1
|
Orchard SG, Lockery JE, Broder JC, Ernst ME, Espinoza S, Gibbs P, Wolfe R, Polekhina G, Zoungas S, Loomans-Kropp HA, Woods RL. Association of metformin, aspirin, and cancer incidence with mortality risk in adults with diabetes. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad017. [PMID: 36857596 PMCID: PMC10042437 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metformin and aspirin are commonly co-prescribed to people with diabetes. Metformin may prevent cancer, but in older people (over 70 years), aspirin has been found to increase cancer mortality. This study examined whether metformin reduces cancer mortality and incidence in older people with diabetes; it used randomization to 100 mg aspirin or placebo in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial to quantify aspirin's impact on metformin users. METHODS Analysis included community-dwelling ASPREE participants (aged ≥70 years, or ≥65 years for members of US minority populations) with diabetes. Diabetes was defined as a fasting blood glucose level greater than 125 mg/dL, self-report of diabetes, or antidiabetic medication use. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the association of metformin and a metformin-aspirin interaction with cancer incidence and mortality, with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS Of 2045 participants with diabetes at enrollment, 965 were concurrently using metformin. Metformin was associated with a reduced cancer incidence risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51 to 0.90), but no conclusive benefit for cancer mortality (adjusted HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.43 to 1.19). Metformin users randomized to aspirin had greater risk of cancer mortality compared with placebo (HR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.18 to 5.43), but no effect was seen for cancer incidence (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.64). The possible effect modification of aspirin on cancer mortality, however, was not statistically significant (interaction P = .11). CONCLUSIONS In community-dwelling older adults with diabetes, metformin use was associated with reduced cancer incidence. Increased cancer mortality risk in metformin users randomized to aspirin warrants further investigation. ASPREE TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01038583.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne G Orchard
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica E Lockery
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
- Translational Immunology and Nanotechnology Research Theme, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan C Broder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| | - Michael E Ernst
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy and Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sara Espinoza
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology and Palliative Medicine, Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center, and Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Peter Gibbs
- The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| | - Galina Polekhina
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| | - Holli A Loomans-Kropp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Robyn L Woods
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne,VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cancer Treatment Patterns and Factors Affecting Receipt of Treatment in Older Adults: Results from the ASPREE Cancer Treatment Substudy (ACTS). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041017. [PMID: 36831362 PMCID: PMC9953887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer treatment planning in older adults is complex and requires careful balancing of survival, quality of life benefits, and risk of treatment-related morbidity and toxicity. As a result, treatment selection in this cohort tends to differ from that for younger patients. However, there are very few studies describing cancer treatment patterns in older cohorts. METHODS We used data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial and the ASPREE Cancer Treatment Substudy (ACTS) to describe cancer treatment patterns in older adults. We used a multivariate logistic regression model to identify factors affecting receipt of treatment. RESULTS Of 1893 eligible Australian and United States (US) participants with incident cancer, 1569 (81%) received some form of cancer treatment. Non-metastatic breast cancers most frequently received treatment (98%), while haematological malignancy received the lowest rates of treatment (60%). Factors associated with not receiving treatment were older age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), residence in the US (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.54), smoking (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.81), and diabetes (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80). After adjustment for treatment patterns in sex-specific cancers, sex did not impact receipt of treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study is one of the first describing cancer treatment patterns and factors affecting receipt of treatment across common cancer types in older adults. We found that most older adults with cancer received some form of cancer treatment, typically surgery or systemic therapy, although this varied by factors such as cancer type, age, sex, and country of residence.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yan MK, Orchard SG, Adler NR, Wolfe R, McLean C, Rodríguez LM, Woods RL, Gibbs P, Chan AT, Haydon A, Mar VJ. Association between hypertension and cutaneous melanoma, and the effect of aspirin: extended follow-up of a large randomised controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102173. [PMID: 35567859 PMCID: PMC10026004 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between hypertension and melanoma is unclear, and previous analyses of data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study demonstrated a reduced number of invasive melanoma events amongst aspirin-exposed hypertensive individuals. METHODS Data from the ASPREE study which included (1) the intervention period with a median follow-up of 4.7 years, and (2) the observational period with an additional 2 years follow-up, were combined for this analysis. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between baseline hypertension and treatment status and past melanoma history. Survival analyses examined the association between hypertension and melanoma risk, and the effect of aspirin across hypertension groups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare incidence across groups. RESULTS 19,114 participants (median age of 74 years) were randomised to daily 100 mg aspirin or placebo. At baseline, hypertension and past melanoma history were recorded in 14,195 and 685 individuals, respectively. After adjustment for confounders, hypertension was significantly associated with past melanoma history (OR=1.34, 95%CI: 1.11-1.62). In a prospective analysis, baseline hypertension was not associated with melanoma risk. However, aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of incident melanoma amongst individuals with uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg; HR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44-0.89), but not in those with controlled hypertension (HR=1.04, 95%CI 0.74-1.46). CONCLUSION Our results support a reduced melanoma incidence amongst individuals with uncontrolled hypertension exposed to aspirin. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel K Yan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Victorian Melanoma Service, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
| | - Suzanne G Orchard
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Nikki R Adler
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Catriona McLean
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Luz María Rodríguez
- Gastrointestinal and Other Cancers Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMM) Uniformed Services University (USU) Department of Surgery, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robyn L Woods
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, University of Melbourne,1 G Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Victoria J Mar
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Victorian Melanoma Service, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bakshi A, Cao Y, Orchard SG, Carr PR, Joshi AD, Manning AK, Buchanan DD, Umar A, Winship IM, Gibbs P, Zalcberg JR, Macrae F, McNeil J, Lacaze P, Chan AT. Aspirin and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer According to Genetic Susceptibility among Older Individuals. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:447-454. [PMID: 35348611 PMCID: PMC9256779 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Although aspirin has been considered a promising agent for prevention of colorectal cancer, recent data suggest a lack of benefit among older individuals. Whether some individuals with higher risk of colorectal cancer may benefit from aspirin remains unknown. We used a 95-variant colorectal cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) to explore the association between genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer and aspirin use in a prospective study of 12,609 individuals of European descent ages ≥70 years, enrolled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial (randomized controlled trial; RCT). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of aspirin use on colorectal cancer, as well as the interaction between the PRS and aspirin treatment on colorectal cancer. Over a median of 4.7 years follow-up, 143 participants were diagnosed with incident colorectal cancer. Aspirin assignment was not associated with incidence of colorectal cancer overall [HR = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.30] or within strata of PRS (P for interaction = 0.97). However, the PRS was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (HR = 1.28 per SD; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51). Individuals in the top quintile of the PRS distribution had an 85% higher risk compared with individuals in the bottom quintile (HR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.15). In a prospective RCT of older individuals, a PRS is associated with incident colorectal cancer risk, but aspirin use was not associated with a reduction of incident colorectal cancer, regardless of baseline genetic risk. PREVENTION RELEVANCE There is strong evidence to support prophylactic aspirin use for the prevention of colorectal cancer. However recent recommendations suggest the risk of bleeding in older individuals outweighs the benefit. We sought to determine whether some older individuals might still benefit from aspirin based on their genetic susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bakshi
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yin Cao
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Suzanne G. Orchard
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Prudence R. Carr
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amit D. Joshi
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - Alisa K Manning
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Asad Umar
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia,Department of Medicine (RMH),The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - John R. Zalcberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia,Department of Medicine (RMH),The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - John McNeil
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Lacaze
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3004 Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fan B, Mohammed A, Huang Y, Luo H, Zhang H, Tao S, Xu W, Liu Q, He T, Jin H, Sun M, Sun M, Yun Z, Zhao R, Wu G, Li X. Can Aspirin Use Be Associated With the Risk or Prognosis of Bladder Cancer? A Case-Control Study and Meta-analytic Assessment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:633462. [PMID: 34350107 PMCID: PMC8327774 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.633462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Aspirin, widely used to prevent cardiovascular disease, had been linked to the incidence of bladder cancer (BCa). Existing studies focusing on Chinese populations are relatively rare, especially for Northeast China. Meanwhile, relevant studies on the effects of aspirin on the occurrence or prognosis of BCa are inconsistent or even controversial. First, in the case control study, logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between aspirin intake and risk of BCa including 1121 patients with BCa and the 2242 controls. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analyses were applied to explore the association between aspirin intake and clinicopathological factors which may predict overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of BCa patients. Finally, we quantificationally combined the results with those from the published literature evaluating aspirin intake and its effects on the occurrence, outcome of surgery and prognosis of BCa by meta-analysis up to May 1, 2021.Our case-control study demonstrated that the regular use of aspirin was not associated with a reduced incidence of BCa (P=0.175). Stratified analyses of sex showed that aspirin intake did not lead to a lower risk of BCa in female patients (P=0.063). However, the male population who regularly took aspirin had a lower incidence of BCa (OR=0.748, 95% CI= 0.584-0.958, P=0.021). Subgroup analyses stratified by smoking found a significant reduction in the risk of BCa in current smokers with aspirin intake (OR=0.522, 95% CI=0.342-0.797, P=0.002). In terms of prognosis of BCa, patients with a history of aspirin intake did not had a markedly longer OS or RFS than those with no history of aspirin intake by Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified analysis by sex showed no correlation between aspirin intake and the recurrence or survival of BCa for either male or female patients. However, in people younger than 68, aspirin intake seemed to have prolonged effects for overall survival (HR=3.876; 95% CI=1.326-11.325, P=0.019). Then, we performed a meta-analysis and the combined results from 19 articles and our study involving more than 39524 BCa cases indicated that aspirin intake was not associated with the occurrence of BCa (P=0.671). Subgroup analysis by whether regular use of aspirin, by the mean duration of use of aspirin, by sex, by smoking exposure, by research region and by study type also supported the above results. In terms of the impact of aspirin intake on the prognosis of patients with BCa, 11 articles and our study involving 8825 BCa cases were eligible. The combined results showed that patients with aspirin intake did not have significantly influence on survival, recurrence, progression and metastasis than those without aspirin intake. On the whole, both our retrospective study and literature meta-analysis suggested a lack of a strong relevant association between the use of aspirin and the incidence or prognosis of BCa. Thus, additional long-term follow-up prospective research is warranted to clarify the association of aspirin with BCa incidence and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Alradhi Mohammed
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yuanbin Huang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hongxian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shenghua Tao
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Weijiao Xu
- Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Medical Imaging, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Tao He
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Huidan Jin
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
| | - Mengfan Sun
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan College of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Man Sun
- Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhifei Yun
- Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Rui Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan College of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guoyu Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xiancheng Li
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genomic Risk Prediction for Breast Cancer in Older Women. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143533. [PMID: 34298747 PMCID: PMC8305131 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We designed a study specifically to assess the performance of genomic risk prediction for breast cancer (BC) in older women aged ≥70 years. We assessed the effects of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for BC and rare pathogenic variants (PVs) in BC susceptibility genes, on incident BC risk in a prospective cohort of 6339 older women (mean age 75 years). During a median follow-up time of 4.7 years, the PRS was an independent predictor of incident BC risk, with women in the top quintile of the PRS distribution having over two-fold higher incident BC risk than women in the lowest quintile. Among 41 carriers of PVs in BC susceptibility genes, we observed no incident BC diagnoses. Our study demonstrates that a PRS still predicts incident BC risk in women aged 70 years and older, suggesting the potential clinical utility of the PRS extends to this older age group. Abstract Genomic risk prediction models for breast cancer (BC) have been predominantly developed with data from women aged 40–69 years. Prospective studies of older women aged ≥70 years have been limited. We assessed the effect of a 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) for BC in 6339 older women aged ≥70 years (mean age 75 years) enrolled into the ASPREE trial, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of daily 100 mg aspirin on disability-free survival. We evaluated incident BC diagnoses over a median follow-up time of 4.7 years. A multivariable Cox regression model including conventional BC risk factors was applied to prospective data, and re-evaluated after adding the PRS. We also assessed the association of rare pathogenic variants (PVs) in BC susceptibility genes (BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2/CHEK2/ATM). The PRS, as a continuous variable, was an independent predictor of incident BC (hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.6) and hormone receptor (ER/PR)-positive disease (HR = 1.5 (CI 1.2–1.9)). Women in the top quintile of the PRS distribution had over two-fold higher risk of BC than women in the lowest quintile (HR = 2.2 (CI 1.2–3.9)). The concordance index of the model without the PRS was 0.62 (95% CI 0.56–0.68), which improved after addition of the PRS to 0.65 (95% CI 0.59–0.71). Among 41 (0.6%) carriers of PVs in BC susceptibility genes, we observed no incident BC diagnoses. Our study demonstrates that a PRS predicts incident BC risk in women aged 70 years and older, suggesting potential clinical utility extends to this older age group.
Collapse
|