Topological stress is responsible for the detrimental outcomes of head-on replication-transcription conflicts

Clues to transcription/replication collision-induced DNA damage: it was RNAP, in the chromosome, with the fork

DNA replication and RNA transcription processes compete for the same DNA template and, thus, frequently collide. These transcription-replication collisions are thought to lead to genomic instability, which places a selective pressure on organisms to avoid them. Here, we review the predisposing causes, molecular mechanisms, and downstream consequences of transcription-replication collisions (TRCs) with a strong emphasis on prokaryotic model systems, before contrasting prokaryotic findings with cases in eukaryotic systems. Current research points to genomic structure as the primary determinant of steady-state TRC levels and RNA polymerase regulation as the primary inducer of excess TRCs. We review the proposed mechanisms of TRC-induced DNA damage, attempting to clarify their mechanistic requirements. Finally, we discuss what drives genomes to select against TRCs.

Untangling bacterial DNA topoisomerases functions

Topoisomerases are the main enzymes capable of resolving the topological constraints imposed by DNA transactions such as transcription or replication. All bacteria possess topoisomerases of different types. Although bacteria with circular replicons should encounter similar DNA topology issues, the distribution of topoisomerases varies from one bacterium to another, suggesting polymorphic functioning. Recently, several proteins restricting, enhancing or modifying the activity of topoisomerases were discovered, opening the way to a new area of understanding DNA topology management during the bacterial cell cycle. In this review, we discuss the distribution of topoisomerases across the bacterial phylum and current knowledge on the interplay among the different topoisomerases to maintain topological homeostasis.

Kinetic Features of Degradation of R-Loops by RNase H1 from Escherichia coli

R-loops can act as replication fork barriers, creating transcription-replication collisions and inducing replication stress by arresting DNA synthesis, thereby possibly causing aberrant processing and the formation of DNA strand breaks. RNase H1 (RH1) is one of the enzymes that participates in R-loop degradation by cleaving the RNA strand within a hybrid RNA-DNA duplex. In this study, the kinetic features of the interaction of RH1 from Escherichia coli with R-loops of various structures were investigated. It was found that the values of the dissociation constants Kd were minimal for complexes of RH1 with model R-loops containing a 10-11-nt RNA-DNA hybrid part, indicating effective binding. Analysis of the kinetics of RNA degradation in the R-loops by RH1 revealed that the rate-limiting step of the process was catalytic-complex formation. In the presence of RNA polymerase, the R-loops containing a ≤16-nt RNA-DNA hybrid part were efficiently protected from cleavage by RH1. In contrast, R-loops containing longer RNA-DNA hybrid parts, as a model of an abnormal transcription process, were not protected by RNA polymerase and were effectively digested by RH1.

Chromatin Buffers Torsional Stress During Transcription

Transcription through chromatin under torsion represents a fundamental problem in biology. Pol II must overcome nucleosome obstacles and, because of the DNA helical structure, must also rotate relative to the DNA, generating torsional stress. However, there is a limited understanding of how Pol II transcribes through nucleosomes while supercoiling DNA. In this work, we developed methods to visualize Pol II rotation of DNA during transcription and determine how torsion slows down the transcription rate. We found that Pol II stalls at ± 9 pN·nm torque, nearly sufficient to melt DNA. The stalling is due to extensive backtracking, and the presence of TFIIS increases the stall torque to + 13 pN·nm, making Pol II a powerful rotary motor. This increased torsional capacity greatly enhances Pol II's ability to transcribe through a nucleosome. Intriguingly, when Pol II encounters a nucleosome, nucleosome passage becomes more efficient on a chromatin substrate than on a single-nucleosome substrate, demonstrating that chromatin efficiently buffers torsional stress via its torsional mechanical properties. Furthermore, topoisomerase II relaxation of torsional stress significantly enhances transcription, allowing Pol II to elongate through multiple nucleosomes. Our results demonstrate that chromatin greatly reduces torsional stress on transcription, revealing a novel role of chromatin beyond the more conventional view of it being just a roadblock to transcription.

Torsion is a Dynamic Regulator of DNA Replication Stalling and Reactivation

The inherent helical structure of DNA dictates that a replisome must rotate relative to DNA during replication, presenting inevitable topological challenges to replication. However, little is known about how the replisome progresses against torsional stress. Here, we developed a label-free, high-resolution, real-time assay to monitor replisome movement under torsion. We visualized the replisome rotation of DNA and determined how the replisome slows down under torsion. We found that while helicase or DNA polymerase (DNAP) individually is a weak torsional motor, the replisome composed of both enzymes is the most powerful DNA torsional motor studied to date. It generates ~ 22 pN·nm of torque before stalling, twice the stall torque of E. coli RNA polymerase. Upon replisome stalling, the specific interaction between helicase and DNAP stabilizes the fork junction; without it, the fork can regress hundreds of base pairs. We also discovered that prolonged torsion-induced stalling inactivates the replisome. Surprisingly, DNAP exchange, mediated by the helicase, is highly effective in facilitating replication restart, but only if excess DNAP is present during stalling. Thus, helicase and DNA polymerase work synergistically as a powerful torsional motor, and their dynamic and fluid interactions are crucial for maintaining fork integrity under torsional stress. This work demonstrates that torsion is a strong regulator of DNA replication stalling and reactivation.

RNA Polymerase II is a Polar Roadblock to a Progressing DNA Fork

DNA replication and transcription occur simultaneously on the same DNA template, leading to inevitable conflicts between the replisome and RNA polymerase. These conflicts can stall the replication fork and threaten genome stability. Although numerous studies show that head-on conflicts are more detrimental and more prone to promoting R-loop formation than co-directional conflicts, the fundamental cause for the RNA polymerase roadblock polarity remains unclear, and the structure of these R-loops is speculative. In this work, we use a simple model system to address this complex question by examining the Pol II roadblock to a DNA fork advanced via mechanical unzipping to mimic the replisome progression. We found that the Pol II binds more stably to resist removal in the head-on configuration, even with minimal transcript size, demonstrating that the Pol II roadblock has an inherent polarity. However, an elongating Pol II with a long RNA transcript becomes an even more potent and persistent roadblock while retaining the polarity, and the formation of an RNA-DNA hybrid mediates this enhancement. Surprisingly, we discovered that when a Pol II collides with the DNA fork head-on and becomes backtracked, an RNA-DNA hybrid can form on the lagging strand in front of Pol II, creating a topological lock that traps Pol II at the fork. TFIIS facilitates RNA-DNA hybrid removal by severing the connection of Pol II with the hybrid. We further demonstrate that this RNA-DNA hybrid can prime lagging strand replication by T7 DNA polymerase while Pol II is still bound to DNA. Our findings capture basal properties of the interactions of Pol II with a DNA fork, revealing significant implications for transcription-replication conflicts.

Dormant origin firing promotes head-on transcription-replication conflicts at transcription termination sites in response to BRCA2 deficiency

BRCA2 is a tumor suppressor protein responsible for safeguarding the cellular genome from replication stress and genotoxicity, but the specific mechanism(s) by which this is achieved to prevent early oncogenesis remains unclear. Here, we provide evidence that BRCA2 acts as a critical suppressor of head-on transcription-replication conflicts (HO-TRCs). Using Okazaki-fragment sequencing (Ok-seq) and computational analysis, we identified origins (dormant origins) that are activated near the transcription termination sites (TTS) of highly expressed, long genes in response to replication stress. Dormant origins are a source for HO-TRCs, and drug treatments that inhibit dormant origin firing led to a reduction in HO-TRCs, R-loop formation, and DNA damage. Using super-resolution microscopy, we showed that HO-TRC events track with elongating RNA polymerase II, but not with transcription initiation. Importantly, RNase H2 is recruited to sites of HO-TRCs in a BRCA2-dependent manner to help alleviate toxic R-loops associated with HO-TRCs. Collectively, our results provide a mechanistic basis for how BRCA2 shields against genomic instability by preventing HO-TRCs through both direct and indirect means occurring at predetermined genomic sites based on the pre-cancer transcriptome.

Processing of stalled replication forks in Bacillus subtilis

Accurate DNA replication and transcription elongation are crucial for preventing the accumulation of unreplicated DNA and genomic instability. Cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to deal with impaired replication fork progression, challenged by both intrinsic and extrinsic impediments. The bacterium Bacillus subtilis, which adopts multiple forms of differentiation and development, serves as an excellent model system for studying the pathways required to cope with replication stress to preserve genomic stability. This review focuses on the genetics, single molecule choreography, and biochemical properties of the proteins that act to circumvent the replicative arrest allowing the resumption of DNA synthesis. The RecA recombinase, its mediators (RecO, RecR, and RadA/Sms) and modulators (RecF, RecX, RarA, RecU, RecD2, and PcrA), repair licensing (DisA), fork remodelers (RuvAB, RecG, RecD2, RadA/Sms, and PriA), Holliday junction resolvase (RecU), nucleases (RnhC and DinG), and translesion synthesis DNA polymerases (PolY1 and PolY2) are key functions required to overcome a replication stress, provided that the fork does not collapse.

Looping out of control: R-loops in transcription-replication conflict

Transcription-replication conflict is a major cause of replication stress that arises when replication forks collide with the transcription machinery. Replication fork stalling at sites of transcription compromises chromosome replication fidelity and can induce DNA damage with potentially deleterious consequences for genome stability and organismal health. The block to DNA replication by the transcription machinery is complex and can involve stalled or elongating RNA polymerases, promoter-bound transcription factor complexes, or DNA topology constraints. In addition, studies over the past two decades have identified co-transcriptional R-loops as a major source for impairment of DNA replication forks at active genes. However, how R-loops impede DNA replication at the molecular level is incompletely understood. Current evidence suggests that RNA:DNA hybrids, DNA secondary structures, stalled RNA polymerases, and condensed chromatin states associated with R-loops contribute to the of fork progression. Moreover, since both R-loops and replication forks are intrinsically asymmetric structures, the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions is influenced by collision orientation. Collectively, the data suggest that the impact of R-loops on DNA replication is highly dependent on their specific structural composition. Here, we will summarize our current understanding of the molecular basis for R-loop-induced replication fork progression defects.

DNA polymerase ε harmonizes topological states and R-loops formation to maintain genome integrity in Arabidopsis

Genome topology is tied to R-loop formation and genome stability. However, the regulatory mechanism remains to be elucidated. By establishing a system to sense the connections between R-loops and genome topology states, we show that inhibiting DNA topoisomerase 1 (TOP1i) triggers the global increase of R-loops (called topoR-loops) and DNA damages, which are exacerbated in the DNA damage repair-compromised mutant atm. A suppressor screen identifies a mutation in POL2A, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase ε, rescuing the TOP1i-induced topoR-loop accumulation and genome instability in atm. Importantly we find that a highly conserved junction domain between the exonuclease and polymerase domains in POL2A is required for modulating topoR-loops near DNA replication origins and facilitating faithful DNA replication. Our results suggest that DNA replication acts in concert with genome topological states to fine-tune R-loops and thereby maintain genome integrity, revealing a likely conserved regulatory mechanism of TOP1i resistance in chemotherapy for ATM-deficient cancers.

Transcription-Replication Conflicts as a Source of Genome Instability

Transcription and replication both require large macromolecular complexes to act on a DNA template, yet these machineries cannot simultaneously act on the same DNA sequence. Conflicts between the replication and transcription machineries (transcription-replication conflicts, or TRCs) are widespread in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and have the capacity to both cause DNA damage and compromise complete, faithful replication of the genome. This review will highlight recent studies investigating the genomic locations of TRCs and the mechanisms by which they may be prevented, mitigated, or resolved. We address work from both model organisms and mammalian systems but predominantly focus on multicellular eukaryotes owing to the additional complexities inherent in the coordination of replication and transcription in the context of cell type-specific gene expression and higher-order chromatin organization.

Direct visualization of transcription-replication conflicts reveals post-replicative DNA:RNA hybrids

Transcription-replication collisions (TRCs) are crucial determinants of genome instability. R-loops were linked to head-on TRCs and proposed to obstruct replication fork progression. The underlying mechanisms, however, remained elusive due to the lack of direct visualization and of non-ambiguous research tools. Here, we ascertained the stability of estrogen-induced R-loops on the human genome, visualized them directly by electron microscopy (EM), and measured R-loop frequency and size at the single-molecule level. Combining EM and immuno-labeling on locus-specific head-on TRCs in bacteria, we observed the frequent accumulation of DNA:RNA hybrids behind replication forks. These post-replicative structures are linked to fork slowing and reversal across conflict regions and are distinct from physiological DNA:RNA hybrids at Okazaki fragments. Comet assays on nascent DNA revealed a marked delay in nascent DNA maturation in multiple conditions previously linked to R-loop accumulation. Altogether, our findings suggest that TRC-associated replication interference entails transactions that follow initial R-loop bypass by the replication fork.

R-loops, type I topoisomerases and cancer

R-loops are abundant and dynamic structures ubiquitously present in human cells both in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. They form in cis in the wake of transcription complexes and in trans apart from transcription complexes. In this review, we focus on the relationship between R-loops and topoisomerases, and cancer genomics and therapies. We summarize the topological parameters associated with the formation and resolution of R-loops, which absorb and release high levels of genomic negative supercoiling (Sc-). We review the deleterious consequences of excessive R-loops and rationalize how human type IA (TOP3B) and type IB (TOP1) topoisomerases regulate and resolve R-loops in coordination with helicase and RNase H enzymes. We also review the drugs (topoisomerase inhibitors, splicing inhibitors, G4 stabilizing ligands) and cancer predisposing genes (BRCA1/2, transcription, and splicing genes) known to induce R-loops, and whether stabilizing R-loops and thereby inducing genomic damage can be viewed as a strategy for cancer treatment.

Analysis of the Plastid Genome Sequence During Maize Seedling Development

Shoot development in maize progresses from small, non-pigmented meristematic cells to expanded cells in the green leaf. During this transition, large plastid DNA (ptDNA) molecules in proplastids become fragmented in the photosynthetically-active chloroplasts. The genome sequences were determined for ptDNA obtained from Zea mays B73 plastids isolated from four tissues: base of the stalk (the meristem region); fully-developed first green leaf; first three leaves from light-grown seedlings; and first three leaves from dark-grown (etiolated) seedlings. These genome sequences were then compared to the Z. mays B73 plastid reference genome sequence that was previously obtained from green leaves. The assembled plastid genome was identical among these four tissues to the reference genome. Furthermore, there was no difference among these tissues in the sequence at and around the previously documented 27 RNA editing sites. There were, however, more sequence variants (insertions/deletions and single-nucleotide polymorphisms) for leaves grown in the dark than in the light. These variants were tightly clustered into two areas within the inverted repeat regions of the plastid genome. We propose a model for how these variant clusters could be generated by replication-transcription conflict.

Walking a tightrope: The complex balancing act of R-loops in genome stability

Although transcription is an essential cellular process, it is paradoxically also a well-recognized cause of genomic instability. R-loops, non-B DNA structures formed when nascent RNA hybridizes to DNA to displace the non-template strand as single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), are partially responsible for this instability. Yet, recent work has begun to elucidate regulatory roles for R-loops in maintaining the genome. In this review, we discuss the cellular contexts in which R-loops contribute to genomic instability, particularly during DNA replication and double-strand break (DSB) repair. We also summarize the evidence that R-loops participate as an intermediate during repair and may influence pathway choice to preserve genomic integrity. Finally, we discuss the immunogenic potential of R-loops and highlight their links to disease should they become pathogenic.

The role of chromatin at transcription-replication conflicts as a genome safeguard

DNA replication ensures the correct copying of the genome and the faithful transfer of the genetic information to the offspring. However, obstacles to replication fork (RF) progression cause RF stalling and compromise efficient genome duplication. Since replication uses the same DNA template as transcription, both transcription and replication must be coordinated to prevent Transcription-Replication Conflicts (TRCs) that could stall RF progression. Several factors contribute to limit the occurrence of such conflicts and their harmful impact on genome integrity. Increasing evidence indicates that chromatin homeostasis plays a key role in the cellular response to TRCs as well as in the preservation of genome integrity. Indeed, chromatin regulating enzymes are frequently mutated in cancer cells, a common characteristic of which is genome instability. Therefore, understanding the role of chromatin in TRC occurrence and resolution may help identify the molecular mechanism by which chromatin protects genome integrity, and the causes and physiological relevance of the high mutation rates of chromatin regulating factors in cancer. Here we review the current knowledge in the field, as well as the perspectives and future applications.

Elongating RNA polymerase II and RNA:DNA hybrids hinder fork progression and gene expression at sites of head-on replication-transcription collisions

Uncoordinated clashes between replication forks and transcription cause replication stress and genome instability, which are hallmarks of cancer and neurodegeneration. Here, we investigate the outcomes of head-on replication-transcription collisions, using as a model system budding yeast mutants for the helicase Sen1, the ortholog of human Senataxin. We found that RNA Polymerase II accumulates together with RNA:DNA hybrids at sites of head-on collisions. The replication fork and RNA Polymerase II are both arrested during the clash, leading to DNA damage and, in the long run, the inhibition of gene expression. The inactivation of RNA Polymerase II elongation factors, such as the HMG-like protein Spt2 and the DISF and PAF complexes, but not alterations in chromatin structure, allows replication fork progression through transcribed regions. Attenuation of RNA Polymerase II elongation rescues RNA:DNA hybrid accumulation and DNA damage sensitivity caused by the absence of Sen1, but not of RNase H proteins, suggesting that such enzymes counteract toxic RNA:DNA hybrids at different stages of the cell cycle with Sen1 mainly acting in replication. We suggest that the main obstacle to replication fork progression is the elongating RNA Polymerase II engaged in an R-loop, rather than RNA:DNA hybrids per se or hybrid-associated chromatin modifications.

A regulatory phosphorylation site on Mec1 controls chromatin occupancy of RNA polymerases during replication stress

Upon replication stress, budding yeast checkpoint kinase Mec1^ATR triggers the downregulation of transcription, thereby reducing the level of RNA polymerase (RNAP) on chromatin to facilitate replication fork progression. Here, we identify a hydroxyurea-induced phosphorylation site on Mec1, Mec1-S1991, that contributes to the eviction of RNAPII and RNAPIII during replication stress. The expression of the non-phosphorylatable mec1-S1991A mutant reduces replication fork progression genome-wide and compromises survival on hydroxyurea. This defect can be suppressed by destabilizing chromatin-bound RNAPII through a TAP fusion to its Rpb3 subunit, suggesting that lethality in mec1-S1991A mutants arises from replication-transcription conflicts. Coincident with a failure to repress gene expression on hydroxyurea in mec1-S1991A cells, highly transcribed genes such as GAL1 remain bound at nuclear pores. Consistently, we find that nuclear pore proteins and factors controlling RNAPII and RNAPIII are phosphorylated in a Mec1-dependent manner on hydroxyurea. Moreover, we show that Mec1 kinase also contributes to reduced RNAPII occupancy on chromatin during an unperturbed S phase by promoting degradation of the Rpb1 subunit.

Toxic R-loops: Cause or consequence of replication stress?

Transcription-replication conflicts (TRCs) represent a potential source of endogenous replication stress (RS) and genomic instability in eukaryotic cells but the mechanisms that underlie this instability remain poorly understood. Part of the problem could come from non-B DNA structures called R-loops, which are formed of a RNA:DNA hybrid and a displaced ssDNA loop. In this review, we discuss different scenarios in which R-loops directly or indirectly interfere with DNA replication. We also present other types of TRCs that may not depend on R-loops to impede fork progression. Finally, we discuss alternative models in which toxic RNA:DNA hybrids form at stalled forks as a consequence - but not a cause - of replication stress and interfere with replication resumption.

Transcription-Replication Collisions-A Series of Unfortunate Events

Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive replication or transcription and pose an even more potent threat to genome integrity when these processes co-occur. It is critical to maintaining high fidelity and processivity of transcription and replication while navigating through a complex chromatin environment, highlighting the importance of defining cellular pathways regulating transcription-replication interaction formation, evasion, and resolution. Here we discuss how transcription influences replication fork stability, and the safeguards that have evolved to navigate transcription-replication interactions and maintain genome integrity in mammalian cells.

Harmful R-loops are prevented via different cell cycle-specific mechanisms

Identifying how R-loops are generated is crucial to know how transcription compromises genome integrity. We show by genome-wide analysis of conditional yeast mutants that the THO transcription complex, prevents R-loop formation in G1 and S-phase, whereas the Sen1 DNA-RNA helicase prevents them only in S-phase. Interestingly, damage accumulates asymmetrically downstream of the replication fork in sen1 cells but symmetrically in the hpr1 THO mutant. Our results indicate that: R-loops form co-transcriptionally independently of DNA replication; that THO is a general and cell-cycle independent safeguard against R-loops, and that Sen1, in contrast to previously believed, is an S-phase-specific R-loop resolvase. These conclusions have important implications for the mechanism of R-loop formation and the role of other factors reported to affect on R-loop homeostasis.

Consequences and Resolution of Transcription-Replication Conflicts

Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it is now clear that conflicts can arise due to aberrant transcription regulation and premature proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress and genomic instability. As both are considered hallmarks of aging and human diseases such as cancer, understanding the cellular consequences of conflicts is of paramount importance. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge on where and when collisions occur and how these encounters affect the genome and chromatin landscape of cells. Finally, we conclude with the different cellular pathways and multiple mechanisms that cells have put in place at conflict sites to ensure the resolution of conflicts and accurate genome duplication.

Bacillus subtilis PcrA Helicase Removes Trafficking Barriers

Bacillus subtilis PcrA interacts with the RNA polymerase and might contribute to mitigate replication-transcription conflicts (RTCs). We show that PcrA depletion lethality is partially suppressed by rnhB inactivation, but cell viability is significantly reduced by rnhC or dinG inactivation. Following PcrA depletion, cells lacking RnhC or DinG are extremely sensitive to DNA damage. Chromosome segregation is not further impaired by rnhB or dinG inactivation but is blocked by rnhC or recA inactivation upon PcrA depletion. Despite our efforts, we could not construct a ΔrnhC ΔrecA strain. These observations support the idea that PcrA dismantles RTCs. Purified PcrA, which binds single-stranded (ss) DNA over RNA, is a ssDNA-dependent ATPase and preferentially unwinds DNA in a 3'→5'direction. PcrA unwinds a 3'-tailed RNA of an RNA-DNA hybrid significantly faster than that of a DNA substrate. Our results suggest that a replicative stress, caused by mis-incorporated rNMPs, indirectly increases cell viability upon PcrA depletion. We propose that PcrA, in concert with RnhC or DinG, contributes to removing spontaneous or enzyme-driven R-loops, to counteract deleterious trafficking conflicts and preserve to genomic integrity.