Transcatheter Device Closure for Atrial Septal Defects: Safety, Efficacy, Complications, and Costs

Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: Comparable Experience and Outcomes Between Developing and Developed Countries

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital heart defects. Transcatheter device closure of ASDs is safe and effective with most of the reported data being described from developed countries. To evaluate the short and mid-term results and experience of device closure of ASDs at a tertiary center in a developing country and compare it to that from developed countries. Retrospective study based on data collection from all patients who have undergone transcatheter percutaneous device closure for ASD from January 2005 until December 2017 at the Children's Heart Center at the American University of Beirut, Medical Center, Lebanon. During the study period, a total of 254 cardiac catheterizations were performed for device closure of ASDs. The mean age of the patients was 18 ± 17.9 years with 37% being less than 6 years of age. Females were 54%. Defect size ranged from 7 to 37 mm and device size ranged from 8 to 40 mm. The procedure was executed with a success rate of 96%. Five patients had device embolization (2%); in one patient the device was snared and for the remainder the devices were removed surgically. None of the study patients had thrombus formation, neurological complications, bacterial endocarditis, or cardiac erosions. There was no mortality. Device closure of ASDs at our tertiary center in a developing country has an effective and safe profile with excellent results and low complications rates, which compare favorably to those reported from centers in developed countries.

Amplatzer occluder versus CardioSEAL/STARFlex occluder: a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of transcatheter occlusion for patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous transcatheter occlusion has benefited thousands of patients suffering from patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect. However, no general agreement has been reached on the superiority among occluders. Thus, a meta-analysis between the two most commonly adopted types of occluders was conducted.

METHODS

The literature review has identified relevant studies up to May, 2011 in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization clinical trials registry centre. Meta-analysis was performed in a fixed/random effects model using Revman 5.1.1. Information on complications and outcomes was extracted.

RESULTS

Analysis from included studies reports an outcome in favour of the Amplatzer. The Amplatzer has proven its superiority in efficacy with a significantly lower risk of early (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.34) and long-term (95% confidence interval = 0.14-0.97) residual shunt rate for atrial septal defect occlusion, although no significant difference in performance has been reported for patent foramen ovale. In addition, the Amplatzer has also remarkably reduced the risk of embolisation by the device (95% confidence interval = 0.07-0.45) for atrial septal defect and new-set atrial fibrillation (95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.48) for patent foramen ovale. On evaluation of recurrent thrombotic events, it was found that the Amplatzer greatly lowered the rate of thrombus formation on the device (95% confidence interval = 0.02-0.21) for patent foramen ovale; however, no statistical difference was found on atrial septal defect evaluation. However, the result indicated no statistically significant difference between the two kinds of occluders in stroke and transient ischaemic attack of patent foramen ovale.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis has proven the Amplatzer to be the superior occluder, serving better prognosis with more fluent procedure and less complications.