Interventions to Decrease Unplanned Healthcare Utilization and Improve Quality of Care in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Healthcare utilisation patterns and drivers amongst inflammatory bowel disease patients in the outpatient clinic

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, impose an escalating burden on healthcare systems globally, with a rising prevalence contributing to increased costs. This study explored healthcare utilisation patterns and its drivers amongst IBD patients in an outpatient clinic.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted at a Dutch academic teaching hospital. IBD patients ( n  = 180) were followed for 1 year and were categorised based on disease activity and consultation frequency. Healthcare utilisation was assessed through consultations and laboratory tests. Patient-reported outcomes and biochemical disease activity were measured, and subsequently the reasons for consultations were analysed.

RESULTS

The frequency of outpatient healthcare utilisation exceeded the recommended IBD care guidelines by two-fold. Comorbidities were the leading reason for consultations (40.4%), followed by remission induction, medication changes and pending test results. Moreover, clinical disease activity, reported problems with self-care, daily activities and pain were predictive of an increase in annual consultations.

CONCLUSION

This study identified factors influencing healthcare utilisation in IBD outpatients. Personalised care pathways using eHealth technologies have the potential to reduce unnecessary consultations and optimise resource allocation.

Inequalities in Healthcare Access, Experience and Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are incurable diseases that require lifelong access to health services. Accumulating evidence of inequalities in health care access, experience, and outcomes for individuals with IBD is apparent. This review aimed to describe the inequalities in healthcare access, experiences, and outcomes of care for adults with IBD, to identify research gaps, and to identify future research priorities in this area.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to retrieve quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods evidence from 3 databases (EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL) published between January 1, 2000, and September 27, 2023.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion. The majority (42 of 51) focused on IBD health outcomes, followed by healthcare access (24 of 51). Significantly fewer investigated patient experiences of IBD healthcare (8 of 51). Most available studies reported on race/ethnic disparities of healthcare (33 of 51), followed by inequalities driven by socioeconomic differences (12 of 51), rurality (7 of 51), gender and sex (3 of 51), age (2 of 51), culture (2 of 51), literacy (1 of 51), and sexuality (1 of 51). Inflammatory bowel disease patients from Black, Asian, and Hispanic ethnic groups had significantly poorer health outcomes. A lack of research was found in the sexual and gender minority community (1 of 51). No research was found to investigate inequalities in IBD patients with learning disabilities or autism.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research, particularly utilizing qualitative methods, is needed to understand health experiences of underserved patient populations with IBD. Cultural humility in IBD care is required to better serve individuals with IBD of Black and Asian race/ethnicity. The lack of research amongst sexual and gender minority groups with IBD, and with learning disabilities, poses a risk of creating inequalities within inequalities.

Current Trends in Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Two Decades

Background

In recent years, there has been a growing focus on chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD) and their impact on personal and social health. Effective management of NCD is essential for their prevention and treatment. This study aims to utilize bibliometric methods to analyze and summarize the current development and emerging trends in NCD management.

Methods

A literature search and screening were conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023. VOSviewer and Citespace software was performed to examine publication volume, authors, institutions, countries, journals, citation frequencies, keywords, clustering, and burst terms, and to create a visual map.

Results

A total of 996 valid publications from 464 journals were included in the study. The number of publications exhibited a gradual growth trend over the years. The United States was the most productive and influential country, contributing the highest proportion of both publications and total citations. BMC Health Services Research, Toronto University, and Marshall, Bruce C. were identified as the most productive journal, institution, and author, respectively. Further analysis of keyword co-occurrence and burst detection revealed that the most prevalent keywords were "improving primary care" and "integrated care".

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and trends in NCD management over the past two decades, providing valuable insights for future research directions. It indicates a potential shift towards enhancing primary healthy care, integrated care, and digital health.

Development of a set of measurable outcome indicators for Flemish patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Uniform and standardised quality measurement allows care assessment and improvement. Following a pragmatic consensus method we aimed to agree on a selection of measurable quality indicators that can be used to assess, benchmark and gradually improve inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care in Flanders.

METHODS

Of 49 structures, 135 processes and 37 outcome indicators identified through literature, 58 were preselected and reformulated into measurable outcome indicators by four IBD physicians. A larger expert group scored the 58 indicators on a 10-point importance scale twice, endorsed by patient and expert perspectives in between rounds. Additional items could be suggested. A final selection and subset of indicators with room for improvement were agreed upon during a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

Fifty indicators received an importance score of 7 or higher by ≥80% of the participants (seven IBD nurses, one abdominal surgeon, one chief medical officer and 31 IBD physicians including two paediatricians). Eight indicators scored highly important by 60-80%, two indicators reintroduced by patients and one newly suggested, were discussed during the consensus meeting. Among 26 participants, eight indicators were agreed to be added to the final selection. Of the 58 selected items, 19 were retained in the improvement subset, related to patient-reported outcomes, use of hospital services and survival, patient characteristics, monitoring of disease activity and remission, endoscopy guidelines, infection prevention, steroid and other medication use.

CONCLUSION

Fifty-eight indicators were selected to assess IBD care in Flanders and a subset of 19 for use in clinical practice to steer quality improvement initiatives.

The Cost of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care - How to Make it Sustainable

The rising global prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, underscores the need to examine current and future IBD care costs. Direct health care expenses, including ambulatory visits, hospitalizations, and medications, are substantial, averaging $9,000 to $12,000 per person annually in high-income regions. However, these estimates do not fully account for factors such as disease severity, accessibility, and variability in health care infrastructure among regions. Indirect costs, predominantly stemming from loss in productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and other intangible costs, further contribute to the financial burden of IBD. Despite efforts to quantify indirect costs, many aspects remain poorly understood, leading to an underestimation of their actual impact. Challenges to achieving cost sustainability include disparities in access, treatment affordability, and the absence of standardized cost-effective care guidelines. Strategies for making IBD care sustainable include early implementation of biologic therapies, focusing on cost-effectiveness in settings with limited resources, and promoting the uptake of biosimilars to reduce direct costs. Multidisciplinary care teams leveraging technology and patient-reported outcomes also hold promise in reducing both direct and indirect costs associated with IBD. Addressing the increasing financial burden of IBD requires a comprehensive approach that tackles disparities, enhances access to cost-effective therapeutics, and promotes collaborative efforts across health care systems. Embracing innovative strategies can pave the way for personalized, cost-effective care accessible to all individuals with IBD, ensuring better outcomes and sustainability.

Quality improvement exercises in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) services: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Quality Improvement initiatives aim to improve care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). These address a range of aspects of care including adherence to published guidelines. The objectives of this review were to document the scope and quality of published quality improvement initiatives in IBD, highlight successful interventions and the outcomes achieved.

DESIGN/METHOD

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. We included peer reviewed articles or conference proceedings reporting initiatives intended to improve the quality of IBD care, with both baseline and prospectively collected follow-up data. Initiatives were categorised based on problems, interventions and outcomes. We used the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set instrument to appraise articles. We mapped the focus of the articles to the six domains of the IBD standards.

RESULTS

100 studies were identified (35 full text; 65 conference abstracts). Many focused on vaccination, medication, screening, or meeting multiple quality measures. Common interventions included provider education, the development of new service protocols, or enhancements to the electronic medical records. Studies principally focused on areas covered by the IBD standards 'ongoing care' and 'the IBD service', with less focus on standards 'pre-diagnosis', 'newly diagnosed', 'flare management', 'surgery' or 'inpatient care'.

CONCLUSION

Good quality evidence exists on approaches to improve the quality of a narrow range of IBD service functions, but there are many topic areas with little or no published quality improvement initiatives. We highlight successful quality improvement interventions and offer recommendations to improve reporting of future studies.

Automated Clinical Pathway Utilizing Custom Risk Stratification Identifies Substantial Rates of Overdue Follow-up Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Facilitates Population Health Interventions

We describe the development and implementation of a dynamic clinical pathway, the IBD CarePath, integrated into the electronic health record that applies custom risk stratification to identify patients with IBD who are overdue for clinical follow-up.

Transition-of-care program from emergency department to gastroenterology clinics improves follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms need to appropriately transition their care to a GI outpatient clinic in a timely manner to have their health needs met and avoid significant morbidity. When this transition isn't optimal, patients are lost to follow-up, potentially placing them at risk for adverse events. We sought to study the effectiveness of implementing an electronic medical record (EMR) based transition-of-care (TOC) program from the ED to outpatient GI clinics.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single center cohort study of patients discharged from the ED of a tertiary care academic medical center referred to outpatient GI clinic before (Pre-TOC patients) and after implementation of an EMR based TOC program (TOC patients). We further stratified patients based on the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), which is a composite measure of economic well-being. We compared rates of appointment scheduling and appointment attendance between the two groups, as well as 30-day readmission rates to the ED. We also performed a subgroup analysis to determine if socioeconomic status would affect patient follow-up rates.

RESULTS

We included 380 Pre-TOC and 399 TOC patients in our analysis. TOC patients were found to both schedule appointments (50% vs 27% p-value <0.01) as well as show up to appointments (34% vs 24% p-value <0.01) at significantly higher rates compared to Pre-TOC patients. There was no significant difference between 30-day readmission rates between the two groups. In addition, TOC patients from At-Risk and Distressed Communities were over 22 times more likely to schedule an appointment compared to Pre-TOC patients from similar neighborhoods (OR 22.18, 95% CI 4.23-116.32).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that patients who are discharged from the ED with outpatient GI follow-up are more likely to both schedule and show up to appointments with implementation of an EMR-based direct referral program compared to no patient navigation, particularly among patients of lower socioeconomic status.