SERRATUS ANTERIOR PLANE BLOCK FOR RIB FRACTURE PAIN IN THE GERIATRIC POPULATION

The effect of erector spinae block versus serratus plane block on pain scores and diaphragmatic excursion in multiple rib fractures. A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate whether ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block would provide effective and safe analgesia in patients with fracture ribs, and to detect their effects on diaphragmatic excursion in such cases.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blind randomized study.

SETTINGS

Tanta University Hospitals.

SUBJECT

Fifty adult patients ASA I, II with fracture ribs.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound guided erector spinae block (Group I) or serratus plane block (Group II) with injection of 19 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 ml dexamethasone (4 mg). Pain scores, 24 hour total analgesic requirements, diaphragmatic excursion and incidence of adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

At rest and dynamic pain scores were significantly lower in Group I as compared to Group II from 2 hour up to 24 hour post block [median differences (95% CI): -1(-0.9999;0.0002), -1(-0.9999;0.0002), -1(-0.9998;0.0003), -1(-1.000;-0.000) and -1(-2.0000;-1.0000), -1(-0.9998;-0.0001), -1(-1.0001;-1.0002), -1(-2.000;0.000) respectively], with a significant reduction in 24h opioid consumption in Group I in comparison to Group II (P= 0.004*). Diaphragmatic excursion showed a significant improvement in Group I when compared to Group II at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hour after the block (p = 0.024*, 0.038*, 0.027*, 0.042* correspondingly). No adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Both erector spinae block and serratus plane block provided safe and effective pain relief in traumatic rib fractures. Though the erector spinae group displayed significantly reduced pain scores, decreased analgesic needs and improved diaphragmatic excursion as compared to serratus group, nevertheless, this was of no clinical significance.

Comparison of serratus anterior plane block with epidural and paravertebral block in critically ill trauma patients with multiple rib fractures

Background

Pain from rib fractures is associated with significant pulmonary morbidity. Epidural and paravertebral blocks (EPVBs) have been recommended as part of a multimodal approach to rib fracture pain, but their utility is often challenging in the trauma intensive care unit (ICU). The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) has potential as an alternative approach for chest wall analgesia.

Methods

This retrospective study compared critically injured adults sustaining multiple rib fractures who had SAPB (n=14) to EPVB (n=25). Patients were matched by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, whether the patient required intubation, number of rib fractures and injury severity score. Outcome measures included hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, preblock and post block rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) in intubated patients, pain scores and morphine equivalent doses administered 24-hour preblock and post-block in non-intubated patients, and mortality.

Results

There were no demographic differences between the two groups after matching. Nearly all of the patients who received either SAPB or EPVB demonstrated a reduction in RSBI or pain scores. The preblock RSBI was higher in the serratus anterior plane block group, but there was no difference between any of the other outcome measures.

Discussion

This retrospective study of our institutional data suggests no difference in efficacy between the serratus anterior plane block and neuraxial block for traumatic rib fracture pain in critically ill patients, but the sample size was too small to show statistical equivalence. Serratus anterior plane block is technically easier to perform with fewer theoretical contraindications compared with traditional neuraxial block. Further study with prospective comparative trials is warranted.

Level of evidence

Retrospective matched cohort; Level IV.