Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit

Bacterial chromatin proteins, transcription, and DNA topology: Inseparable partners in the control of gene expression

DNA in bacterial chromosomes is organized into higher-order structures by DNA-binding proteins called nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) or bacterial chromatin proteins (BCPs). BCPs often bind to or near DNA loci transcribed by RNA polymerase (RNAP) and can either increase or decrease gene expression. To understand the mechanisms by which BCPs alter transcription, one must consider both steric effects and the topological forces that arise when DNA deviates from its fully relaxed double-helical structure. Transcribing RNAP creates DNA negative (-) supercoils upstream and positive (+) supercoils downstream whenever RNAP and DNA are unable to rotate freely. This (-) and (+) supercoiling generates topological forces that resist forward translocation of DNA through RNAP unless the supercoiling is constrained by BCPs or relieved by topoisomerases. BCPs also may enhance topological stress and overall can either inhibit or aid transcription. Here, we review current understanding of how RNAP, BCPs, and DNA topology interplay to control gene expression.

Early intermediates in bacterial RNA polymerase promoter melting visualized by time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy

During formation of the transcription-competent open complex (RPo) by bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAPs), transient intermediates pile up before overcoming a rate-limiting step. Structural descriptions of these interconversions in real time are unavailable. To address this gap, here we use time-resolved cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to capture four intermediates populated 120 ms or 500 ms after mixing Escherichia coli σ70-RNAP and the λPR promoter. Cryo-EM snapshots revealed that the upstream edge of the transcription bubble unpairs rapidly, followed by stepwise insertion of two conserved nontemplate strand (nt-strand) bases into RNAP pockets. As the nt-strand 'read-out' extends, the RNAP clamp closes, expelling an inhibitory σ70 domain from the active-site cleft. The template strand is fully unpaired by 120 ms but remains dynamic, indicating that yet unknown conformational changes complete RPo formation in subsequent steps. Given that these events likely describe DNA opening at many bacterial promoters, this study provides insights into how DNA sequence regulates steps of RPo formation.

Structural basis of promoter recognition by Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase

Bacterial RNAP needs to form holoenzyme with σ factors to initiate transcription. While Staphylococcus aureus σA controls housekeeping functions, S. aureus σB regulates virulence, biofilm formation, persistence, cell internalization, membrane transport, and antimicrobial resistance. Besides the sequence difference, the spacers between the -35 element and -10 element of σB regulated promoters are shorter than those of σA regulated promoters. Therefore, how σB recognizes and initiates transcription from target promoters can not be inferred from that of the well studied σ. Here, we report the cryo-EM structures of S. aureus RNAP-promoter open complexes comprising σA and σB, respectively. Structural analyses, in combination with biochemical experiments, reveal the structural basis for the promoter specificity of S. aureus transcription. Although the -10 element of σA regulated promoters is recognized by domain σA2 as single-stranded DNA, the -10 element of σB regulated promoters is co-recognized by domains σB2 and σB3 as double-stranded DNA, accounting for the short spacers of σB regulated promoters. S. aureus RNAP is a validated target of antibiotics, and our structures pave the way for rational drug design targeting S. aureus RNAP.

Structural and functional insights into transcription activation of the essential LysR-type transcriptional regulators

The enormous LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs), which are diversely distributed amongst prokaryotes, play crucial roles in transcription regulation of genes involved in basic metabolic pathways, virulence and stress resistance. However, the precise transcription activation mechanism of these genes by LTTRs remains to be explored. Here, we determine the cryo-EM structure of a LTTR-dependent transcription activation complex comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), an essential LTTR protein GcvA and its cognate promoter DNA. Structural analysis shows two N-terminal DNA binding domains of GcvA (GcvA_DBD) dimerize and engage the GcvA activation binding sites, presenting the -35 element for specific recognition with the conserved σ70R4. In particular, the versatile C-terminal domain of α subunit of RNAP directly interconnects with GcvA_DBD, σ70R4 and promoter DNA, providing more interfaces for stabilizing the complex. Moreover, molecular docking supports glycine as one potential inducer of GcvA, and single molecule photobleaching experiments kinetically visualize the occurrence of tetrameric GcvA-engaged transcription activation complex as suggested for the other LTTR homologs. Thus, a general model for tetrameric LTTR-dependent transcription activation is proposed. These findings will provide new structural and functional insights into transcription activation of the essential LTTRs.

Design of a tunable bacterial gene expression system using engineered σ factors

Extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors selectively upregulate expression of specific genes in bacteria. These σ factors, belonging to the σ70 family, are much smaller than the primary, housekeeping σ factor with two helical domains that interact with the Pribnow box and the -35 element of the promoter DNA. Structural studies reveal that promoter specificity in a σ factor is determined by the interactions between a loop (L3) and the Pribnow box element. Similarly, the efficiency of transcription initiation is governed by the polypeptide linker between the two promoter-binding domains. Both these polypeptide segments are dynamic and poorly conserved among ECF σ factor homologs. This feature hitherto limited insights from protein-DNA interactions to be correlated with transcription initiation efficiency. Here, we describe an approach to characterize these features that govern the dynamic range of gene expression using chimeric Escherichia coli σE. The L3 loop and linker polypeptides in these σE chimeras were replaced by the corresponding segments from 10 annotated and functional Mycobacterium tuberculosis ECF σ's. In vitro and in vivo measurements to determine the effect of these polypeptide replacements provided an experimentally validated σE chimera- gene expression level data set. We illustrate the utility of this chimeric σE library in improving the efficiency of a biosynthetic pathway in E. coli. In a two-enzyme step, unaffected by feedback inhibition and substrate concentration, we show an increase in desired product levels by altering the relative intracellular levels of the target enzymes using this library of σ factors. The chimeric σE library thus demonstrates the feasibility of engineering σ factors to achieve bespoke expression levels of target genes for diverse applications in synthetic microbiology.

IMPORTANCE

The synthesis of organic compounds involves the action of multiple enzymes in a biosynthetic pathway. Incorporating such biosynthetic pathways into microbes often leads to substantial cellular and metabolic stress resulting in low titers of the target compound. This limitation can be offset, in part, by optimizing enzyme efficiency and cellular enzyme concentration. The former involves significant efforts to achieve improvements in catalytic efficiency with the caveat that the metabolic load on a microbial cell imposed by the overexpression of the exogenous enzyme could result in reduced cell fitness. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of engineered σ factors to modulate gene expression levels without significant genetic engineering. We note that changing the sequence of two flexible polypeptide loops without any changes to the structural scaffold of the transcription initiation factor σE could modulate the expression levels of the target genes. This ability provides a route to improve the efficiency of a biosynthetic pathway without altering the overall genomic makeup. The σE chimera library thus provides an avenue for pre-determined conditional gene expression of specific genes in Escherichia coli.

Recent Advances of Oxalate Decarboxylase: Biochemical Characteristics, Catalysis Mechanisms, and Gene Expression and Regulation

Oxalate decarboxylase (OXDC) is a typical Mn2+/Mn3+ dependent metal enzyme and splits oxalate to formate and CO2 without any organic cofactors. Fungi and bacteria are the main organisms expressing the OXDC gene, but with a significantly different mechanism of gene expression and regulation. Many articles reported its potential applications in the clinical treatment of hyperoxaluria, low-oxalate food processing, degradation of oxalate salt deposits, oxalate acid diagnostics, biocontrol, biodemulsifier, and electrochemical oxidation. However, some questions still remain to be clarified about the role of substrate binding and/or protein environment in modulating the redox properties of enzyme-bound Mn(II)/Mn(III), the nature of dioxygen involved in the catalytic mechanism, and how OXDC acquires Mn(II) /Mn(III). This review mainly summarizes its biochemical and structure characteristics, gene expression and regulation, and catalysis mechanism. We also deep-mined oxalate decarboxylase gene data from National Center for Biotechnology Information to give some insights to explore new OXDC with diverse biochemical properties.

Structure and molecular mechanism of bacterial transcription activation

Transcription activation is an important checkpoint of regulation of gene expression which occurs in response to different intracellular and extracellular signals. The key elements in this signal transduction process are transcription activators, which determine when and how gene expression is activated. Recent structural studies on a considerable number of new transcription activation complexes (TACs) revealed the remarkable mechanistic diversity of transcription activation mediated by different factors, necessitating a review and re-evaluation of the transcription activation mechanisms. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of transcription activation mechanisms and propose a new, elaborate, and systematic classification of transcription activation mechanisms, primarily based on the structural features of diverse TAC components.

Early intermediates in bacterial RNA polymerase promoter melting visualized by time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy

During formation of the transcription-competent open complex (RPo) by bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAP), transient intermediates pile up before overcoming a rate-limiting step. Structural descriptions of these interconversions in real time are unavailable. To address this gap, time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) was used to capture four intermediates populated 120 or 500 milliseconds (ms) after mixing Escherichia coli σ70-RNAP and the λPR promoter. Cryo-EM snapshots revealed the upstream edge of the transcription bubble unpairs rapidly, followed by stepwise insertion of two conserved nontemplate strand (nt-strand) bases into RNAP pockets. As nt-strand "read-out" extends, the RNAP clamp closes, expelling an inhibitory σ70 domain from the active-site cleft. The template strand is fully unpaired by 120 ms but remains dynamic, indicating yet unknown conformational changes load it in subsequent steps. Because these events likely describe DNA opening at many bacterial promoters, this study provides needed insights into how DNA sequence regulates steps of RPo formation.

Towards a rational approach to promoter engineering: understanding the complexity of transcription initiation in prokaryotes

Promoter sequences are important genetic control elements. Through their interaction with RNA polymerase they determine transcription strength and specificity, thereby regulating the first step in gene expression. Consequently, they can be targeted as elements to control predictability and tuneability of a genetic circuit, which is essential in applications such as the development of robust microbial cell factories. This review considers the promoter elements implicated in the three stages of transcription initiation, detailing the complex interplay of sequence-specific interactions that are involved, and highlighting that DNA sequence features beyond the core promoter elements work in a combinatorial manner to determine transcriptional strength. In particular, we emphasize that, aside from promoter recognition, transcription initiation is also defined by the kinetics of open complex formation and promoter escape, which are also known to be highly sequence specific. Significantly, we focus on how insights into these interactions can be manipulated to lay the foundation for a more rational approach to promoter engineering.

Structural basis for transcription activation by the nitrate-responsive regulator NarL

Transcription activation is a crucial step of regulation during transcription initiation and a classic check point in response to different stimuli and stress factors. The Escherichia coli NarL is a nitrate-responsive global transcription factor that controls the expression of nearly 100 genes. However, the molecular mechanism of NarL-mediated transcription activation is not well defined. Here we present a cryo-EM structure of NarL-dependent transcription activation complex (TAC) assembled on the yeaR promoter at 3.2 Å resolution. Our structure shows that the NarL dimer binds at the -43.5 site of the promoter DNA with its C-terminal domain (CTD) not only binding to the DNA but also making interactions with RNA polymerase subunit alpha CTD (αCTD). The key role of these NarL-mediated interactions in transcription activation was further confirmed by in vivo and in vitro transcription assays. Additionally, the NarL dimer binds DNA in a different plane from that observed in the structure of class II TACs. Unlike the canonical class II activation mechanism, NarL does not interact with σ4, while RNAP αCTD is bound to DNA on the opposite side of NarL. Our findings provide a structural basis for detailed mechanistic understanding of NarL-dependent transcription activation on yeaR promoter and reveal a potentially novel mechanism of transcription activation.

Alteration of the -35 and -10 sequences and deletion the upstream sequence of the -35 region of the promoter A1 of the phage T7 in dsDNA confirm the contribution of non-specific interactions with E. coli RNA polymerase to the transcription initiation process

Transcription initiation is a multi-step process, in which the RNA polymerase holoenzyme binds to the specific promoter sequences to form a closed complex, which, through intermediate stages, isomerizes into an open complex capable of initiating the productive phase of transcription. The aim of this work was to determine the contribution of the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter, as well as the role of non-specific interactions, in the binding of RNA polymerase and the formation of an active initiation complex capable of transcription. Therefore, fragments of promoter DNA, derived from the strong promoter A1 of the phage T7, containing completely and partially altered elements -35 and -10, and devoid of an upstream region, were constructed using genetic engineering methods. Functional analyses of modified promoter fragments were carried out, checking their ability to form binary complexes with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the efficiency of converting binary complexes into triple complexes characteristic of the productive phase of transcription. The obtained results suggest that, in relation to the A1 promoter of the T7 phage, the most important role of the -35 region is carrying the open complex through the next phases of transcription initiation. The weakening of specific impacts within the region -35 is a reason for the defect associated with the transformation of the open complex, formed by a DNA fragment containing the completely altered -35 region, into elongation and the impairment of RNA synthesis. This leads to breaking contacts with the RNA polymerase holoenzyme, and destabilization and disintegration of the complex in the initial phase of productive transcription. This confirms the hypothesis of the so-called stressed intermediate state associated with the stage of transition from the open complex to the elongation complex. The experiments carried out in this work confirm also that the process of promoter localization and recognition, as well as the formation of binary complexes, is sequential in nature, and that the region located upstream of the -35 hexamer, and the hexamer itself, plays here an additive role.

An Improved Method for Eliminating or Creating Intragenic Bacterial Promoters

Recent advances in genomic refactoring have been hindered by the ever-present complication of internal or cryptic transcriptional regulation. Typical approaches to these features have been to randomize or perform mass alterations to the gene sequences thought to contain the regulatory motifs; however, this approach can cause problems by altering translational speeds, introducing long distance DNA-DNA interaction effects, and inducing RNA toxicity. Previously, we developed a rational design approach named COdon Restrained Promoter SilEncing (CORPSE) which takes externally identified promoter sequences and uses position-specific scoring matrices as proxy promoter strengths to make minimal changes to promoter sequences to disable their activity. Additionally, through inverting our system we were also able to modify weak internal promoters to increase their activity. In this chapter, we augment our previous process with the biophysical model Promoter Calculator v1.0 developed by LaFleur et al. to combine promoter identification and activity prediction, with our algorithm to silently modify promoter sequences, to provide more robust promoter elimination and creation.

Dynamics and logic of promoter melting

Despite significant progress in our understanding of promoter melting dynamics, underlying principles of the process remain elusive, with opposing views on key aspects held by many in the field. Here, I discuss the mechanistic logic behind the interplay of thermal and deterministic forces acting to create transcriptionally competent promoter complexes.

Structural visualization of transcription initiation in action

Transcription initiation is a complex process, and its mechanism is incompletely understood. We determined the structures of de novo transcribing complexes TC2 to TC17 with RNA polymerase II halted on G-less promoters when nascent RNAs reach 2 to 17 nucleotides in length, respectively. Connecting these structures generated a movie and a working model. As initially synthesized RNA grows, general transcription factors (GTFs) remain bound to the promoter and the transcription bubble expands. Nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-driven RNA-DNA translocation and template-strand accumulation in a nearly sealed channel may promote the transition from initially transcribing complexes (ITCs) (TC2 to TC9) to early elongation complexes (EECs) (TC10 to TC17). Our study shows dynamic processes of transcription initiation and reveals why ITCs require GTFs and bubble expansion for initial RNA synthesis, whereas EECs need GTF dissociation from the promoter and bubble collapse for promoter escape.

Development of a bacterial gene transcription activating strategy based on transcriptional activator positive feedback

INTRODUCTION

Transcription of biological nitrogen fixation (nif) genes is activated by the NifA protein which recognizes specific activating sequences upstream of σ54-dependent nif promoters. The large quantities of nitrogenase which can make up 20% of the total proteins in the cell indicates high transcription activating efficiency of NifA and high transcription level of nifHDK nitrogenase genes.

OBJECTIVES

Development of an efficient gene transcription activating strategy in bacteria based on positive transcription regulatory proteins and their regulating DNA sequences.

METHODS

We designed a highly efficient gene transcription activating strategy in which the nifA gene was placed directly downstream of its regulating sequences. The NifA protein binds its regulating sequences and stimulates transcription of itself and downstream genes. Overexpressed NifA causes transcription activation by positive reinforcement.

RESULTS

When this gene transcription activating strategy was used to overexpress NifA in Pseudomonas stutzeri DSM4166 containing the nif gene cluster, the nitrogenase activity was increased by 368 folds which was 16 times higher than that obtained by nifA driven by the strongest endogenous constitutive promoter. When this strategy was used to activate transcription of exogenous biosynthetic genes for the plant auxin indole-3-acetic acid and the antitumor alkaloid pigment prodigiosin in DSM4166, both of them resulted in better performance than the strongest endogenous constitutive promoter and the highest reported productions in heterologous hosts to date. Finally, we demonstrated the universality of this strategy using the positive transcriptional regulator of the psp operon, PspF, in E. coli and the pathway-specific positive transcription regulator of the polyene antibiotic salinomycin biosynthesis, SlnR, in Streptomyces albus.

CONCLUSION

Many positive transcription regulatory proteins and their regulating DNA sequences have been identified in bacteria. The gene transcription activating strategy developed in this study will have broad applications in molecular biology and biotechnology.

The bacterial replication origin BUS promotes nucleobase capture

Genome duplication is essential for the proliferation of cellular life and this process is generally initiated by dedicated replication proteins at chromosome origins. In bacteria, DNA replication is initiated by the ubiquitous DnaA protein, which assembles into an oligomeric complex at the chromosome origin (oriC) that engages both double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to promote DNA duplex opening. However, the mechanism of DnaA specifically opening a replication origin was unknown. Here we show that Bacillus subtilis DnaAATP assembles into a continuous oligomer at the site of DNA melting, extending from a dsDNA anchor to engage a single DNA strand. Within this complex, two nucleobases of each ssDNA binding motif (DnaA-trio) are captured within a dinucleotide binding pocket created by adjacent DnaA proteins. These results provide a molecular basis for DnaA specifically engaging the conserved sequence elements within the bacterial chromosome origin basal unwinding system (BUS).

Transcription regulation by CarD in mycobacteria is guided by basal promoter kinetics

Bacterial pathogens like Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) employ transcription factors to adapt their physiology to the diverse environments within their host. CarD is a conserved bacterial transcription factor that is essential for viability in Mtb. Unlike classical transcription factors that recognize promoters by binding to specific DNA sequence motifs, CarD binds directly to the RNA polymerase to stabilize the open complex intermediate (RPo) during transcription initiation. We previously showed using RNA-sequencing that CarD is capable of both activating and repressing transcription in vivo. However, it is unknown how CarD achieves promoter-specific regulatory outcomes in Mtb despite binding indiscriminate of DNA sequence. We propose a model where CarD's regulatory outcome depends on the promoter's basal RPo stability and test this model using in vitro transcription from a panel of promoters with varying levels of RPo stability. We show that CarD directly activates full-length transcript production from the Mtb ribosomal RNA promoter rrnAP3 (AP3) and that the degree of transcription activation by CarD is negatively correlated with RPo stability. Using targeted mutations in the extended -10 and discriminator region of AP3, we show that CarD directly represses transcription from promoters that form relatively stable RPo. DNA supercoiling also influenced RPo stability and affected the direction of CarD regulation, indicating that the outcome of CarD activity can be regulated by factors beyond promoter sequence. Our results provide experimental evidence for how RNA polymerase-binding transcription factors like CarD can exert specific regulatory outcomes based on the kinetic properties of a promoter.

An unexpected abundance of bidirectional promoters within Salmonella Typhimurium plasmids

Transcription of the DNA template, to generate an RNA message, is the first step in gene expression. The process initiates at DNA sequences called promoters. Conventionally, promoters have been considered to drive transcription in a specific direction. However, in recent work, we showed that many prokaryotic promoters can drive divergent transcription. This is a consequence of key DNA sequences for transcription initiation being inherently symmetrical. Here, we used global transcription start site mapping to determine the prevalence of such bidirectional promoters in Salmonella Typhimurium. Surprisingly, bidirectional promoters occur three times more frequently in plasmid components of the genome compared to chromosomal DNA. Implications for the evolution of promoter sequences are discussed.

Structural Analysis of Bacillus subtilis Sigma Factors

Bacteria use an array of sigma factors to regulate gene expression during different stages of their life cycles. Full-length, atomic-level structures of sigma factors have been challenging to obtain experimentally as a result of their many regions of intrinsic disorder. AlphaFold has now supplied plausible full-length models for most sigma factors. Here we discuss the current understanding of the structures and functions of sigma factors in the model organism, Bacillus subtilis, and present an X-ray crystal structure of a region of B. subtilis SigE, a sigma factor that plays a critical role in the developmental process of spore formation.

A general mechanism for transcription bubble nucleation in bacteria

Bacterial transcription initiation requires σ factors for nucleation of the transcription bubble. The canonical housekeeping σ factor, σ70, nucleates DNA melting via recognition of conserved bases of the promoter -10 motif, which are unstacked and captured in pockets of σ70. By contrast, the mechanism of transcription bubble nucleation and formation during the unrelated σN-mediated transcription initiation is poorly understood. Herein, we combine structural and biochemical approaches to establish that σN, like σ70, captures a flipped, unstacked base in a pocket formed between its N-terminal region I (RI) and extra-long helix features. Strikingly, RI inserts into the nascent bubble to stabilize the nucleated bubble prior to engagement of the obligate ATPase activator. Our data suggest a general paradigm of transcription initiation that requires σ factors to nucleate an early melted intermediate prior to productive RNA synthesis.

Correlative Escherichia coli Transcription Rate and Bubble Conformation Remodeled by NusA and NusG

Transcription is highly regulated by a variety of transcription factors, among which NusA and NusG act contradictorily in Escherichia coli (E. coli) that NusA stabilizes a paused RNA polymerase (RNAP) and NusG suppresses it. The mechanism of the NusA and NusG regulations on RNAP transcription has been addressed, but their effect on the conformational changes of the transcription bubble correlated with transcription kinetics remains elusive. By using single-molecule magnetic trap, we identify a reduction in the transcription rate of ∼40% events by NusA. Although the rest ∼60% of transcription events exhibit unaffected transcription rates, a NusA-enhanced standard deviation of the transcription rate is observed. NusA remodeling also increases the extent of DNA unwinding in the transcription bubble by 1-2 base pairs, which can be reduced by NusG. The NusG remodeling is more significant on the RNAP molecules with reduced transcription rates rather than those without. Our results provide a quantitative view on the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by NusA and NusG factors.

Transcription regulation by CarD in mycobacteria is guided by basal promoter kinetics

Bacterial pathogens like Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) employ transcription factors to adapt their physiology to the diverse environments within their host. CarD is a conserved bacterial transcription factor that is essential for viability in Mtb . Unlike classical transcription factors that recognize promoters by binding to specific DNA sequence motifs, CarD binds directly to the RNA polymerase (RNAP) to stabilize the open complex intermediate (RP _o ) during transcription initiation. We previously showed using RNA-sequencing that CarD is capable of both activating and repressing transcription in vivo . However, it is unknown how CarD achieves promoter specific regulatory outcomes in Mtb despite binding indiscriminate of DNA sequence. We propose a model where CarD's regulatory outcome depends on the promoter's basal RP _o stability and test this model using in vitro transcription from a panel of promoters with varying levels of RP _o stability. We show that CarD directly activates full-length transcript production from the Mtb ribosomal RNA promoter rrnA P3 (AP3) and that the degree of transcription activation by CarD is negatively correlated with RP _o stability. Using targeted mutations in the extended -10 and discriminator region of AP3, we show that CarD directly represses transcription from promoters that form relatively stable RP _o . DNA supercoiling also influenced RP _o stability and affected the direction of CarD regulation, indicating that the outcome of CarD activity can be regulated by factors beyond promoter sequence. Our results provide experimental evidence for how RNAP-binding transcription factors like CarD can exert specific regulatory outcomes based on the kinetic properties of a promoter.

Clamp Interactions with +3/+6 Duplex and Upstream-to-Downstream Allosteric Effects in Late Steps of Forming a Stable RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex

Stable 37 °C open complexes (OC) of E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) at λP_R and T7A1 promoters form at similar rates but have very different lifetimes. To understand the downstream interactions responsible for OC lifetime, how promoter sequence directs them and when they form, we report lifetimes of stable OC and unstable late (I₂) intermediates for promoters with different combinations of λP_R (L) and T7A1 (T) discriminators, core promoters and UP elements. I₂ lifetimes are similarly short, while stable OC lifetimes differ greatly, determined largely by the discriminator and modulated by core-promoter and UP elements. The free energy change ΔG₃^o for I₂ → stable OC is approximately -4 kcal more favorable for L-discriminator than for T-discriminator promoters. Downstream-truncation at +6 (DT+6) greatly destabilizes OC at L-discriminator but not T-discriminator promoters, making all ΔG₃^o values similar (approximately -4 kcal). Urea reduces OC lifetime greatly by affecting ΔG₃^o. We deduce that urea acts by disfavoring coupled folding of key elements of the β'-clamp, that I₂ is an open-clamp OC, and that clamp-closing in I₂ → stable OC involves coupled folding. Differences in ΔG₃^o between downstream-truncated and full-length promoters yield contributions to ΔG₃^o from interactions with downstream mobile elements (DME) including β-lobe and β'-jaw, more favorable for L-discriminator than for T-discriminator promoters. We deduce how competition between far-downstream DNA and σ⁷⁰ region 1.1 affects ΔG₃^o values. We discuss variant-specific ΔG₃^o contributions in terms of the allosteric network by which differences in discriminator and -10 sequence are sensed and transmitted downstream to affect DME-duplex interactions in I₂ → stable OC.

The origin of genetic and metabolic systems: Evolutionary structuralinsights

DNA is derived from reverse transcription and its origin is related to reverse transcriptase, DNA polymerase and integrase. The gene structure originated from the evolution of the first RNA polymerase. Thus, an explanation of the origin of the genetic system must also explain the evolution of these enzymes. This paper proposes a polymer structure model, termed the stable complex evolution model, which explains the evolution of enzymes and functional molecules. Enzymes evolved their functions by forming locally tightly packed complexes with specific substrates. A metabolic reaction can therefore be considered to be the result of adaptive evolution in this way when a certain essential molecule is lacking in a cell. The evolution of the primitive genetic and metabolic systems was thus coordinated and synchronized. According to the stable complex model, almost all functional molecules establish binding affinity and specific recognition through complementary interactions, and functional molecules therefore have the nature of being auto-reactive. This is thermodynamically favorable and leads to functional duplication and self-organization. Therefore, it can be speculated that biological systems have a certain tendency to maintain functional stability or are influenced by an inherent selective power. The evolution of dormant bacteria may support this hypothesis, and inherent selectivity can be unified with natural selection at the molecular level.

Anti-σ28 Factor FlgM Regulates Flagellin Gene Expression and Flagellar Polarity of Treponema denticola

FlgM, an antagonist of FliA (also known as σ28), inhibits transcription of bacterial class 3 flagellar genes. It does so primarily through binding to free σ28 to prevent it from forming a complex with core RNA polymerase. We recently identified an FliA homolog (FliATd) in the oral spirochete Treponema denticola; however, its antagonist FlgM remained uncharacterized. Herein, we provide several lines of evidence that TDE0201 functions as an antagonist of FliATd. TDE0201 is structurally similar to FlgM proteins, although its sequence is not conserved. Heterologous expression of TDE0201 in Escherichia coli inhibits its flagellin gene expression and motility. Biochemical and mutational analyses demonstrate that TDE0201 binds to FliATd and prevents it from binding to the σ28-dependent promoter. Deletions of flgM genes typically enhance bacterial class 3 flagellar gene expression; however, deletion of TDE0201 has an opposite effect (e.g., the mutant has a reduced level of flagellins). Follow-up studies revealed that deletion of TDE0201 leads to FliATd turnover, which in turn impairs the expression of flagellin genes. Swimming plate, cell tracking, and cryo-electron tomography analyses further disclosed that deletion of TDE0201 impairs spirochete motility and alters flagellar number and polarity: i.e., instead of having bipolar flagella, the mutant has flagella only at one end of cells. Collectively, these results indicate that TDE0201 is a FlgM homolog but acts differently from its counterparts in other bacteria. IMPORTANCE Spirochetes are a group of bacteria that cause several human diseases. A unique aspect of spirochetes is that they have bipolar periplasmic flagella (PFs), which bestow on the spirochetes a unique spiral shape and distinct swimming behaviors. While the structure and function of PFs have been extensively studied in spirochetes, the molecular mechanism that regulates the PFs' morphogenesis and assembly is poorly understood. In this report, FlgM, an anti-σ28 factor, is identified and functionally characterized in the oral spirochete Treponema denticola. Our results show that FlgM regulates the number and polarity of PFs via a unique mechanism. Identification of FliA and FlgM in T. denticola sets a benchmark to investigate their roles in other spirochetes.

Promoter–motif extraction from co-regulated genes and their relevance to co-expression using E. coli as a model

Gene expression varies due to the intrinsic stochasticity of transcription or as a reaction to external perturbations that generate cellular mutations. Co-regulation, co-expression and functional similarity of substances have been employed for indoctrinating the process of the transcriptional paradigm. The difficult process of analysing complicated proteomes and biological switches has been made easier by technical improvements, and microarray technology has flourished as a viable platform. Therefore, this research enables Microarray to cluster genes that are co-expressed and co-regulated into specific segments. Copious search algorithms have been employed to ascertain diacritic motifs or a combination of motifs that are performing regular expression, and their relevant information corresponding to the gene patterns is also documented. The associated genes co-expression and relevant cis-elements are further explored by engaging Escherichia coli as a model organism. Various clustering algorithms have also been used to generate classes of genes with similar expression profiles. A promoter database ‘EcoPromDB’ has been developed by referring RegulonDB database; this promoter database is freely available at www.ecopromdb.eminentbio.com and is divided into two sub-groups, depending upon the results of co-expression and co-regulation analyses.

Manipulation of topoisomerase expression inhibits cell division but not growth and reveals a distinctive promoter structure in Synechocystis

In cyanobacteria DNA supercoiling varies over the diurnal cycle and is integrated with temporal programs of transcription and replication. We manipulated DNA supercoiling in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by CRISPRi-based knockdown of gyrase subunits and overexpression of topoisomerase I (TopoI). Cell division was blocked but cell growth continued in all strains. The small endogenous plasmids were only transiently relaxed, then became strongly supercoiled in the TopoI overexpression strain. Transcript abundances showed a pronounced 5'/3' gradient along transcription units, incl. the rRNA genes, in the gyrase knockdown strains. These observations are consistent with the basic tenets of the homeostasis and twin-domain models of supercoiling in bacteria. TopoI induction initially led to downregulation of G+C-rich and upregulation of A+T-rich genes. The transcriptional response quickly bifurcated into six groups which overlap with diurnally co-expressed gene groups. Each group shows distinct deviations from a common core promoter structure, where helically phased A-tracts are in phase with the transcription start site. Together, our data show that major co-expression groups (regulons) in Synechocystis all respond differentially to DNA supercoiling, and suggest to re-evaluate the long-standing question of the role of A-tracts in bacterial promoters.

TSSNote-CyaPromBERT: Development of an integrated platform for highly accurate promoter prediction and visualization of Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. through a state-of-the-art natural language processing model BERT

Since the introduction of the first transformer model with a unique self-attention mechanism, natural language processing (NLP) models have attained state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on various tasks. As DNA is the blueprint of life, it can be viewed as an unusual language, with its characteristic lexicon and grammar. Therefore, NLP models may provide insights into the meaning of the sequential structure of DNA. In the current study, we employed and compared the performance of popular SOTA NLP models (i.e., XLNET, BERT, and a variant DNABERT trained on the human genome) to predict and analyze the promoters in freshwater cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and the fastest growing cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus sp. UTEX 2973. These freshwater cyanobacteria are promising hosts for phototrophically producing value-added compounds from CO₂. Through a custom pipeline, promoters and non-promoters from Synechococcus elongatus sp. UTEX 2973 were used to train the model. The trained model achieved an AUROC score of 0.97 and F1 score of 0.92. During cross-validation with promoters from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, the model achieved an AUROC score of 0.96 and F1 score of 0.91. To increase accessibility, we developed an integrated platform (TSSNote-CyaPromBERT) to facilitate large dataset extraction, model training, and promoter prediction from public dRNA-seq datasets. Furthermore, various visualization tools have been incorporated to address the "black box" issue of deep learning and feature analysis. The learning transfer ability of large language models may help identify and analyze promoter regions for newly isolated strains with similar lineages.

DNA opening during transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in atomic detail

RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) synthesizes RNA by reading the DNA code. During transcription initiation, RNAP II opens the double-stranded DNA to expose the DNA template to the active site. The molecular interactions driving and controlling DNA opening are not well understood. We used all-atom steered molecular dynamics simulations to derive a continuous pathway of DNA opening in human RNAP II, involving a 55 Å DNA strand displacement and a nearly 360° DNA helix rotation. To drive such large-scale transitions, we used a combination of RMSD-based collective variables, a newly designed rotational coordinate, and a path collective variable. The simulations reveal extensive interactions of the DNA with three conserved protein loops near the active site, namely with the rudder, fork loop 1, and fork loop 2. According to the simulations, DNA-protein interactions support DNA opening by a twofold mechanism; they catalyze DNA opening by attacking Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds, and they stabilize the open DNA bubble by the formation of a wide set of DNA-protein salt bridges.

Structural basis of three different transcription activation strategies adopted by a single regulator SoxS

Transcription activation is established through extensive protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions that allow an activator to engage and remodel RNA polymerase. SoxS, a global transcription activator, diversely regulates subsets of stress response genes with different promoters, but the detailed SoxS-dependent transcription initiation mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of three SoxS-dependent transcription activation complexes (SoxS-TAC^I, SoxS-TAC^II and SoxS-TAC^III) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), SoxS protein and three representative classes of SoxS-regulated promoters. The structures reveal that SoxS monomer orchestrates transcription initiation through specific interactions with the promoter DNA and different conserved domains of RNAP. In particular, SoxS is positioned in the opposite orientation in SoxS-TAC^III to that in SoxS-TAC^I and SoxS-TAC^II, unveiling a novel mode of transcription activation. Strikingly, two universally conserved C-terminal domains of alpha subunit (αCTD) of RNAP associate with each other, bridging SoxS and region 4 of σ⁷⁰. We show that SoxS interacts with RNAP directly and independently from DNA, remodeling the enzyme to activate transcription from cognate SoxS promoters while repressing transcription from UP-element containing promoters. Our data provide a comprehensive summary of SoxS-dependent promoter architectures and offer new insights into the αCTD contribution to transcription control in bacteria.

Structural basis of AlpA-dependent transcription antitermination

AlpA positively regulates a programmed cell death pathway linked to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by recognizing an AlpA binding element within the promoter, then binding RNA polymerase directly and allowing it to bypass an intrinsic terminator positioned downstream. Here, we report the single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of both an AlpA-loading complex and an AlpA-loaded complex. These structures indicate that the C-terminal helix-turn-helix motif of AlpA binds to the AlpA binding element and that the N-terminal segment of AlpA forms a narrow ring inside the RNA exit channel. AlpA was also revealed to render RNAP resistant to termination signals by prohibiting RNA hairpin formation in the RNA exit channel. Structural analysis predicted that AlpA, 21Q, λQ and 82Q share the same mechanism of transcription antitermination.

Quantitative parameters of bacterial RNA polymerase open-complex formation, stabilization and disruption on a consensus promoter

Transcription initiation is the first step in gene expression, and is therefore strongly regulated in all domains of life. The RNA polymerase (RNAP) first associates with the initiation factor \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\sigma$\end{document} to form a holoenzyme, which binds, bends and opens the promoter in a succession of reversible states. These states are critical for transcription regulation, but remain poorly understood. Here, we addressed the mechanism of open complex formation by monitoring its assembly/disassembly kinetics on individual consensus lacUV5 promoters using high-throughput single-molecule magnetic tweezers. We probed the key protein–DNA interactions governing the open-complex formation and dissociation pathway by modulating the dynamics at different concentrations of monovalent salts and varying temperatures. Consistent with ensemble studies, we observed that RNAP-promoter open (RP_O) complex is a stable, slowly reversible state that is preceded by a kinetically significant open intermediate (RP_I), from which the holoenzyme dissociates. A strong anion concentration and type dependence indicates that the RP_O stabilization may involve sequence-independent interactions between the DNA and the holoenzyme, driven by a non-Coulombic effect consistent with the non-template DNA strand interacting with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\sigma$\end{document} and the RNAP \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\beta$\end{document} subunit. The temperature dependence provides the energy scale of open-complex formation and further supports the existence of additional intermediates.

Structural basis of template strand deoxyuridine promoter recognition by a viral RNA polymerase

Recognition of promoters in bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAPs) is controlled by sigma subunits. The key sequence motif recognized by the sigma, the -10 promoter element, is located in the non-template strand of the double-stranded DNA molecule ~10 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site. Here, we explain the mechanism by which the phage AR9 non-virion RNAP (nvRNAP), a bacterial RNAP homolog, recognizes the -10 element of its deoxyuridine-containing promoter in the template strand. The AR9 sigma-like subunit, the nvRNAP enzyme core, and the template strand together form two nucleotide base-accepting pockets whose shapes dictate the requirement for the conserved deoxyuridines. A single amino acid substitution in the AR9 sigma-like subunit allows one of these pockets to accept a thymine thus expanding the promoter consensus. Our work demonstrates the extent to which viruses can evolve host-derived multisubunit enzymes to make transcription of their own genes independent of the host.

Structural basis of transcription activation by Rob, a pleiotropic AraC/XylS family regulator

Rob, which serves as a paradigm of the large AraC/XylS family transcription activators, regulates diverse subsets of genes involved in multidrug resistance and stress response. However, the underlying mechanism of how it engages bacterial RNA polymerase and promoter DNA to finely respond to environmental stimuli is still elusive. Here, we present two cryo-EM structures of Rob-dependent transcription activation complex (Rob-TAC) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), Rob-regulated promoter and Rob in alternative conformations. The structures show that a single Rob engages RNAP by interacting with RNAP αCTD and σ70R4, revealing their generally important regulatory roles. Notably, by occluding σ70R4 from binding to -35 element, Rob specifically binds to the conserved Rob binding box through its consensus HTH motifs, and retains DNA bending by aid of the accessory acidic loop. More strikingly, our ligand docking and biochemical analysis demonstrate that the large Rob C-terminal domain (Rob CTD) shares great structural similarity with the global Gyrl-like domains in effector binding and allosteric regulation, and coordinately promotes formation of competent Rob-TAC. Altogether, our structural and biochemical data highlight the detailed molecular mechanism of Rob-dependent transcription activation, and provide favorable evidences for understanding the physiological roles of the other AraC/XylS-family transcription factors.

Beyond the approved: target sites and inhibitors of bacterial RNA polymerase from bacteria and fungi

Covering: 2016 to 2022RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the central enzyme in bacterial gene expression representing an attractive and validated target for antibiotics. Two well-known and clinically approved classes of natural product RNAP inhibitors are the rifamycins and the fidaxomycins. Rifampicin (Rif), a semi-synthetic derivative of rifamycin, plays a crucial role as a first line antibiotic in the treatment of tuberculosis and a broad range of bacterial infections. However, more and more pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis develop resistance, not only against Rif and other RNAP inhibitors. To overcome this problem, novel RNAP inhibitors exhibiting different target sites are urgently needed. This review includes recent developments published between 2016 and today. Particular focus is placed on novel findings concerning already known bacterial RNAP inhibitors, the characterization and development of new compounds isolated from bacteria and fungi, and providing brief insights into promising new synthetic compounds.

Inhibitory proteins block substrate access by occupying the active site cleft of Bacillus subtilis intramembrane protease SpoIVFB

Intramembrane proteases (IPs) function in numerous signaling pathways that impact health, but elucidating the regulation of membrane-embedded proteases is challenging. We examined inhibition of intramembrane metalloprotease SpoIVFB by proteins BofA and SpoIVFA. We found that SpoIVFB inhibition requires BofA residues in and near a predicted transmembrane segment (TMS). This segment of BofA occupies the SpoIVFB active site cleft based on cross-linking experiments. SpoIVFB inhibition also requires SpoIVFA. The inhibitory proteins block access of the substrate N-terminal region to the membrane-embedded SpoIVFB active site, based on additional cross-linking experiments; however, the inhibitory proteins did not prevent interaction between the substrate C-terminal region and the SpoIVFB soluble domain. We built a structural model of SpoIVFB in complex with BofA and parts of SpoIVFA and substrate, using partial homology and constraints from cross-linking and co-evolutionary analyses. The model predicts that conserved BofA residues interact to stabilize a TMS and a membrane-embedded C-terminal region. The model also predicts that SpoIVFA bridges the BofA C-terminal region and SpoIVFB, forming a membrane-embedded inhibition complex. Our results reveal a novel mechanism of IP inhibition with clear implications for relief from inhibition in vivo and design of inhibitors as potential therapeutics.

The Vibrio cholerae master regulator for the activation of biofilm biogenesis genes, VpsR, senses both cyclic di-GMP and phosphate

Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation/maintenance is controlled by myriad factors; chief among these are the regulator VpsR and cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP). VpsR has strong sequence similarity to enhancer binding proteins (EBPs) that activate RNA polymerase containing sigma factor σ54. However, we have previously shown that transcription from promoters within the biofilm biogenesis/maintenance pathways uses VpsR, c-di-GMP and RNA polymerase containing the primary sigma factor (σ70). Previous work suggested that phosphorylation of VpsR at a highly conserved aspartate, which is phosphorylated in other EBPs, might also contribute to activation. Using the biofilm biogenesis promoter PvpsL, we show that in the presence of c-di-GMP, either wild type or the phospho-mimic VpsR D59E activates PvpsL transcription, while the phospho-defective D59A variant does not. Furthermore, when c-di-GMP levels are low, acetyl phosphate (Ac∼P) is required for significant VpsR activity in vivo and in vitro. Although these findings argue that VpsR phosphorylation is needed for activation, we show that VpsR is not phosphorylated or acetylated by Ac∼P and either sodium phosphate or potassium phosphate, which are not phosphate donors, fully substitutes for Ac∼P. We conclude that VpsR is an unusual regulator that senses phosphate directly, rather than through phosphorylation, to aid in the decision to form/maintain biofilm.

Codon-Restrained Method for Both Eliminating and Creating Intragenic Bacterial Promoters

Future applications of synthetic biology will require refactored genetic sequences devoid of internal regulatory elements within coding sequences. These regulatory elements include cryptic and intragenic promoters, which may constitute up to a third of the predicted Escherichia coli promoters. The promoter activity is dependent on the structural interaction of core bases with a σ factor. Rational engineering can be used to alter key promoter element nucleotides interacting with σ factors and eliminate downstream transcriptional activity. In this paper, we present codon-restrained promoter silencing (CORPSE), a system for removing intragenic promoters. CORPSE exploits the DNA-σ factor structural relationship to disrupt σ⁷⁰ promoters embedded within gene coding sequences with a minimum of synonymous codon changes. Additionally, we present an inverted CORPSE system, iCORPSE, which can create highly active promoters within a gene sequence while not perturbing the function of the modified gene.

Real-Time Single-Molecule Studies of RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex Formation Reveal Substantial Heterogeneity Along the Promoter-Opening Pathway

The expression of most bacterial genes commences with the binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP)-σ70 holoenzyme to the promoter DNA. This initial RNAP-promoter closed complex undergoes a series of conformational changes, including the formation of a transcription bubble on the promoter and the loading of template DNA strand into the RNAP active site; these changes lead to the catalytically active open complex (RPO) state. Recent cryo-electron microscopy studies have provided detailed structural insight on the RPO and putative intermediates on its formation pathway. Here, we employ single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to interrogate the conformational dynamics and reaction kinetics during real-time RPO formation on a consensus lac promoter. We find that the promoter opening may proceed rapidly from the closed to open conformation in a single apparent step, or may instead involve a significant intermediate between these states. The formed RPO complexes are also different with respect to their transcription bubble stability. The RNAP cleft loops, and especially the β' rudder, stabilise the transcription bubble. The RNAP interactions with the promoter upstream sequence (beyond -35) stimulate transcription bubble nucleation and tune the reaction path towards stable forms of the RPO.

OUP accepted manuscript

Burkholderia cenocepacia is an opportunistic pathogen that causes severe infections of the cystic fibrosis (CF) lung. To acquire iron, B. cenocepacia secretes the Fe(III)-binding compound, ornibactin. Genes for synthesis and utilisation of ornibactin are served by the iron starvation (IS) extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor, OrbS. Transcription of orbS is regulated in response to the prevailing iron concentration by the ferric uptake regulator (Fur), such that orbS expression is repressed under iron-sufficient conditions. Here we show that, in addition to Fur-mediated regulation of orbS, the OrbS protein itself responds to intracellular iron availability. Substitution of cysteine residues in the C-terminal region of OrbS diminished the ability to respond to Fe(II) in vivo. Accordingly, whilst Fe(II) impaired transcription from and recognition of OrbS-dependent promoters in vitro by inhibiting the binding of OrbS to core RNA polymerase (RNAP), the cysteine-substituted OrbS variant was less responsive to Fe(II). Thus, the cysteine residues within the C-terminal region of OrbS contribute to an iron-sensing motif that serves as an on-board ‘anti-σ factor’ in the presence of Fe(II). A model to account for the presence two regulators (Fur and OrbS) that respond to the same intracellular Fe(II) signal to control ornibactin synthesis and utilisation is discussed.

Minor Alterations in Core Promoter Element Positioning Reveal Functional Plasticity of a Bacterial Transcription Factor

IscR is a global transcription factor that regulates Fe-S cluster homeostasis and other functions in Escherichia coli by either activating or repressing transcription. While the interaction of IscR with its DNA sites has been studied, less is known about the mechanism of IscR regulation of transcription. Here, we show that IscR recruits RNA polymerase to an activated promoter and that IscR binding compensates for the lack of an optimal RNA polymerase σ⁷⁰ −35 promoter element. We also find that the position of the −35 promoter element within the IscR DNA site impacts whether IscR activates or represses transcription. RNA polymerase binding at a distally positioned −35 element within the IscR site results in IscR activation. Molecular modeling suggests that this position of the −35 element allows IscR and RNA polymerase to bind to the promoter from opposite faces of the helix. Shifting the −35 element 1 nucleotide upstream within the IscR binding site results in IscR repression and a steric clash of IscR and RNA polymerase binding in the models. We propose that the sequence similarity of the IscR binding site with the −35 element is an important feature in allowing plasticity in the mechanism of IscR regulation.

Reconstructing the transcription regulatory network to optimize resource allocation for robust biosynthesis

An ideal microbial cell factory (MCF) should deliver maximal resources to production, which conflicts with the microbe's native growth-oriented resource allocation strategy and can therefore lead to early termination of the high-yield period. Reallocating resources from growth to production has become a critical factor in constructing robust MCFs. Instead of strengthening specific biosynthetic pathways, emerging endeavors are focused on rearranging the gene regulatory network to fundamentally reprogram the resource allocation pattern. Combining this idea with transcriptional regulation within the hierarchical regulatory network, this review discusses recent engineering strategies targeting the transcription machinery, module networks, regulatory edges, and bottom network layer. This global view will help to construct a production-oriented phenotype that fully harnesses the potential of MCFs.

Bacterial MerR family transcription regulators: activationby distortion

Transcription factors (TFs) modulate gene expression by regulating the accessibility of promoter DNA to RNA polymerases (RNAPs) in bacteria. The MerR family TFs are a large class of bacterial proteins unique in their physiological functions and molecular action: they function as transcription repressors under normal circumstances, but rapidly transform to transcription activators under various cellular triggers, including oxidative stress, imbalance of cellular metal ions, and antibiotic challenge. The promoters regulated by MerR TFs typically contain an abnormal long spacer between the -35 and -10 elements, where MerR TFs bind and regulate transcription activity through unique mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the function, ligand reception, DNA recognition, and molecular mechanism of transcription regulation of MerR-family TFs.

DNA Replication-Transcription Conflicts Do Not Significantly Contribute to Spontaneous Mutations Due to Replication Errors in Escherichia coli

Encounters between DNA replication and transcription can cause genomic disruption, particularly when the two meet head-on. Whether these conflicts produce point mutations is debated. This paper presents detailed analyses of a large collection of mutations generated during mutation accumulation experiments with mismatch repair (MMR)-defective Escherichia coli. With MMR absent, mutations are primarily due to DNA replication errors. Overall, there were no differences in the frequencies of base pair substitutions or small indels (i.e., insertion and deletions of ≤4 bp) in the coding sequences or promoters of genes oriented codirectionally versus head-on to replication. Among a subset of highly expressed genes, there was a 2- to 3-fold bias for indels in genes oriented head-on to replication, but this difference was almost entirely due to the asymmetrical genomic locations of tRNA genes containing mononucleotide runs, which are hot spots for indels. No additional orientation bias in mutation frequencies occurred when MMR⁻ strains were also defective for transcription-coupled repair (TCR). However, in contrast to other reports, loss of TCR slightly increased the overall mutation rate, meaning that TCR is antimutagenic. There was no orientation bias in mutation frequencies among the stress response genes that are regulated by RpoS or induced by DNA damage. Thus, biases in the locations of mutational targets can account for most, if not all, apparent biases in mutation frequencies between genes oriented head-on versus codirectional to replication. In addition, the data revealed a strong correlation of the frequency of base pair substitutions with gene length but no correlation with gene expression levels.

Transcription initiation at a consensus bacterial promoter proceeds via a 'bind-unwind-load-and-lock' mechanism

Transcription initiation starts with unwinding of promoter DNA by RNA polymerase (RNAP) to form a catalytically competent RNAP-promoter complex (RPo). Despite extensive study, the mechanism of promoter unwinding has remained unclear, in part due to the transient nature of intermediates on path to RPo. Here, using single-molecule unwinding-induced fluorescence enhancement to monitor promoter unwinding, and single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor RNAP clamp conformation, we analyse RPo formation at a consensus bacterial core promoter. We find that the RNAP clamp is closed during promoter binding, remains closed during promoter unwinding, and then closes further, locking the unwound DNA in the RNAP active-centre cleft. Our work defines a new, ‘bind-unwind-load-and-lock’, model for the series of conformational changes occurring during promoter unwinding at a consensus bacterial promoter and provides the tools needed to examine the process in other organisms and at other promoters.

Structural basis of transcription activation by the global regulator Spx

Spx is a global transcriptional regulator in Gram-positive bacteria and has been inferred to efficiently activate transcription upon oxidative stress by engaging RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA. However, the precise mechanism by which it interacts with RNAP and promoter DNA to initiate transcription remains obscure. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of an intact Spx-dependent transcription activation complex (Spx-TAC) from Bacillus subtilis at 4.2 Å resolution. The structure traps Spx in an active conformation and defines key interactions accounting for Spx-dependent transcription activation. Strikingly, an oxidized Spx monomer engages RNAP by simultaneously interacting with the C-terminal domain of RNAP alpha subunit (αCTD) and σA. The interface between Spx and αCTD is distinct from those previously reported activators, indicating αCTD as a multiple target for the interaction between RNAP and various transcription activators. Notably, Spx specifically wraps the conserved -44 element of promoter DNA, thereby stabilizing Spx-TAC. Besides, Spx interacts extensively with σA through three different interfaces and promotes Spx-dependent transcription activation. Together, our structural and biochemical results provide a novel mechanistic framework for the regulation of bacterial transcription activation and shed new light on the physiological roles of the global Spx-family transcription factors.

Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability

The first step in gene expression in all organisms requires opening the DNA duplex to expose one strand for templated RNA synthesis. In Escherichia coli, promoter DNA sequence fundamentally determines how fast the RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms "open" complexes (RPo), whether RPo persists for seconds or hours, and how quickly RNAP transitions from initiation to elongation. These rates control promoter strength in vivo, but their structural origins remain largely unknown. Here, we use cryoelectron microscopy to determine the structures of RPo formed de novo at three promoters with widely differing lifetimes at 37 °C: λP_R (t_1/2 ∼10 h), T7A1 (t_1/2 ∼4 min), and a point mutant in λP_R (λP_R-5C) (t_1/2 ∼2 h). Two distinct RPo conformers are populated at λP_R, likely representing productive and unproductive forms of RPo observed in solution studies. We find that changes in the sequence and length of DNA in the transcription bubble just upstream of the start site (+1) globally alter the network of DNA-RNAP interactions, base stacking, and strand order in the single-stranded DNA of the transcription bubble; these differences propagate beyond the bubble to upstream and downstream DNA. After expanding the transcription bubble by one base (T7A1), the nontemplate strand "scrunches" inside the active site cleft; the template strand bulges outside the cleft at the upstream edge of the bubble. The structures illustrate how limited sequence changes trigger global alterations in the transcription bubble that modulate the RPo lifetime and affect the subsequent steps of the transcription cycle.

Promoter Architecture Differences among Alphaproteobacteria and Other Bacterial Taxa

Much of our knowledge of bacterial transcription initiation has been derived from studying the promoters of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Given the expansive diversity across the bacterial phylogeny, it is unclear how much of this knowledge can be applied to other organisms. Here, we report on bioinformatic analyses of promoter sequences of the primary σ factor (σ70) by leveraging publicly available transcription start site (TSS) sequencing data sets for nine bacterial species spanning five phyla. This analysis identifies previously unreported differences in the -35 and -10 elements of σ70-dependent promoters in several groups of bacteria. We found that Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters lack the TTG triad in their -35 element, which is predicted to be conserved across the bacterial phyla. In addition, the majority of the Alphaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters analyzed lacked the thymine at position -7 that is highly conserved in other phyla. Bioinformatic examination of the Alphaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters identifies a significant overrepresentation of essential genes and ones encoding proteins with common cellular functions downstream of promoters containing an A, C, or G at position -7. We propose that transcription of many σ70-dependent promoters in Alphaproteobacteria depends on the transcription factor CarD, which is an essential protein in several members of this phylum. Our analysis expands the knowledge of promoter architecture across the bacterial phylogeny and provides new information that can be used to engineer bacteria for use in medical, environmental, agricultural, and biotechnological processes. IMPORTANCE Transcription of DNA to RNA by RNA polymerase is essential for cells to grow, develop, and respond to stress. Understanding the process and control of transcription is important for health, disease, the environment, and biotechnology. Decades of research on a few bacteria have identified promoter DNA sequences that are recognized by the σ subunit of RNA polymerase. We used bioinformatic analyses to reveal previously unreported differences in promoter DNA sequences across the bacterial phylogeny. We found that many Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria promoters lack a sequence in their -35 DNA recognition element that was previously assumed to be conserved and that Alphaproteobacteria lack a thymine residue at position -7, also previously assumed to be conserved. Our work reports important new information about bacterial transcription, illustrates the benefits of studying bacteria across the phylogenetic tree, and proposes new lines of future investigation.

Systematic dissection of σ70 sequence diversity and function in bacteria

Primary σ⁷⁰ factors are key conserved bacterial regulatory proteins that interact with regulatory DNA to control gene expression. It is, however, poorly understood whether σ⁷⁰ sequence diversity in different bacteria reflects functional differences. Here, we employ comparative and functional genomics to explore the sequence and function relationship of primary σ⁷⁰. Using multiplex automated genome engineering and deep sequencing (MAGE-seq), we generate a saturation mutagenesis library and high-resolution fitness map of E. coli σ⁷⁰ in domains 2-4. Mapping natural σ⁷⁰ sequence diversity to the E. coli σ⁷⁰ fitness landscape reveals significant predicted fitness deficits across σ⁷⁰ orthologs. Interestingly, these predicted deficits are larger than observed fitness changes for 15 σ⁷⁰ orthologs introduced into E. coli. Finally, we use a multiplexed transcriptional reporter assay and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to explore functional differences of several σ⁷⁰ orthologs. This work provides an in-depth analysis of σ⁷⁰ sequence and function to improve efforts to understand the evolution and engineering potential of this global regulator.