1
|
Cornelissen D, de Kunder S, Si L, Reginster JY, Evers S, Boonen A, Hiligsmann M. Interventions to improve adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications: an updated systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1645-1669. [PMID: 32358684 PMCID: PMC7423788 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05378-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED An earlier systematic review on interventions to improve adherence and persistence was updated. Fifteen studies investigating the effectiveness of patient education, drug regimen, monitoring and supervision, and interdisciplinary collaboration as a single or multi-component intervention were appraised. Multicomponent interventions with active patient involvement were more effective. INTRODUCTION This study was conducted to update a systematic literature review on interventions to improve adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline (using PubMed), Embase (using Ovid), Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov , NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination, CINHAL, and PsycINFO to search for original studies that assessed interventions to improve adherence (comprising initiation, implementation, and discontinuation) and persistence to anti-osteoporosis medications among patients with osteoporosis, published between July 2012 and December 2018. Quality of included studies was assessed. RESULTS Of 585 studies initially identified, 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of which 12 were randomized controlled trials. Interventions were classified as (1) patient education (n = 9), (2) drug regimen (n = 3), (3) monitoring and supervision (n = 2), and (4) interdisciplinary collaboration (n = 1). In most subtypes of interventions, mixed results on adherence (and persistence) were found. Multicomponent interventions based on patient education and counseling were the most effective interventions when aiming to increase adherence and/or persistence to osteoporosis medications. CONCLUSION This updated review suggests that patient education, monitoring and supervision, change in drug regimen, and interdisciplinary collaboration have mixed results on medication adherence and persistence, with more positive effects for multicomponent interventions with active patient involvement. Compared with the previous review, a shift towards more patient involvement, counseling and shared decision-making, was seen, suggesting that individualized solutions, based on collaboration between the patient and the healthcare provider, are needed to improve adherence and persistence to osteoporosis medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cornelissen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands.
| | - S de Kunder
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Center for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - L Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
| | - J-Y Reginster
- WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - S Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
- Centre for economic evaluation, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A Boonen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this review, we present the application of pragmatic clinical trials for evaluating interventions in osteoporosis, and we discuss methodological considerations for designing and conducting a pragmatic clinical trial compared with a classical randomized clinical trial. RECENT FINDINGS Pragmatic clinical trials are a popular study design testing effectiveness of health interventions and are intended to address the limitations associated with traditional explanatory randomized clinical trials testing efficacy of interventions. To date, only few pragmatic clinical trials have been conducted in osteoporosis. Pragmatic clinical trials are conducted under routine clinical practice setting and are intended to inform policy makers and clinical decisions. Osteoporosis is a chronic disease well-suited to this particular study design given the existence of a clear and specific natural endpoint, namely fracture occurrence, and the availability of several treatments to prevent fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Adami
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Pz Scuro 10, 37135, Verona, Italy
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| | - Maria I Danila
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Faculty Office Tower 820D, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edmonds S, Lou Y, Robinson B, Cram P, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Saag K, Wolinsky FD. Characteristics of older adults using patient web portals to view their DXA results. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:187. [PMID: 31533717 PMCID: PMC6751667 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0904-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sharing test results with patients via patient web portals is a new trend in healthcare. No research has been done examining patient web portal use with bone density test results. The objective of our study was to identify patient characteristics associated with the use of patient web portals to view their bone density test results. Methods A secondary analysis of data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of 7749 participants ≥50 years old that had presented for a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone density test. Patients were interviewed at enrollment and 12 weeks later. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient characteristics that differentiated those who used the web portal from those who did not. Results Our sample included 4669 patients at the two (University of Iowa [UI], and Kaiser Permanente of Georgia [KPGA]) clinical sites that had patient web portals. Of these patients, 3399 (72.8%) reported knowing their test results 12 weeks post-DXA, with 649 (13.9%) reporting that they viewed their DXA results using the web portal. Web portal users were more likely to be from UI than KPGA, and were younger, more educated, had higher health literacy, had osteopenia, and had the same sex as their referring physician (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Only 19.1% of the 3399 patients who knew their DXA results used the available patient web portals to find out about them. Web portal users differed from non-users on several characteristics. This suggests that simply making patient web portals available for use may not be sufficient to appreciably enhance patient awareness of their test results. Based on these findings, a better understanding of the reasons why older, less educated, and less activated patients do not access their test results through patient web portals is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Edmonds
- Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Newton Rd. 5231 WL, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. .,CADRE, Iowa City VA Health System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Yiyue Lou
- College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Brandi Robinson
- Kaiser Permanente, Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University of Toronto Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Nicole C Wright
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, UK
| | - Kenneth Saag
- School of Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, UK
| | - Fredric D Wolinsky
- Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Newton Rd. 5231 WL, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.,College of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Solimeo SL, Nguyen VTT, Edmonds SW, Lou Y, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P, Wolinsky FD. Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:1033-1041. [PMID: 30701343 PMCID: PMC7720864 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04854-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The Osteoporosis Self Efficacy Scale was determined to equivalently measure calcium and exercise beliefs in both sexes. Despite data illustrating men's and women's similar self-efficacy, gender differences in clinical predictors of self-efficacy imply that efforts to improve care must account for more than self-efficacy. INTRODUCTION To understand the extent to which the Osteoporosis Self Efficacy (OSE) Scale is reliable for both men and women. A secondary objective was to evaluate sex differences in OSE. METHODS For this cross-sectional study, we analyzed data collected as part of the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) pragmatic trial which enrolled 7749 community-residing adults aged 50 and older reporting for bone densitometry. We used univariable methods, item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and linear regression to evaluate sex differences in OSE responses and measurement. RESULTS In this sample, the confirmatory factor analysis model for OSE both overall and within groups indicated a poor fit. The sex differences in the measurement model, however, were minor and reflected configural invariance (i.e., constructs were measuring the same things in both men and women), confirming that the OSE was measuring the same constructs in men and women. Men overall had higher exercise self-efficacy and women higher calcium self-efficacy. Overall, education, hip fracture, and self-reported health status predicted exercise self-efficacy whereas prior DXA, self-reported osteoporosis, and history of pharmacotherapy use did not. Predictors of calcium self-efficacy differed by gender. CONCLUSION The OSE can be used to measure calcium and exercise self-efficacy in all older adults. However, gender differences in clinical predictors of self-efficacy and the lack of an association of prior DXA with self-efficacy imply that interventions to improve self-efficacy may be insufficient to drive significant improvement in rates of osteoporosis evaluation and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN), NCT01507662, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01507662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S L Solimeo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Department of Veterans Affairs, CADRE, Iowa City VA HCS, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - V-T T Nguyen
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S W Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, CADRE, Iowa City VA HCS, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Y Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - K G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - P Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| | - F D Wolinsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Race Plays a Role in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Women with Osteoporosis. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2019; 6:707-718. [PMID: 30747331 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-019-00569-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Using a concurrent mixed methods design, we investigated how knowledge, attitudes, values, and beliefs among women with osteoporosis can explain racial disparities in bone health. We recruited African American and White women ≥ 65 years of age with osteoporosis to participate in focus groups. We quantitatively compared scores of the "Osteoporosis & You" knowledge scale and each domain (internal, powerful others, and chance) of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale by race using t tests. We qualitatively explored potential racial differences in attitudes, values, and beliefs in the domains: (1) osteoporosis and bone health concerns, (2) knowledge about osteoporosis, (3) utilization of medical services for osteoporosis, (4) facilitators of osteoporosis prevention activities, and (5) barriers to osteoporosis prevention activities. A total of 48 women (White: 36; African American: 12) enrolled in the study. White women had a mean (SD) of 7.8 (0.92), whereas African American women score a 6.6 (2.6) (p = 0.044) out of 10 on the Osteoporosis & You Scale. The powerful others domain was significantly higher among African American for both general and bone health [General Health - African American: 26.7 (5.9) vs. White: 22.3 (3.8); p = 0.01]. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed differences by race in knowledge, types of physical activity, coping with comorbidities, physician trust, religion, and patient activation. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, our study identified racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in women with osteoporosis that could result in racial disparities in bone health, indicating the need to improve education and awareness about osteoporosis in African American women.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hall SF, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds S, Roblin D, Jones M, Saag K, Cram P. The prevalence of overtreatment of osteoporosis: results from the PAADRN trial. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:103. [PMID: 30267162 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0517-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Overtreatment of osteoporosis increases costs and puts patients at unnecessary risk of experiencing adverse drug events. In the Patient Activation After DXA Receipt Notification (PAADRN) trial, we found that 8% of individuals with no indication for therapy were recommended a new osteoporosis medication or continuation of an existing medication. PURPOSE There is a robust body of literature addressing undertreatment in osteoporosis, but limited data addressing overtreatment. Understanding overtreatment is important to minimize harm and decrease costs. METHODS One of the pre-specified post hoc analyses of the PAADRN trial, a randomized, controlled, pragmatic clinical trial, was to quantify and identify risk factors associated with osteoporosis overtreatment. PAADRN included patients ≥ 50 years of age presenting for bone density testing between February, 2012, and August, 2014, at three US healthcare systems. We assessed 20,397 patients for eligibility and randomized 7749. Intervention patients received a tailored letter containing their dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results and an educational osteoporosis brochure. Control patients received usual care. Using the National Osteoporosis Foundation treatment guidelines, we defined overtreatment as the receipt of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy 12 weeks after DXA when treatment was not indicated. We evaluated the relationship between the following baseline variables-sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and differences across health systems-and overtreatment using a series of multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Among 3602 patients with no apparent indication for osteoporosis treatment, 292 (8.1%; 95% CI, 7.22 to 9.00%) received a new prescription for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or were instructed to continue an existing medication (presumed overtreatment). Presumed overtreatment was more common among participants with prior DXA history, those who reported a history of osteoporosis or low bone mass, and those referred for testing by family medicine providers. CONCLUSION In our sample of older adults, overuse of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy was only 8.1%. Nevertheless, overtreatment exposes patients to possible risk with negligible chance of benefit and should be minimized. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01507662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie F Hall
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave JJN1-200, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Nicole C Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Fredric D Wolinsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Stephanie Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Douglas Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, USA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kenneth Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai and UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kopanitsa G, Semenov I. Patient facing decision support system for interpretation of laboratory test results. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:68. [PMID: 30029644 PMCID: PMC6053711 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In some healthcare systems, it is common that patients address laboratory test centers directly without a physician’s recommendation. This practice is widely spread in Russia with about 28% of patients who visiting laboratory test centers for diagnostics. This causes an issue when patients get no help from the physician in understanding the results. Computer decision support systems proved to efficiently solve a resource consuming task of interpretation of the test results. So, a decision support system can be implemented to rise motivation and empower the patients who visit a laboratory service without a doctor’s referral. Methods We have developed a clinical decision support system for patients that solves a classification task and finds a set of diagnoses for the provided laboratory tests results. The Wilson and Lankton’s assessment model was applied to measure patients’ acceptance of the solution. Results A first order predicates-based decision support system has been implemented to analyze laboratory test results and deliver reports in natural language to patients. The evaluation of the system showed a high acceptance of the decision support system and of the reports that it generates. Conclusions Detailed notification of the laboratory service patients with elements of the decision support is significant for the laboratory data management, and for patients’ empowerment and safety. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0648-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgy Kopanitsa
- Institute Cybernetic Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina 30, 634050, Tomsk, Russia. .,Tomsk State University for Architecture and Building, Tomsk, Russia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roblin DW, Cram P, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD. Diet and exercise changes following bone densitometry in the Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:4. [PMID: 29307094 PMCID: PMC7409367 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0402-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Calcium and vitamin D intake and exercise are suboptimal among older adults. Following bone densitometry, a letter communicating individualized fracture risk accompanied by an educational brochure improved participants' lifestyle-but no more than existing communication strategies-over 52 weeks. Simple communication strategies are insufficient for achieving optimal levels of bone health behaviors. PURPOSE The Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study was designed to evaluate whether a letter with individualized fracture risk and an educational brochure mailed to patients soon after their DXA might improve bone health behaviors (daily calcium intake, vitamin D supplementation, and weekly exercise sessions) compared to slower, less individualized communication characterizing usual care. METHODS Participants ≥ 50 years were recruited, at three sites, following their DXA and randomized with 1:1 allocation to intervention and control (usual care only) groups. Data were collected at enrollment interview and by phone survey at 12 and 52 weeks thereafter. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted on 7749 of the 20,397 eligible participants who enrolled. Changes in bone health behaviors were compared within and between study groups. Average treatment effects and heterogeneity of treatment effects were estimated with multivariable linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS In unadjusted analyses, calcium intake, vitamin D supplementation, and weekly exercise sessions increased significantly over 52 weeks within both the intervention and control groups (all p < 0.001). In unadjusted analyses and multivariable models, increases in each behavior did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups. Intervention group participants with a > 20% 10-year fracture risk at enrollment did, however, have a significantly greater increase in calcium intake compared to other study participants (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Bone health behaviors improved, on average, over 52 weeks among all participants following a DXA. Receipt of the PAADRN letter and educational brochure did not directly improve bone health behaviors compared to usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) Study is registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT01507662, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01507662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas W. Roblin
- Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, 2101 East Jefferson St., 3 West, Rockville, MD 20852, USA,Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research, Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Stephanie W. Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sylvie F. Hall
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Michael P. Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kenneth G. Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nicole C. Wright
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA,Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Fredric D. Wolinsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA,Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nguyen VT, Edmonds SW, Lou Y, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P, Wolinsky FD. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the "Osteoporosis and You" knowledge scale. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:3379-3388. [PMID: 28879445 PMCID: PMC5685910 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4204-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
We studied the Osteoporosis and You knowledge scale in 7749 participants enrolled in a clinical trial. Results confirmed its psychometric properties in a diverse audience. Baseline scores were associated with better recall of bone mineral density test results at follow-up; however, the scale was not responsive to knowledge change. INTRODUCTION The goal of this study was to confirm the measurement properties of the Osteoporosis and You (O&Y) knowledge scale using classic test theory methods in the 7749 men and women participating in the Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) randomized controlled trial. We hypothesized a simple factor structure that would reflect the four-factor model previously published. METHODS We conducted psychometric analyses which included item analysis, internal consistency reliability, construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA), comparing knowledge levels across pre-specified groups, and responsiveness to change. RESULTS PAADRN participants were predominantly college educated, White females with low bone density, and a moderate level of 10-year fracture risk. EFA revealed four domains closely matching those in two previous reports. While overall scale reliability was minimally acceptable at 0.68, the reliabilities of the domain subscales were unacceptably low (0.59, 0.64, 0.45, and 0.36 for the Biological, Lifestyle, Consequences, and Prevention and Treatment subscales). CFA revealed the data fit the hypothesized model reasonably well with the items loading on their expected latent variable. The scale was not responsive to change, but although not significant, improved knowledge indicated better DXA result recall at 12 and 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS In the PAADRN population, the O&Y knowledge scale had psychometric properties similar to those previously reported. Over 12 and 52 weeks, participants did not demonstrate significant changes in knowledge, but those with higher knowledge at baseline were more likely to accurately recall their baseline DXA result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V T Nguyen
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 5233 Westlawn, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - S W Edmonds
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- CADRE, Iowa City VA Health System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Y Lou
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 5233 Westlawn, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - D W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - P Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ONT, Canada
- University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ONT, Canada
| | - F D Wolinsky
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 5233 Westlawn, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolinsky FD, Hall SF, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Saag KG, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Cram P, Curtis JR, Morgan SL, Schlechte JA, Williams JH, Zelman DJ. The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2017. [PMID: 28620779 PMCID: PMC5670012 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4113-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In a large, pragmatic clinical trial, we calculated the costs of achieving four successful patient-centered outcomes using a tailored patient activation DXA result letter accompanied by a bone health brochure. The cost to achieve one successful outcome (e.g., a 0.5 standard deviation improvement in care satisfaction) ranged from $127.41 to $222.75. INTRODUCTION Pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should focus on patient-centered outcomes and report the costs for achieving those outcomes. We calculated per person incremental intervention costs, the number-needed-to-treat (NNT), and incremental per patient costs (cost per NNT) for four patient-centered outcomes in a direct-to-patient bone healthcare intervention. METHODS The Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) pragmatic RCT enrolled 7749 patients presenting for DXA at three health centers between February 2012 and August 2014. Interviews occurred at baseline and 52 weeks post-DXA. Intervention subjects received an individually tailored DXA result letter accompanied by an educational bone health brochure 4 weeks post-DXA, while the usual care subjects did not. Outcomes focused on patients (a) correctly identifying their results, (b) contacting their providers, (c) discussing their results with their providers, and (d) satisfaction with their bone healthcare. NNTs were determined using intention-to-treat linear probability models, per person incremental intervention costs were calculated, and costs per NNT were computed. RESULTS Mean age was 66.6 years old, 83.8% were women, and 75.3% were non-Hispanic whites. The incremental per patient cost (costs per NNT) to increase the ability of a patient to (a) correctly identify their DXA result was $171.07; (b) contact their provider about their DXA result was $222.75; (c) discuss their DXA result with their provider was $193.55; and (d) achieve a 0.5 SD improvement in satisfaction with their bone healthcare was $127.41. CONCLUSION An individually tailored DXA result letter accompanied by an educational brochure can improve four patient-centered outcomes at a modest cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01507662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F D Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, 145 North Riverside Drive, CPHB N211, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - S F Hall
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Y Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S W Edmonds
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- CADRE, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - N C Wright
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M P Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - P Cram
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Wright NC, Saag KG, Cram P, Roblin DW. Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Densitom 2017; 20:464-471. [PMID: 27647261 PMCID: PMC5354993 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In cross-sectional studies, patient activation has been associated with better health behaviors, health outcomes, and health-care experiences. Moreover, tailored interventions have led to clinically meaningful improvements in patient activation, as well as health outcomes over time. We tested whether a tailored patient-activation letter communicating bone mineral density (BMD) test results plus an educational brochure improved patient activation scores and levels at 12 and 52 wk post-baseline as the mechanism leading to enhanced bone healthcare. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter pragmatic clinical trial, we randomized 7749 patients ≥50 yr old and presenting for BMD testing at 3 medical centers in the United States between February 2012 and August 2014. The outcome measures were patient activation scores and levels based on 6 items taken from the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) that were administered at the baseline, 12-wk, and 52-wk follow-up interviews. Mean age was 66.6 yr, 83.8% were women, and 75.3% were Non-Hispanic-Whites. Overall, PAM activation scores improved from 58.1 at baseline to 76.4 by 12 wk (p < 0.001) and to 77.2 (p = 0.002) by 52 wk post-baseline. These improvements, however, were not significantly different between the intervention and usual care groups (18.7 vs 18.1, p = 0.176, at 12 wk) in intention-to-treat analyses. PAM activation scores and levels substantially improved at 12 wk and 52 wk, but no differences were observed in these improvements between the intervention and usual care groups. These null findings may have occurred because the tailoring focused on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results, rather than on the patient's BMD and fracture risk results as well as the patient's baseline PAM activation scores or levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredric D Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Stephanie W Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sylvie F Hall
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Michael P Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nicole C Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA; School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Saag KG, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Cram P. The effects of a patient activation intervention on smoking and excessive drinking cessations: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:3055-3060. [PMID: 28573377 PMCID: PMC5670005 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4101-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patients may exhibit risky bone health behaviors. In a large pragmatic clinical trial, we tested whether a tailored patient activation DXA result letter accompanied by a bone health brochure led to smoking and excessive drinking cessations. The intervention did not, however, alter these risky bone health behaviors. INTRODUCTION Besides dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening and pharmacotherapy when indicated, beneficial bone health behaviors including proper calcium and vitamin D intake and weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercise should be encouraged. Similarly, risky bone health behaviors like smoking and excessive drinking should be discouraged. We examined whether a direct-to-patient activation intervention led to smoking and excessive drinking cessations. METHODS The Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) pragmatic clinical trial enrolled 7749 patients between February 2012 and August 2014. Interviews occurred at baseline and 12 and 52 weeks later. Intervention subjects were mailed an individually tailored DXA results letter accompanied by a bone health educational brochure 4 weeks post-DXA. Usual care subjects were not sent these materials. Smoking and excessive drinking were assessed by self-report at each interview. Intention-to-treat linear probability models were used. RESULTS Mean age was 66.6 years, 83.8% were women, and 75.3% were Non-Hispanic-Whites. Smoking was reported at baseline by 7.6% of the intervention group vs. 7.7% of the usual care group (p = 0.873). Excessive drinking was reported at baseline by 6.5% of the intervention group vs. 6.5% of the usual care group (p = 0.968). Intention-to-treat analyses indicated no significant differences between the intervention vs. usual care groups at either 12 or 52 weeks post-DXA (all p values ≥ 0.346). CONCLUSION An individually tailored DXA result letter accompanied by an educational brochure did not lead to smoking or excessive drinking cessations in patients who received DXA. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01507662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F D Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, 145 North Riverside Drive, CPHB N211, Iowa City, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Y Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S W Edmonds
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- CADRE, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - N C Wright
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M P Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - P Cram
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roblin DW, Zelman D, Plummer S, Robinson BE, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Wolinsky FD, Saag KG, Cram P. Evaluation of a "Just-in-Time" Nurse Consultation on Bone Health: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Perm J 2017; 21:16-112. [PMID: 28746019 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/16-112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Evidence is inconclusive whether a nurse consultation can improve osteoporosis-related patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a nurse consultation immediately after dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) produced better osteoporosis-related outcomes than a simple intervention to activate adults in good bone health practices or usual care. DESIGN Pilot randomized controlled trial, conducted within the larger Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) trial (NCT01507662). After DXA, consenting adults age 50 years or older were randomly assigned to 3 groups: nurse consultation, PAADRN intervention (mailed letter with individualized fracture risk and an educational brochure), or usual care (control). Nurse consultation included reviewing DXA results, counseling on bone health, and ordering needed follow-up tests or physician referrals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change from baseline to 52 weeks in participant-reported osteoporosis-related pharmacotherapy, lifestyle, activation and self-efficacy, and osteoporosis care satisfaction. RESULTS Nurse consultation participants (n = 104) reported 52-week improvements in strengthening and weight-bearing exercise (p = 0.09), calcium intake (p < 0.01), osteoporosis knowledge (p = 0.04), activation (p < 0.01), dietary self-efficacy (p = 0.06), and osteoporosis care satisfaction (p < 0.01). Compared with PAADRN intervention participants (n = 39), nurse consultation participants had improved dietary self-efficacy (p = 0.07) and osteoporosis care satisfaction (p = 0.05). No significant improvements in osteoporosis-related outcomes were achieved vs PAADRN controls (n = 70). CONCLUSION "Just-in-time" nurse consultation yielded a few improvements over 52 weeks in osteoporosis-related outcomes; however, most changes were not different from those obtained through the lower-cost PAADRN intervention or usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas W Roblin
- Professor of Health Management and Policy at Georgia State University School of Public Health and a Consulting Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research in Atlanta.
| | - David Zelman
- At the time of this study was a Rheumatologist with The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Inc, in Atlanta, GA.
| | - Sally Plummer
- At the time of this study was a Consulting Nurse Educator at the Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research in Atlanta, GA.
| | - Brandi E Robinson
- Senior Project Manager at the Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research in Atlanta, GA.
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Biostatistician in the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in Iowa City.
| | - Stephanie W Edmonds
- Graduate Research Assistant in Internal Medicine and a Doctoral Candidate in the College of Nursing at the University of Iowa in Iowa City.
| | - Fredric D Wolinsky
- The John W Colloton Chair in the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in Iowa City.
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Professor of Medicine in the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| | - Peter Cram
- Professor of Internal Medicine in the Division of General Internal Medicine at the University of Toronto and the Director of General Internal Medicine at the University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hall SF, Edmonds SW, Lou Y, Cram P, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Wright NC, Jones MP, Wolinsky FD. Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence to recommended osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2017; 57:503-509. [PMID: 28602783 PMCID: PMC5515491 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As many as one-half of patients recommended for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy do not take their medications. To identify intervention targets, we examined patient characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended pharmacotherapy and their reasons for nonadherence. METHODS Data come from the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study, a randomized controlled trial of 7749 patients aged 50 years or older presenting for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 3 health centers in the United States. We focused on the 790 patients who reported receiving a recommendation for new pharmacotherapy at baseline. Using Pearson chi-squared tests for categorical variables, 2-sample t tests for continuous variables, and multivariable multinomial logistic regression, we compared those who reported starting the recommended medication (adherers) with temporary nonadherers and nonadherers on demographics, health habits, DXA impression, 10-year probability of fracture using the assessment tool, and osteoporosis knowledge, and we examined their stated reasons for nonadherence. RESULTS Mean age was 66.8 years (SD = 8.9); 87.2% were women, and 84.2% were white. One-fourth of patients (24.8%) reported that they did not start their recommended pharmacotherapy. In the unadjusted analyses, the only factor significantly associated with nonadherence was osteoporosis knowledge, with those having better knowledge being less likely to take their medications (P < 0.05). The most common reasons for nonadherence were fear of adverse effects (53.3%), a dislike of taking medicine (25.3%), and the belief that the medication would not help their condition (16.7%). CONCLUSION One in 4 patients recommended for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy declined treatment because they feared potential adverse effects, did not like taking medicine, or believed that the medication would not help their condition. Improved patient counseling on the potential adverse effects of osteoporosis treatment and the risk-benefit ratio for these medications may increase adherence.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cram P, Saag KG, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Wolinsky FD. Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Care 2017; 55:561-568. [PMID: 28288074 PMCID: PMC5432397 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Determining whether observed differences in health care can be called disparities requires persistence of differences after adjustment for relevant patient, provider, and health system factors. We examined whether providing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test results directly to patients might reduce or eliminate racial differences in osteoporosis-related health care. DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES We analyzed data from 3484 white and 1041 black women who underwent DXA testing at 2 health systems participating in the Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) pragmatic clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT-01507662) between February 2012 and August 2014. We examined 7 outcomes related to bone health at 12 weeks and 52 weeks post-DXA: (1) whether the patient correctly identified their DXA baseline results; (2) whether the patient was on guideline-concordant osteoporosis pharmacotherapy; (3) osteoporosis-related satisfaction; (4) osteoporosis knowledge; (5 and 6) osteoporosis self-efficacy for exercise and for diet; and (7) patient activation. We examined whether unadjusted differences in outcomes between whites and blacks persisted after adjusting for patient, provider, and health system factors. RESULTS Mean age was 66.5 years and 29% were black. At baseline black women had less education, poorer health status, and were less likely to report a history of osteoporosis (P<0.001 for all). In unadjusted analyses black women were less likely to correctly identify their actual DXA results, more likely to be on guideline-concordant therapy, and had similar patient activation. After adjustment for patient demographics, baseline health status and other factors, black women were still less likely to know their actual DXA result and less likely to be on guideline-concordant therapy, but black women had greater patient activation. CONCLUSIONS Adjustment for patient and provider level factors can change how racial differences are viewed, unmasking new disparities, and providing explanations for others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - Kenneth G. Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Yiyue Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA
| | - Stephanie W. Edmonds
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA
- University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA
- CADRE, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA
| | - Sylvie F. Hall
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA
| | - Douglas W. Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nicole C. Wright
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Michael P. Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA
| | - Fredric D. Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA
- University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Danila MI, Outman RC, Rahn EJ, Mudano AS, Thomas TF, Redden DT, Allison JJ, Anderson FA, Anderson JP, Cram PM, Curtis JR, Fraenkel L, Greenspan SL, LaCroix AZ, Majumdar SR, Miller MJ, Nieves JW, Safford MM, Silverman SL, Siris ES, Solomon DH, Warriner AH, Watts NB, Yood RA, Saag KG. A multi-modal intervention for Activating Patients at Risk for Osteoporosis (APROPOS): Rationale, design, and uptake of online study intervention material. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2016; 4:14-24. [PMID: 27453960 PMCID: PMC4955389 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Revised: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an innovative and effective educational intervention to inform patients about the need for osteoporosis treatment and to determine factors associated with its online uptake. METHODS Postmenopausal women with a prior fracture and not currently using osteoporosis therapy were eligible to be included in the Activating Patients at Risk for OsteoPOroSis (APROPOS). Four nominal groups with a total of 18 racially/ethnically diverse women identified osteoporosis treatment barriers. We used the Information, Motivation, Behavior Skills conceptual model to develop a direct-to-patient intervention to mitigate potentially modifiable barriers to osteoporosis therapy. The intervention included videos tailored by participants' race/ethnicity and their survey responses: ranked barriers to osteoporosis treatment, deduced barriers to treatment, readiness to behavior change, and osteoporosis treatment history. Videos consisted of "storytelling" narratives, based on osteoporosis patient experiences and portrayed by actresses of patient-identified race/ethnicity. We also delivered personalized brief phone calls followed by an interactive voice-response phone messages aimed to promote uptake of the videos. RESULTS To address the factors associated with online intervention uptake, we focused on participants assigned to the intervention arm (n = 1342). These participants were 92.9% Caucasian, with a mean (SD) age 74.9 (8.0) years and the majority (77.7%) had some college education. Preference for natural treatments was the barrier ranked #1 by most (n = 130; 27%), while concern about osteonecrosis of the jaw was the most frequently reported barrier (at any level; n = 322; 67%). Overall, 28.1% (n = 377) of participants in the intervention group accessed the videos online. After adjusting for relevant covariates, the participants who provided an email address had 6.07 (95% CI 4.53-8.14) higher adjusted odds of accessing their online videos compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION We developed and implemented a novel tailored multi-modal intervention to improve initiation of osteoporosis therapy. An email address provided on the survey was the most important factor independently associated with accessing the intervention online. The design and uptake of this intervention may have implications for future studies in osteoporosis or other chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan C. Outman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Amy S. Mudano
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Jeroan J. Allison
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | - Fred A. Anderson
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Z. LaCroix
- Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA 98112, USA
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | | | - Michael J. Miller
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
| | | | - Monika M. Safford
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Ethel S. Siris
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | | | - Nelson B. Watts
- Mercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, OH 45236, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cram P, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Saag KG. Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27:3513-3524. [PMID: 27363400 PMCID: PMC5572571 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Patients often do not know or understand their bone density test results, and pharmacological treatment rates are low. In a clinical trial of 7749 patients, we used a tailored patient-activation result letter accompanied by a bone health brochure to improve appropriate pharmacological treatment. Treatment rates, however, did not improve. INTRODUCTION Patients often do not know or understand their dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test results, which may lead to suboptimal care. We tested whether usual care augmented by a tailored patient-activation DXA result letter accompanied by an educational brochure would improve guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment compared to usual care only. METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, pragmatic clinical trial at three health care centers in the USA. We randomized 7749 patients ≥50 years old and presenting for DXA between February 2012 and August 2014. The primary clinical endpoint at 12 and 52 weeks post-DXA was receiving guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment. We also examined four of the steps along the pathway from DXA testing to that clinical endpoint, including (1) receiving and (2) understanding their DXA results and (3) having subsequent contact with their provider and (4) discussing their results and options. RESULTS Mean age was 66.6 years, 83.8 % were women, and 75.3 % were non-Hispanic whites. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment was not improved at either 12 weeks (65.1 vs. 64.3 %, p = 0.506) or 52 weeks (65.2 vs. 63.8 %, p = 0.250) post-DXA, even though patients in the intervention group were more likely (all p < 0.001) to recall receiving their DXA results letter at 12 weeks, correctly identify their results at 12 and 52 weeks, have contact with their provider at 52 weeks, and have discussed their results with their provider at 12 and 52 weeks. CONCLUSION A tailored DXA result letter and educational brochure failed to improve guideline-concordant care in patients who received DXA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - F D Wolinsky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- The University of Iowa, 145 North Riverside Drive, CPHB N211, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Y Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S W Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
- University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S F Hall
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - D W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, 30305, USA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - N C Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M P Jones
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Wright NC, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure. Perm J 2016; 21:16-024. [PMID: 28080957 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/16-024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Patient education materials can provide important information related to osteoporosis prevention and treatment. However, available osteoporosis education materials fail to follow best-practice guidelines for patient education. OBJECTIVE To develop an educational brochure on bone health for adults aged 50 years and older using mixed-method, semistructured interviews. DESIGN This project consisted of 3 phases. In Phase 1, we developed written content that included information about osteoporosis. Additionally, we designed 2 graphic-rich brochures, Brochure A (photographs) and Brochure B (illustrations). In Phase 2, interviewers presented the text-only document and both brochure designs to 53 participants from an academic Medical Center in the Midwest and an outpatient clinic in the Southeastern region of the US. Interviewers used open- and closed-ended questions to elicit opinions regarding the brochures. In Phase 3, using feedback from Phase 2, we revised the brochure and presented it to 11 participants at a third site in the Southeastern US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants' comprehension of brochure text and acceptability of brochure design. RESULTS We enrolled 64 participants. Most were women, white, and college-educated, with an average age of 66.1 years. Participants were able to restate the basic content of the brochure and preferred Brochure A's use of photographs. CONCLUSIONS Using feedback from older adults, we developed and refined a brochure for communicating bone health information to older adults at risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The methods outlined in this article may serve to guide others in developing health educational brochures for chronic medical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W Edmonds
- Project Coordinator and a Doctoral Candidate at the College of Nursing, University of Iowa in Iowa City and a Veterans Affairs Quality Scholar at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
| | - Samantha L Solimeo
- Assistant Professor at the Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa and an Investigator at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
| | - Vu-Thuy Nguyen
- Graduate Research Assistant and Doctoral Candidate at the College of Public Health, University of Iowa in Iowa City.
| | - Nicole C Wright
- Assistant Professor in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Professor at the School of Public Health at Georgia State University and a Consulting Research Scientist with the Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research at Kaiser Permanente in Atlanta.
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Professor of Medicine in the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| | - Peter Cram
- Director of the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics at University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital and a Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lou Y, Jones MP, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD. Effects of a DXA result letter on satisfaction, quality of life, and osteoporosis knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:369. [PMID: 27562713 PMCID: PMC5000520 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1227-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Undiagnosed, or diagnosed and untreated osteoporosis (OP) increases the likelihood that falls result in hip fractures, decreased quality of life (QOL), and significant medical expenditures among older adults. We tested whether a tailored dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test result letter and an accompanying educational bone-health brochure affected patient satisfaction, QOL, or OP knowledge. Methods The Patient Activation after DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study was a double-blinded, pragmatic, randomized trial which enrolled patients from 2012 to 2014. We randomized 7,749 patients presenting for DXA at three health care institutions in the United States who were ≥ 50 years old and able to understand English. Intervention patients received a tailored letter four weeks after DXA containing their results, 10-year fracture risk, and a bone-health educational brochure. Control patients received the results of their DXA per the usual practices of their providers and institutions. Satisfaction with bone health care, QOL, and OP knowledge were assessed at baseline and 12- and 52-weeks after DXA. Intention-to-treat analyses used multiple imputation for missing data and random effects regression models to adjust for clustering within providers and covariates. Results At 12-weeks 6,728 (86.8 %) and at 52-weeks 6,103 participants (78.8 %) completed their follow-up interviews. The intervention group was more satisfied with their bone health care compared to the usual care group at both their 12- and 52-week follow-ups (standardized effect size = 0.28 at 12-weeks and 0.17 at 52-weeks, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the intervention and usual care groups in QOL or OP knowledge at either time point. Conclusions A tailored DXA result letter and bone-health educational brochure sent to patients improved patient satisfaction with bone-related health care. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01507662 First received: December 8, 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W Edmonds
- Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 5231 Westlawn, IA 52242, Iowa City, IA, USA. .,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Division of General Internal Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yiyue Lou
- College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Michael P Jones
- College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente, Atlanta, GA, USA.,School of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nicole C Wright
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Fredric D Wolinsky
- Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 5231 Westlawn, IA 52242, Iowa City, IA, USA.,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,College of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients are increasingly being given access to their test results, but little is known about how preferences vary with the test under consideration or the results of the test (normal or abnormal). OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to examine preferences for test result communication. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We surveyed adults to explore their preferences for test result notification for three common diagnostic tests of varying "emotional impact" (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], genital herpes, and cancer biopsy) when test results were 1) normal and 2) abnormal. We conducted our survey between June and August 2012 on the campus of an academic medical center. For each scenario, subjects were asked to rank seven methods that might be used to communicate test results (letter, unsecured email, secured email, text message, telephone call, secure Web portal, office visit) in order of acceptability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main measures were the percentage of respondents who ranked a particular test result notification method favorably and the percentage who ranked it as unacceptable. RESULTS When test results were normal, subjects' notification preferences were generally similar for DXA, herpes and cancer biopsy, with telephone and letter ranked most favorably for all three tests. Conversely, text message and unsecured email were viewed as unacceptable notification methods for normal results by 45.0-55.0 % of subjects across all three tests. When test results were abnormal, office visits became more popular. A higher proportion of subjects ranked office visits as their most preferred notification method for our test with high "emotional impact" (cancer biopsy) (38.4 %) as compared to DXA (28.2 %) and herpes (27.9 %) (P = 0.02). For most test scenarios, younger subjects appeared to rank electronic communication modalities (secure email or Web portal) higher than older subjects, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS Preferences for test result notification can differ substantially depending upon the test under consideration and results of the test. Providers and health care systems should consider these factors when deciding how to communicate results to patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lu X, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Saag KG, Solimeo SL. Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014; 14:101. [PMID: 25743200 PMCID: PMC4260260 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-014-0101-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To determine patients’ preferences for, and understanding of, FRAX® fracture risk conveyed through illustrations. Methods Drawing on examples from published studies, four illustrations of fracture risk were designed and tested for patient preference, ease of understanding, and perceived risk. We enrolled a convenience sample of adults aged 50 and older at two medical clinics located in the Midwestern and Southern United States. In-person structured interviews were conducted to elicit patient ranking of preference, ease of understanding, and perceived risk for each illustration. Results Most subjects (n = 142) were female (64%), Caucasian (76%) and college educated (78%). Of the four risk depictions, a plurality of participants (37%) listed a bar graph as most preferred. Subjects felt this illustration used the stoplight color system to display risk levels well and was the most “clear,” “clean,” and “easy to read”. The majority of subjects (52%) rated the pictogram as the most difficult to understand as this format does not allow people to quickly ascertain their individual risk category. Conclusions Communicating risk to patients with illustrations can be done effectively with clearly designed illustrations responsive to patient preference. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01507662
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W Edmonds
- Division of General Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. .,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Peter Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Xin Lu
- Division of General Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Nicole C Wright
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Samantha L Solimeo
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Lu X, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014; 8:827-41. [PMID: 24940049 PMCID: PMC4051798 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s60106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To use a mixed-methods approach to develop a letter that can be used to notify patients of their bone mineral density (BMD) results by mail that may activate patients in their bone-related health care. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team developed three versions of a letter for reporting BMD results to patients. Trained interviewers presented these letters in a random order to a convenience sample of adults, aged 50 years and older, at two different health care systems. We conducted structured interviews to examine the respondents' preferences and comprehension among the various letters. RESULTS A total of 142 participants completed the interview. A majority of the participants were female (64.1%) and white (76.1%). A plurality of the participants identified a specific version of the three letters as both their preferred version (45.2%; P<0.001) and as the easiest to understand (44.6%; P<0.01). A majority of participants preferred that the letters include specific next steps for improving their bone health. CONCLUSION Using a mixed-methods approach, we were able to develop and optimize a printed letter for communicating a complex test result (BMD) to patients. Our results may offer guidance to clinicians, administrators, and researchers who are looking for guidance on how to communicate complex health information to patients in writing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W Edmonds
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Correspondence: Stephanie W Edmonds, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Internal Medicine, C44-G GH, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA, Tel +1 319 356 1761, Fax +1 319 356 1229, Email
| | - Samantha L Solimeo
- Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Xin Lu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Douglas W Roblin
- Kaiser Permanente of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peter Cram
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|