Interdisciplinary Approaches to Managing Pain in Older Adults

Can the Assessment of the Circadian Rhythm of Pain Be Shortened? A Study of Community-Dwelling Participants with Chronic Pain

Purpose

This study aimed to juxtapose the circadian rhythm of pain with the conventional 7-day assessment and ascertain the feasibility of condensing the evaluation of the circadian rhythm of pain into a 3-day timeframe.

Patients and Methods

Seventy-three patients with pain persisting for a minimum of 3 months and a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of ≥2 were recruited from three medical centers. The circadian patterns of pain were appraised over a 7-day period by quantifying the intensity of pain at six temporal junctures each day using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Cluster analysis was performed using six standardized variables derived from the VAS score of each participant at six designated time points to identify cohorts with analogous circadian rhythms of pain. The clusters were discerned for the 7- and 3-day assessments (Tuesday-Thursday, Friday-Sunday, and Sunday-Tuesday), according to the research objectives. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to gauge the intra-observer variability to assess the consistency between the outcomes of the cluster analysis for the 7-day assessment and each of the 3-day assessments.

Results

The highest Cohen's kappa coefficient was observed for the 3-day evaluation spanning from Friday to Sunday, indicating a substantial concordance with the results of the 7-day assessment.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that it may be prudent to consider implementing a condensed 3-day evaluation of the circadian rhythm of pain that is tailored to individual characteristics. This approach will allow a better understanding of the diurnal rhythms of chronic pain in patients and implement more targeted and specific pain management strategies. Furthermore, it will contribute to increased patient satisfaction through early intervention.

Classification of circadian pain rhythms and pain characteristics in chronic pain patients: An observational study

This study aimed to perform cluster analysis in patients with chronic pain to extract groups with similar circadian rhythms and compare neuropathic pain and psychological factors among these groups to identify differences in pain-related outcomes. A total of 63 community-dwellers with pain lasting at least 3 months and Numerical Rating Scale scores of ≥2 were recruited from 3 medical institutions. Their pain circadian rhythms were evaluated over 7 days by measuring pain intensity at 6-time points per day using a 10-cm visual analog scale. Cluster analysis was performed using 6 variables with standardized visual analog scale values at 6-time points for individual participants to extract groups with similar pain circadian rhythms. The results of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and psychological evaluations in each group were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results revealed 3 clusters with different circadian rhythms of pain. The total and evoked pain subscale Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scores differed among the 3 clusters. The results suggest that a thorough understanding of circadian pain rhythms in chronic pain patients may facilitate the performance of activities of daily living and physical exercise from the perspective of pain management.

Effectiveness of patient education focusing on circadian pain rhythms: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain management should aim at improving quality of life and daily living activities of patients; therefore, emphasis should be placed on pain management including understanding the pain patterns during daily activity. Therefore, lifestyle guidance should be based on a detailed understanding of pain; however, previous studies commonly evaluated pain intensity at a single point in time. We report a case on patient education intervention based on the relationship between pain circadian rhythms and detailed physical activity during the day.

CASE SUMMARY

A man in his 60s, who suffered a brachial plexus injury in a traffic accident, presented with neuropathic pain. Early assessment of the importance of daily living activities to the patient, pain rhythmicity, and physical activity, was performed. The early assessments showed that the pain intensity was lower on days when more light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) was performed, than on days when less LIPA was performed. Consequently, patient education focused on methods to decrease the pain intensity that tended to worsen in the afternoon, and encouraged behavioral changes by suggesting the patient to take walks,” which could be used to maintain LIPA in the afternoon. On reassessment, the afternoon LIPA, which had been the focus of attention, had increased and a change was noted in the circadian rhythm of pain.

CONCLUSION

Patient education based on a composite assessment elicited positive results in relation to the pain circadian rhythm and physical activity.

Pain in dementia

The ageing revolution is changing the composition of our society with more people becoming very old with higher risks for developing both pain and dementia. Pain is normally signaled by verbal communication, which becomes more and more deteriorated in people with dementia. Thus, these individuals unnecessarily suffer from manageable but unrecognized pain. Pain assessment in patients with dementia is a challenging endeavor, with scientific advancements quickly developing. Pain assessment tools and protocols (mainly observational scales) have been incorporated into national and international guidelines of pain assessment in aged individuals. To effectively assess pain, interdisciplinary collaboration (nurses, physicians, psychologists, computer scientists, and engineers) is essential. Pain management in this vulnerable population is also preferably done in an interdisciplinary setting. Nonpharmacological management programs have been predominantly tested in younger populations without dementia. However, many of them are relatively safe, have proven their efficacy, and therefore deserve a first place in pain management programs. Paracetamol is a relatively safe and effective first-choice analgesic. There are many safety issues regarding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and adjuvant analgesics in dementia patients. It is therefore recommended to monitor both pain and potential side effects regularly. More research is necessary to provide better guidance for pain management in dementia.

Chronification of Pain: Mechanisms, Current Understanding, and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of acute to chronic pain involves distinct pathophysiological changes in the peripheral and central nervous systems. This article reviews the mechanisms, etiologies, and management of chronic pain syndromes with updates from recent findings in the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is not limited to major surgeries and can develop after smaller procedures such as hernia repairs. While nerve injury has traditionally been thought to be the culprit for CPSP, it is evident that nerve-sparing surgical techniques are not completely preventative. Regional analgesia and agents such as ketamine, gabapentinoids, and COX-2 inhibitors have also been found to decrease the risks of developing chronic pain to varying degrees. Yet, given the correlation of central sensitization with the development of chronic pain, it is reasonable to utilize aggressive multimodal analgesia whenever possible. Development of chronic pain is typically a result of peripheral and central sensitization, with CPSP being one of the most common presentations. Using minimally invasive surgical techniques may reduce the risk of CPSP. Regional anesthetic techniques and preemptive analgesia should also be utilized when appropriate to reduce the intensity and duration of acute post-operative pain, which has been correlated with higher incidences of chronic pain.