Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: Protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial

Development and refinement of a novel end-of-life planning website for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods approach

PURPOSE

Despite known benefits of planning for end-of-life, no digital tool exists to help patients with advanced cancer and their loved ones plan for death comprehensively. To address this unmet need, we developed a preliminary version of an innovative website to help patients with advanced cancer prepare for end-of-life tasks.

METHODS

Guided by the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model for behavioral intervention development, patients with advanced cancer (n = 10) and their caregivers (n = 10) participated in a "Think Aloud" exercise and usability protocols to optimize the end-of-life planning website. The website was iteratively refined throughout the study in collaboration with the partnering company, Peacefully, Inc. Participants also completed the Acceptability E-Scale and System Usability Scale, with a priori benchmarks established for acceptability (scores of ≥ 24 on the Acceptability E-Scale) and usability (scores of ≥ 68 on the System Usability Scale).

RESULTS

Patients (N = 10) and caregivers (N = 10) completed usability testing. Patients were majority female (80%), White (100%), and had a mean age of 58 years. Caregivers (N = 10) were majority male (60%), spouse/partner (90%), White (90%), and had a mean age of 59 years. For patients, a priori hypotheses were met for both acceptability (mean score of 24.7, SD = 4.35) and usability (mean score of 73.8, SD = 6.15). For caregivers, acceptability was just below the cutoff (mean score of 22.9, SD = 4.07) and usability exceeded the cutoff (mean score of 70.0, SD = 8.42). Overall, patients and caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and found the website helpful, with specific suggestions for changes (e.g., add more information about information security, improve text legibility).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study will inform modifications to optimize an innovative website to support patients with advanced cancer to prepare holistically for end-of-life tasks.

Understanding of Health-related Decision-making Terminology Among Cancer Caregivers

Research on understanding health-related decision-making terminology among family caregivers of adults living with advanced cancer is lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine interpretations of the meaning of health-related decision-making terminology such as quality-of-life and end-of-life among caregivers of adults living with advanced cancer as a basis for improved understanding of caregiver decision support needs. Interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 10 caregivers of adults diagnosed with advanced cancer who completed a longitudinal, descriptive study (NRO14856) of factors influencing cancer care decisions. Audio transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Caregivers described interpretations of the meaning and process of decision-making and decision-related distress. Caregivers were uncertain about the meaning of end-of-life-related terminology, and a placed high value on quality-of-life and faith/spirituality in the decision-making process. Improvements in information and decision support interventions are needed to better support caregivers and subsequently patients towards informed cancer care decisions.