Implications of Anemia in the Elderly Undergoing Surgery

Hemoglobin determination with point-of-care testing, performance evaluation compared to central laboratory analyzers in transfusion decision, an in vitro and retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Point of care (POC) analyzers are an integral part of the patient care. Transfuse can be an emergency decision, not being a benign act, it is necessary to ensure that the hemoglobin value measured by the POC are comparable with the reference analyzer. The objective is to compare the analytical performance of three POCs: ABL800 Flex, Hemocue and iSTAT and a central laboratory analyzer: XN-10 and the impact on the transfusion decision.

METHODS

An in vitro study was performed in 50 patients for whom a hemogram had been prescribed on the XN-10, the hemoglobin determination was performed in parallel on the three POCs. Then, retrospective study was performed to compare the hemoglobin values returned for matched samples in routine practice, 5505 for ABL800 Flex, 55 for Hemocue and 70 for iSTAT were analyzed.

RESULTS

In vitro study shows systematic biases in the measurement of hemoglobin between the different analyzers, overestimation for the ABL800 Flex and the Hemocue, underestimation for the iSTAT. These biases are accentuated in current practice for iSTAT but decreased for ABL800 Flex. In the transfusion decision range from 70 to 100 g/L, there were 8.6% of clinically discordant results between the reference method and ABL, 34.8% for Hemocue and 21.4% for iSTAT.

CONCLUSION

In addition to systematic biases, many additional factors may be involved for variation in hemoglobin measurement with POC. Thus, in the case of urgent transfusion decisions, sending a hemogram on a central laboratory analyzer seems to be essential, while being compatible with a life-threatening emergency.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid Treatment in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

»

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a drug used to control hemorrhage by preventing the breakdown of fibrin.

»

TXA is a cost-effective treatment for trauma patients across a variety of economic settings.

»

Concerns of TXA causing thromboembolic events (TEEs) in orthopaedic trauma patients are not supported by evidence.

»

TXA has been shown to reduce blood loss in hip fracture surgery.

The usefulness of non-invasive co-oximetry haemoglobin measurement for screening pre-operative anaemia

Pre-operative anaemia (haemoglobin < 13.0 g.dl^-1 ) is a modifiable peri-operative risk-factor. This is screened for using formal laboratory testing. A non-invasive finger-probe sensor that can accurately measure haemoglobin is a possible alternative. This study considers the accuracy of non-invasive haemoglobin measurement using the Rad-67™ Rainbow (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) compared with formal laboratory testing and its usefulness in detecting pre-operative anaemia. A total of 392 patients had measurements taken for non-invasive haemoglobin and perfusion index values using the Rad-67 Rainbow, alongside further peri-operative parameters and a formal laboratory haemoglobin test. Bland-Altman and sensitivity analysis showed that the limits of agreement between non-invasive and formal laboratory haemoglobin testing were between -1.95 g.dl^-1 and 2.23 g.dl^-1 (p < 0.001). The overall performance of non-invasive haemoglobin measurement was better in men than women (ROC 91.1% vs. 78.2%) and less biased in men, mean -0.08 (SD 1.09, 95%Cl -0.23-0.07) compared with women (mean 0.38 (SD 0.99, 95%CI 0.24-0.52)). Pre-operative anaemia was more prevalent in women than men (50.3% vs. 14.4%). The sensitivity of non-invasive anaemia detection (haemoglobin < 13 g.dl^-1 ) was 66% for women and 52% for men. A non-invasive haemoglobin value of 14.0 g.dl^-1 had an overall 91% sensitivity for detecting pre-operative anaemia (82% in men and 93% in women). The Rad-67 Rainbow is inadequate for the estimation of formal laboratory haemoglobin and lacks sensitivity for detecting pre-operative anaemia, especially in women. Further advancement in technology and accuracy is needed before it can be recommended as a routine pre-operative screening test.