Validation of a Scoring System to Predict Microscopic Colitis in a Cohort of Patients With Chronic Diarrhea

Practice Implications of Colonoscopic Investigation of Microscopic Colitis in Patients Above 50 Years of Age Presenting With Chronic Diarrhoea: A Multi-Centre Review

Background Patients with an unknown cause for chronic diarrhoea will usually undergo a colonoscopy as part of the investigative work-up, and it is acceptable practice for the patients to undergo random biopsies. The optimum number of biopsies has yet to be established. This study investigated the implications of routine random biopsies for diagnosing microscopic colitis in patients 50 years and older who presented with chronic diarrhoea. Methodology A retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained internal hospital database across three tertiary teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, on participants >50 years old who presented for an elective colonoscopy to investigate chronic diarrhoea between January 2016 and June 2019. Data was captured from medical records, imaging, colonoscopy, and histopathology reports, and patient follow-up was analysed using SPSS v.29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results There were 216 patients, with the majority female (67%) and a mean age of 64.6 (SD±9.9). Microscopic colitis was identified in 7.4% (95% CI = 3.9-10.9%). Most positive biopsies (81.3%) were from the left colon. The median number of biopsies per case was seven (IQR=5). The median procedure duration and scope withdrawal time were 23 and eight minutes, respectively. Most of the procedures were done by a consultant (77%). Bowel was adequately prepped in 76.9% of the cases. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the rate of identification of microcolitis was associated with the number of biopsies taken; microcolitis positivity had a higher mean number of biopsies, 10.8 vs 6.7 (p<0.001). Key complications were a 30-day readmission rate, seven-day re-presentation with acute colitis, post-procedure bleeding, requiring further imaging or angioembolisation and increased length of stay on readmission. Conclusion The prevalence of positive biopsies for microcolitis is low (7.4%). Biopsies during colonoscopy are associated with clinically significant morbidity and health care costs. Most positive biopsies were attained from the left colon. It may be time to standardise practice in investigating microscopic colitis as a cause of chronic diarrhoea in patients > 50 years old.

Undiagnosed microscopic colitis: a hidden cause of chronic diarrhoea and a frequently missed treatment opportunity

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a treatable cause of chronic, non-bloody, watery diarrhoea, but physicians (particularly in primary care) are less familiar with MC than with other causes of chronic diarrhoea. The colon in patients with MC is usually macroscopically normal. MC can only be diagnosed by histological examination of colonic biopsies (subepithelial collagen band >10 µm (collagenous colitis) or >20 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells (lymphocytic colitis), both with lamina propria inflammation). The UK National Health Service exerts downward pressure to minimise colonoscopy referrals. Furthermore, biopsies are often not taken according to guidelines. These factors work against MC diagnosis. In this review, we note the high incidence of MC (comparable to ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease) and its symptomatic overlap with irritable bowel syndrome. We also highlight problems with the recommendation by National Health Service/National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for inflammatory bowel diseases that colonoscopy referrals should be based on a faecal calprotectin level of ≥100 µg/g. Faecal calprotectin is <100 µg/g in over half of individuals with active MC, building into the system a propensity to misdiagnose MC as irritable bowel syndrome. This raises important questions-how many patients with MC have already been misdiagnosed, and how do we address this silent burden? Clarity is needed around pathways for MC management; MC is poorly acknowledged by the UK healthcare system and it is unlikely that best practices are being followed adequately. There is an opportunity to identify and treat patients with MC more effectively.

Optimization of a Scoring System to Predict Microscopic Colitis in a Cohort of Patients With Chronic Diarrhea

GOALS

Our aim was to develop a scoring system to predict risk of microscopic colitis (MC), to identify patients at low risk, potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic diarrhea often undergo colonoscopy with biopsy, but few have histologic abnormalities.

STUDY

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with chronic diarrhea and a macroscopically normal colonoscopy at our institution over a 9-month period. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between predictors and the presence of biopsy-proven MC.

RESULTS

The derivation cohort included 617 patients. Median age was 55.1 (39.6 to 68.1) years; 397 (64.3%) were female and 81 (13.1%) had MC. Age ≥55 years, duration of diarrhea ≤6 months, ≥5 bowel movements per day, body mass index <30 kg/m, current smoking, and current use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitorss and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were independently associated with MC. A score of ≥10 points in our scoring system, yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.83 with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 49% in predicting which patients have MC. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.8% (95.0% to 99.1%).In the validation cohort, the scoring system performed similarly (AUC 0.79, sensitivity 91%, specificity 49%, NPV 97%). By avoiding biopsies in patients at low risk of having MC, costs associated with colon biopsies could be reduced by almost 43%.

CONCLUSION

This scoring system including 7 clinical variables was able to identify patients unlikely to have MC, with excellent sensitivity, reasonable specificity, and a high NPV, translating into important potential cost savings.

Diagnosis and Management of Microscopic Colitis

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a relatively common cause of chronic watery diarrhea, especially in older persons. Associated symptoms, including abdominal pain and arthralgias, are common. The diagnosis is based upon characteristic histological findings in the presence of diarrhea. The two types of MC, collagenous and lymphocytic colitis, share similar clinical features, with the main difference being the presence or absence of a thickened subepithelial collagen band. There are several treatment options for patients with MC, although only budesonide has been well studied in multiple controlled clinical trials. This review will describe the clinical features, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of patients with MC.

Validation and modification of a diagnostic scoring system to predict microscopic colitis

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with diarrhoea undergo colonoscopy. If this is macroscopically normal, random biopsies are obtained to rule out microscopic colitis (MC), but most patients have functional disease. Accurate predictors of MC could avoid the need to take biopsies in a substantial proportion of patients, saving money for the health service. We validated a previously described diagnostic scoring system for MC, and incorporated further variables to assess whether this improved performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive adults with loose stools undergoing colonoscopy in Leeds, UK were included. Demographic and symptom data were collected prospectively. The diagnostic scoring system described previously was applied. In addition, the incorporation of further variables, including drugs associated with MC, number of stools, nocturnal passage of stools, and duration of loose stools, into the scoring system was assessed. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 242 patients (mean age 51.0 years, 163 (67.4%) female), 26 (10.7%) of whom had MC, a cut off of ≥4 on the original scoring system had a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 35.2%. Nocturnal passage of stools and duration of loose stools <6 months were significant predictors of MC. Incorporating these variables in a new scoring system with a cut off of ≥6 identified MC with 95.7% sensitivity and 46.0% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating nocturnal passage of stools and duration of loose stools into the scoring system may improve ability to predict MC, and avoid random colonic biopsies in a greater proportion of patients with loose stools.