1
|
Saha S, Linz D, Saha D, McEwan A, Baumert M. Overcoming Uncertainties in Electrogram-Based Atrial Fibrillation Mapping: A Review. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2024; 15:52-64. [PMID: 37962813 DOI: 10.1007/s13239-023-00696-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
In clinical rhythmology, intracardiac bipolar electrograms (EGMs) play a critical role in investigating the triggers and substrates inducing and perpetuating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the interpretation of bipolar EGMs is ambiguous due to several aspects of electrodes, mapping algorithms and wave propagation dynamics, so it requires several variables to describe the effects of these uncertainties on EGM analysis. In this narrative review, we critically evaluate the potential impact of such uncertainties on the design of cardiac mapping tools on AF-related substrate characterization. Literature suggest uncertainties are due to several variables, including the wave propagation vector, the wave's incidence angle, inter-electrode spacing, electrode size and shape, and tissue contact. The preprocessing of the EGM signals and mapping density will impact the electro-anatomical representation and the features extracted from the local electrical activities. The superposition of multiple waves further complicates EGM interpretation. The inclusion of these uncertainties is a nontrivial problem but their consideration will yield a better interpretation of the intra-atrial dynamics in local activation patterns. From a translational perspective, this review provides a concise but complete overview of the critical variables for developing more precise cardiac mapping tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simanto Saha
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2008, Australia.
| | - Dominik Linz
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Dyuti Saha
- Kumudini Women's Medical College, The University of Dhaka, Tangail, 1940, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Alistair McEwan
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2008, Australia
| | - Mathias Baumert
- School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ezzeddine FM, Leon IG, Cha YM. Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2023; 12:e22. [PMID: 37654672 PMCID: PMC10466271 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isaac G Leon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, US
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Batul SA, Vijayaraman P. Intracardiac Echocardiography Guidance for Left Bundle Pacing: An Expensive Adjunct or Necessity for Optimal Lead Placement? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2023; 16:e011931. [PMID: 36951088 PMCID: PMC10473020 DOI: 10.1161/circep.123.011931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Atiqa Batul
- Geisinger Heart Institute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faiola S, Casati D, Nelva Stellio L, Laoreti A, Corti C, Mannarino S, Lanna M, Cetin I. Congenital heart defects in monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2023; 61:504-510. [PMID: 36273402 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence, subtypes and postnatal outcomes of congenital heart defects (CHD) in a cohort of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies complicated by selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), and to compare this population with a cohort of uncomplicated MCDA pregnancies evaluated during the same period. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive MCDA pregnancies referred between 2009 and 2018, including those complicated by sFGR (Group A) and those without complications (Group B). All neonates delivered in our center were screened for CHD before discharge. Discharge letters for all those delivered elsewhere were retrieved. Pregnancies with complications other than sFGR and those without perinatal follow-up were excluded. Pregnancies in Group A were divided into three types according to the Gratacós system of sFGR classification. RESULTS A total of 870 MCDA twin pregnancies were included: 296 in Group A and 574 in Group B. In Group A, the prevalence of CHD was 3.7% (22/592 twins), with no significant difference in CHD frequency between the three types of sFGR (Type I, 3.7%; Type II, 3.2%; Type III, 4.2%; P = 0.55). Of four Type-III sFGR pregnancies with CHD, one had pulmonary stenosis (PS) in the larger twin and isolated coarctation of the aorta in the smaller cotwin, and three had PS in the larger twin only. No Type-III sFGR pregnancies in which only the smaller twin was affected by CHD were observed. Of 11 CHD cases in the larger twin, 10 (91%) were right ventricular outflow tract abnormalities (RVOTA), and one (9%) was a ventricular septal defect. In the smaller twins, 11 cases of CHD were observed, covering a broad spectrum of cardiac abnormalities. In Group B, the CHD prevalence was 1.1% (13/1148 twins), which was similar to that in the general population, according to the EUROCAT registry for the same period and geographical area of the study (0.96%; P = 0.579). The CHD prevalence was significantly higher in Group A compared with Group B (3.7% vs 1.1%; P = 0.0002; odds ratio, 3.57 (95% CI, 1.78-7.22)). In all pregnancies with CHD in the study population, the anomaly was discordant. CONCLUSIONS In MCDA twin pregnancy, sFGR was associated with a three-fold higher prevalence of CHD. Women with such pregnancies should be referred to a tertiary care hospital for pre- and postnatal cardiac evaluation, treatment and long-term follow-up. In larger twins, the only major CHD observed was RVOTA, while a broad spectrum of CHD was noted in smaller twins. The higher risk of CHD in MCDA pregnancies appears to be due to the typical complications of the monochorionic pregnancy, rather than to the monochorionic nature of the pregnancy itself. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Faiola
- Fetal Therapy Unit 'Umberto Nicolini', Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - D Casati
- Fetal Therapy Unit 'Umberto Nicolini', Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L Nelva Stellio
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - A Laoreti
- Fetal Therapy Unit 'Umberto Nicolini', Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - C Corti
- Paediatric Cardiology Unit, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - S Mannarino
- Paediatric Cardiology Unit, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M Lanna
- Fetal Therapy Unit 'Umberto Nicolini', Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - I Cetin
- Department of Women, Mother and Newborn, Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|