Theoretical force-field model for blue-shifted hydrogen bonds with fluoromethanes

Disorder of Hydrofluorocarbon Molecules Entrapped in the Water Cages of Structure I Clathrate Hydrate

Water versus fluorine: Clathrate hydrates encaging hydrofluorocarbons as guests show both isotropic and anisotropic distributions within host water cages, depending on the number of fluorine atoms in the guest molecule; this is caused by changes in intermolecular interactions to host water molecules in the hydrates.

Weak H-bonds. Comparisons of CH···O to NH···O in proteins and PH···N to direct P···N interactions

Whereas CH···O H-bonds are usually weaker than interpeptide NH···O H-bonds, this is not necessarily the case within proteins. The nominally weaker CH···O are surprisingly strong, comparable to, and in some cases stronger than, the NH···O H-bonds in the context of the forces that hold together the adjacent strands in protein β-sheets. The peptide NH is greatly weakened as proton donor in certain conformations of the protein backbone, particularly extended structures, and forms correspondingly weaker H-bonds. The PH group is a weak proton donor, but will form PH···N H-bonds. However, there is a stronger interaction in which P can engage, in which the P atom, not the H, directly approaches the N electron donor to establish a direct P···N interaction. This approach is stabilized by the same sort of electron transfer from the N lone pair to the P-H σ* antibond that characterizes the PH···N H-bond.

Raman spectrum of [Ru(CNBu t)(CO)(eta2-C6H4-2-CHO)(PPh3)2][BF4].2CDCl3 shows that the crystallographically determined bifurcated hydrogen-bonding interaction Cl3CD...F2BF2- is an example of a blue-shifting hydrogen bond

Raman data suggest that a crystallographically determined Cl3CD...F2BF2- interaction in the solid-state structure of [Ru(CNBut)(CO)(eta2-C6H4-2-CHO)(PPh3)2][BF4].2CDCl3 is an example of a blue-shifting bifurcated hydrogen bond. The nu(C-D) band blue-shifts 5 cm-1 to 2269 cm-1 compared to 2264 cm-1 for CDCl3 in the gas phase and 20 cm-1 from frozen CDCl3 at 2249 cm-1. A conventional interpretation of these band shifts would suggest that the CCl2 fragment of DCCl3 is a stronger hydrogen-bond acceptor than the BF2 fragment of a BF4- group.

Blue-Shifted A−H Stretching Modes and Cooperative Hydrogen Bonding. 1. Complexes of Substituted Formaldehyde with Cyclic Hydrogen Fluoride and Water Clusters

The structures and vibrational spectra of the intermolecular complexes formed by insertion of substituted formaldehyde molecules HRCO (R = H, Li, F, Cl) into cyclic hydrogen fluoride and water clusters are studied at the MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ computational level. Depending on the nature of the substituent R, the cluster type, and its size, the C-H stretching modes of HRCO undergo large blue and partly red shifts, whereas all the F-H and O-H stretching modes of the conventional hydrogen bonds are strongly red-shifted. It is shown that (i) the mechanism of blue shifting can be explained within the concept of the negative intramolecular coupling between C-H and C=O bonds that is inherent to the HRCO monomers, (ii) the blue shifts also occur even if no hydrogen bond is formed, and (iii) variation of the acceptor X or the strength of the C-H...X hydrogen bond may either amplify the blue shift or cause a transition from blue shift to red shift. These findings are illustrated by means of intra- and intermolecular scans of the potential energy surfaces. The performance of the negative intramolecular coupling between C-H and C=O bonds of H(2)CO is interpreted in terms of the NBO analysis of the isolated H(2)CO molecule and H(2)CO interacting with (H2O)n and (HF)n clusters.

Red-, Blue-, or No-Shift in Hydrogen Bonds: A Unified Explanation

We provide a simple explanation for X-H bond contraction and the associated blue shift and decrease of intensity in IR spectrum of the so-called improper hydrogen bonds. This explanation organizes hydrogen bonds (HBs) with a seemingly random relationship between the X-H bond length (and IR frequency and its intensity) to its interaction energy. The factors which affect the X-H bond in all X-H...Y HBs can be divided into two parts: (a) The electron affinity of X causes a net gain of electron density at the X-H bond region in the presence of Y and encourages an X-H bond contraction. (b) The well understood attractive interaction between the positive H and electron rich Y forces an X-H bond elongation. For electron rich, highly polar X-H bonds (proper HB donors) the latter almost always dominates and results in X-H bond elongation, whereas for less polar, electron poor X-H bonds (pro-improper HB donors) the effect of the former is noticeable if Y is not a very strong HB acceptor. Although both the above factors increase with increasing HB acceptor ability of Y, the shortening effect dominates over a range of Ys for suitable pro-improper X-Hs resulting in a surprising trend of decreasing X-H bond length with increasing HB acceptor ability. The observed frequency and intensity variations follow naturally. The possibility of HBs which do not show any IR frequency change in the X-H stretching mode also directly follows from this explanation.