Current State of Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: How and When

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion with concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: exacerbating heart failure or preventing stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common source of thromboembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical LAA occlusion concomitant with other cardiac surgical procedures based mostly on observational data and a few small trials. Recently published results of several large retrospective studies and one prospective trial are reviewed herein.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large retrospective studies using quality and administrative databases show mixed results with regard to efficacy of surgical LAA occlusion in preventing stroke, although most showed stroke reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Safety concerns have been raised based on nonrandomized data suggesting increased complications. A recent large, multicenter international randomized study with 3-year follow-up demonstrated significant reduction in stroke following LAA occlusion with no differences in death or heart failure exacerbations.

SUMMARY

Most patients with AF undergoing another cardiac surgical procedure should be considered for concomitant LAA occlusion as part of a heart team discussion. The choice of surgical closure technique is critical. There is insufficient data to recommend LAA occlusion as an alternative to anticoagulation.

Risks and Benefits of Removal of the Left Atrial Appendage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In patients with atrial fibrillation who are unable to take novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prophylaxis due to bleeding risk or other contraindications, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion and exclusion devices have shown benefit. In this review, we highlight the risks and benefits associated with LAA removal.

RECENT FINDINGS

LAA, once considered a vestigial organ, has been shown to have physiological, anatomical, and arrhythmogenic properties. Device-related complications such as pericardial effusion, device embolization, device-related thrombus, while uncommon, are still present. With increased operator experience related to appendage occlusion, overall procedural complications have declined. Further refinements in device technology will help decrease complications. While benefits of appendage removal are plenty, procedural complications need to be weighed into the equation when making decisions regarding LAA occlusion.