The MANDELA study: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial to refine the use of everolimus after heart transplantation

[Heart transplantation : Current situation]

Heart transplantation is the gold-standard in the treatment of terminal heart failure. The shortage of donor hearts represents the major obstacle in patient care and necessitates the creation of waiting lists and allocation algorithms. The Transplantation Act regulates donor heart allocation according to the urgency and the prospects of success. Donor hearts can be implanted following the classical biatrial or the modern bicaval valve implantation technique with a slightly lower spectrum of complications. Modern mechanical perfusion systems enable extended transport times. After heart transplantation rejection reactions must be controlled by an individually adjusted immunosuppression to guarantee long-term survival with as few complications as possible.

Comparing everolimus-based immunosuppression with reduction or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor reduction from six months after heart transplantation: the randomized MANDELA study

In the 12-month, open-label MANDELA study, patients were randomized at month 6 after heart transplantation to (i) convert to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression with everolimus (EVR), mycophenolic acid and steroids (CNI-free, n=71), or to (ii) continue reduced-exposure CNI, with EVR and steroids (EVR/redCNI, n=74). Tacrolimus was administered in 48.8% of EVR/redCNI patients and 52.6% of CNI-free patients at radomization. Both strategies improved and stabilized renal function based on the primary endpoint (estimated GFR at month 18 post-transplant post-randomization) with superiority of the CNI-free group versus EVR/redCNI : mean 64.1mL/min/1.73m2 versus 52.9mL/min/1.73m2 ; difference +11.3mL/min/1.73m2 (p<0.001). By month 18, estimated GFR had increased by ≥10mL/min/1.732 in 31.8% and 55.2% of EVR/redCNI and CNI-free patients, respectively, and by ≥25 mL/min/1.73m2 in 4.5% and 20.9%. Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 6.8% and 21.1%; all cases were without hemodynamic compromise. BPAR was less frequent with EVR/redCNI versus the CNI-free regimen (p=0.015); 6/15 episodes in CNI-free patients occurred with EVR concentration <5ng/mL. Rates of adverse events and associated discontinuations were comparable EVR/redCNI from month 6 achieved stable renal function with infrequent BPAR. One-year renal function can be improved by early conversion to EVR-based CNI-free therapy but requires close EVR monitoring. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Everolimus immunosuppression for renal protection, reduction of allograft vasculopathy and prevention of allograft rejection in de-novo heart transplant recipients: could we have it all?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

De-novo introduction of everolimus (Eve) in heart transplant recipients opens for early reduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and potential of preserving renal function, attenuate progression of coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and maintain rejection efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first trials demonstrated adequate rejection prophylaxis and favorable outcomes on CAV, but observed enhanced nephrotoxicity because of insufficient CNI reduction. The SCHEDULE trial compared de-novo Eve with significantly reduced CNI exposure and conversion to CNI-free treatment week 7-11 postheart transplant, with standard CNI immunosuppression. Improved renal function and attenuation of CAV was found among Eve patients, with higher numbers of treated acute rejections observed. With sustained superior renal and CAV related data also after 36 months with the Eve protocol, cardiac function was equally well preserved in both groups. According to the International Society of Heart and Lunge Transplantation registry, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor treatment is uncommon during the first postoperative year, with a prevalence of 20% in patients after 5 years.

SUMMARY

Current evidence suggests a greater benefit from these immunosuppressives if introduced at an earlier timepoint. Immunosuppressive protocols based on Eve treatment in de-novo patients should be further investigated and developed, enabling CNI avoidance before accelerating side-effects lead to irreversible damage.

The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (N = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (N = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (p < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.