A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of 21- and 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles for Performing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in Sarcoidosis

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of the 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Needle in Subjects with Sarcoidosis (GUESS)

INTRODUCTION

Observational data suggest that the 19-gauge (G) needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) offers a higher diagnostic yield than the 22-G needle in sarcoidosis. No randomized trial has compared the yield of the two needles.

METHODS

We randomized consecutive subjects with suspected sarcoidosis and enlarged thoracic lymph nodes to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 19-G or the 22-G needle. We compared the study groups for diagnostic sensitivity (primary outcome) assessed by the yield of granulomas in subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis. We also compared the sample adequacy, difficulty performing the needle puncture assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS), the subject's cough intensity on an operator-rated VAS, and procedure-related complications (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

We randomized 150 (mean age, 43.0 years; 55% women) subjects and diagnosed sarcoidosis in 116 subjects. The diagnostic sensitivity of the 19-G needle (45/60, 75.0%) was not higher (p = 0.52) than the 22-G needle (39/56, 69.6%). We obtained adequate aspirates in 90.0% and 85.7% of subjects in the respective groups (p = 0.48). The operators had greater difficulty puncturing lymph nodes with the 19-G needle (p = 0.03), while the operator-assessed cough intensity was similar in the groups (p = 0.41). Transient hypoxemia was the only complication encountered during EBUS-TBNA (two subjects in either group).

CONCLUSION

We did not find the 19-G needle superior to the 22-G in diagnostic sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Puncturing the lymph nodes was more difficult with the 19-G needle.

Role of Bronchoscopy in Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disorder with unclear etiology and can often pose a diagnostic challenge. A tissue diagnosis is often necessary to illustrate the non-caseating granulomas on histopathology. This review aims to synthesize current evidence related to tissue diagnosis of sarcoidosis using various bronchoscopic techniques. We start by discussing standard bronchoscopic techniques which have remained the cornerstone of diagnostic workup such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), endobronchial biopsy (EBB), conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) followed by newer modalities that incorporate real-time image guidance using endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound. Although BAL, EBB, and TBLB have been employed as a diagnostic tool for several decades, their sensitivity and diagnostic yield is inferior to ultrasound-based endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). More recently, convincing evidence has also emerged to support the diagnostic accuracy and tissue yield of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy which will also be discussed in this review. These advances in bronchoscopic equipment and techniques over the last 2 decades have made it possible to obtain tissue samples using minimally invasive techniques thus avoiding invasive open lung biopsy and the risks that inherently follow. Up-to-date knowledge of these modalities is imperative for ensuring evidence-based medicine and improving patient-centric outcomes.

Comparison of the harvest volume between maneuvers of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration including the "cross-fanning technique"

Recently, a certain volume of biopsy specimens has been required for genetic testing of tumors using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). This study aimed to verify the superiority of our newly devised EBUS-TBNA biopsy technique, the "cross-fanning technique," which combines rotation and up-down maneuvers, by comparing its harvest volume with that of other maneuvers. Using a bronchoscope simulator, ultrasonic bronchoscope, and 21-gauge puncture needle, we compared the weight of silicone biopsy specimens obtained by the following 4 procedures: Conventional maneuver; Up-down maneuver; Rotation maneuver, and; Cross-fanning technique. Each procedure was repeated 24 times in total, rotating the sequences of the maneuvers, and the operator/assistant pair to align the conditions. The means ± standard deviations of the sample volumes for each puncture technique were as follows: 2.8 ± 1.2 mg; 3.1 ± 1.6 mg; 3.7 ± 1.2 mg, and; 3.9 ± 1.2 mg. There was a significant difference between the 4 groups (P = .024). The post hoc test showed a statistically significant difference between techniques A and D (P = .019). This study showed that the cross-fanning technique might contribute to the increased volume of tissue samples obtained by EBUS-TBNA biopsy.

Effect of Needle Size on Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis with Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that most commonly involves the lungs. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an invaluable tool in the assessment of patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy. Objective: It has been hypothesized that use of the larger 19-gauge (G) needle with EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic sensitivity in sarcoidosis. However, it is unclear whether the existing literature supports this supposition. Data Sources: A literature search of Embase and Medline was performed by two reviewers. Included articles were evaluated for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data Extraction: For quantitative analysis, we performed a meta-analysis using a binary random-effects model to determine pooled sensitivity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on needle size, use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), study design, and prevalence of sarcoidosis in study group. Synthesis: Sixty-five studies with a total of 4,242 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity for diagnosis of sarcoidosis was 83.99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.22-86.53) among all studies. The 19G subgroup had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.73%; 95% CI, 89.72-97.74%; I² = 0.00%; P < 0.01) compared with the 21G subgroup (84.61%; 95% CI, 78.80-90.42%; I² = 69.83%), 22G subgroup (84.07%; 95% CI, 80.90-87.24%; I² = 85.21%) or unspecified 21G/22G subgroup (78.85%; 95% CI, 70.81-86.90%; I² = 84.47%). There were no significant differences with use of ROSE or prevalence of sarcoidosis or by study design. Conclusions: The use of 19G needles during EBUS-TBNA had the highest diagnostic sensitivity based on available studies. Further randomized controlled trials using 19G needles should be considered in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

Contribution of aspiration to the diagnosis of lung cancer in endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy

OBJECTIVE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration has been successfully applied in both diagnosis and staging of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathies and masses, especially in malignant cases. However, the optimal procedure of Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration to further increase diagnostic yield and minimize processing complexity remains controversial. This study aims to compare aspiration biopsy (Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration) and non-aspiration biopsy (Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle capillary sampling) in terms of sample adequacy, diagnosis, and quality in malignant cases.

METHODS

Between March 2018 and June 2020, Endobronchial ultrasound-guided was performed sequentially on patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes that were considered malignant. Each lymphadenopathy was sampled with and without aspiration. A single-blinded pathologist evaluated the samples.

RESULTS

A total of 84 lymph nodes evaluations of 51 patients were included. Most samples were taken from the right lower paratracheal lymph nodes (n=27, 32.2%) and subcarinal LN (n=21, 25%). The mean size of the lymph nodes was 21.21±8.257 (8-40) mm. The agreement between the two procedures in terms of sample adequacy and diagnostic yield was 69.1% (95%CI 58-78.7, p=0.076). In addition, according to the goodness-of-fit statistics, the kappa values were 0.255 (p=0.015) and 0.302 (p=0.004) for sample adequacy and diagnostic yield, respectively. There was no difference between the two procedures in relation to complications.

CONCLUSION

Although the agreement between the two procedures is weak, Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle capillary sampling can be performed with less personnel, without reducing diagnostic yield and tissue adequacy. These findings can assist clinicians in determining the optimal procedure for Endobronchial ultrasound-guided.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): Technical Updates and Pathological Yield

Since the endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscope was introduced to clinical practice, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the procedure of choice to sample hilar and mediastinal adenopathy. Multiple studies have been conducted in the last two decades to look at the different technical aspects of the procedure and their effects on the final cytopathological yield. In addition, newer modes of ultrasound scanning and newer tools with the potential to optimize the selection and sampling of the target lymph node have been introduced. These have the potential to reduce the number of passes, reduce the procedure time, and increase the diagnostic yield, especially in rare tumors and benign diseases. Herein, we review the latest updates related to the technical aspects of EBUS-TBNA and their effects on the final cytopathological yield in malignant and benign diseases.

Slow-pull capillary technique versus suction technique in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing diseases involving hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely used, safe, and accurate technique for obtaining pathological specimens to be used in the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal lymph node (LN) enlargement. However, application of the suction technique during EBUS-TBNA remains controversial. In addition, the effectiveness of the slow-pull capillary technique for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses was recently reported. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA using these two techniques.

METHODS

The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and availability of tissue cores of the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were studied retrospectively in patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients with hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement underwent EBUS-TBNA; 30 patients underwent the suction technique, 56 patients underwent the slow-pull capillary technique, 5 patients underwent both techniques, and 6 patients had failed operations. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and the number of tissue cores obtained with the suction and slow-pull capillary techniques were 66.67% versus 85.71% (p = 0.039), 43.75% versus 85.42% (p < 0.001), 92.86% versus 87.5% (p > 0.05), 59.09% versus 50% (p > 0.05), 87.5% versus 97.62% (p > 0.05), and 19 versus 50 (p = 0.004), respectively. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the acquisition of tissue core was significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA. Moreover, the slow-pull capillary technique was significantly associated with the acquisition of tissue core in EBUS-TBNA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the blood contamination of samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the slow-pull capillary technique in EBUS-TBNA can significantly increase the accuracy related to the diagnosis of diseases involving hilar and mediastinal LN enlargement by improving the acquisition of tissue core. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Diagnostic yield and safety of the ProCore versus the standard EBUS-TBNA needle in subjects with suspected sarcoidosis

Background: No randomized trial has compared the yield of the ProCore needle, a novel needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), with standard needles.Research design and methods: Consecutive subjects with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy due to suspected sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1 to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 22-gauge ProCore (EchoTip-ProCore, Cook-Medical) or the 22-gauge standard (Vizishot, Olympus) needle. The primary outcome was the diagnostic sensitivity; the secondary outcomes included the number of adequate aspirates obtained and procedure-related complications.Results: We randomized 100 (mean age, 43.4 years; 53% women) subjects. Of the 84 subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis, the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was higher with the ProCore (36/42, 85.7%) versus the standard needle (31/42, 73.8%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.18). We obtained adequate aspirates in 95.2% and 90.5% subjects in the ProCore and the standard needle groups, respectively (p = 0.68). One complication (transient hypoxemia) occurred in each group. There were two incidences of the ProCore needle getting bent during the procedure.Conclusions: We found no difference in the sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA when performed with the ProCore or the Olympus needle in subjects with sarcoidosis. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.[clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03656003].

Lung cancer cytology and small biopsy specimens: diagnosis, predictive biomarker testing, acquisition, triage, and management

In the 21st century, there has been a dramatic shift in the management of advanced-stage lung carcinoma, and this has coincided with an increasing use of minimally invasive tissue acquisition methods. Both have had significant downstream effects on cytology and small biopsy specimens. Current treatments require morphologic, immunohistochemical, and/or genotypical subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma. To meet these objectives, standardized classification of cytology and small specimen diagnoses, immunohistochemical algorithms, and predictive biomarker testing guidelines have been developed. This review provides an overview of current classification, biomarker testing, methods of small specimen acquisition and triage, clinical management strategies, and emerging technologies.

Role of Bronchoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Thoracic Sarcoidosis

The diagnosis of sarcoidosis relies on clinical and radiological presentation, evidence of non-caseating granulomas in histopathology and exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous inflammation. Currently, a proper diagnosis, with a high level of confidence, is considered as key to the appropriate diagnosis and management of the disease. In this sense, this review aims to provide a brief overview on the role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of thoracic sarcoidosis, incorporating newer techniques to establish, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), transesophageal ultrasound-guided needle aspiration with the use of an echo bronchoscope (EUS-B-FNA) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Most of the literature reports the diagnostic superiority of endosonographic techniques, such as EBUS-TBNA alone or in combination with EUS-FNA, over conventional bronchoscopic modalities in diagnosing Scadding stages I and II of the disease. Moreover, TBLC may be considered a useful and safe diagnostic tool for thoracic sarcoidosis, overcoming some limitations of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), avoiding more invasive modalities and being complementary to endosonographic procedures such as EBUS-TBNA.

Role of Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonmalignant Diseases

Here we present a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the utility of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant conditions and discuss the associated complications. CP-EBUS has been conventionally used for the staging of lung cancer and sampling of mediastinal and hilar nodes. However, its application is not limited to malignant conditions, and it is gaining acceptance as a diagnostic modality of choice for nonmalignant conditions such as tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary embolism, thyroid lesions, and cysts. Moreover, its therapeutic value allows for extended applications such as mediastinal and thyroid cyst drainage, fiducial marker placement for radiation therapy, and transbronchial needle injection. The noninvasiveness, low complication rate, high diagnostic yield, and satisfactory sensitivity and specificity values are the main attributes that lend credence to the use of CP-EBUS as a standalone primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pulmonary medicine in the foreseeable future.

Role of cytomorphology in differentiating sarcoidosis and tuberculosis in subjects undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Background

The role of cytomorphology in differentiating sarcoidosis from tuberculosis is not fully elucidated. Herein, we evaluate the utility of cytological features in differentiating between these two diseases in subjects undergoing endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA and had a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis or tuberculosis. The final diagnosis was based on the clinicoradiological features, microbiology and clinical course during follow-up (including response to treatment) at six months. A cytologist blinded to the clinical details and microbiology examined the aspirates. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of cytologist's impression to diagnose sarcoidosis as compared to the final diagnosis.

Results

179 (145 sarcoidosis, 34 tuberculosis) subjects were included. Granuloma was identified in 135 (75.4%) subjects; amongst these, the cytologist made a correct diagnosis in 62.2% cases, misdiagnosed 28.9% cases, and in 8.9% cases differentiating sarcoidosis from tuberculosis was not possible. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the cytologist in diagnosing sarcoidosis was 62%, 64%, 90%, and 25%, respectively. The identification of a non-necrotic granuloma, along with a negative TST and the lack of endosonographic features favouring tuberculosis (heterogeneous echotexture and coagulation necrosis sign), provided the best specificity (97%) and PPV (99%) to diagnose sarcoidosis.

Conclusion

Sarcoidosis cannot be reliably differentiated from tuberculosis based on cytomorphology alone. A combination of clinical features, endosonography, cytology and microbiology is required for accurate diagnosis.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in sarcoidosis: Beyond the diagnostic yield

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the commonly used technique for pathological confirmation of clinically suspected sarcoidosis, mostly owing to its consistently high success rate in the detection of granulomas. However, other possible advantages, which are less appreciated and often poorly studied, may also contribute to the wider use of EBUS-TBNA in the future. These advantages include refinement of differential diagnoses through the study of lymph node characteristics during B-mode examination; reduction of complications associated with bronchoscopy, as well as improved triage of the specimen for ancillary studies with the use of rapid on-site evaluation; optimization of the quality of the sample through the selection of a target area for biopsy with minimal vascularity and absence of calcifications by using the colour Doppler and the B-mode; and prediction of the presence of extensive lymph node fibrosis by using the strain elastography module. Yet, limitations and possible clinical drawbacks should also be acknowledged. Indeed, due to the lack of specificity of the pathology findings in EBUS-derived samples, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is one of the exclusion and should remain essentially clinical. The external validity of EBUS-TBNA results in sarcoidosis is questionable, as they mainly derive from studies in populations with a high disease prevalence. Finally, the risk exists that the low morbidity and high diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA may lead to its overuse in patients with clinical/radiological findings specific enough to secure a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Techniques and Challenges

Intrathoracic lymphadenopathy is a common problem encountered in clinical practice and is caused by a wide variety of diseases. Traditionally, the mediastinal lymph nodes were sampled using conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), or surgical methods such as mediastinoscopy, and thoracotomy (open or video-assisted thoracoscopy). However, surgical modalities including mediastinoscopy are invasive, expensive, and not universally available. Moreover, they are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Conventional TBNA although minimally invasive has a low diagnostic yield. In the last decade, endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as the diagnostic procedure of choice in evaluating undiagnosed intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. EBUS-TBNA is also currently the preferred modality in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer. The procedure is minimally invasive, safe, and can be performed as a day-care procedure. In the era of personalized medicine in lung cancer, optimizing the procedure, sample collection, and processing are crucial, as more tissue is required for performing a wide array of molecular tests. Despite its widespread use and acceptance, the diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA is still low. To maximize the yield, cytologists and physicians should be aware of the technical details of the procedure. Herein, we discuss the technique of performing EBUS-TBNA, its indications, contraindications, and the processing of the samples at our bronchoscopy suite. We also highlight the challenges faced by the cytologists and clinicians while processing EBUS aspirates.

Bronchoscopic lung cryobiopsy: An Indian association for bronchology position statement

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung cryobiopsy (BLC) is a novel technique for obtaining lung tissue for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. The procedure is performed using several different variations of technique, resulting in an inconsistent diagnostic yield and a variable risk of complications. There is an unmet need for standardization of the technical aspects of BLC.

METHODOLOGY

This is a position statement framed by a group comprising experts from the fields of pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, pathology, and radiology under the aegis of the Indian Association for Bronchology. Sixteen questions on various technical aspects of BLC were framed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases. The expert group discussed the available evidence relevant to each question through e-mail and a face-to-face meeting, and arrived at a consensus.

RESULTS

The experts agreed that patients should be carefully selected for BLC after weighing the risks and benefits of the procedure. Where appropriate, consideration should be given to perform alternate procedures such as conventional transbronchial biopsy or subject the patient directly to a surgical lung biopsy. The procedure is best performed after placement of an artificial airway under sedation/general anesthesia. Fluoroscopic guidance and occlusion balloon should be utilized for positioning the cryoprobe to reduce the risk of pneumothorax and bleeding, respectively. At least four tissue specimens (with at least two of adequate size, i.e., ≥5 mm) should be obtained during the procedure from different lobes or different segments of a lobe. The histopathological findings of BLC should be interpreted by an experienced pulmonary pathologist. The final diagnosis should be made after a multidisciplinary discussion. Finally, there is a need for structured training for performing BLC.

CONCLUSION

This position statement is an attempt to provide practical recommendations for the performance of BLC in DPLDs.

Role of EBUS-TBNA in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Sarcoidosis

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of mediastinal tubercular lymphadenitis, especially when culture and cytological diagnosis is combined with high clinical suspicion. Both sarcoidosis and tuberculosis (TB) demonstrate granulomatous inflammation on cytology. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis in regions with a high burden of TB is challenging. We conducted a prospective study in 179 cases of suspected granulomatous pathology in mediastinal lymphadenopathy cases to evaluate the role of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosis of sarcoidosis and TB. It was found that extensive caseous necrosis, acid-fast bacilli positivity on Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and/or microbiological culture positivity have high positive predictive value for the diagnosis of TB.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Using 19-G Needle for Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Flexible bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is increasingly being used to obtain pathology specimens for diagnosis of sarcoidosis. There is wide variation in reported diagnostic yield in literature. New TBNA needles are available in the market but data are lacking about their diagnostic yield especially for sarcoidosis. This study reports the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA using ViziShot FLEX 19-G needle in a series of patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review for diagnostic yield of the 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle for suspected sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-six EBUS bronchoscopies were performed, 15 were done with clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis. The 19-G needle was used for all cases of suspected sarcoidosis. The procedure was diagnostic of sarcoidosis in 14 (93.3%) patients by TBNA with 1 nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. Procedural diagnostic yield was 93.3%. Eighty-five percent (28/33) of sampled lymph nodes were positive for noncaseating granulomas. The yield of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and endobronchial lung biopsy was 38% (5/13) and 43% (6/14), respectively. TBLB and endobronchial lung biopsy did not add to the diagnostic yield of the procedure. No significant adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

This series reports a higher diagnostic yield than most other published studies and opens platform for direct comparison of each available needle. It also adds to the safety data for this larger needle. In addition, it raises doubt into utility of TBLB for diagnosis of sarcoidosis, which can increase the procedural complications.

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of suction and inner-stylet of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy

Background

The optimal procedure for maximizing the diagnostic yield and minimizing the procedural complexity of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is controversial. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal procedure of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, with a particular focus on the roles of the inner-stylet and suction.

Methods

Consecutive patients with enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (LNs), detected by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), who underwent EBUS-TBNA were included. Each LN was sampled with three needle passes using suction–stylet, suction–no stylet, and stylet–no suction procedures. The samples were smeared onto glass slides for cytological evaluation. A single, blinded cytopathologist evaluated each set of slides. The primary outcomes were cytological specimen adequacy rate and diagnostic yield of malignant LNs. The secondary outcomes were tissue-core acquisition rate, procedural time, and the amount of bleeding.

Results

This study evaluated 97 patients with a total of 255 LNs. The final LN diagnosis was benign in 144, malignant in 104, and inadequate in 7 cases. There were no significant differences among the suction–stylet, suction–no stylet, and stylet–no suction groups in specimen adequacy rate (87.1, 88.2, 85.9%, respectively) or diagnostic yield of malignancy (32.2, 31.8, 31.0%, respectively). However, the use of suction was associated with an increase in tissue-core acquisition rate (P <  0.001). The no-stylet procedure decreased the average procedural time by 14 s (P <  0.001). There was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding among the procedures.

Conclusions

The use of suction or non-use of an inner-stylet does not make a significant difference in cytological specimen adequacy or diagnostic yield when performing EBUS-TBNA. While omitting the stylet can simplify the procedure, applying suction can increase the tissue-core acquisition rate. These findings may assist endoscopic physicians in determining the optimal EBUS-TBNA procedure and warrant clinical verification in a future multicentre study.

Trial registration

Trial registration: (ChiCTR-IOR-17010616). Retrospective registered date: 12th February, 2017.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the economically disadvantaged: A retrospective analysis of 1582 individuals

Background:

Whether the indications and diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) vary according to the socioeconomic status of the patient, remains unknown. Herein, we evaluate this aspect in participants who underwent EBUS-TBNA.

Materials and Methods:

This is a retrospective analysis of all participants who underwent EBUS-TBNA for the evaluation of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. We evaluated the indications and outcome of EBUS-TBNA in participants with and without economic disadvantage (issuance of a below poverty line card by the government).

Results:

Of the EUBUS procedures performed on 1582 participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 46.1 [15.7] years; 593 [37.5%] women) performed during the study, 61 (3.9%) were done in the economically disadvantaged (ED) group. Individuals in the ED group were younger (median age, 40 vs. 46 years; P = 0.002) and more likely to have tuberculosis (42.6% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.005) or malignancy (39.3% vs. 26.9%, P = 0.032) as a presumptive diagnosis. The overall diagnostic yield of EBUS was 63% and was significantly lower in the ED group (49.2% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.023). Previously used EBUS-TBNA needles were more commonly employed in the ED participants (62.7% vs. 20.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, younger age, larger size, and number of nodes sampled, and the use of new (versus reused) needles were independent predictors of higher diagnostic yield. There was no difference in the complication rate between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The diagnostic yield of EBUS was significantly lower in the ED participants, which is due to the differences in the clinical and procedural characteristics.

Utility of Core Needle Biopsies and Transbronchial Biopsies for Diagnosing Nonneoplastic Lung Diseases

Context.—

Small lung biopsies (core needle biopsies and transbronchial biopsies) are the most common—and often the first—lung sample obtained when a radiologic abnormality is detected and tissue diagnosis is required. When a neoplastic diagnosis cannot be made but pathologic abnormalities are present, it is useful for pathologists to have a list (“menu”) of specific nonneoplastic diagnoses that can be made in these samples.

Objective.—

To provide surgical pathologists and pathology trainees with menus of nonneoplastic entities that can be diagnosed in small lung biopsies, and to briefly describe and illustrate some of these entities as they appear in small lung biopsies.

Data Sources.—

Published literature and the authors' experience with small lung biopsies for diagnosis of nonneoplastic lung diseases.

Conclusions.—

Although sampling error imposes some limitations, core needle biopsies and transbronchial lung biopsies can contribute to the diagnosis of a variety of nonneoplastic lung diseases and reduce the need for invasive surgical intervention.

Bronchoscopic modalities to diagnose sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several studies have investigated different bronchoscopic techniques to obtain tissue diagnosis in patients with suspected sarcoidosis when the diagnosis cannot be based on clinicoradiographic findings alone. In this review, we will describe the most recent and relevant evidence from different bronchoscopic modalities to diagnose sarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite multiple available bronchoscopic modalities to procure tissue samples to diagnose sarcoidosis, the vast majority of evidence favors endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration to diagnose Scadding stages 1 and 2 sarcoidosis. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is a new technique that is mainly used to aid in the diagnosis of undifferentiated interstitial lung disease; however, we will discuss its potential use in sarcoidosis.

SUMMARY

This review illustrates the limited information about the different bronchoscopic techniques to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. However, it demonstrates that the combination of available bronchoscopic techniques increases the diagnostic yield for suspected sarcoidosis.