Estimation of greenhouse gases emission from domestic wastewater in Nepal: A scenario-based analysis applicable for developing countries

Groundwater implications on methane emission from non-sewered sanitation systems in Nepal

Non-sewered sanitation systems (NSSS) are identified as a significant contributor of greenhouse gases (GHGs), primarily due to biological processes within the containment systems. In unsealed or unlined containment systems like pit latrines, the emissions are influenced by moisture. This work quantified the GHG emission occurring from unlined or unsealed containments prevalent in Nepal and compared it with sealed containment-like septic tanks, where the chances of groundwater (GW) inundation are low. The modeled GW data extracted from the secondary sources were validated with available national data. The emissions were quantified using the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) model for different ecological divisions and provincial divisions of Nepal. Spatial representation for the results was done using the Geographical Information System (GIS) tool. The total methane (CH4) emission occurring from the various NSSS was determined to be 2,618 Gg CO2 e per year which is almost twice the emission from the waste sector, as reported by the recent national communication submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC). Variation of the CH4 emission was found to be prominent in lowlands (Terai region) with total national emissions of 1,329.37 Gg CO2e per year. The lowland has a shallow GW table that can easily inundate the unlined containments like pit latrines thus contributing to more anaerobic conditions which may lead to higher CH4 emissions compared to containments in mid and highlands. This study concludes that the GHG emissions occurring from NSSS are substantial and addressing these emissions can help fulfil the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in the waste sector.

Revisiting China's domestic greenhouse gas emission from wastewater treatment: A quantitative process life-cycle assessment

The wastewater treatment industry could alleviate water pollution but consume a large amount of energy and resources. China has over 5000 centralized domestic wastewater treatment plants and produces an unignorable amount of greenhouse gases (GHG). By considering the wastewater treatment, wastewater discharge, and sludge disposal processes, and employing the modified process-based quantification method, this study quantifies wastewater treatment's on-site and off-site GHG emissions across China. Results showed that the total GHG emission was 67.07 Mt CO₂-eq in 2017, with approximately 57% of on-site emissions. The top seven cosmopolis and metropolis (top 1%) emitted nearly 20% of the total GHG emission, while their emission intensity was relatively low due to the huge population. This means that a high urbanization rate may be a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions in the wastewater treatment industry in the future. Furthermore, GHG reduction strategies can also focus on process optimization and improvement at WWTPs as well as the nationwide promotion of onsite thermal conversion technologies for sludge management.

Understanding the greenhouse gas emissions from China's wastewater treatment plants: Based on life cycle assessment coupled with statistical data

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are significant contributors to energy consumption and anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For achieving carbon reduction in the wastewater treatment industry, the direct and indirect GHG emissions generated by WWTPs need to be understood from a holistic perspective. This study estimated GHG emissions from WWTPs at the country scale by integrating process-based life cycle assessment and statistical data. On-site data were collected from 17 WWTPs of various regions in China. Uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo was also performed, so as to provide more reliable results. The results show that life cycle GHG emissions generated from the wastewater treatment process vary from 0.29 kg CO₂ eq/m³ to 1.18 kg CO₂ eq/m³ based on 17 sample WWTPs. The key factors contributing to overall GHG emissions are also identified as carbon dioxide (fossil) and methane (fossil) to air mainly generated from electricity generation, and methane (biogenic) and nitrous oxide (biogenic) to air mainly generated from wastewater treatment. National average GHG emissions was evaluated with the value of 0.88 kg CO₂ eq/m³, with on-site GHG emissions and off-site electricity-based GHG emissions accounting for 32% and 34%, respectively. The total GHG emissions generated from wastewater treatment are 56.46 billion kg CO₂ eq in 2020, with Guangdong province having the dominant contribution. Policy suggestions (e.g., further adjusting the electricity grid toward a low carbon structure, improving technology to promote treatment efficiency and energy recovery) were highly recommended so that national GHG emissions of WWTPs can be reduced. In order to achieve the synergy of pollutant removal and GHG emission reduction, policy-making on wastewater treatment should be tailored to specific local conditions.

Sustainability for wastewater treatment: bioelectricity generation and emission reduction

This review covers the technological measures of a self-sustainable anaerobic up-flow sludge blanket (UASB) system compared with an aerobic activated sludge process (ASP) for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The ASP requires a huge amount of electricity and chemicals and also results in the emission of carbon. The UASB system, instead, is based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction and is associated with biogas production for cleaner electricity. WWTPs including the ASP system are not sustainable due to the massive financial power required for clean wastewater. When the ASP system was used, the amount of production was estimated to be 10658.98 tonnes CO₂eq-d^- of carbon dioxide. Whereas it was 239.19 tonnes CO₂eq-d^-1 with the UASB. The UASB system is advantageous over the ASP system as it has a high production of biogas, needs low maintenance, yields a low amount of sludge, and is also a source of electricity that can be used as a power source for the WWTPs. Also, the UASB system produces less biomass, and this helps in reducing costs and maintaining work. Moreover, the aeration tank of the ASP needs 60% of energy distribution; on the other hand, the UASB consumes less energy, approximately 3-11%.

Nitrous oxide emission in altered nitrogen cycle and implications for climate change

Natural processes and human activities play a crucial role in changing the nitrogen cycle and increasing nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions, which are accelerating at an unprecedented rate. N₂O has serious global warming potential (GWP), about 310 times higher than that of carbon dioxide. The food production, transportation, and energy required to sustain a world population of seven billion have required dramatic increases in the consumption of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers and fossil fuels, leading to increased N₂O in air and water. These changes have radically disturbed the nitrogen cycle and reactive nitrogen species, such as nitrous oxide (N₂O), and have impacted the climatic system. Yet, systematic and comprehensive studies on various underlying processes and parameters in the altered nitrogen cycle, and their implications for the climatic system are still lacking. This paper reviews how the nitrogen cycle has been disturbed and altered by anthropogenic activities, with a central focus on potential pathways of N₂O generation. The authors also estimate the N₂O-N emission mainly due to anthropogenic activities will be around 8.316 Tg N₂O-N yr^-1 in 2050. In order to minimize and tackle the N₂O emissions and its consequences on the global ecosystem and climate change, holistic mitigation strategies and diverse adaptations, policy reforms, and public awareness are suggested as vital considerations. This study concludes that rapidly increasing anthropogenic perturbations, the identification of new microbial communities, and their role in mediating biogeochemical processes now shape the modern nitrogen cycle.