GGA3 interacts with L-type prostaglandin D synthase and regulates the recycling and signaling of the DP1 receptor for prostaglandin D2 in a Rab4-dependent mechanism

Rab8A promotes breast cancer progression by increasing surface expression of Tropomyosin-related kinase B

Ras-related protein in brain (Rab) proteins are dysregulated in cancer cells and affect the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells, thereby reducing the survival rate of cancer patients. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor Tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) play an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. In this research, we investigate the interaction of Rab8A and TrkB in regulating the progression of breast cancer. Rab8A is upregulated in breast cancer tissues. The knockdown of Rab8A inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells through inhibiting TrkB. Moreover, the phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2 is suppressed by Rab8A knockdown. Rab8A interacts with TrkB, as revealed by co-immunoprecipitation assay to promote the surface expression of TrkB. However, Rab8A induced no significant changes in TrkB internalization. Functionally, BDNF promotes the expression of Rab8A through inhibiting Rab8A degradation. The TrkB inhibitor K252a blocks cell proliferation, migration and invasion as well as the activation of the AKT and ERK1/2 signaling pathway, which is induced by Rab8A in breast cancer cells. Our results reveal that Rab8A is upregulated by BDNF, and that Rab8A increases the surface expression of TrkB to promote the growth of breast cancer through the activation of the AKT and ERK1/2 signaling pathway. These results suggest that inhibiting Rab8A level could inhibit the progression of breast cancer.

Identification of the interactome of the DP1 receptor for Prostaglandin D2: Regulation of DP1 receptor signaling and trafficking by IQGAP1

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms governing localization, trafficking and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical in cell function. Protein-protein interactions are determinant in these processes. However, there are very little interacting proteins known to date for the DP1 receptor for prostaglandin D₂.

METHODS

We performed LC-MS/MS analyses of the DP1 receptor interactome in HEK293 cells. To functionally validate our LC-MS/MS data, we studied the implications of the interaction with the IQGAP1 scaffold protein in the trafficking and signaling of DP1.

RESULTS

In addition to expected interacting proteins such as heterotrimeric G protein subunits, we identified proteins involved in signaling, trafficking, and folding localized in various cell compartments. Endogenous DP1-IQGAP1 co-immunoprecipitation was observed in colon cancer HT-29 cells. The interaction was augmented by DP1 agonist activation in HEK293 cells and GST-pulldown assays showed that IQGAP1 binds to intracellular loops 2 and 3 of DP1. Co-localization of the two proteins was observed by confocal microscopy at the cell periphery and in intracellular vesicles in the basal state. PGD₂ treatment resulted in the redistribution of the DP1-IQGAP1 co-localization in the perinuclear vicinity. DP1 receptor internalization was promoted by overexpression of IQGAP1, while it was diminished by IQGAP1 knockdown with DsiRNAs. DP1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was augmented and sustained overtime by overexpression of IQGAP1 when compared to DP1 expressed alone. IQGAP1 knockdown decreased ERK1/2 activation by DP1 stimulation. Interestingly, ERK1/2 signaling by DP1 was increased when IQGAP2 was silenced, while it was impaired by IQGAP3 knockdown.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings define the putative DP1 interactome, a patho-physiologically important receptor, and validated the interaction with IQGAP1 in DP1 function. Our data also reveal that IQGAP proteins may differentially regulate GPCR signaling.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

The identified putative DP1-interacting proteins open multiple lines of research in DP1 and GPCR biology in various cell compartments.