ventilation support. Conventional coagulation tests, blood type and ROTEM were taken at admission. 60 patients were included; age 61 (median), 67% men, many with comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, diabetes). The ROTEM variables Maximum Clot Firmness (EXTEM-/FIBTEM-MCF) were higher in COVID-19 patients compared with in healthy controls (p < 0.001) and higher in severely ill patients compared with in patients at regular wards (p < 0.05). Our results suggest that hypercoagulopathy is present early in patients with mild to moderate disease, and more pronounced in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Non-O blood types were not overrepresented in COVID-19 positive patients. ROTEM variables showed hypercoagulopathy at admission and this pattern was more pronounced in patients with increased disease severity. If this feature is to be used to predict the risk of thromboembolic complications further studies are warranted.

Current perspective on fibrinogen concentrate in critical bleeding

INTRODUCTION

. Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates.

AREAS COVERED

. We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events.

EXPERT OPINION

. Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.

A Randomized Control Trial of Thromboelastography-Guided Transfusion in Cirrhosis for High-Risk Invasive Liver-Related Procedures

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hemostasis in cirrhosis is dynamic and balanced. Thromboelastography (TEG) assesses global coagulation status. We aimed to assess whether TEG-guided blood product transfusions result in lower blood product requirements in patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive liver-related procedures as compared to the conventional standard of care (SOC).

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, cirrhosis patients with coagulopathy, undergoing invasive liver-related procedures, were randomized to either TEG-guided blood product transfusion or SOC. The primary outcome was difference in the amount of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet units transfused between the two groups. The secondary outcome was procedure-related bleeding complications within 5 days and any complications until 28 days.

RESULTS

From November 2017 till June 2019, 58 patients were recruited (29: TEG and 29: SOC). Most common procedures performed were percutaneous liver biopsy (n = 48), followed by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (n = 2), percutaneous acetic acid injection (n = 2), and transarterial chemoembolization (n = 2). There were no differences in baseline demographics, hemostatic profile, and types of procedures between the two groups. Only nine patients in TEG group received transfusions compared to all patients in SOC (31% vs 100%; P < 0.001). In TEG group, six (20.7%) received FFP (P = 0.753 vs. SOC), two (6.9%) received platelets (P < 0.001 vs. SOC), and 1(3.4%) patient received both FFP and platelet (P ≥ 0.999 vs. SOC) transfusion. None of the patients in either group developed procedure-related bleeding complications until 5 days post-procedure. The complication rates at 28-day follow-up were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

TEG-guided blood product transfusion strategy reduces blood product transfusion without increased risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive liver-related procedures (CTRI/2017/12/010822).