Significance of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in acute coronary syndromes: relation with clinical presentation

Low Molecular Weight Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotype Rather Than Lipoprotein(a) Is Associated With Coronary Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Infarction

Background and Aims

Current evidence suggests that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level above 50 mg/dL is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Our study aim was to determine the relationship of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) concentration below and above 50 mg/dL with coronary atherosclerosis severity and myocardial infarction (MI).

Material and Methods

The study population consisted of 540 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 8.8 years, 82% men) who passed through coronary angiography. The number of diseased major coronary arteries assessed atherosclerosis severity. Lipids, glucose, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in all patients. All patients were divided into four groups: with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL [ “normal” Lp(a)] or ≥50 mg/dL [hyperLp(a)], and with low-molecular (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) phenotypes.

Results

Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics were similar between the groups. In groups with LMW apo(a) phenotypes, the odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) of multivessel disease was higher [10.1; 3.1–33.5, p < 0.005 for hyperLp(a) and 2.2; 1.0–4.9, p = 0.056 for normal Lp(a)], but not in the group with HMW apo(a) and hyperLp(a) [1.1; 0.3–3.3, p = 0.92] compared with the reference group with HMW apo(a) and normal Lp(a). Similarly, MI was observed more often in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotype and hyperLp(a) and normal Lp(a) than in groups with HMW apo(a) phenotype.

Conclusion

The LMW apo(a) phenotype is associated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and MI even when Lp(a) level is below 50 mg/dL. The combination of Lp(a) level above 50 mg/dL and LMW apo(a) phenotype increases the risk of severe coronary atherosclerosis, regardless of other risk factors.

Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology

Human epidemiologic and genetic evidence using the Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale studies now strongly supports that elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease, that is, for myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis. The Mendelian randomization approach used to infer causality is generally not affected by confounding and reverse causation, the major problems of observational epidemiology. This approach is particularly valuable to study causality of Lp(a), as single genetic variants exist that explain 27-28% of all variation in plasma Lp(a). The most important genetic variant likely is the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variant, as the apo(a) product of this variant influences fibrinolysis and thereby thrombosis, as opposed to the Lp(a) particle per se. We speculate that the physiological role of KIV-2 in Lp(a) could be through wound healing during childbirth, infections, and injury, a role that, in addition, could lead to more blood clots promoting stenosis of arteries and the aortic valve, and myocardial infarction. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of Lp(a) reduction in individuals with very high concentrations to reduce cardiovascular disease are awaited. Recent genetic evidence documents elevated Lp(a) as a cause of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis.

Association of plasma eotaxin levels with the presence and extent of angiographic coronary artery disease

Eotaxin (CCL11) is an eosinophil-specific chemoattractant which has been found to be highly expressed at sites of vascular pathology. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of plasma eotaxin levels with the presence and extent of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD). Three hundred and fifty six consecutive patients attending for elective coronary angiography were investigated. Compared with 111 patients without CAD, 245 with CAD showed higher eotaxin concentrations [median (interquartile range): 76.0 (56.3-103.0)pg/ml versus 116.0 (80.5-162.0)pg/ml, respectively; P<0.001]. Importantly, a significant Spearman correlation was found between eotaxin levels and the extent score of coronary artery stenosis (r=0.449, P<0.001). A stepwise increase in plasma levels of eotaxin was also found depending on the number of >50% coronary stenosis: median value 76.0 pg/ml in CAD(-) subjects, 96.0 pg/ml in 1-vessel disease, 128.0 pg/ml in 2-vessel disease, and 129.0 pg/ml in 3-vessel disease (P<0.001 for trend). After confounding variables were controlled for, multiple stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that plasma eotaxin was an independent predictor of angiographic extent of CAD (beta=0.426, P<0.001). Our data suggest that increased eotaxin levels are associated with the presence of CAD and that circulating levels of this chemokine may reflect the extent of coronary atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis: new perspectives on the mechanism of action of an enigmatic lipoprotein

Although elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, the pathophysiologic and physiologic roles of Lp(a) continue to elude basic researchers and clinicians alike. Lp(a) is a challenging lipoprotein to study because it has a complex structure consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety to which is covalently attached the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Apo(a) contains multiply repeated kringle domains that are similar to a sequence found in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen; differing numbers of kringle sequences in apo(a) give rise to Lp(a) isoform size heterogeneity. In addition to elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), apo(a) isoform size has been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, although studies addressing this relationship have been limited. The similarity of Lp(a) to low-density lipoprotein and plasminogen provides an enticing link between the processes of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, although a clear demonstration of this association in vivo has not been provided. Clearly, Lp(a) is a risk factor for both atherothrombotic and purely thrombotic events; a plethora of mechanisms to explain these clinical findings has been provided by both in vitro studies as well as animal models for Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor

Evidence for the role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) in atherosclerosis and thrombosis has considerably increased over the past few years. Therefore, Lp(a) is currently classified as an emerging lipid risk factor for cardiovascular disease. High Lp(a) plasma levels carried in particles with small-sized apolipoprotein(a) isoforms are associated with preclinical vascular changes, cardiovascular disease and the mode of presentation of coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndromes). However, randomized clinical trials with an emphasis on agents that specifically lower plasma Lp(a) do not exist. At present, screening for increases in Lp(a) in the general population is not recommended. The measurement of Lp(a) may be of value in individuals with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly in patients with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma levels, since a high Lp(a) concentration in such subjects further increases the risk of coronary heart disease.

Plasma levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and coronary artery disease in nondiabetic men

OBJECTIVE

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cell surface receptor whose signaling pathway has been implicated in atherogenesis. RAGE has an endogenous secretory receptor form, called soluble RAGE (sRAGE), that could exert antiatherogenic effects by acting as a decoy. We sought to determine whether a decreased plasma level of sRAGE could be independently associated with the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in nondiabetic men.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plasma levels of sRAGE were determined in 328 nondiabetic male patients with angiographically proved CAD and in 328 age-matched healthy controls. The concentration of sRAGE in plasma was significantly lower (P<0.0001) in CAD cases [median (interquartile range): 966 (658-1372) pg/mL] than in control subjects [1335 (936-1954) pg/mL]. In logistic regression analysis, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio for the presence of CAD was 6.719 (95% confidence interval, 3.773 to 11.964; P<0.0001) when the lowest quartile of the sRAGE level was compared with the highest quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that low levels of sRAGE in plasma are independently associated with the presence of CAD in nondiabetic men and suggest that sRAGE is one of the clinically important molecules associated with atherosclerosis.