1
|
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Dubinsky MC, Sands BE, Panés J, Schreiber S, Reinisch W, Feagan BG, Danese S, Yarur AJ, D’Haens GR, Goetsch M, Wosik K, Keating M, Lazin K, Wu J, Modesto I, McDonnell A, Bartolome L, Vermeire S. Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Isolated Proctitis: Results From the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:1270-1282. [PMID: 38613425 PMCID: PMC11324338 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials. METHODS Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed. RESULTS We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (≥10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p < 0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings. CONCLUSIONS Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France
- INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD Center, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Susan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bruce E Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julian Panés
- Formerly Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Walter Reinisch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Brian G Feagan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Alimentiv Inc, London, ON, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andres J Yarur
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Geert R D’Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin X, You Y, Ruan G, Zhou W, Li J, Li J. Deep mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: how deep is better? Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1429427. [PMID: 39156693 PMCID: PMC11327023 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1429427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC), characterized by its recurrent nature, imposes a significant disease burden and compromises the quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that achieving clinical remission is not sufficient for long-term remission. In pursuit of a favorable prognosis, mucosal healing (MH) has been defined as the target of therapies in UC. This paradigm shift has given rise to the formulation of diverse endoscopic and histological scoring systems, providing distinct definitions for MH. Endoscopic remission (ER) has been widely employed in clinical practice, but it is susceptible to subjective factors related to endoscopists. And there's growing evidence that histological remission (HR) might be associated with a lower risk of disease flares, but the incorporation of HR as a routine therapeutic endpoint remains a debate. The integration of advanced technology has further enriched the definition of deep MH. Up to now, a universal standardized definition for deep MH in clinical practice is currently lacking. This review will focus on the definition of deep MH, from different dimensions, and analyze strengths and limitations, respectively. Subsequent multiple large-scale trials are needed to validate the concept of deep MH, offering valuable insights into potential benefits for UC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan You
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Gechong Ruan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Weixun Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ji Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jingnan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gros B, Ross H, Nwabueze M, Constantine-Cooke N, Derikx LAAP, Lyons M, O’Hare C, Noble C, Arnott ID, Jones GR, Lees CW, Plevris N. Long-term outcomes and predictors of vedolizumab persistence in ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848241258372. [PMID: 39086990 PMCID: PMC11289824 DOI: 10.1177/17562848241258372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term vedolizumab (VDZ) outcomes in real-world cohorts have been largely limited to 1-year follow-up, with few bio-naïve patients or objective markers of inflammation assessed. Objectives We aimed to assess factors affecting VDZ persistence including clinical, biochemical and faecal biomarker remission at 1, 3 and 5 years. Design We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Methods All adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who had received VDZ induction for ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD-unclassified (IBDU) were included. Baseline phenotype and follow-up data were collected via a review of electronic medical records. Results We included 290 patients [UC n = 271 (93.4%), IBDU n = 19 (6.6%)] with a median time on VDZ of 27.6 months (interquartile range: 14.4-43.2). At the end of follow-up, a total of 157/290 (54.1%) patients remained on VDZ. The median time to discontinuation was 14.1 months (7.0-23.3). Previous exposure to ⩾1 advanced therapy, steroid use at baseline and disease extension (E3 and E2 versus E1) were independent predictors for worse VDZ persistence. Clinical remission (partial Mayo < 2) was 75.7% (171/226), 72.4% (157/217) and 70.2% (127/181) at years 1, 3 and 5, respectively. Steroid use during maintenance VDZ therapy occurred in 31.7% (92/290), hospitalization in 15.5% (45/290) and surgery in 3.4% (10/291). The rate of serious adverse events was 1.2 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusion VDZ effectiveness appears enduring with favourable long-term safety profile. VDZ persistence was influenced by previous exposure to biologics/small molecules, disease distribution and steroid use at baseline in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Gros
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology; Liver and Digestive Diseases Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain and Hepatology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Hannah Ross
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Maureen Nwabueze
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Nathan Constantine-Cooke
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Centre for Genomics and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Lauranne A. A. P. Derikx
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathew Lyons
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Claire O’Hare
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Edinburgh Pharmacy Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Colin Noble
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Ian D. Arnott
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Gareth-Rhys Jones
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Charlie W. Lees
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Centre for Genomics and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Nikolas Plevris
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Deo D, Dal Buono A, Gabbiadini R, Spaggiari P, Busacca A, Masoni B, Ferretti S, Bezzio C, Armuzzi A. Management of proctitis in ulcerative colitis and the place of biological therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:443-453. [PMID: 38874980 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2369189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 20-30% of the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may present with isolated proctitis. Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a challenging condition to manage due to its significant burden in terms of disabling symptoms. AREAS COVERED PubMed was searched up to March 2024 to identify relevant studies on UP. A comprehensive summary and critical appraisal of the available data on UP are provided, highlighting emerging treatments and areas for future research. EXPERT OPINION Patients with UP are often undertreated, and the disease burden is often underestimated in clinical practice. Treat-to-target management algorithms can be applied to UP, aiming for clinical remission in the short term, and endoscopic remission and maintenance of remission in the long term. During their disease, approximately one-third of UP patients require advanced therapies. Escalation to biologic therapy is required for refractory or steroid dependent UP. For optimal patient care and management of UP, it is necessary to include these patients in future randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta De Deo
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Dal Buono
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola Spaggiari
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Milan, Italy
| | - Anita Busacca
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Masoni
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Ferretti
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uzzan M, Nachury M, Nuzzo A, Amiot A, Caron B, Benezech A, Buisson A, Bouguen G, Le Berre C, Reenaers C, Le Cosquer G, Savoye G, Charkaoui M, Vidon M, Guillo L, Fumery M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Kirchgesner J, Bouhnik Y. Tofacitinib for Patients with Anti-TNF Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis: A Multicentre Cohort Study from the GETAID. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:424-430. [PMID: 37796025 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although ulcerative proctitis [UP] can dramatically impair quality of life, treatment efficacy has been poorly investigated in UP as it was historically excluded from phase 2/3 randomised controlled trials in ulcerative colitis. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of UP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 17 GETAID centres, including consecutive patients with UP treated with tofacitinib. The primary endpoint was steroid-free remission between Week 8 and Week 14, defined as a partial Mayo score of 2 [and no individual subscore above 1]. Secondary outcomes included clinical response and steroid-free remission after induction and at 1 year. RESULTS All the 35 enrolled patients previously received anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy and 88.6% were exposed to at least two lines of biologics. At baseline, the median partial Mayo score was 7 (intequartile range [IQR] [5.5-7]). After induction [W8-W14], 42.9% and 60.0% of patients achieved steroid-free remission and clinical response, respectively. At 1 year, the steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response rates were 39.4% and 45.5%, respectively, and 51.2% [17/33] were still receiving tofacitinib treatment. Survival without tofacitinib withdrawal was estimated at 50.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] [35.5-71.6]) at 1 year. Only a lower partial Mayo at baseline was independently associated with remission at induction (0dds ratio [OR] = 0.56 for an increase of 1, (95% CI [0.33-0.95], p = 0.03). Five [14.3%] adverse events were reported, with one leading to treatment withdrawal [septic shock secondary to cholecystitis]. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib may offer a therapeutic option for patients with refractory UP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Uzzan
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France
| | - Maria Nachury
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Nuzzo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hopital Beaujon, Universite de Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hopitaux Universitaires Bicêtre, Universite Paris Est Creteil and Universite Paris Saclay, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, and INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Alban Benezech
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Avignon, Avignon, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Catherine Le Berre
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et Assistance Nutritionnelle,Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Catherine Reenaers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Guillaume Le Cosquer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Hôpital Rangueil, Université Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Savoye
- Department of Gastroenterology Rouen University Hospital, UMR 1073 University of Rouen Normandy, Rouen, France
| | - Maeva Charkaoui
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Mathias Vidon
- Department of Gastroenterology. Hopital Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Lucas Guillo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, University of Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, and UMR I01, PERITOX, Jules Verne University of Picardy, Amiens, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, and INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Julien Kirchgesner
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Paris IBD Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Neuilly sur Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tal N, Tzivinikos C, Gasparetto M, Serban DE, Zifman E, Hojsak I, Ledder O, Yerushalmy Feler A, Rolandsdotter H, Aloi M, Bramuzzo M, Buderus S, Lionetti P, Norsa L, Norden C, Urlep D, Romano C, Shaoul R, Martinez-Vinson C, Karoliny A, De Greef E, Kang B, VIčková E, Alvisi P, Kori M, Tavares M, Weiss B, Hussey S, Qamhawi ME, Palomino Pérez LM, Henderson P, Parmar R, Miele E, Rinawi F, Lozano-Ruf A, Zamvar V, Kolho KL, Shouval DS. Clinical Features and Natural History of Paediatric Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis: A Multicentre Study from the Paediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1939-1948. [PMID: 37392064 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Ulcerative proctitis [UP] is an uncommon presentation in paediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. We aimed to characterize the clinical features and natural history of UP in children, and to identify predictors of poor outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective study involving 37 sites affiliated with the IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. Data were collected from patients aged <18 years diagnosed with UP between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. RESULTS We identified 196 patients with UP (median age at diagnosis 14.6 years [interquartile range, IQR 12.5-16.0]), with a median follow-up of 2.7 years [IQR 1.7-3.8]. The most common presenting symptoms were bloody stools [95%], abdominal pain [61%] and diarrhoea [47%]. At diagnosis, the median paediatric ulcerative colitis activity index [PUCAI] score was 25 [IQR 20-35], but most patients exhibited moderate-severe endoscopic inflammation. By the end of induction, 5-aminosalicylic acid administration orally, topically or both resulted in clinical remission rates of 48%, 48%, and 73%, respectively. The rates of treatment escalation to biologics at 1, 3, and 5 years were 10%, 22%, and 43%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the PUCAI score at diagnosis was significantly associated with initiation of systemic steroids, or biologics, and subsequent acute severe colitis events and inflammatory bowel disease-associated admission, with a score ≥35 providing an increased risk for poor outcomes. By the end of follow-up, 3.1% of patients underwent colectomy. Patients with UP that experienced proximal disease progression during follow-up [48%] had significantly higher rates of a caecal patch at diagnosis and higher PUCAI score by the end of induction, compared to those without progression. CONCLUSION Paediatric patients with UP exhibit high rates of treatment escalation and proximal disease extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Tal
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Christos Tzivinikos
- Paediatric Gastroenterology Department, Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco Gasparetto
- Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, London, UK
| | - Daniela E Serban
- 2nd Clinic of Pediatrics, 'Iuliu Hatieganu' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eyal Zifman
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | - Iva Hojsak
- Referral Center for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Oren Ledder
- The Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Anat Yerushalmy Feler
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Institute, 'Dana-Dwek' Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Helena Rolandsdotter
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Aloi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Institute, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Bramuzzo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Lionetti
- Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Norsa
- Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Christoph Norden
- Department of Pediatrics, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Darja Urlep
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University Children's Hospital of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Claudio Romano
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood 'G. Barresi', University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ron Shaoul
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Institute, Ruth Children's Hospital of Haifa, Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Christine Martinez-Vinson
- Service de Gastroentérologie et Nutrition Pédiatriques, Hôpital Universitaire Robert-Debré, Paris, France
| | - Anna Karoliny
- Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Elisabeth De Greef
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Kidz Health Castle UZ Brussels, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ben Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Eva VIčková
- Department of Pediatrics, 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Patrizia Alvisi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michal Kori
- Pdiatric Gastroenterology, Kaplan Medical Centre, Rehovot and the Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Marta Tavares
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Batia Weiss
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Seamus Hussey
- Children's Health Ireland, UCD and RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maria E Qamhawi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, StockholmSweden
| | - Laura M Palomino Pérez
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul Henderson
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Raj Parmar
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Erasmo Miele
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Firas Rinawi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ana Lozano-Ruf
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Veena Zamvar
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kaija-Leena Kolho
- Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dror S Shouval
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aruljothy A, Singh S, Narula N, Moran GW, Vuyyuru SK, Hogan M, Zayadi A, MacDonald JK, Caron B, Danese S, Biroulet LP, Ma C, Jairath V. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Medical therapies for treatment of ulcerative proctitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:740-762. [PMID: 37589498 PMCID: PMC11162959 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common highly symptomatic form of ulcerative colitis that can be difficult to treat. AIM To assess the efficacy of medical treatments for UP. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 23 November 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for adults with UP. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. RESULTS We included 53 RCTs (n = 4096) including 46 induction studies (n = 3731) and seven maintenance studies (n = 365). First-line therapies included topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), conventional corticosteroids, budesonide, and oral 5-ASA. Therapy for refractory UP included topical tacrolimus and small molecules. Topical 5-ASA was superior to placebo for induction (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.94-3.82) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26-3.46). Topical corticosteroids were superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.62-4.92). Topical budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44-3.81). Combination therapy with topical 5-ASA and topical corticosteroids was superior to topical monotherapy with either agent. Topical tacrolimus was superior to placebo. Etrasimod was superior to placebo for induction (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.2-18.49) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.31-3.32). CONCLUSIONS Topical 5-ASA and corticosteroids are effective for active UP. Topical 5-ASA may be effective for maintenance of remission. Tacrolimus may be effective for induction of remission. Etrasimod may be effective for induction and for maintenance of remission. Trials should include UP to expand the evidence base for this under-represented population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achuthan Aruljothy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon W. Moran
- National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sudheer K. Vuyyuru
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Benedicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Christopher Ma
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parigi TL, D'Amico F, Abreu MT, Dignass A, Dotan I, Magro F, Griffiths AM, Jairath V, Iacucci M, Mantzaris GJ, O'Morain C, Reinisch W, Sachar DB, Turner D, Yamamoto T, Rubin DT, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Ghosh S, Danese S. Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: results from an international consensus meeting. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:853-859. [PMID: 37423233 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00154-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have persistent symptoms and disease activity despite the best available medical or surgical treatments. These patients are commonly referred to as having difficult-to-treat IBD and need additional therapeutic strategies. However, the absence of standard definitions has impeded clinical research efforts and comparisons of data. Under the guidance of the endpoints cluster of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, we held a consensus meeting to propose a common operative definition for difficult-to-treat IBD. 16 participants from 12 countries voted on 20 statements covering various elements of difficult-to-treat IBD, such as failure of medical and surgical treatments, disease phenotypes, and specific complaints from patients. "Agreement" was defined as at least 75% consensus. The group agreed that difficult-to-treat IBD is defined by the failure of biologics and advanced small molecules with at least two different mechanisms of action, or postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease after two surgical resections in adults, or one in children. In addition, chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, complex perianal disease, and comorbid psychosocial complications that impair disease management also qualified as difficult-to-treat IBD. Adoption of these criteria could serve to standardise reporting, guide enrolment in clinical trials, and help identify candidates for enhanced treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria T Abreu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Fernando Magro
- Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Anne M Griffiths
- Division of Gastroenterology, SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; APC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Colm O'Morain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Walter Reinisch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David B Sachar
- The Dr Henry J Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dan Turner
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Subrata Ghosh
- APC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsafaridou M, Augoustaki A, Koutroubakis I. Lymphogranuloma venereum and CMV co-infection mimicking ulcerative proctitis in a non-immunocompromised patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 35:921-922. [PMID: 37395246 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Tsafaridou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Atreya R, Neurath MF. Induction of microRNA-124 as a novel therapeutic concept in ulcerative colitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:977-978. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00249-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|