Hepatopulmonary Syndrome in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Liver Disease

Combined Heart-Lung-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: The Australian Experience

BACKGROUND

Combined multivisceral transplantation has emerged as a therapeutic option for a select patient cohort; however, clinical decision-making remains complex and controversial. The aim of this study was to examine patient characteristics, operative complications, and long-term outcomes of all patients who have undergone combined heart-lung-liver transplantation (HLLTx) in Australia.

METHODS

In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who have undergone combined HLLTx in Australia to date. Recipient clinical characteristics, waitlist, and transplant outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Eight adult patients have received HLLTx at a single Australian transplant center. Recipients of HLLTx have typically been young (median age, 30.1 years; range, 24-37), underweight (median body mass index, 19.8 kg/m²; range, 16.2-30.4) patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 8, 100%) with severe airflow obstruction (median forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, 24% predicted; range, 17%-48%) accompanied by liver cirrhosis confirmed on histopathology (n = 8, 100%). Despite relative preservation of synthetic function and low model for end-stage liver disease scores (median, 8; range, 6-17), all recipients had complications of portal hypertension prior to transplantation, with many patients having suffered life-threatening variceal hemorrhage. In this cohort, HLLTx was associated with overall posttransplant survival of 87.5% at 30 days, 71.4% at 1 year, and 42.9% at 5 years. Listing for combined HLLTx was associated with prolonged waitlist times relative to bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation (median 556 vs 56 days, respectively), however waitlist mortality and/or delisting was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these findings highlight the opportunities and challenges facing combined (heart-) lung and liver transplantation in patients with multiorgan failure.

Cystic fibrosis liver disease: A condition in need of structured transition and continuity of care

Liver disease affects one-third of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and it is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Historically considered a disease of childhood, its impact is now seen more often in adulthood. The heterogeneous pattern of CF liver disease and its rapid progression to cirrhosis remain a diagnostic challenge and new questions pertaining to the nature of liver involvement have recently been raised. Non-invasive measures to stratify the severity of liver involvement are increasingly used to predict clinical outcomes. A single treatment, ursodeoxycholic acid, has been used to slow progression of liver disease while recent advances in the field of CF treatments are promising. Management of portal hypertension remains challenging but outcomes after liver transplantation are encouraging. While many questions remain unanswered, a growing number of CF patients reach adulthood and will require care for CF liver disease.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pretransplant and Posttransplant Management of Cystic Fibrosis-Associated Liver Disease

Approximately 5%-10% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) will develop advanced liver disease with portal hypertension, representing the third leading cause of death among patients with CF. Cystic fibrosis with advanced liver disease and portal hypertension (CFLD) represents the most significant risk to patient mortality, second only to pulmonary or lung transplant complications in patients with CF. Currently, there is no medical therapy to treat or reverse CFLD. Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with CFLD with portal hypertension confers a significant survival advantage over those who do not receive LT, although the timing in which to optimize this benefit is unclear. Despite the value and efficacy of LT in selected patients with CFLD, established clinical criteria outlining indications and timing for LT as well as disease-specific transplant considerations are notably absent. The goal of this comprehensive and multidisciplinary report is to present recommendations on the unique CF-specific pre- and post-LT management issues clinicians should consider and will face.

Diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of cystic fibrosis-related liver disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an insight and overview of the challenges in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of cystic fibrosis-related liver disease (CFLD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The variable pathophysiology of CFLD complicates its diagnosis and treatment. A 'gold standard' for CFLD diagnosis is lacking. Over the past years, new techniques to diagnose features of CFLD, such as transient elastography, have been investigated. Although most of these tests confirm cystic fibrosis-related liver involvement (CFLI), they are, however, not suitable to distinguish various phenotypical presentations or predict progression to clinically relevant cirrhosis or portal hypertension. A combined initiative from the European and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition has been started, aimed to obtain consensus on CFLD criteria and definitions. Currently, only ursodeoxycholic acid is used in CFLD treatment, although it has not been convincingly demonstrated to change the natural course of the disease. Drugs that directly target cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein dysfunction show promising results; however, more long-term follow-up and validation studies are needed.

SUMMARY

CFLD is an umbrella term referring to a wide variety of liver manifestations with variable clinical needs and consequences. CFLD with portal hypertension is the most severe form of CFLD due to its significant implications on morbidity and mortality. The clinical relevance of other CFLI is uncertain. Consensus on CFLD definitions is essential to validate new diagnostic tools and therapeutic outcome measures.