Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Pharmacokinetic determinants for the right dose of antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) show a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), which may lead to inappropriate dosing and drug toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present review is to describe PK properties of AADs, discussing the main changes in different clinical scenarios, such as the elderly and patients with obese, chronic kidney, liver, and cardiac disease, in order to guide their right prescription in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

There are few data about PK properties of AADs in a special population or challenging clinical setting. The use and dose of AADs is commonly based on physicians' clinical experience observing the clinical effects rather than being personalized on the individual patients PK profiles. More and updated studies are needed to validate a patient centered approach in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias based on patients' clinical features, including pharmacogenomics, and AAD pharmacokinetics.

The Magnitude of the Warfarin-Amiodarone Drug-Drug Interaction Varies With Renal Function: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Amiodarone inhibits warfarin metabolism and is associated with major bleeding during warfarin therapy. Managing this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is challenging because of substantial interpatient variability in DDI magnitude. Because renal dysfunction induces changes in drug metabolism and protein binding that could alter cytochrome P450 inhibition mechanisms, we hypothesized that renal dysfunction alters the impact of the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. We tested this question in a propensity-matched cohort study of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients were queried from an electronic health record database. Renal function was estimated with creatinine clearance (CrCl). Warfarin response was measured with the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), a dose-normalized international normalized ratio (INR) measure, and was modeled with multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Time to supratherapeutic INR (> 4) was modeled using Cox regression. Propensity score matching resulted in 4,518 patients administered amiodarone and 4,518 controls. Amiodarone's effect on warfarin response varied threefold across the renal function range, increasing WSI by 36% in patients with normal renal function (CrCl 115 mL/minute), but by only 11.8% in patients with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl 15 mL/minute). Similarly, amiodarone had a strong effect in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio (HR) 1.80; 1.23, 2.64), but a negligible effect on supratherapeutic INR hazard in patients with severe renal dysfunction (HR 1.01; 0.75, 1.37). These results suggest that renal function is a novel factor that explains substantial variability in the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. This information could inform warfarin dosage adjustment and monitoring and may have implications for the selection of oral anticoagulation agents in patients treated with amiodarone.