Safety, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Effects of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration on Detection of Extravascular Migratory Metastases

Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can overcome the limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided acquisition by identifying microvessels inside inhomogeneous tumours and improving the characterization of these tumours. Despite the initial enthusiasm that oriented needle sampling under CH-EUS guidance could provide better diagnostic yield in pancreatic solid lesions, further studies did not confirm the supplementary values in cases of tissue acquisition guided by CH-EUS. This review details the knowledge based on the available data on contrast-guided procedures. The indications for CH-EUS tissue acquisition include isoechoic EUS lesions with poor visible delineation where CH-EUS can differentiate the lesion vascularisation from the surrounding parenchyma and also the mural nodules within biliopancreatic cystic lesions, which occur in select cases. Additionally, the roles of CH-EUS-guided therapy in patients whose pancreatic fluid collections or bile ducts that have an echogenic content have indications for drainage, and patients who have nonvisualized vessels that need to be highlighted via Doppler EUS are presented. Another indication is represented if there is a need for an immediate assessment of the post-radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, in which case CH-EUS can be used to reveal the incomplete tumour destruction.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common (90%) type of solid pancreatic neoplasm. Due to its late presentation and poor survival rate, early diagnosis and timely treatment is of utmost importance for better clinical outcomes. Endoscopic ultrasound provides high-resolution images of the pancreas and has excellent sensitivity in the diagnosis of even small (<2 cm) pancreatic lesions. Apart from imaging, it also has an advantage of tissue acquisition (EUS fine-needle aspiration, FNA; or fine-needle biopsy, FNB) for definitive diagnoses. EUS-guided tissue acquisition plays a crucial role in genomic and molecular studies, which in today's era of personalized medicine, are likely to become important components of PDAC management. With the use of better needle designs and technical advancements, EUS has now become an indispensable tool in the management of PDAC. Lastly, artificial intelligence for the detection of pancreatic lesions and newer automated needles for tissue acquisition will obviate observer dependency in the near future, resulting in the wider dissemination and adoption of this technology for improved outcomes in patients with PDAC.

Monitoring Angiotropic Extravascular Migratory Metastasis In Vitro

The mechanism of cancer cell migration from the primary tumor toward secondary sites is not fully understood. In addition to intravascular cellular migration, angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis (EVMM) has been recognized as a metastatic pathway involving tumor cells crawling along the abluminal vascular surface to distant sites. A very simple in vitro 3D assay is described here, which is based on a previous in vitro angiogenesis assay. The assay involves monitoring single fluorescence-tagged migrating cancer cells in the presence of vascular structures in real time. This coculture assay represents a quantitative approach for monitoring the migration processes of cancer cells along vessels, demonstrating phenotypic switching and migration dynamics. This protocol can be used for molecular analyses and can also be adapted for screening of therapeutic agents to block cancer metastasis.

Hematogenous metastasis and tumor dormancy as concepts or dogma? The continuum of vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis as an alternative

It has been accepted for many years that tumor cells spread via the circulation to distant sites. The latency period between treatment and tumor recurrence has been attributed to dormant cells in distant organs that emerge and grow as metastatic tumors. These processes are accepted with an incomplete demonstration of their existence. Challenging such a well-established accepted paradigm is not easy as history as shown. An alternative or co-existing mechanism involving tumor cell migration along the outside of the vessels and co-option of the blood vessel has been studied for over 25 years and is presented. Several lines of data support this new mechanism of tumor spread and metastatic growth and is termed angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis or EVMM. This slow migration along the outside of the vessel wall may explain the latency period between treatment and metastatic tumor growth. The reader is asked to be open to this possible new concept in how tumors spread and grow and the reason for this latency period. A full understanding of how tumors spread and grow is fundamental for the targeting of new therapeutics.

Vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis: a continuum of tumour growth and spread?

Two fields of cancer research have emerged dealing with the biology of tumour cells localised to the abluminal vascular surface: vessel co-option (VCo), a non-angiogenic mode of tumour growth and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis (EVMM), a non-hematogenous mode of tumour migration and metastasis. VCo is a mechanism by which tumour cells gain access to a blood supply by spreading along existing blood vessels in order to grow locally. Angiotropic EVMM involves "pericytic mimicry" (PM), which is characterised by tumour cells continuously migrating in the place of pericytes distantly along abluminal vascular surfaces. When cancer cells are engaged in PM and EVMM, they migrate along blood vessels beyond the advancing front of the tumour to secondary sites with the formation of regional and distant metastases. In the present perspective, the authors review the current scientific literature, emphasising the analogies between embryogenesis and cancer progression, the re-activation of embryonic signals by "cancer stem cells", and the important role of laminins and epithelial-mesenchymal-transition. This perspective maintains that VCo and angiotropic EVMM constitute complementary processes and represent a continuum of cancer progression from the primary tumour to metastases and of tumour growth to EVMM, analogous to the embryonic development program.

Angiotropism, pericytic mimicry and extravascular migratory metastasis: an embryogenesis-derived program of tumor spread

Intravascular dissemination of tumor cells is the accepted mechanism of cancer metastasis. However, the phenomenon of angiotropism, pericyte mimicry (PM), and extravascular migratory metastasis (EVMM) has questioned the concept that tumor cells metastasize exclusively via circulation within vascular channels. This new paradigm of cancer spread and metastasis suggests that metastatic cells employ embryonic mechanisms for attachment to the abluminal surfaces of blood vessels (angiotropism) and spread via continuous migration, competing with and replacing pericytes, i.e., pericyte mimicry (PM). This is an entirely extravascular phenomenon (i.e., extravascular migratory metastasis or EVMM) without entry (intravasation) into vascular channels. PM and EVMM have mainly been studied in melanoma but also occur in other cancer types. PM and EVMM appear to be a reversion to an embryogenesis-derived program. There are many analogies between embryogenesis and cancer progression, including the important role of laminins, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and the re-activation of embryonic signals by cancer cells. Furthermore, there is no circulation of blood during the first trimester of embryogenesis, despite the fact that there is extensive migration of cells to distant sites and formation of organs and tissues during this period. Embryonic migration therefore is a continuous extravascular migration as are PM and EVMM, supporting the concept that these embryonic migratory events appear to recur abnormally during the metastatic process. Finally, the perivascular location of tumor cells intrinsically links PM to vascular co-option. Taken together, these two new paradigms may greatly influence the development of new effective therapeutics for metastasis. In particular, targeting embryonic factors linked to migration that are detected during cancer metastasis may be particularly relevant to PM/EVMM.