1
|
Gettel CJ, Hastings SN, Biese KJ, Goldberg EM. Emergency Department-to-Community Transitions of Care: Best Practices for the Older Adult Population. Clin Geriatr Med 2023; 39:659-672. [PMID: 37798071 PMCID: PMC10716862 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
This article describes emergency department (ED)-to-community care transitions for older adults and associated challenges, measurement, proven efficacious and effective interventions, and policy considerations. Older adults experiencing social isolation and impairments in functional status or cognition represent unique populations that are particularly at risk during ED-to-community transitions of care and may benefit from targeted intervention implementation. Future efforts should target optimizing screening techniques to identify those at risk, developing and validating patient-centered outcome measures, and using policy and reimbursement levers to include transitional care management services for older adults within the ED setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 464 Congress Avenue, Suite 260, New Haven, CT 06519, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3003, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Geriatric Research, Education, Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Center for the Study of Human Aging and Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin J Biese
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7594, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Medicine, Center for Aging and Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Goldberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, CB #C290, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Batt AM, Williams B, Brydges M, Leyenaar M, Tavares W. New ways of seeing: supplementing existing competency framework development guidelines with systems thinking. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2021; 26:1355-1371. [PMID: 34003391 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10054-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Competency frameworks provide a link between professional practice, education, training, and assessment. They support and inform downstream processes such as curriculum design, assessment, accreditation and professional accountability. However, existing guidelines are limited in accounting for the complexities of professional practice potentially undermining utility of such guidelines and validity of outcomes. This necessitates additional ways of "seeing" situated and context-specific practice. We highlight what a conceptual framework informed by systems thinking can offer when developing competency frameworks. Mirroring shifts towards systems thinking in program evaluation and quality improvement, we suggest that similar approaches that identify and make use of the role and influence of system features and contexts can provide ways of augmenting existing guidelines when developing competency frameworks. We framed a systems thinking approach in two ways. First using an adaptation of Ecological Systems Theory which offers a realist perspective of the person and environment, and the evolving interaction between the two. Second, by employing complexity thinking, which obligates attention to the relationships and influences of features within the system, we can explore the multiple complex, unique, and context-embedded problems that exist within and have stake in real-world practice settings. The ability to represent clinical practice when developing competency frameworks can be improved when features that may be relevant, including their potential interactions, are identified and understood. A conceptual framework informed by systems thinking makes visible features of a practice in context that may otherwise be overlooked when developing competency frameworks using existing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan M Batt
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
- McNally Project for Paramedicine Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Fanshawe College, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Brett Williams
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Madison Brydges
- McNally Project for Paramedicine Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Health, Ageing and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Leyenaar
- McNally Project for Paramedicine Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Walter Tavares
- McNally Project for Paramedicine Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Wilson Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto/University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Post‑MD Education (Post‑Graduate Medical Education/Continued Professional Development), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|