Delayed vs. Early Appendectomy (DELAY) trial for adult patients with acute appendicitis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night.

BACKGROUND

Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute appendicitis who present at night frequently have surgery delayed until the after morning.

METHODS

The delay trial is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 22 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Adults with imaging confirmed acute appendicitis who presented at night (8:00 pm -4:00 am ). Delaying surgery until after 6:00 am was compared with immediate surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications. An a prior noninferiority margin of 15% was deemed clinically relevant.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven of the planned 140 patients were enrolled in the Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy (DELAY) trial (59 in the delayed group and 68 in the immediate group). The two groups were similar at baseline. The mean time between the decision to operate and surgery was longer in the delayed group (11.0 vs 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001). The primary outcome occurred in 6/59 (10.2%) of those in the delayed group versus 15/67 (22.4%) of those in the immediate group ( P = 0.07). The difference between groups met the a priori noninferiority criteria of +15% (risk difference -12.2%, 95% CI: -24.4% to +0.4%, test of noninferiority P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DELAY study is the first trial to assess delaying appendectomy in those with acute appendicitis. We demonstrate the noninferiority of delaying surgery until the after morning.

Expedited Surgical Care of Appendicitis is Associated With Improved Resource Utilization

INTRODUCTION

Appendectomy for acute appendicitis is the most common pediatric intra-abdominal operation. Current literature supports the notion that modest in-hospital, preoperative delays are not associated with greater patient morbidity. However, there is less certainty regarding the role that hour-of-presentation plays in determining the timing of surgery. Thus, we aimed to evaluate how after-hours presentation may relate to the timing of surgery and to assess the outcomes and resource utilization associated with expedited appendectomy compared to nonexpedited.

METHODS

Patient records for children who underwent an appendectomy at a freestanding pediatric hospital from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Business hour presentations were defined as arrival at the emergency department from 7 AM to 6 PM. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), cost derived from the Pediatric Health Information System database, perforation, surgical complications, and 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

Nine hundred forty-two patients underwent appendectomy over the study period. The median time to OR was 2.0 h in the expedited cohort and 9.8 h in the nonexpedited group. Presentation during business hours was associated with 4.4 higher odds (P < 0.001) of expedited workflow. Expedited appendectomies were associated with shorter hospital LOS (11.5 h, P < 0.001), less costly admissions ($1,155, P < 0.001); LOS measured in midnights, perforation and readmission rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found reduced resource utilization associated with expedited appendectomy. Additionally, the demonstrated association between the time of presentation to the emergency department (ED) and the timing of surgery may be utilized to inform staffing and resource deployment decisions. Further research regarding the generalizability and sustainability of an expedited presurgical workflow in pediatric appendectomy is certainly indicated.

Revisiting delayed appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common acute abdomen, and appendectomy is the most common nonelective surgery performed worldwide. Despite the long history of understanding this disease and enhancements to medical care, many challenges remain in the diagnosis and treatment of AA. One of these challenges is the timing of appendectomy. In recent decades, extensive studies focused on this topic have been conducted, but there have been no conclusive answers. From the onset of symptoms to appendectomy, many factors can cause delay in the surgical intervention. Some are inevitable, and some can be modified and improved. The favorable and unfavorable results of these factors vary according to different situations. The purpose of this review is to discuss the causes of appendectomy delay and its risk-related costs. This review also explores strategies to balance the positive and negative effects of delayed appendectomy.