Early hepatitis B virus DNA suppression can predict virologic response to peginterferon and lamivudine treatment

Different Mechanisms May Exist for HBsAg Synthesis and Secretion During Various Phases of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

The aim of this study was to characterize the expression and secretion of hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg) in the hepatocytes of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients at different phases of infection; as such, the association of intrahepatic HBsAg expression with virological markers and the histological characteristics were analyzed.

Material/Methods

302 chronic HBV infection patients who had not received antiviral therapy were stratified by HBeAg status. The proportion of HBsAg-positive cells was used as an indicator for HBsAg expression level.

Results

In HBeAg-positive patients, there was a significant correlation between serum HBsAg and serum HBV DNA levels (r=0.569, p<0.001). Intrahepatic HBsAg expression and serum HBsAg level in HBeAg-positive patients were higher than those in HBeAg-negative patients (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). A significant correlation between serum HBsAg level and intrahepatic HBsAg expression was found in HBeAg-negative patients (r=0.377, p<0.001), but not in HBeAg-positive patients (r=0.051, p=0.557). Very interestingly, the correlation between serum HBsAg level and HBsAg expression in hepatocytes gradually increased along with disease progression through the immune-tolerant, immune-clearance, inactive, and recovery phases of HBV infection (r=−0.184, 0.068, 0.492, and 0.575; and p=0,238, 0,722, 0.012, and 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

Different mechanisms may be involved in HBsAg synthesis and secretion in different phases of chronic HBV infection.

Ten-year follow-up of hepatitis B relapse after cessation of lamivudine or telbivudine treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients

The high rate of relapse after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) treatment in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients leads us to reassess the feasibility for off-therapy, but long-term follow-up data are scarce. We assessed the feasibility for off-therapy by a long-term observation of relapse in response to lamivudine (LAM) and telbivudine (LdT). Eighty-six NUC-naive CHB patients, treated with LAM (n = 46) or LdT (n = 40) who reached the guidelines recommended for off-therapy, were followed for up to 10 years. Hepatitis B virus (HBV), viral serology and biochemistries were periodically determined. COX model was used to predict the risk of relapse. A total of 52.3% of patients experienced relapse within a median of 115 months (range, 61-122 months). A total of 93.3% of relapses occurred within 48 months. Relapse rates in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n = 56) and HBeAg-negative (n = 30) patients were 39.3% and 76.7%, respectively (p < 0.01). HBeAg-positive patients who achieved an early viral response (EVR), defined as undetectable HBV DNA within 6 months, had a lower relapse rate compared to non-EVR patients (21.4% vs. 59.2%, p < 0.01). EVR patients who had both lower HBV DNA (<10(6) copies/mL) at baseline and lower hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at end of treatment had a relapse rate of 10.7%. The high relapse rates in CHB patients over this 10-year follow-up make LAM or LdT off therapy infeasible in most of the cases, except in the case of HBsAg loss and/or seroconversion. HBeAg-positive patients with EVR, lower HBV DNA and HBsAg had lower relapse rates and could be good candidates for off-therapy. Long-term monitoring, especially during the first 4 years, is critical for patients off-therapy.

Changing serum levels of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA in hepatitis B virus surface antigen carriers: a follow-up study of an elderly cohort

This study was to elucidate longitudinally quantitative changes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA in elder HBsAg carriers in a community. Among 1002 residents screened for HBsAg in 2005, 405 responded to this follow-up study in 2010. Fifty-nine (14.6%) were HBsAg carriers in 2005; HBsAg quantification and HBV DNA were measured. HBsAg quantification (cutoff 1600 IU/mL) and HBV DNA (cutoff 2000 IU/mL) were combined to stratify the participants between two screens. A total of 30 men and 29 women with a mean age of 63.9 ± 7.9 years were enrolled. Quantitative levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA were significantly correlated in 2005 (r = 0.509, p < 0.001) and 2010 (r = 0.777, p < 0.001). Concentrations of HBsAg (IU/mL) significantly decreased from 2.2 ± 1.0 log in 2005 to 1.7 ± 1.5 log in 2010 (p < 0.001). The level of HBsAg was decreased in 48 (81.4%) individuals and HBsAg was undetectable in eight (13.6%). The annual incidence of HBsAg clearance was 2.7%. These 59 HBsAg carriers in 2005 were divided into four groups: low HBsAg low HBV DNA (n = 32), high HBsAg low HBV DNA (n = 5), low HBsAg high HBV DNA (n = 12) and high HBsAg high HBV DNA (n = 10). All 32 individuals in the low HBsAg low HBV DNA group were still in that group in 2010, whereas only two of the high HBsAg high HBV DNA group became inactive. As with a younger cohort in hospital, HBsAg quantification was still well correlated with HBV DNA in elderly HBsAg carriers in the community. Lower levels of both HBsAg and HBV DNA might represent an inactive HBV infection.

Predictive factors of lamivudine treatment success in an hepatitis B virus-infected pediatric cohort: a 10-year study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are responsible for the development of chronic hepatitis in 400 million people worldwide. Currently, no consensus exists as to when treatment should be initiated for pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risks and predictive factors of success of lamivudine treatment in children with chronic, active HBV infection.

METHODS

Forty-three children (22 male, median age 9.6 years) chronically infected with HBV and treated between 1998 and 2008 at CHU Ste-Justine (Montreal, Quebec) were included in the present chart review study. Inclusion criteria were detectable hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), minimum serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of two times the upper limit of normal and detectable serum HBV DNA for at least three months. Patients received lamivudine for a minimum of six months (median 14 months). Genotyping was performed.

RESULTS

Lamivudine treatment was effective in 35% of cases (15 of 43) and overall virological response (during or after treatment) was achieved in 51% of patients. Three patients harboured suspected lamivudine-resistant mutations and five progressed to HBeAg-chronic HBV. Predictive factors for success of treatment were: younger age at beginning of treatment (P=0.05), elevated ALT levels throughout treatment duration (P=0.003) and loss of HBeAg during treatment (P=0.016). Asian origin did not affect treatment success or spontaneous viral control during follow-up. HBV genotype did not influence treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine treatment in a carefully selected cohort of HBV patients demonstrated a good rate of success and low incidence of mutation. Younger age at the beginning of treatment and high ALT levels during treatment predicted a positive outcome.

Efficacy of thymosin α-1 plus peginterferon α-2a combination therapy compared with peginterferon α-2a monotherapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study

OBJECTIVE

Thymosin α-1 plus interferon α-2a offers superior efficacy over interferon α-2a alone in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The aim was to compare the antiviral efficacy of thymosin α-1 plus peginterferon α-2a and peginterferon α-2a alone in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HBeAg-positive CHB patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open-label study. Fifty-one patients were assigned to either combination (26 patients; 180 μg of peginterferon α-2a weekly for 48 weeks and 1.6 mg of thymosin α-1 twice a week for the first 12 weeks) or monotherapy (25 patients; 180 μg of peginterferon α-2a weekly for 48 weeks) groups.

RESULTS

The rates of the combined response, defined as HBeAg seroconversion, HBV DNA suppression, and normalization of serum ALT, were 4/26 (15.4%) and 3/25 (12.0%) for the combination group and the monotherapy group at the end of treatment (p = 0.725), and 6/26 (23.1%) and 5/25 (20.0%) at the end of follow-up (p = 0.789), respectively. Based on multiple logistic regression analysis, a >2 log₁₀ IU/mL reduction of HBV DNA at week 12 was identified as an independent predictor for combined response (OR, 9.72; 95% CI, 1.33-71.06; p = 0.025) at the end of follow-up. A lower pretreatment HBV DNA level (≤ 7 log(10) IU/mL) was another predictor for combined response (OR, 9.64; 95% CI, 1.23-75.32; p = 0.031). No significant differences in adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term addition of thymosin α-1 was not superior to peginterferon α-2a alone in HBeAg-positive CHB patients on the basis of antiviral efficacy.

Serum HBsAg quantification to predict response to peginterferon therapy of e antigen positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

On-treatment predictors of response to peginterferon can guide individualization of therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

AIM

To investigate the use of serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantification to predict sustained response.

METHODS

Hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received peginterferon for 32-48 weeks with or without lamivudine combination were studied. Sustained response was defined as hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and chronic hepatitis B virus DNA <10 000 copies/mL until 12 months post-treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 92 (23%) patients achieved sustained response. At month 6, the area under receiver operating characteristics curve for hepatitis B surface antigen to predict sustained response was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.89, P < 0.001). An hepatitis B surface antigen cutoff at 300 IU/mL at month 6 could give the maximum combination of sensitivity (62%) and specificity (89%) to predict sustained response. Nine of 21 (43%) sustained responders vs. 9 of 71 (13%) nonsustained responders had >1 log hepatitis B surface antigen reduction at month 6 (P < 0.001). Combined hepatitis B surface antigen ≤ 300 IU/mL and >1 log reduction at month 6 had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 43%, 96%, 75% and 85% to predict sustained response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On-treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen can predict response to peginterferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

Durability of peginterferon alfa-2b treatment at 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

Approximately 30%-40% of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B treated with peginterferon and/or lamivudine achieve HBeAg seroconversion 6 months after the end of treatment. The durability and long-term effect of treatment are unknown. In this study, 85 HBeAg-positive patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg/week for 32 weeks and lamivudine 100 mg/day for 52 or 104 weeks were prospectively followed for 6.1 +/- 1.7 years posttreatment. Twenty-five (29%) patients had virologic response (HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA <10,000 copies/mL) at 5 years. The rate of HBeAg seroconversion rose progressively from 37% at the end of treatment to 60% at 5 years. Twenty-seven (32%) and 11 (13%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA (<100 copies/mL) at the end of peginterferon treatment and at 5 years, respectively. Two (2.4%) patients achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance at 2.6 and 84 months posttreatment. Among virologic responders at the end of treatment, 82% and 57% and sustained HBeAg seroconversion and virologic response at 5 years. End-of-treatment serum quantitative HBsAg was significantly lower in patients with sustained virologic response at 5 years (median 1,431 IU/mL versus 2,689 IU/mL [P = 0.041]). At the last follow-up, the liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography was 5.8 +/- 2.7 kPa. Only two patients had liver stiffness suggestive of advanced fibrosis. Week 16 HBV DNA, end-of-treatment HBeAg seroconversion, and undetectable HBV DNA were independent factors associated with virologic response at 5 years. The duration of concomitant lamivudine treatment had no impact on any long-term response.

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon has high durability in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with end-of-treatment virologic response.

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B e-antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon-alpha-2b therapy in hepatitis B e-antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) therapy.

METHODS

Thirty HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG-IFN-alpha-2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis.

RESULTS

VR at 48 weeks post-treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non-responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log(10) HBsAg and log(10) HBeAg correlated well with those of log(10) cccDNA and log(10) total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log(10) sample to cut-off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic hepatitis B

The ultimate goal of treatment for chronic hepatitis B is to reduce liver-related complications and mortality. Sustained hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance 6-12 months after stopping treatment are the short-term surrogate outcomes for interferon or peginterferon therapy. As most patients require long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment, which also has the risk of drug resistance in the case of incomplete viral suppression, maintained hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression to an undetectable level is the appropriate surrogate outcome. Because no antiviral treatment is perfect, it is desirable for treatment response to be predicted and the treatment regimen modified accordingly. At baseline, high ALT and low HBV DNA levels can predict response to both (peg)interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotype A HBV responds best to peginterferon but HBV genotype has no predictive value for nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. HBV DNA is a good on-treatment predictor of response for nucleos(t)ide analogues but not for (peg)interferon. The data supporting the use of quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg to predict response to peginterferon is stronger than that for nucleos(t)ide analogues. In conclusion, predictors of response are useful to provide the most appropriate antiviral therapy to the most suitable patients, in order to achieve the best response and improve the clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis B patients.

New developments in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B affects approximately 400 million people in the world with a substantial disease burden like liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment for chronic hepatitis B has improved dramatically in the last decade, resulting in more patients achieving a state of inactive disease. Currently two treatment strategies are available; treatment with peginterferon (peg-IFN) or nucleos(t)ide analogues with the aim to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to subsequently avoid the development of cirrhosis and HCC. Unfortunately, treatment with peg-IFN can be suboptimal with important adverse effects and nucleos(t)ide analogues provoke resistance. At present, no new promising compounds attacking the HBV life cycle are in development. However, for prediction of sustained response or treatment failure, data from the long-term large peg-IFN trials provide important response markers. For the future the focus is to achieve HBsAg loss and anti-HBs conversion which is the closest the treatment can get to a cure. This review summarizes the current treatment options with their response rates and discusses future strategies for chronic hepatitis B treatment.

Benefits and risks of interferon therapy for hepatitis B

Alpha interferon is the only licensed drug for hepatitis B with immunomodulatory as well as viral inhibitory properties. Potential advantages of interferon compared to nucleoside analogs include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and a higher likelihood for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance. Approximately 30% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 40% of HBeAg-negative cases have a sustained virological response (when defined as HBeAg seroconversion and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 20,000 copies/mL, respectively) 6 months after completion of a 48-week course of peginterferon alfa-2a These responses remain durable in 80% and 50% of cases, respectively, when evaluated several years later. Recent studies have shown that changes in HBsAg and HBeAg concentration during treatment predict sustained virological response and serial monitoring of HBsAg is helpful in predicting HBsAg clearance. HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A have higher rates of HBeAg and HBsAg clearance, whereas HBeAg-negative patients with genotype D have the lowest rate of response to interferon therapy. Long-term follow-up of virological responders to either standard alpha interferon or peginterferon has demonstrated a progressive increase in the rate of HBsAg clearance, particularly in patients who were initially HBeAg-positive. Future studies need to address if specific virological benchmarks during therapy can be used to tailor treatment duration.

CONCLUSION

Peginterferon alfa has a place as first-line therapy of hepatitis B in patients who are carefully selected on the basis of pretreatment serum HBV DNA and aminotransferase levels, safety considerations, and viral genotype.

Monitoring during and after antiviral therapy for hepatitis B

Recent studies suggest that long-term suppression of viral replication is critical to reducing the complications of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Monitoring for continued virological response during and after treatment is essential because current treatment options have limited success in achieving durable endpoints, and antiviral resistance may emerge during long-term therapy. Methods of monitoring treatment response include tests for serum aminotransferase levels, HBV DNA level, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and antibody (anti-HBe), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or antibody (anti-HBs), and liver histology. Virological suppression and loss of HBeAg or HBsAg with or without seroconversion play a prominent role in decision-making regarding the success and duration of antiviral therapy. Guidelines recommend that testing for serum markers be repeated every 12-24 weeks during antiviral therapy and every 6-12 months afterward. Recent data also suggest that serum HBV DNA levels should be assessed at weeks 12 and 24 of therapy, because early viral response may predict the likelihood of sustained response and antiviral resistance. The use of serum HBV DNA levels for this purpose requires an assay with a wide range of quantification, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction assays, which have a 7-8 log(10) dynamic range. Newer, investigational methods for monitoring treatment response include quantitative measurement of HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Better methods for defining durable treatment endpoints are needed. Other areas requiring further research include the optimal treatment duration and the establishment of the optimal use of early viral kinetics for decision-making during antiviral therapy.

On-Treatment Outcome Prediction and Adjustment during Chronic Hepatitis B Therapy: Now and Future

Studies published to date regarding on-treatment outcome prediction during chronic hepatitis B therapy were reviewed. Studies have shown that initial virological responses in terms of week 24 serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are associated with therapeutic outcomes of 1-year pegylated interferon-α and entecavir therapy, and weeks 52 or 104 of lamivudine and telbuvudine therapy. HBV DNA levels at week 48 are also associated with long-term adefovir therapy outcomes. Conceptual on-treatment adjustment and strategies have been proposed; however, this approach seems only necessary during therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues with substantial risk of drug resistance. In addition, studies are needed to decide whether switching to or adding on a second drug, and with which drug, is the most cost-effective strategy.

Virodynamic Predictors of Response to Pegylated Interferon and Lamivudine Combination Treatment of Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Background

Early identification of non-responders to interferon-α and development of stopping rules are needed in patients with chronic hepatitis B to reduce treatment-related costs and morbidity.

Methods

In total, 47 patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B received pegylated interferon-α2b for 8 weeks, lamivudine plus pegylated interferon-α2b combination therapy for 24 weeks and lamivudine monotherapy for 28 weeks. Sustained virological response was defined as HBeAg seroconversion and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA<105 copies/ml at the end of treatment and after 52 weeks of follow-up. The early HBV DNA data from the first 12 weeks of therapy were fitted by a viral kinetic model.

Results

Cutoff values for prediction of sustained virological response were defined as a rate of infected cell loss δ≥0.005 per day (negative predictive value [NPV] 100% and positive predictive value [PPV] 33.3%) and log values of the area under the mathematically predicted HBV DNA curve between baseline and week 12 of therapy ≤8.9 log10 copies/ml x days (NPV 100% and PPV 50%). By the latter cutoff, 25/36 (69.4%) patients without sustained virological response could be identified after 12 weeks of therapy.

Conclusions

In the present study, mathematical modelling of viral dynamics allowed prediction of sustained virological response after 12 weeks of therapy. Virodynamic predictors for sustained virological response should be further validated. The area under the mathematically predicted HBV DNA curve seems a promising candidate for potential cutoff values as it summarizes the influence of baseline HBV DNA and treatment effects.