A reappraisal of plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates, and recombinant factor VIIa in patient blood management

The Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates: Results of a Nationwide Survey of Critical Care Pharmacists

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are frequently used.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate practices and perceptions of proprietary and nonproprietary PCCs use.

METHODS

An electronic pretested cross-sectional survey e-mailed thrice to 1 critical care pharmacist at 1170 US institutions. Questions addressed hospital and pharmacy characteristics, use of PCCs, and perceptions of effectiveness and safety.

RESULTS

429 (39.5%) of 1086 eligible institutions completed the questionnaire. PCCs were used several times per month to several times per week (62.6%). An order set was routinely or always used to direct PCCs usage at 66.4% of institutions. Four-factor PCCs were preferred by 93% of institutions. The most common perceived indications for 4-factor PCCs were hemorrhage related to warfarin (92.1%) or oral Xa inhibitors (81.8%), intracranial hemorrhage (78.4%), trauma hemorrhage (66.2%), surgical hemorrhage (61.1%), and refractory hemorrhage (57.3%). The most common perceived contraindications were heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (42%), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (39.2%), and active thromboembolism (38.9%). Most institutions considered patient weight (78.8%), indication (77.6%), and International Normalized Ratio (76.9%) when dosing PCCs. Only 43.8% of institutions used fixed dose, only 19.6% compounded PCCs at the bedside, and only 11.9% administered PCCs by rapid infusion. Compared to standard blood products, respondents believed PCCs acted more rapidly, were less likely to cause volume issues, and were more expensive. Respondents were neutral about PCCs acting longer, being more effective at preventing or treating hemorrhage, or causing thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of PCCs is common. Differing perceptions surrounding indications, contraindications, and comparisons to blood products/procoagulants likely contribute to variable practices.

Prothrombin complex concentrates versus fresh frozen plasma for warfarin reversal A systematic review and meta-analysis

Urgent reversal of warfarin is required for patients who experience major bleeding or require urgent surgery. Treatment options include the combination of vitamin K and coagulation factor replacement with either prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). However, the optimal reversal strategy is unclear based on clinically relevant outcomes. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library to December 2015. Thirteen studies (5 randomised studies and 8 observational studies) were included. PCC use was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to FFP (OR= 0.56, 95 % CI; 0.37–0.84, p=0.006). A higher proportion of patients receiving PCC achieved haemostasis compared to those receiving FFP, but this was not statistically significant (OR 2.00, 95 % CI; 0.85–4.68). PCC use was more likely to achieve normalisation of international normalised ratio (INR) (OR 10.80, 95 % CI; 6.12–19.07) and resulted in a shorter time to INR correction (mean difference –6.50 hours, 95 %CI; –9.75 to –3.24). Red blood cell transfusion was not statistically different between the two groups (OR 0.88, 95 % CI: 0.53–1.43). Patients receiving PCC had a lower risk of post-transfusion volume overload compared to FFP (OR 0.27, 95 % CI; 0.13–0.58). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of thromboembolism following administration of PCC or FFP (OR 0.91, 95 % CI; 0.44–1.89). In conclusion, as compared to FFP, the use of PCC for warfarin reversal was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality, more rapid INR reduction, and less volume overload without an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Clinical Application of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Blood Management in Patients

Management of patients receiving anticoagulants is a major factor in achieving better outcomes. Anticoagulant therapy may need to be discontinued or rapidly reversed before urgent surgery or invasive procedures. In these situations, treatment with concentrated vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, and/or clotting factors can achieve more rapid anticoagulant reversal than can drug discontinuation alone. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate is used to treat hemophiliac patients with acquired factor VIII inhibitors. Nonactivated prothrombin complex concentrates are used for anticoagulant reversal. The concentrates are effective within minutes of dosing, providing a nearly immediate decrease in the international normalized ratio. The concentrates are lyophilized powders that can be quickly reconstituted, do not require ABO blood typing before use, and contain 25 times the concentration of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors compared with fresh frozen plasma. Studies suggest that the concentrates are associated with better clinical end points than is fresh frozen plasma.

Comparison of Fresh-Frozen Plasma, Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrates, and Recombinant Factor VIIa to Facilitate Procedures in Critically Ill Patients with Coagulopathy from Liver Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for lowering international normalized ratio (INR) and facilitating procedures in critically ill patients with hepatic impairment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Intensive care units at a large university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-five adults with hepatic impairment who were admitted between September 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, and had an admission INR of 1.5 or greater, required an invasive intervention or minor surgical procedure, and received FFP alone (15 patients), PCCs (15 patients), or rFVIIa (15 patients).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcomes were rates of achieving an INR less than 1.5 at the time of the procedure and an absolute change in INR from 12 hours before the procedure to the time of the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the time to the procedure, blood product use, bleeding rates, and adverse events. The mean ± SD doses of FFP, PCCs, and rFVIIa were 1.1 ± 0.5 units, 2523 ± 861 units, and 2.6 ± 0.9 mg, respectively, administered 2.1 ± 1.4 hours (p<0.05, FFP vs PCCs or rFVIIa), 1.3 ± 0.5 hours, and 1.3 ± 0.6 hours before the procedure, respectively. Achieving an INR less than 1.5 was more likely to occur with PCCs (80%, p=0.03) and rFVIIa (87%, p=0.01) compared with FFP (27%). INR reduction was greater with PCCs (1.6 ± 0.9, p<0.05) and rFVIIa (1.8 ± 0.7, p<0.01) compared with FFP (0.5 ± 0.8). Use of blood products (FFP, cryoprecipitate, packed red blood cells, and platelets) was significantly greater in the FFP group both before and after the procedural intervention. Hypervolemia was less likely to occur in the PCCs (40%, p=0.02) or rFVIIa (33%, p<0.01) groups than in the FFP group (93%). Overall, 33 (73%) of the 45 patients experienced minor bleeding. Three patients (7%) experienced clotting of a central line or dialysis filter, and all were in the PCCs or rFVIIa groups.

CONCLUSION

Unlike FFP, PCCs and rFVIIa effectively and safely reduced INR in critically ill patients with coagulopathy associated with liver impairment to expedite interventions. The amount of blood products used was significantly lower in the PCC and rFVIIa groups, possibly reducing the risk of hypervolemia. Bleeding rates, however, were similar across groups.

Clotting factor product administration and same-day occurrence of thrombotic events, as recorded in a large healthcare database during 2008-2013

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic events (TEs) are serious adverse events that can occur following administration of clotting factors (CFs).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate occurrence of same-day TEs for different CF products and potential risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of individuals exposed to CF products during 2008-2013 was conducted using a large commercial insurance database. CF products were identified by procedure codes, and TEs were ascertained via diagnosis codes. Crude same-day TE rates (per 1000 persons exposed) were estimated overall and by congenital factor deficiency (CFD) status, CF products, age and gender. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to control for confounding. Laboratory analysis was used to compare the procoagulant activities of FIX products.

RESULTS

Of 3801 individuals exposed to CFs, 117 (30.8 per 1000) had same-day TEs recorded. The crude same-day TE rate was higher for CF users without CFD, 70.2 (102 of 1452), as compared with those with CFD, 6.4 (15 of 2349) (RR, 11.0; 95% CI, 6.4-18.9). For individuals without CFD, a significantly increased same-day TE risk was identified for factor IX complex (OR, 6.92; 95% CI, 3.11-15.40), factor VIIa (OR, 9.42; 95% CI, 4.99-17.78) and other products when compared with fibrin sealant. An increased risk of a TE was found with older age (≥ 45 years), history of TEs and underlying health conditions. The laboratory identified elevated procoagulant activity in Profilnine(®) and Benefix(®) .

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows an increased same-day TE risk for CF users without CFD and suggests substantial off-label CF use. The study findings also show elevated same-day TE rates for different CF products and suggest the importance of product properties and patient factors.

Coagulopathies in the PICU: DIC and liver disease

Bleeding in patients in pediatric intensive care units is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Fortunately, most patients with an abnormal coagulation profile do not bleed because this is generally secondary to liver disease or dietary-induced vitamin K deficiency. When the laboratory markers of coagulopathy are the result of disseminated intravascular coagulation, bleeding is common and the risk of mortality extreme. Although interventions directed toward correcting the abnormal coagulation test results are generally initiated, they are also generally either not warranted or not fully successful.