Surveillance of the eye and vision in a clinical trial of MART1-transformed dendritic cells for metastatic melanoma

Dendritic cell vaccination combined with CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

Tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) are believed to activate antitumor immunity by stimulating T cells, and CTL-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4)-blocking antibodies should release a key negative regulatory pathway on T cells. The combination was tested in a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced melanoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Autologous DC were pulsed with MART-1(26-35) peptide and administered with a dose escalation of the CTLA4-blocking antibody tremelimumab. Sixteen patients were accrued to five dose levels. Primary end points were safety and immune effects; clinical efficacy was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 hypophysitis developed in two of three patients receiving tremelimumab at 10 mg/kg monthly. Four patients had an objective tumor response, two partial responses and two complete responses, all melanoma free between 2 and 4 years after study initiation. There was no difference in immune monitoring results between patients with an objective tumor response and those without a response. Exploratory gene expression analysis suggested that immune-related gene signatures, in particular for B-cell function, may be important in predicting response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of MART-1 peptide-pulsed DC and tremelimumab results in objective and durable tumor responses at the higher range of the expected response rate with either agent alone.

Detailed analysis of immunologic effects of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-blocking monoclonal antibody tremelimumab in peripheral blood of patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

CTLA4-blocking antibodies induce tumor regression in a subset of patients with melanoma. Analysis of immune parameters in peripheral blood may help define how responses are mediated.

METHODS

Peripheral blood from HLA-A*0201-positive patients with advanced melanoma receiving tremelimumab (formerly CP-675,206) at 10 mg/kg monthly was repeatedly sampled during the first 4 cycles. Samples were analyzed by 1) tetramer and ELISPOT assays for reactivity to CMV, EBV, MART1, gp100, and tyrosinase; 2) activation HLA-DR and memory CD45RO markers on CD4+/CD8+ cells; and 3) real-time quantitative PCR of mRNA for FoxP3 transcription factor, preferentially expressed by T regulatory cells. The primary endpoint was difference in MART1-specific T cells by tetramer assay. Immunological data were explored for significant trends using clustering analysis.

RESULTS

Three of 12 patients eligible for immune monitoring had tumor regression lasting > 2 years without relapse. There was no significant change in percent of MART1-specific T cells by tetramer assay. Additionally, there was no generalized trend toward postdosing changes in other antigen-specific CD8+ cell populations, FoxP3 transcripts, or overall changes in surface expression of T-cell activation or memory markers. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on immune monitoring data segregated patients randomly. However, clustering according to T-cell activation or memory markers separated patients with clinical response and most patients with inflammatory toxicity into a common subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Administration of CTLA4-blocking antibody tremelimumab to patients with advanced melanoma results in a subset of patients with long-lived tumor responses. T-cell activation and memory markers served as the only readout of the pharmacodynamic effects of this antibody in peripheral blood.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00086489.

Vaccine therapy for melanoma: current status and future directions

A vaccine is typically defined as any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease. Vaccines for infectious diseases are highly effective, acting by inducing antigen-specific immunity that prevents subsequent infection. Unfortunately, the success of vaccines in infectious diseases has not been mirrored in oncology. This failure is the result of several challenges facing cancer vaccines, including the conceptual shift from disease prevention to disease treatment, tumor-induced immunosuppression and other mechanisms of immune escape, the similarity between tumor antigens and self antigens to which the patient is tolerant, unfavorable effector-to-target ratios in patients with established tumors, and financial and regulatory issues. Despite this, cancer remains a promising target for vaccine therapy. Melanoma in particular is known for its inherent immunogenicity on the basis of many anecdotal reports of spontaneous immune-based tumor regression, and thus has been the focus of immunotherapeutic approaches. Rare but significant vaccine-induced clinical regression of melanoma has spurred intensive investigations to augment vaccine efficacy. This review explores the many vaccine strategies that have been clinically tested for the treatment of melanoma and considers future approaches of cancer immunotherapy.

Surveillance of the eye and vision in clinical trials of CP-675,206 for metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To determine the ocular safety of CP-675,206 (Pfizer, New York, New York, USA), a fully human anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monoclonal antibody in clinical trials of immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized study of the eye and vision in phase I/II clinical trials of CP-675,206 in metastatic melanoma conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles.

METHODS

Patients with regional or distant metastatic melanoma were enrolled in phase I/II clinical trials evaluating the safety and antitumor efficacy of CP-675,206 alone or in combination with melanoma antigen peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccines. Ophthalmic evaluation was performed at the onset of CP-675,206 immunotherapy (baseline evaluation), two months or more after the onset of CP-675,206 immunotherapy (end-study evaluation), and at two- to three-month intervals thereafter in patients who continued to receive CP-675,206 immunotherapy (poststudy evaluation). Baseline and end-study evaluations included comprehensive ophthalmic examination, psychophysical and electrophysiologic visual function assessment, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and visual function assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with metastatic melanoma arising from the skin, mucosa, eye, or unknown site were evaluated. Systemic toxicity attributed to CP-675,206 included dermatologic manifestations, diarrhea, and autoimmune hepatitis with panhypopituitarism. A subset of patients receiving CP-675,206 demonstrated antitumor efficacy with partial response or complete response of metastatic melanoma. Comparison of ophthalmic baseline with end-study evaluations in all 20 patients and limited-term poststudy evaluations showed no adverse effect of CP-675,206 immunotherapy on the eye or vision.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, CP-675,206 immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma did not adversely affect the eye or vision.