Errors in Methodology Affect Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Speed Videomicroscopy Analysis in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: discrepancy according to different algorithms

Background

Diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is challenging since there is no gold standard test. The European Respiratory (ERS) and American Thoracic (ATS) Societies developed evidence-based diagnostic guidelines with considerable differences.

Objective

We aimed to compare the algorithms published by the ERS and the ATS with each other and with our own PCD-UNIBE algorithm in a clinical setting. Our algorithm is similar to the ERS algorithm with additional immunofluorescence staining. Agreement (Cohen's κ) and concordance between the three algorithms were assessed in patients with suspicion of PCD referred to our diagnostic centre.

Results

In 46 out of 54 patients (85%) the final diagnosis was concordant between all three algorithms (30 PCD negative, 16 PCD positive). In eight patients (15%) PCD diagnosis differed between the algorithms. Five patients (9%) were diagnosed as PCD only by the ATS, one (2%) only by the ERS and PCD-UNIBE, one (2%) only by the ATS and PCD-UNIBE, and one (2%) only by the PCD-UNIBE algorithm. Agreement was substantial between the ERS and the ATS (κ=0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.92) and the ATS and the PCD-UNIBE (κ=0.73, 95% CI 0.53–0.92) and almost perfect between the ERS and the PCD-UNIBE algorithms (κ=0.92, 95% CI 0.80–1.00).

Conclusion

The different diagnostic algorithms lead to a contradictory diagnosis in a considerable proportion of patients. Thus, an updated, internationally harmonised and standardised PCD diagnostic algorithm is needed to improve diagnostics for these discordant cases.

There is no gold standard test for diagnosing PCD. The use of existing diagnostic algorithms leads to contradicting results in many patients (15% in this study). Thus, an updated and internationally harmonised diagnostic guideline is needed.https://bit.ly/2U19Vvq

Ciliary Videomicroscopy: A Long Beat from the European Respiratory Society Guidelines to the Recognition as a Confirmatory Test for Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare inherited ciliopathy in which respiratory cilia are stationary or dyskinetic. The clinical presentation of PCD is highly non-specific since it includes infections and disorders of the upper (otitis and rhinosinusitis) and lower (neonatal respiratory distress, bronchitis, pneumonia and bronchiectasis) airways, starting in early life. Clinical examination alone does not allow a PCD diagnosis, which relies on several concordant tests, since none are sensitive or specific enough alone. Despite being the most sensitive and specific test to diagnose PCD, digital high-speed videomicroscopy (DHSV) is not sufficiently standardized, preventing its use with complete confidence as a confirmatory diagnostic test for PCD, or its inclusion in a diagnostic algorithm. Since the 2017 ERS recommendations for PCD diagnosis, three main issues remain to be solved in order to optimize DHSV ciliary beating evaluation: the problem in defining an accurate sensitivity and specificity as there is no gold standard method to diagnose all PCD cases, a lack of standardization in the operating procedure for processing respiratory samples, and in the choice of measured parameters (self-operating or not). The development of new automated analysis approaches is promising and will require full clinical validation.

Progress in Diagnosing Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: The North American Perspective

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, under-recognized disease that affects respiratory ciliary function, resulting in chronic oto-sino-pulmonary disease. The PCD clinical phenotype overlaps with other common respiratory conditions and no single diagnostic test detects all forms of PCD. In 2018, PCD experts collaborated with the American Thoracic Society (ATS) to create a clinical diagnostic guideline for patients across North America, specifically considering the local resources and limitations for PCD diagnosis in the United States and Canada. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) testing is recommended for first-line testing in patients ≥5 years old with a compatible clinical phenotype; however, all low nNO values require confirmation with genetic testing or ciliary electron micrograph (EM) analysis. Furthermore, these guidelines recognize that not all North American patients have access to nNO testing and isolated genetic testing is appropriate in cases with strong clinical PCD phenotypes. For unresolved diagnostic cases, referral to a PCD Foundation accredited center is recommended. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide insight on the North American PCD diagnostic process, to enhance the understanding of and adherence to current guidelines, and to promote collaboration with diagnostic pathways used outside of North America.

The Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Computed Tomography Score in Adults with Bronchiectasis: A Derivation und Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder which requires a complex diagnostic workup. Thus, an easy and widely available screening method would be helpful to identify patients who need a further diagnostic workup for PCD.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT) score for PCD to facilitate etiological diagnosis in adults with bronchiectasis.

METHOD

Chest CTs from 121 adults with bronchiectasis were scored for bronchiectasis morphology, distribution, and associated findings. Patients with and without the etiological diagnosis of PCD (46 and 75, respectively) were compared. Significantly, different imaging findings (p < 0.05) in univariate analysis were considered for multivariate analysis. Distinct findings were used to build the score. Based on this score, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The score was validated with 2 independent cohorts, another cohort from the same institution with 56 patients (28 with PCD) and an external cohort from another referral center with 172 patients (86 with PCD).

RESULTS

The following parameters predicted PCD in adults with bronchiectasis and were included in the score with weighting according to their regression coefficients: 2 points were given for predominance in the middle/lower lobe, 2 points for tree-in-bud pattern, 2 points for atelectasis or prior resection of a middle/lower lobe, and 3 points for absence of emphysema and fibrosis. Situs inversus was only observed in subjects with PCD (Kartagener syndrome) and, thus, was not used in the primary ciliary dyskinesia computed tomography (PCD-CT) score as group comparisons could not be performed. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.96). Youden index was the highest at a threshold of >6 with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 83%. In the validation cohorts, ROC curve analysis confirmed the performance of the score with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.94) in the first validation cohort and 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.86) in the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCD-CT score provides the first validated CT score for PCD and helps physicians in identifying adult bronchiectasis patients who require further diagnostic workup. Key message: The PCD-CT score provides the first validated CT score to assist physicians in identifying adult bronchiectasis patients who require a further diagnostic workup for PCD. It potentially improves earlier recognition of this rare and underdiagnosed disease.