Differing antidepressant maintenance methodologies

Association between duration of antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder and relapse rate after discontinuation: A meta-analysis

The optimal duration of antidepressant treatment for patients with major depressive disorder to reduce the risk of relapse after discontinuation remains uncertain. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a discontinuation design. A single-group summary meta-analysis was performed to calculate 6-month relapse rates after discontinuation. Meta-regression with restricted cubic splines was performed to model the non-linear relationship between treatment duration and relapse rate after discontinuation. Thirty-five RCTs were included. The relapse rate after discontinuation was approximately 34.81 % at 6 months and 45.12 % at 12 months. After controlling for covariates, the meta-analysis shows that the duration of treatment is associated with the risk of relapse after discontinuation in a non-linear curve, with a relatively higher risk of relapse observed for a duration of less than three months. There appears to be no further reduction in the risk of relapse when treatment is continued for over six months. Our results indicate the importance of at least three months of treatment to avoid the relatively high risk of relapse after discontinuation. The additional benefit of longer treatment remains to be proven.

Vortioxetine 5, 10, and 20 mg significantly reduces the risk of relapse compared with placebo in patients with remitted major depressive disorder: The RESET study

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) is typically recommended at the dose on which the patient was stabilized. However, for some patients, dose alteration may be required. We investigated multiple vortioxetine doses versus placebo for relapse prevention in patients achieving remission with vortioxetine 10 mg daily.

METHODS

In this US-based, randomized withdrawal study, outpatients (N = 1106, aged 18-75 years) with recurrent MDD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≥26), a current major depressive episode (MDE) (8 weeks-18 months' duration), and ≥2 previous MDEs were treated with open-label vortioxetine 10 mg once daily orally for 16 weeks. Responders at week 8 (≥50% MADRS score reduction) achieving remission (MADRS score ≤12) at weeks 14 and 16 (N = 580) were randomized to vortioxetine 5, 10, or 20 mg or placebo in a 32-week double-blind period. The primary outcome was time to first relapse over the first 28 weeks; secondary outcomes (relapse, change in total MADRS, Clinician Global Impression-Severity [CGI-S]) were evaluated at 32 weeks.

RESULTS

Time to relapse was longer and cumulative relapse rates were lower for vortioxetine 5 mg (19.3%), 10 mg (17.9%), and 20 mg (17.4%) versus placebo (32.5%) over 28 weeks (p<0.05 for all). CGI-S scores remained stable and adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate.

LIMITATIONS

Extrapolation of results to patients achieving remission with vortioxetine doses other than 10 mg should be made with caution.

CONCLUSION

For patients with MDD achieving symptomatic remission at 10 mg/day, all doses of vortioxetine were effective for relapse prevention, with acceptable tolerability.

A novel study design for investigating relapse prevention in major depressive disorder: Preliminary data from the open-label period of a phase 4 vortioxetine study

BACKGROUND

Traditional randomized withdrawal studies have assessed the efficacy of antidepressants for reducing relapse and recurrence of major depressive episodes (MDEs) but have not compared dose reduction, increase, or maintenance within the same study.

METHODS

Here we present the development, implementation, and preliminary data from the open-label period of an ongoing phase 4, non-traditional, randomized withdrawal study. Designed to evaluate the efficacy of vortioxetine across its approved dose range for relapse prevention, the study enrolled adult patients with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) ≥ 26, and history of ≥2 MDEs. After a 16-week, open-label, fixed-dose (vortioxetine 10 mg once daily) period, patients meeting response criteria (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score, Weeks 8-16) and remission criteria (MADRS total score ≤12, Weeks 14 and 16) were randomized to vortioxetine 5, 10, or 20 mg, or placebo in a 32-week double-blind treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 1106 patients enrolled, 510 completed the open-label period (mean age: 45.7 years; mean MADRS = 5.0; predominantly female, white, and never smokers) and were eligible for randomization in the ongoing double-blind period.

LIMITATIONS

Study is ongoing; only data from the open-label period are available for evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary analysis suggests that patient baseline characteristics were not a factor in response to and stabilization with vortioxetine during the open-label period. The lack of flexibility in dosing, however, may have reduced the number of patients qualifying for randomization. This study design may provide useful information for optimizing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine treatment for MDD.

Popular Herbal and Natural Remedies Used in Psychiatry

Natural and herbal remedies, also known as "alternative" or "complementary" medicines, have grown tremendously in popularity over the past two decades, becoming a major component of health care and general wellness in the United States and worldwide. The ready availability of these remedies over the counter and their generally good tolerability and safety contribute to this popularity, and many people have benefited from them, often in cases when conventional treatments have failed or caused intolerable side effects. Despite many Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved psychotropic medications on the market, efficacy has been inconsistent for some, and many treatment responders will eventually relapse. Continued research on the efficacy and safety of these alternative therapies is, therefore, important. This article reviews six of the most commonly used natural remedies for psychiatric conditions, including the antidepressants St. John's wort, omega-3 fatty acids, and S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe); the sedative-hypnotics valerian and melatonin; and the nootropic ginkgo biloba. We outline the general indications for use, suggested doses, possible mechanisms, and adverse effects to give clinicians a good summary of the benefits and liabilities of each. Although there is growing evidence of efficacy and safety to support the use of these remedies, clinicians must be aware of the limitations of the evidence base and take that into account with all the other factors that contribute to clinical decision making.

Current Role of Herbal and Natural Preparations

Depression remains difficult to manage, despite the many registered treatments available. For many depressed individuals, particularly those who have not responded to and/or had adverse effects from standard therapies, herbal and natural medications represent a potentially valuable alternative. This chapter will review several natural remedies used in the treatment of depression. Specific remedies covered include St. John's wort (SJW), S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe), omega-3 fatty acids, rhodiola, and others. We will begin by providing some historical and social context about these remedies. Then we will review efficacy and safety data, as well as biological mechanisms of action of these therapies. Finally, we will discuss the limitations of the current state of knowledge and provide suggestions for a productive research agenda focused on natural remedies. While many questions about these treatments remain unanswered and much work needs to be done before we determine their place in the psychiatric armamentarium, we believe that this chapter will give psychiatrists a good perspective on the pros and cons of herbal and natural antidepressants as part of the pharmacological armamentarium and sensible guidelines on how and when they should be used.