How to Recognize a Failed Burn Resuscitation

American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation

This Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) addresses the topic of acute fluid resuscitation during the first 48 hours following a burn injury for adults with burns ≥20% of the total body surface area (%TBSA). The listed authors formed an investigation panel and developed clinically relevant PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions. A systematic literature search returned 5978 titles related to this topic and after 3 levels of screening, 24 studies met criteria to address the PICO questions and were critically reviewed. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of human albumin solution, especially in patients with larger burns, to lower resuscitation volumes and improve urine output. We recommend initiating resuscitation based on providing 2 mL/kg/% TBSA burn in order to reduce resuscitation fluid volumes. We recommend selective monitoring of intra-abdominal and intraocular pressure during burn shock resuscitation. We make a weak recommendation for clinicians to consider the use of computer decision support software to guide fluid titration and lower resuscitation fluid volumes. We do not recommend the use of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived variables to guide burn shock resuscitation. We are unable to make any recommendations on the use of high-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), early continuous renal replacement therapy, or vasopressors as adjuncts during acute burn shock resuscitation. Mortality is an important outcome in burn shock resuscitation, but it was not formally included as a PICO outcome because the available scientific literature is missing studies of sufficient population size and quality to allow us to confidently make recommendations related to the outcome of survival at this time.

Assessment and Management of Acute Burn Injuries

Burn injuries can affect patients from all walks of life and represent a significant healthcare problem globally. The skin is the largest organ of the body and consequences of injury range of minor pain to severe end-organ dysfunction and even death. The acute assessment and management of burn-injured patients is a critical part of their short-term and long-term outcomes and often benefit from specialty, multidisciplinary care. Local wound care and appropriate excision and grafting are important parts of managing the functional, cosmetic, and physiologic derangements caused by burn injuries. Large burns also require judicious fluid resuscitation. Electrical, chemical, and inhalational injuries are less common than thermal burns but require additional care and are often associated with increased morbidity.

The First 24 Hours: Burn Shock Resuscitation and Early Complications

Resuscitation is required for the management of patients with severe thermal injury. Some of the initial pathophysiologic events following burn injury include an exaggerated inflammatory state, injury to the endothelium, and increased capillary permeability, which all culminate in shock. Understanding these processes is critical to the effective management of patients with burn injuries. Formulas predicting fluid requirements during burn resuscitation have evolved over the past century in response to clinical experience and research efforts. Modern resuscitation features individualized fluid titration and monitoring along with colloid-based adjuncts. Despite these developments, complications from over-resuscitation still occur.

The use of vasopressors during acute burn resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Vasopressors may be required during acute burn resuscitation to support mean arterial blood pressure, but their use is not well-described in the burn literature. The purpose of this study was to examine vasopressor use during acute fluid resuscitation.

METHODS

Retrospective review of adults with burns ≥ 20% TBSA admitted to an ABA-verified regional burn center. Patients administered an infusion of a vasopressor for at least 30 min during the 1 st 48 h post-burn formed the PRESSOR group while patients who did not receive vasopressors formed the NoPRESSOR group.

RESULTS

We studied 52 burned adults, 85% of which had flame burns. Vasopressors were administered during resuscitation to 31% of patients. Vasopressor infusions began at 20.9 ± 10.9 h post burn and were continued for 16.8 ± 10.8 h. PRESSOR patients (N = 16) had significantly greater total (p = 0.001) and full thickness burn size (p < 0.001), and need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.005) than NoPRESSOR patients (N = 36). PRESSOR and NoPRESSOR patients did not differ significantly in per cent predicted fluid volume received in the first 24 h (143 ± 58 Vs. 125 ± 46 respectively). PRESSOR patients compared to NoPRESSOR patients tended to have been administered 5% albumin (Alb) less often (38% Vs 47%) and high dose vitamin C (HDVC) more often during resuscitation (69% vs 17%). Multivariate regression analysis found that patient age (OR 1.189, 95% CI: 1.047, 1.351) and HDVC (OR 24.701, 95% CI: 1.558, 391.551) were independently associated with greater use of vasopressors. An inverse probability weighted propensity analysis also identified a significant association between HDVC and increased use of vasopressors (OR 6.902, 95 % CI: 2.503, 19.026), and significantly decreased vasopressor administration following Alb administration (OR 0.310, 95% CI: 0.130, 0.739).

CONCLUSION

Advanced age appears to be the most important determinant of vasopressor use during resuscitation. While vasopressor requirements appear to have been increased by HDVC and decreased by Alb, this needs to be formally evaluated in a large randomized study.