1
|
Liang J, He P. A reference for selecting an appropriate method for generating glioblastoma organoids from the application perspective. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:459. [PMID: 39292297 PMCID: PMC11411047 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma organoids (GBOs) serve as a powerful and reliable tool to study glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) and glioblastoma (GBM). GBOs can be derived from different materials using different methods. To identify the predominant generation methods and the most applications of GBOs, we searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Laboratory) from August 2021 to August 2023. After screening, 42 out of 295 articles were included and analyzed. GBOs in these articles were generated using only one material, such as tumor tissues, tumor cells, and gene-edited multifunctional stem cells, or simultaneously using two materials, such as tumor cells and normal organoids. Methodologically, direct cultivation of GBM cells or tissues was the most commonly used method to generate GBOs. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were the frequently used multifunctional stem cells to generate GBOs by simultaneously silencing P53, NF1, and PTEN using CRISPR/Cas9. In terms of applications, GBOs generated by direct cultivation of GBM tissue had the most applications, including molecular mechanisms, therapy, and culture technique. This review provides a theoretical reference for selecting an appropriate method to generate GBOs when studying GSCs and GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liang
- Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China
| | - Peng He
- Department of Biobank, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Begagić E, Bečulić H, Đuzić N, Džidić-Krivić A, Pugonja R, Muharemović A, Jaganjac B, Salković N, Sefo H, Pojskić M. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review. Biomedicines 2024; 12:238. [PMID: 38275409 PMCID: PMC10813360 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
This scoping review examines the use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in glioblastoma (GBM), a predominant and aggressive brain tumor. Categorizing gene targets into distinct groups, this review explores their roles in cell cycle regulation, microenvironmental dynamics, interphase processes, and therapy resistance reduction. The complexity of CRISPR-Cas9 applications in GBM research is highlighted, providing unique insights into apoptosis, cell proliferation, and immune responses within the tumor microenvironment. The studies challenge conventional perspectives on specific genes, emphasizing the potential therapeutic implications of manipulating key molecular players in cell cycle dynamics. Exploring CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy in GBMs yields significant insights into the regulation of cellular processes, spanning cell interphase, renewal, and migration. Researchers, by precisely targeting specific genes, uncover the molecular orchestration governing cell proliferation, growth, and differentiation during critical phases of the cell cycle. The findings underscore the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in unraveling the complex dynamics of the GBM microenvironment, offering promising avenues for targeted therapies to curb GBM growth. This review also outlines studies addressing therapy resistance in GBM, employing CRISPR/Cas9 to target genes associated with chemotherapy resistance, showcasing its transformative potential in effective GBM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emir Begagić
- Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Travnička 1, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Hakija Bečulić
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Crkvice 67, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Travnička 1, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nermin Đuzić
- Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, International Burch University Sarajevo, Francuske revolucije BB, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Amina Džidić-Krivić
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Crkvice 67, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ragib Pugonja
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Crkvice 67, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Asja Muharemović
- Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, International Burch University Sarajevo, Francuske revolucije BB, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Belma Jaganjac
- Department of Histology, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, Travnička 1, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Naida Salković
- Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Univerzitetska 1, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
| | - Haso Sefo
- Clinic of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center Sarajevo, Bolnička 25, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Mirza Pojskić
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35033 Marburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|