1
|
Bressán I, Martínez OF, Astolfo MA. Bioanalytical validation and clinical application of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of 3-orthomethyldopa, 5-hydroxytryptophan, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid and homovanillic acid in human cerebrospinal fluid. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2024; 248:116321. [PMID: 38959757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Inherited disorders of monoamine neurotransmitters are a subset of inborn errors of metabolism affecting biochemical pathways of catecholamines, serotonin or their enzymatic cofactors. Usually, their clinical presentation is similar to those of other common neurological syndromes. For this reason, they are frequently under-recognized and misdiagnosed. Because cerebrospinal fluid concentration of catecholamine metabolites (3-orthomethyldopa and homovanillic acid) and serotonin metabolites (5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid) presents a direct correlation with their brain levels, analysis of this group of compounds is critical to reach an accurate diagnosis. Although there are several published liquid chromatography-based bioanalytical methods for the quantification of these compounds, most of them present disadvantages, making their application difficult to implement in routine clinical practice. In this study, a rapid and simple UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of 3-orthomethyldopa, 5-hydroxytryptophan, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid and homovanillic acid in human cerebrospinal fluid was validated. All the evaluated performance parameters, including linearity, carryover, accuracy and precision (within and between-day), lower limit of quantitation, recovery, matrix effect and stability under different conditions met the acceptance criteria from international guidelines. Additionally, 10 human cerebrospinal fluid samples collected via lumbar puncture from 10 pediatric patients were quantified using the validated method to assess its clinical application and diagnostic utility for inherited monoamine neurotransmitter metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Bressán
- Laboratory of Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Tte. Juan Domingo Perón 4190, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina; Department of Chemistry, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Potosí 4265, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina.
| | - Ornella Fracalossi Martínez
- Laboratory of Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Tte. Juan Domingo Perón 4190, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| | - María Agustina Astolfo
- Laboratory of Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Tte. Juan Domingo Perón 4190, Buenos Aires C1181ACH, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang X, Shao Y, Liao Y, Zheng X, Peng M, Cai Y, Wang M, Liu H, Zeng C, Lin Y, Zhang W, Liu L. Mechanisms underlying the efficacy and limitation of dopa and tetrahydrobiopterin therapies for the deficiency of GTP cyclohydrolase 1 revealed in a novel mouse model. Eur J Pharmacol 2024; 967:176379. [PMID: 38342361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Dopa and tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) supplementation are recommended therapies for the dopa-responsive dystonia caused by GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1, also known as GTPCH) deficits. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of these therapies have not been intensively studied yet. In this study, we tested the efficacy of dopa and BH4 therapies by using a novel GTPCH deficiency mouse model, Gch1KI/KI, which manifested infancy-onset motor deficits and growth retardation similar to the patients. First, dopa supplementation supported Gch1KI/KI mouse survival to adulthood, but residual motor deficits and dwarfism remained. Interestingly, RNAseq analysis indicated that while the genes participating in BH4 biosynthesis and regeneration were significantly increased in the liver, no significant changes were observed in the brain. Second, BH4 supplementation alone restored the growth of Gch1KI/KI pups only in early postnatal developmental stage. High doses of BH4 supplementation indeed restored the total brain BH4 levels, but brain dopamine deficiency remained. While total brain TH levels were relatively increased in the BH4 treated Gch1KI/KI mice, the TH in the striatum were still almost undetectable, suggesting differential BH4 requirements among brain regions. Last, the growth of Gch1KI/KI mice under combined therapy outperformed dopa or BH4 therapy alone. Notably, dopamine was abnormally high in more than half, but not all, of the treated Gch1KI/KI mice, suggesting the existence of variable synergetic effects of dopa and BH4 supplementation. Our results provide not only experimental evidence but also novel mechanistic insights into the efficacy and limitations of dopa and BH4 therapies for GTPCH deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoling Jiang
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Yongxian Shao
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Yongqiang Liao
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Xiaoning Zheng
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Minzhi Peng
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Yanna Cai
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Meiyi Wang
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Huazhen Liu
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Chunhua Zeng
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China
| | - Yunting Lin
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China.
| | - Wen Zhang
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China.
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Genetics and Endocrine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623, China.
| |
Collapse
|