Of mice and men: From hematopoiesis in mouse models to curative gene therapy for sickle cell disease

Identification of novel BCL11A variant in a patient with developmental delay and behavioural differences

BACKGROUND

The BCL11A gene is involved in disorders including intellectual disability syndrome (IDS), encodes a zinc finger protein highly expressed in haematopoietic and brain and acts as a transcriptional repressor of foetal haemoglobin (HbF). De novo variants in BCL11A have been associated with IDS, which is characterized by developmental delays, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and speech and language delays. The reports of BCL11A gene variants are still limited worldwide, and additional cases are needed to expand the variant and phenotype spectrums.

METHODS

The patient is a 5-year-old girl who was hospitalized due to developmental delays. After analysing her clinical and pathological characterizations, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for pathogenic genetic variants of developmental delay and behavioural differences. Candidate variant in BCL11A gene was identified and further validated by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A heterozygous variant, c.1442delA (p.Glu481Glyfs*25), was identified in exon 4 of the BCL11A gene through WES. This variant results in a truncated expression of the encoded protein. This de novo variant was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The language delay and behavioural differences were prominent in our patient.

CONCLUSION

Our finding demonstrates that BCL11A variant may cause developmental delay and behavioural differences, expanding the genetic spectrum of the BCL11A gene.

CRISPR technology in human diseases

Gene editing is a growing gene engineering technique that allows accurate editing of a broad spectrum of gene-regulated diseases to achieve curative treatment and also has the potential to be used as an adjunct to the conventional treatment of diseases. Gene editing technology, mainly based on clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein systems, which is capable of generating genetic modifications in somatic cells, provides a promising new strategy for gene therapy for a wide range of human diseases. Currently, gene editing technology shows great application prospects in a variety of human diseases, not only in therapeutic potential but also in the construction of animal models of human diseases. This paper describes the application of gene editing technology in hematological diseases, solid tumors, immune disorders, ophthalmological diseases, and metabolic diseases; focuses on the therapeutic strategies of gene editing technology in sickle cell disease; provides an overview of the role of gene editing technology in the construction of animal models of human diseases; and discusses the limitations of gene editing technology in the treatment of diseases, which is intended to provide an important reference for the applications of gene editing technology in the human disease.

A Journey from Blood Cells to Genes and Back

I was attracted to hematology because by combining clinical findings with the use of a microscope and simple laboratory tests, one could often make a diagnosis. I was attracted to genetics when I learned about inherited blood disorders, at a time when we had only hints that somatic mutations were also important. It seemed clear that if we understood not only what genetic changes caused what diseases but also the mechanisms through which those genetic changes contribute to cause disease, we could improve management. Thus, I investigated many aspects of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase system, including cloning of the gene, and in the study of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), I found that it is a clonal disorder; subsequently, we were able to explain how a nonmalignant clone can expand, and I was involved in the first trial of PNH treatment by complement inhibition. I was fortunate to do clinical and research hematology in five countries; in all of them, I learned from mentors, from colleagues, and from patients.

Precision Medicine and Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by variable clinical outcomes, with some patients suffering life-threatening complications during childhood, and others living relatively symptom-free into old age. Because of this variability, there is an important potential role for precision medicine, in which particular different treatments are selected for different groups of patients. However, the application of precision medicine in SCD is limited by difficulties in identifying different prognostic groups and the small number of available treatments. The main genetic determinant of outcomes in SCD is the underlying β-globin genotype, with sickle cell anemia (HbSS) and hemoglobin SC disease (HbSC) forming the 2 major forms of the disease in most populations of African origin. Although there are clear differences in clinical outcomes between these conditions, treatments approaches are very similar, with little evidence on how to treat HbSC in particular. Other genomic information, such as the co-inheritance of α-thalassemia, or high fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels, is of some prognostic value but insufficient to determine treatments. Precision medicine is further limited by the fact that the 2 main drugs used in SCD, penicillin and hydroxyurea, are currently recommended for all patients. Newer treatments, such as crizanlizumab and voxelotor, raise the possibility that groups will emerge who respond best to particular drugs or combinations. Perhaps the best current example of precision medicine in SCD is the selective use of blood transfusions as primary stroke prevention in children with evidence of cerebral vasculopathy. More precise treatments may emerge as we understand more about the pathology of SCD, including problems with erythropoiesis.