Application of a volume retarded osmosis-low pressure membrane hybrid process for treatment of acid whey

Low-pressure volume retarded osmosis for removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Forward osmosis is an energy efficient process that is capable of recovering high-quality water from secondary wastewater treatment. However, regeneration of the draw solution (DS) is a problem that needs to be addressed. Herein, we developed and optimized a one-step process that does not require additional treatment for the DS. This process, called pressure assisted-volume retarded osmosis (PA-VRO), utilizes naturally occurring pressure with the aid of a small inlet pressure (< 1 bar). Poly(styrenesulfonate) was employed as the DS, for its high solubility in water and large molecular size (∼70,000 Da). Accordingly, real wastewater was employed as the feed solution for 48 h to remove perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) through PA-VRO. The rejection rates for PFOA/PFOS and poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) were observed to exceed 98%, after 24 h and 99%, after 48 h. Moreover, there were no traceable amounts of PFOA/PFOS in the DS, and hence the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS can be attributed to the residuals from the equipment. Therefore, this well-optimized PA-VRO process can be utilized for potable water production from treated wastewater.

Effects of co-existence of organic matter and microplastics on the rejection of PFCs by forward osmosis membrane

Perfluorinated chemical (PFC)-based materials have been widely applied in industry. In this study, the influence of PFCs on the physicochemical properties of membranes and that of the co-existence of organic matter and microplastics on the removal rate in the process of forward osmosis (FO) was examined. The water flux, reverse salt flux, and rejection of PFCs were evaluated under w and w/o contaminants. The lowest rejection rates of PFCs in FO membranes were observed to be 92.2% and 90.4% for FO-TFC and PA-Aqua FO membranes, respectively. The main rejection mechanism of the FO membrane is the sieving effect (p-value: PA-TFC-0.015, PA-Aqua-0.002) based on molecular volume, which is more dominant than the electrostatic repulsive force and hydrophobic interaction, the major rejection mechanisms of existing trace contaminants. In addition, we observed that the effects of co-existing pollutants in raw water have an insignificant effect on the rejection of PFCs because of the physical and chemical stability of PFCs. According to the results of this study, using the FO membrane, PFCs can effectively control not only their self-existence but also when contaminants co-exist with them in water bodies.