Risk of Colorectal and Other Cancers in Patients With Serrated Polyposis

Serrated polyposis syndrome; epidemiology and management

Serrated colorectal polyps, long considered innocent, are currently recognized as the precursors to one-third of all colorectal cancers (CRC). Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS), characterized by accumulation of multiple and/or large serrated polyps, symbolizes the highest expression of serrated pathway of carcinogenesis, leading to a high risk of CRC when it is not detected or treated on time. Although previously considered uncommon, SPS is now acknowledged as the most prevalent colorectal polyposis. This syndrome has attracted increasing interest over the past decade and has become a hot topic in the field of gastrointestinal oncology. Besides a small proportion of cases caused by germline mutations in RNF43, no clear genetic cause has been identified. Both epigenetic and environmental factors, especially smoking, have been related to this syndrome, but the etiology of SPS remains uncertain and diagnosis is based on endoscopic criteria. Recent studies on SPS have focused on identifying the underlying risk-factors for CRC, defining the best endoscopic techniques for surveillance and establishing optimal preventive strategies aimed at reducing CRC-incidence without exposing patients to unnecessary procedures. The purpose of this chapter is to review, from a practical perspective, current knowledge and future directions in the diagnosis and management of serrated polyposis syndrome.

Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is characterized by development of numerous serrated lesions throughout the colorectum and increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, SPS has been an underrecognized CRC predisposition syndrome, and the true risk of CRC in SPS, both overall and in surveillance, is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to describe the risk of CRC in patients with SPS.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched on March 25, 2021, for studies describing CRC risk in SPS. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess pooled risk of CRC among SPS patients. Primary outcomes were risk of CRC at time of SPS diagnosis and during surveillance following diagnosis of SPS. Secondary outcomes included risk of CRC prior to diagnosis of SPS and effect of World Health Organization subtype on CRC risk.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies including 2788 patients with SPS were included in the analysis. Overall risk of CRC in SPS was 19.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3%-24.5%). CRC risk at the time of diagnosis was 14.7% (95% CI, 11.4%-18.8%), while risk during surveillance was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.4%), or 7 cases per 1000 person-years. SPS patients also had a high incidence of history of CRC prior to SPS diagnosis (7.0%; 95% CI, 4.6%-11.7). Subgroup analysis did not reveal any significant differences based on World Health Organization subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with SPS have an elevated risk of CRC, which is highest at the time of diagnosis and suggests the importance of early SPS recognition and screening to modify CRC risk. The persistently elevated CRC risk during surveillance supports current guidelines recommending heightened surveillance protocols.

Cancer Risk in Patients With and Relatives of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Sporadic Sessile Serrated Lesions

INTRODUCTION

Patients with serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) and their first-degree relatives (FDRs) have increased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Patients with sporadic sessile serrated lesion (SSL) have risk for progression to CRC. Yet familial risks of common extracolonic cancers and even CRC in these cohorts are poorly understood. Our aim was to examine cancer risk for patients with SPS and sporadic SSL and their close and more distant relatives using a large population database.

METHODS

Patients with SPS (n = 59) from hereditary patient registries were eligible for study. Sporadic SSL (n = 754) and sex- and age-matched normal colonoscopy controls (n = 1,624) were selected from clinical data linked to the Utah Population Database. Cox models adjusting for the number of relatives, degree of relatedness, and person-years at risk were used to estimate CRC, extracolonic, and any-site adenocarcinoma/carcinoma cancer risk in patients and their relatives.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, CRC risk was elevated 10-fold in patients with SPS (P = 0.04) and 5-fold in their FDRs (P = 0.001). Any-site adenoma/carcinoma risk was increased 2.6-fold in FDRs of patients with SPS. No elevated risks of other common extracolonic cancers were observed in SPS and family members. The FDRs, second-degree relatives, and third-degree relatives of patients with both SSL and adenomatous polyps exhibited a 50% increased CRC risk.

DISCUSSION

Patients with SPS and their FDRs have an increased CRC risk, confirming other reports. Interestingly, patients with SSL were noted to have an increased risk of prostate cancer. Relatives of individuals with both sporadic SSL and adenomas, irrespective of size or dysplasia on examination, may have an elevated CRC risk, suggesting closer colonoscopy surveillance in this population.

Novel Genetic Causes of Gastrointestinal Polyposis Syndromes

Hereditary polyposis syndromes are characterized by a large number and/or histopathologically specific polyps in the gastrointestinal tract and a high risk of both colorectal cancer and extracolonic cancer at an early age. While the genes responsible for some of the syndromes, eg, APC in familial adenomatous polyposis and STK11 in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, have been known for decades, novel genetic causes have recently been detected that have shed light on the broader clinical spectrum of syndromes. Genetic diagnoses are important because they can facilitate a personalized surveillance program. Furthermore, at-risk members of the patient's family can be tested and enrolled in surveillance as needed. In some cases, prenatal diagnostics should be offered. In this paper, we describe the development in germline genetics of the hereditary polyposis syndromes over the last 10-12 years, their clinical characteristics, as well as how to implement genetic analyses in the diagnostic pipeline.

Serrated Polyposis Syndrome with a Synchronous Colon Adenocarcinoma Treated by an Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) can transform to malignant lesions through the sessile serrated pathway and traditional serrated pathway. These pathways may cause rapid neoplastic progression compared to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, which may cause interval colorectal cancer. The authors experienced a case of SPS with a synchronous colon adenocarcinoma that was treated with an endoscopic mucosal resection. In pathology reviews, other parts of the adenocarcinoma showed sessile serrated adenoma. Therefore, patients with SPS have a potential for malignant transformation, highlighting the need for strict colonoscopy surveillance starting at the time of SPS diagnosis.

Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature

Serrated polyp associated colorectal cancer (CRC) develops from an alternative mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis and accounts for 10-15% of all CRC. Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) occurs infrequently and is characterized by the occurrence of multiple serrated polyps (hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated lesions and traditional serrated adenomas) throughout the colon and/or rectum and has been strongly associated with development of CRC. However, SPS is frequently unrecognized, due to application failure of the WHO criteria regarding diagnosis and/or missed serrated polyps during endoscopy. The management of SPS requires surveillance at regular intervals and removal of large serrated polyps. Endoscopic resection suitability and technique depends on lesion size and the endoscopist's experience. In this manuscript, we present an update regarding SPS epidemiology, molecular characteristics, management, surveillance strategies and endoscopic resection techniques.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 3-5 years for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of individuals with a familial history of CRC. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of screening alternatives in this population.

METHODS

Eight screening strategies were compared with no screening: fecal immunochemical test (FIT), Stool DNA and blood-based screening every 2 years, colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography, colon capsules, and sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy at 45 years followed, if negative, by FIT every 2 years. Screening test and procedures performance were obtained from the literature. A microsimulation model reproducing the natural history of CRC was used to estimate the cost (€2018) and effectiveness [quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] of each strategy. A lifetime horizon was used. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3.5% annually.

RESULTS

Compared with no screening, colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy at a 30% uptake were the most effective strategy (46.3 and 43.9 QALY/1000). FIT at a 30 µg/g threshold with 30% uptake was only half as effective (25.7 QALY). Colonoscopy was associated with a cost of €484,000 per 1000 individuals whereas sigmoidoscopy and FIT were associated with much lower costs (€123,610 and €66,860). Incremental cost-effectiveness rate for FIT and sigmoidoscopy were €2600/QALY (versus no screening) and €3100/QALY (versus FIT), respectively, whereas it was €150,000/QALY for colonoscopy (versus sigmoidoscopy). With a lower threshold (10 µg/g) and a higher uptake of 45%, FIT was more effective and less costly than colonoscopy at a 30% uptake and was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €4240/QALY versus no screening.

CONCLUSION

At 30% uptake, current screening is the most effective screening strategy for high-risk individuals but is associated with a high ICER. Sigmoidoscopy and FIT at lower thresholds (10 µg/g) and a higher uptake should be given consideration as cost-effective alternatives.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in high-risk individuals Fecal occult blood testing with an immunochemical test (FIT) is generally considered as the most cost-effective alternative in colorectal cancer screening programs for average risk individuals without family history.Current screening guidelines for high-risk individuals with familial history recommend colonoscopy every 3-5 years.Colonoscopy every 3-5 years for individuals with familial history is the most effective strategy but is associated with a high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.Compared with colonoscopy, if screening based on FIT is associated with a higher participation rate, it can achieve a similar effectiveness at a lower cost.

A natural language-based tool for diagnosis of serrated polyposis syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) is common but under-recognized and is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The diagnosis is based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and is inclusive of the cumulative number of lifetime serrated polyps. We used natural language processing (NLP) to extract colonoscopy and pathology data from the electronic medical record (EMR). The aim of this study was to assess feasibility of using an NLP-based SPS tool to identify patients with SPS.

METHODS

NLP was used to extract data from 323,494 colonoscopies performed in 255,074 distinct patients between August 1998 and March 2016 to identify individuals who met SPS criteria. The accuracy of diagnosis of SPS was assessed by manual review of the EMR.

RESULTS

Of 255,074 patients, 71 were identified as meeting 1 WHO criteria for SPS. Manual review confirmed the diagnosis of SPS to be accurate in 66 cases (93%). Erroneous diagnosis in the remaining 5 cases occurred because of duplicate polyp data by NLP extraction. Only 25 of 66 patients (38%) were diagnosed with SPS by a clinician in the EMR. Of these, SPS was diagnosed by NLP at least 2 years before the clinician in 5 of 25 patients (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort, NLP accurately identified SPS in over 90% of cases, most of which were not previously recognized. NLP can assist in collating colonoscopy and pathology data across multiple procedures in the same patient to make an accurate and earlier diagnosis of SPS.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative colon cancer screening strategies in the context of the French national screening program

BACKGROUND

A nationwide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was set up in France from 2009 for average-risk, asymptomatic people aged 50-74 years based on an immunochemical fecal occult blood test [faecal immunochemical test (FIT)] every 2 years, followed by colonoscopy if positive. The European standard recommends a participation rate of 45% for the program to be cost-effective, yet the latest published rate in France was 34%. The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of screening alternatives taking real-world participation rates into account.

METHODS

Eight screening strategies were compared, based either on a screening test (Guaiac or FIT testing, blood-based, stool DNA, computed tomography colonography, colon capsules, and sigmoidoscopy) followed by full colonoscopy if positive or direct colonoscopy. A microsimulation model was used to estimate the cost effectiveness associated with each strategy.

RESULTS

Compared with no screening, FIT was associated with a 14.0 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) increase of €50,520 per 1000 individuals, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3600/QALY. Only stool DNA and blood-based testing were associated with a QALY increase compared with FIT, with stool DNA weakly dominated by blood-based testing, and the latter associated with an ICER of €154,600/QALY compared with FIT. All other strategies were dominated by FIT.

CONCLUSION

FIT every 2 years appears to be the most cost-effective CRC screening strategy when taking into account a real-world participation rate of 34%.

Age-dependent performance of BRAF mutation testing in Lynch syndrome diagnostics

BRAF V600E mutations have been reported as a marker of sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI) colorectal cancer (CRC). Current international diagnostic guidelines recommend BRAF mutation testing in MSI CRC patients to predict low risk of Lynch syndrome (LS). We evaluated the age-specific performance of BRAF testing in LS diagnostics. We systematically compared the prevalence of BRAF mutations in LS-associated CRCs and unselected MSI CRCs in different age groups as available from published studies, databases and population-based patient cohorts. Sensitivity/specificity analysis of BRAF testing for exclusion of LS and cost calculations were performed. Among 969 MSI CRCs from LS carriers in the literature and German HNPCC Consortium, 15 (1.6%) harbored BRAF mutations. Six of seven LS patients with BRAF-mutant CRC and reported age were <50 years. Among 339 of 756 (44.8%) of BRAF mutations detected in unselected MSI CRC, only 2 of 339 (0.6%) BRAF mutations were detected in patients <50 years. The inclusion of BRAF testing led to high risk of missing LS patients and increased costs at age <50 years. BRAF testing in patients <50 years carries a high risk of missing a hereditary cancer predisposition and is cost-inefficient. We suggest direct referral of MSI CRC patients <50 years to genetic counseling without BRAF testing.

[Estimated impact of the current colorectal screening program in France]

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second most deadly in France. A Cochrane meta-analysis has confirmed the benefits of colorectal cancer screening. A nationwide colorectal screening program was set up in France in 2009 for medium-risk, asymptomatic people aged 50 to 74 years. It has been based, since 2015, on the Fecal Immunochemical Test. The participation rate for 2016-2017 was 34%, which is lower than the European objectives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the program at the current participation rate and at rates of 45% and 65%.

METHODS

The epidemiological impact of the program was estimated from the results of an individual simulation model adapted from the Microsimulation Screening Analysis Colon model, calibrated and transposed to the French context. An initial analysis was conducted to estimate the individual impact of screening and a second for the entire eligible population, at various participation rates.

RESULTS

The test is associated with a lifetime reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer of 24% for men and 21% for women, and a reduction in the risk of death from colorectal cancer of 51% and 43% respectively. At the current level of participation, the program reduces incidence by 5% and mortality by 14% compared to no organized screening. The impact would be reduced by an additional 3% and 8% for participation rates of 45% and 65% respectively. Similarly, mortality would decrease by an additional 8% and 22%.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that in a population at medium risk for colorectal cancer, the organised programme is an effective strategy for reducing its incidence. They also confirm that the achievement of European objectives remains a key issue for improving the effectiveness of organized screening. An evolution of immunological test delivery modalities could help to achieve these participation objectives.

Gastrointestinal Polyposis in Pediatric Patients

Gastrointestinal polyps are mucosal overgrowths that, if unchecked, can undergo malignant transformation. Although relatively uncommon in the pediatric age group, they can be the harbingers of multiorgan cancer risk and require close management and follow-up. Additionally, as many polyposis syndromes are inherited, appropriate genetic testing and management of relatives is vital for the health of the entire family. In this review, we discuss both common and uncommon childhood gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes in terms of clinical presentation, management, and surveillance. We also detail any additional malignancy risk and surveillance required in the pediatric age group (<21 years old). Through this review, we provide a framework for gastroenterologists to manage the multifaceted nature of pediatric polyposis syndromes.

Serrated Polyposis Syndrome in a Single-Center 10-Year Experience

Aims:

Serrated polyposis syndrome is a disease that is often missed in the clinical setting and is associated with colorectal cancer. We investigated the prevalence of SPS and the association between colorectal or other cancers in a 10-year, retrospective data analysis.

Methods:

We reviewed complete colonoscopy data obtained from January 2005 through January 2015 at a health-screening centre. Serrated polyposis syndrome was defined on the basis of the criteria established by the 2010 World Health Organization.

Results:

Of a total of 53.842 consecutive subjects who underwent complete colonoscopy, 12 (0.022%) patients had serrated polyposis syndrome. All of these cases were under-recognized by the endoscopist or referring physician. The mean patient age was 58.6 years; 67% of the patients were men and 33% were women. No serrated polyposis syndrome patients had a first-degree relative with serrated polyposis syndrome, and no serrated polyposis syndrome patients had colorectal cancer. Two cases (17%) had extra-colonic cancers (prostate cancer and thyroid cancer). Eight cases (67%) had a family history of cancer (stomach, breast, lung, pancreas, prostate and colorectal cancer).

Conclusion:

Serrated polyposis syndrome was a rare condition in a 10-year database, and it was diagnosed late in all cases. Serrated polyposis syndrome may be associated with an increased risk of extra-colonic cancer.

Presentation, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal (bowel) cancer remains a common disease, particularly in developed countries. If diagnosed early, it has a high five-year survival rate, yet the disease remains a significant cause of mortality. This article aims to improve nurses' understanding of the signs and symptoms of colorectal cancer, and the role of all nurses in supporting early diagnosis and providing follow-up care. It also discusses the available treatment options for colorectal cancer, enabling nurses to offer informed care to patients, who in turn, can make informed decisions about their treatment.

Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect

Serrated polyps are important contributors to the burden of colorectal cancers (CRC). These lesions were once considered to have no malignant potential, but currently up to 30% of all CRC are recognized to arise from the serrated neoplasia pathway. The primary premalignant lesions are sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), although traditional serrated adenomas are relatively uncommon. Compared to conventional adenomas, SSA/Ps are morphologically subtle with indistinct borders, may be difficult to detect endoscopically, are more prevalent than previously thought, are associated with synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia, and have a higher risk of incomplete resection. Although many lesions remain “dormant,” progressive disease is associated with the development of dysplasia and more rapid progression to CRC. As a result, SSA/Ps are strongly implicated in the development of interval cancers. These factors represent unique challenges that require a meticulous approach to their management. In this review, we summarize the contemporary literature on the characterization, detection and resection of SSA/Ps.

Serrated Polyps of Colon and Rectum: a Clinicopathologic Review

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, there have been significant changes in the classification and nomenclature of colorectal polyps. Previously, only two groups of lesions were widely recognized, the adenoma and the hyperplastic polyp. Adenomas were considered the only precursor of colorectal cancer, and hyperplastic polyps were considered innocent with no malignant potential. However, recent discoveries about molecular pathways of colorectal cancers have significantly changed our understanding of these neoplasms. Serrated polyps-previously uniformly called hyperplastic polyps-are now known to comprise a heterogeneous family of neoplasms united by their characteristic saw tooth morphology but differing in many important ways, including their malignant potential and molecular profile. This group of neoplasms includes both hyperplastic polyps and the more recently recognized serrated adenomas. Serrated adenomas can be subdivided into the traditional serrated adenoma and the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp. Both of these lesions show characteristic molecular changes, which differ from traditional colorectal adenomatous polyps.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we will discuss the morphologic features of serrated colorectal lesions, the molecular alterations that characterize them, and their role in colorectal cancer development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The English literature regarding the new nomenclature will be reviewed and the key diagnostic points will be recorded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This large group of polyps has recently been better classified which needs specific attention by pathologists, gastroenterologists and even surgeons.