Warfarin Is Associated With Higher Rates of Upper But Not Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Compared with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Population-Based Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study

Identification, screening, and comprehensive evaluation of novel thrombin inhibitory peptides from the hirudo produced using pepsin

Purpose

The inhibition of thrombin has proven to be an efficacious therapeutic approach for managing cardiovascular disease (CVD), with widespread implementation in clinical settings. Oral ingestion of peptides and protein drugs is influenced by gastrointestinal digestive enzymes. We aimed to evaluate the thrombin inhibitory properties of hirudo hydrolysates (HHS) produced by pepsin and propose a comprehensive approach to screen and evaluate thrombin inhibitors.

Methods

We evaluated the in vitro inhibitory properties of the hirudo extract, both before and after hydrolysis with pepsin, toward thrombin. We screened for the most potent thrombin inhibitory peptide (TIP) using nano liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (Nano LC-MS/MS) coupled with in silico analysis. Next, we employed the thrombin inhibition activity IC50 to investigate the interaction between TIP and thrombin, and conducted in vitro evaluations of its anticoagulant effects (APTT, TT, PT), as well as its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation. Furthermore, we utilized UV-Vis spectroscopy to explore structural changes in thrombin upon binding with TIP and employed molecular dynamics simulations to delve deeper into the potential atomic-level interaction modes between thrombin and TIP.

Results

The retention rate of thrombin inhibition for HHS was found to be between 60% and 75%. A total of 90 peptides from the HHS were identified using LC-MS/MS combined with de novo sequencing. Asn-Asp-Leu-Trp-Asp-Gln-Gly-Leu-Val-Ser-Gln-Asp-Leu (NDLWDQGLVSQDL, P1) was identified as the most potent thrombin inhibitory peptide after in silico screening (molecular docking and ADMET). Then, the in vitro study revealed that P1 had a high inhibitory effect on thrombin (IC50: 2,425.5 ± 109.7 μM). P1 exhibited a dose-dependent prolongation of the thrombin time (TT) and a reduction in platelet aggregation rate. Both UV-Vis spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that P1 binds effectively to thrombin.

Conclusion

Overall, the results suggested that HHS provides new insights for searching and evaluating potential antithrombotic compounds. The obtained P1 can be structurally optimized for in-depth evaluation in animal and cellular experiments.

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown comparable efficacy and a superior safety profile in clinical trials for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, further study is needed to assess DOACs' effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in a real-world context. Thus, this meta-analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with VTE.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from inception until June 2024. We examined observational studies that compared safety and effectiveness between DOACs and warfarin when used in treating VTE and reported adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and/or odds ratios (ORs) for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death from any cause. We then estimated the pooled effect using the random-effects model for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were included in the current meta-analysis. DOAC therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of recurrent VTE (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.85), major bleeding (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83) compared to warfarin. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.10).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that DOACs are associated with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence in addition to the known favorable safety profile when compared to warfarin.

Clinical significance of gastrointestinal bleeding history in patients who undergo left atrial appendage closure

Background and Aim

Anticoagulant users with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) sometimes suffer from gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and have difficulty continuing the medication. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been developed for such situations. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of a history of GIB in comparison to other factors in patients who had undergone LAAC.

Methods

From October 2019 to September 2023, patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC at our hospital were enrolled. We investigated the percentage of patients with a history of GIB who underwent LAAC and compared the incidence of post-LAAC bleeding in these patients compared to those with other factors.

Results

A total of 45 patients were included. There were 19 patients (42%) with a history of GIB who underwent LAAC. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of bleeding complications after LAAC was significantly higher in patients with a history of GIB in comparison to patients with other factors. There were eight cases of post-LAAC bleeding in total, and seven cases had GIB.

Conclusions

We need to recognize that GIB is a significant complication in patients who undergo LAAC. The management of GIB by gastroenterologists is essential to the success of LAAC.

Exploring DrugCentral: from molecular structures to clinical effects

DrugCentral, accessible at https://drugcentral.org , is an open-access online drug information repository. It covers over 4950 drugs, incorporating structural, physicochemical, and pharmacological details to support drug discovery, development, and repositioning. With around 20,000 bioactivity data points, manual curation enhances information from several major digital sources. Approximately 724 mechanism-of-action (MoA) targets offer updated drug target insights. The platform captures clinical data: over 14,300 on- and off-label uses, 27,000 contraindications, and around 340,000 adverse drug events from pharmacovigilance reports. DrugCentral encompasses information from molecular structures to marketed formulations, providing a comprehensive pharmaceutical reference. Users can easily navigate basic drug information and key features, making DrugCentral a versatile, unique resource. Furthermore, we present a use-case example where we utilize experimentally determined data from DrugCentral to support drug repurposing. A minimum activity threshold t should be considered against novel targets to repurpose a drug. Analyzing 1156 bioactivities for human MoA targets suggests a general threshold of 1 µM: t = 6 when expressed as - log[Activity(M)]). This applies to 87% of the drugs. Moreover, t can be refined empirically based on water solubility (S): t = 3 - logS, for logS < - 3. Alongside the drug repurposing classification scheme, which considers intellectual property rights, market exclusivity protections, and market accessibility, DrugCentral provides valuable data to prioritize candidates for drug repurposing programs efficiently.

Pre-hospital use of direct oral anticoagulants agents is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding events in critically ill patients: A single academic center experience

BACKGROUND

The last decade has witnessed significant advancements in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), transforming the landscape of anticoagulation therapy. With the uptrend in DOACs use, critical care physicians are encountering more patients with pre-hospital DOACs prescription. Safety and real world outcomes-related data on DOACs use in critically ill patients are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We assess the risk of major bleeding (MB) events and patient-centered outcomes with pre-hospital use of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) compared to warfarin therapy.

METHODS

Observational study in a single large academic center from January 1st, 2012, through May 4th, 2018. We included adult critically ill patients with warfarin or one of the DOACs, as active medications at the time of hospital admission. The primary outcome was major bleeding (MB), based on the ISTH criteria RESULTS: 99,481 patients were screened; 558 and 3037 patients were included in the final analysis for the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the pre-hospital use of DOACs was associated with lower odds for major bleeding events, GI bleeding, need for endoscopic intervention, hemorrhagic shock, any blood transfusion; but higher odds of intracranial bleeding, as compared to warfarin use. There was no difference in hospital length of stay or ICU-free days.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-hospital use of DOACs among critically ill patients is associated with lower major bleeding events, GI bleeding, need for endoscopic intervention, and blood transfusion but a higher risk for intracranial bleeding.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulation: What is Currently Known

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer.