Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Role of advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography and MRI in atrial and ventricular ablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing evidence supports the use of advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the work-up of patients with arrythmias being considered for ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in imaging technology and postprocessing are facilitating the use of advanced imaging before, during and after ablation in patients with both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.In atrial arrythmias, quantitative assessment of left atrial wall thickness on CCT and quantification of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR identify patients more likely to develop recurrent atrial arrythmias following ablation. In addition, in patients with recurrent arrythmia post ablation, LGE CMR can potentially identify targets for repeat ablation.In ventricular arrythmias, qualitative assessment of LGE can aide in determining the optimal ablation approach and predicts likelihood of ventricular arrythmias inducibility. Quantitative assessment of LGE can identify conduction channels that can be targeted for ablation. On CCT, quantitative assessment of left ventricular wall thickness can demonstrate myocardial ridges associated with re-entrant circuits for ablation.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on the utility of CCT and CMR in identifying key anatomical components and arrhythmogenic substrate contributing to both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients being considered for ablation. Advanced imaging has the potential to improve procedural outcomes, decrease complications and shorten procedural time.

Ultralow temperature cryoablation: Safety and efficacy of preclinical atrial and ventricular lesions

BACKGROUND

Ultralow temperature cyroablation (ULTC) is designed to create focal, linear, and circumferential lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of atrial and ventricular ULTC lesions in preclinical large animal models.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ULTC system uses nitrogen near its liquid-vapor critical point to cool 11-cm ablation catheters. The catheter can be shaped to specific anatomies using pre-shaped stylets. ULTC was used in 11 swine and four sheep to create atrial (pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation) and ventricular lesions. Acute and 90-day success were evaluated by intracardiac mapping and histologic examination. Cryoadherence was observed during all ULTC applications, ensuring catheter stability at target locations. Local electrograms were completely eliminated immediately after the first single-shot ULTC application in 49 of 53 (92.5%) atrial and in 31 of 32 (96.9%) ventricular applications. Lesion depth as measured on histology preparations was 1.96 ± 0.8 mm in atrial and 5.61 ± 2.2 mm in ventricular lesions. In all animals, voltage maps and histology demonstrated transmural and durable lesions without gaps, surrounded by intact collagen fibers without injury to surrounding tissues. Transient coronary spasm could be provoked with endocardial ULTC in the left ventricle in close proximity to a coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

ULTC created effective and efficient atrial and ventricular lesions in vivo without procedural complications in two large animal models. ULTC lesions were transmural, contiguous, and durable over 3 months.

Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia in ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Background

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, results in non‐ICM (NICM) patients are not satisfactory, and studies comparing differences between NICM and ICM are limited. We conducted a meta‐analysis of procedural characteristics and long‐term outcomes of catheter ablation for VA, comparing results between ICM and NICM.

Methods

Studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed. Four studies reporting comparison of catheter ablation of VA between ICM and NICM were examined. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale was used to appraise study quality. A random‐effects model with inverse variance method was used for comparisons.

Results

Epicardial approach was significantly more undertaken for the NICM group than in the ICM group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09‐0.18; P < .00001). Mean ablation time (P = .54), fluoroscopy time (P = .55), and procedural time (P = .18) did not differ significantly between the ICM and NICM groups. Procedural failure rates (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24‐0.89; P = .02) and VA recurrence rates (risk ratio [RR]: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46‐1.01; P = .06) were significantly higher in the NICM group than in the ICM group. However, all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.75‐2.49; P = .31) did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

Procedural failure and VA recurrence rates were significantly higher in the NICM group, despite significantly more frequent epicardial access. These highlight the limitations of catheter ablation for VA in NICM, given our current knowledge.