Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Adults: A Consensus Statement Regarding Initial Strategies

Effect of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the ICU: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was previously established as a method that can increase the pathogen identification rate in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP).

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the impact on clinical outcomes of mNGS of BAL fluid (BALF) in patients with SCAP in the ICU?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled open-label clinical trial was conducted in 10 ICUs. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo BALF assessment with conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) only (ie, the CMT group) or BALF assessment with both mNGS and CMTs (ie, the mNGS group). The primary outcome was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a six-category ordinal scale or discharge from the ICU, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

A total of 349 patients were randomized to treatment between January 1, 2021, and November 18, 2022; 170 were assigned to the CMT group and 179 to the mNGS group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the time to clinical improvement was better in the mNGS group than in the CMT group (10 days vs 13 days; difference, -2.0 days; 95% CI, -3.0 to 0.0 days). Similar results were obtained in the per-protocol analysis. The proportion of patients with clinical improvement within 14 days was significantly higher in the mNGS group (62.0%) than in the CMT group (46.5%). There was no significant difference in other secondary outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

We found that compared with the use of CMTs alone, mNGS combined with CMTs reduced the time to clinical improvement for patients with SCAP.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR; www.chictr.org.cn/index.html; ChiCTR2000037894.

The imbalance of circulating PD-L1-expressing non-classical/ classical monocytes is involved in immunocompromised host related pulmonary opportunistic infection

The application of biological therapy and glucocorticoids in Auto-immune diseases (AID) patients will cause immunocompromised host (ICH) prone to infection. And monocytes play a key role in both innate and adaptive immune responses. We aimed to investigate the changes of circulating monocyte subsets in AID or AID-ICH patients with pulmonary infection. The subgroups and PD-L1 expression of monocytes were measured by flow cytometry in healthy individuals (HC), new-onset AID patients (AID cohort) and AID-ICH patients with pulmonary opportunistic infection (AID-ICH cohort). Flow cytometry analysis was used to determine the distribution of monocyte subsets, including classical monocytes (CL, CD14++CD16-), intermediate monocytes (ITM, CD14++CD16+) and non-classical monocytes (NC, CD14+/-CD16++), as well as the dynamic change of PD-L1 + cluster among monocyte subsets. Among total monocyte, AID-ICH displayed decreased CL subset along with increased NC subset compared to HCs and AID. Regarding PD-L1 + monocytes, although CL subset constituted the majority of that in HCs, AIDs and AID-ICHs, imbalance of NC/CL within PD-L1 + monocytes was only noticed in AID-ICHs (P < 0.05). Furthermore, when AID subjects were developed into immunocompromised status (ICH), PD-L1 + cluster in CL was minorly decreased (P > 0.05). Clinically, the lower ratio of PD-L1 + cluster among CL subset (P < 0.05) and the less differentiated CL in PD-L1 + monocytes (P < 0.05) was more likely to leaded to disease progression. The imbalance of circulating NC/CL subset was remarkable in immunocompromised host with pulmonary opportunistic infection, especially involvement of PD-L1+ cluster, which served as a potential biomarker in clinical practice.

Pneumonia in Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management

Transplant recipients have an increased risk of complications, including graft dysfunction and infections, which can be life-threatening if not recognized early. Pneumonia ranks as one of the most frequent complications in both solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Clinical symptoms manifest late during infections in immunocompromised patients. An aggressive approach centered on early confirmatory diagnosis and a low threshold for empiric therapy is often the most effective strategy. The isolation of a pathogen in an upper airway sample does not necessarily mean the same organism is responsible for pneumonia. Viruses such as CMV (cytomegalovirus virus) may function as co-pathogens for opportunistic infections in transplant recipients in addition to causing their own primary infectious syndrome. Furthermore, some viruses exhibit immunomodulatory effects that can affect the graft function. Given the exhaustive list of causative pathogens responsible for pneumonia, the best approach to the diagnosis is to have a conceptual framework that includes a detailed history, such as the type of transplant, degree of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, risk factors, time of presentation since transplantation and the radiographic pattern on the CT chest (computer tomography of the chest). Management depends predominantly on the degree of antimicrobial resistance, drug-to-drug interaction, and adjustments to the immunosuppression.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for detecting Aspergillosis pneumonia in immunocompromised patients: a retrospective study

Purpose

The identification of Aspergillus by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) remains a challenging task due to the difficulty of nucleic acid extraction. The objective of this study was to determine whether mNGS could provide an accurate and efficient method for detecting invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in immunocompromised patients (ICP).

Methods

A total of 133 ICP admitted to the ICU between January 2020 and September 2022 were enrolled in the study, of which 46 were diagnosed with IPA and 87 were non-IPA cases. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analyzed for the presence of Aspergillosis and other co-pathogens using mNGS, and its diagnostic performance was compared to conventional microbial tests (CMTs) that included smear, cultures, serum and BALF galactomannan (GM) test. Clinical composite diagnosis was used as the reference standard.

Results

mNGS had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82.6%, 97.7%, and 92.5%, respectively, in diagnosing IPA. These findings were comparable to those of the combination of multiple CMTs. Interestingly, the sensitivity of mNGS was superior to that of any single CMT method, as demonstrated by comparisons with smears (8.7%, P < 0.001), culture (39.1%, P < 0.001), serum GM (23.9%, P < 0.001) and BALF GM (69.6%, P = 0.031). mNGS was capable of accurately distinguish strains of Aspergillus genus, with a consistency of 77.8% with culture. Furthermore, mNGS also identified A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terrestris, A. oryzae and Mucor spp. in culture-negative cases. The sequencing reads of Aspergillus by mNGS exhibited extensive variation, ranging from 11 to1702. A positive correlation was observed between the optical density index of BALF GM and unique reads by mNGS (r = 0.607, P = 0.001) in BALF-GM positive patients. Notably, mNGS was able to diagnose 35 out of 37 cases with mixed infection, with P. jirovecii and cytomegalovirus being the most common co-pathogens.

Conclusions

mNGS presents a feasible and remarkably sensitive approach for detecting Aspergillus in ICP, thereby serving as a valuable adjunctive tool to CMT. Furthermore, mNGS's ability to accurately identify fungal species and co-pathogens can assist in guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Clinical Efficiency of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Sputum for Pathogen Detection of Patients with Pneumonia According to Disease Severity and Host Immune Status

Purpose

Severe pneumonia causes the highest mortality rate in immunocompromised patients. This study aimed to investigate the pathogen diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) using sputum sample in patients with pneumonia according to patients' disease severity and immune conditions.

Patients and Methods

A total of 180 patients suffering from pneumonia were recruited, and sputum samples were collected in duplicate for pathogen detection by both conventional microbiological tests (CMT) and mNGS. Then, the performance of pathogen identification was examined between two methods, according to disease severity and patients' immune status.

Results

In comparison to CMT, mNGS had higher positivity rates in all patients with pneumonia (85.0% vs 62.2%, P=9.445e-07). The most commonly detected microorganism in sputum of pneumonia patients was Acinetobacter baumannii (42/180, 23.3%) in bacterum level, Candida albicans in fungus level (44/180, 24.4%), and Human herpesvirus 1 (39/180, 27.5%) in virus level. However, for mNGS results, Candida albicans in 34.9% of positive patients, and Human herpesvirus 1 in 7.7% of positive cases were confirmed as pathogens causing pneumonia. Acinetobacter baumannii detected by mNGS in 75% of positive patients was diagnosed as pathogen of pneumonia. The microorganism profile of sputum mNGS differed according to disease severity and immune status of patients. Pneumocystis jirovecii was more likely to infect immunocompromised patients (P=0.002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.8% vs 0.0%, P=0.008) and Human herpesvirus 1 (26.1% vs 5.3%, P=0.004) had higher infection rate in patients with severe pneumonia compared with non-severe cases. mNGS had overwhelming advantages over CMT in detecting a lot of microorganisms including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and majority of viruses.

Conclusion

mNGS is a complementary tool of CMT for detecting suspected pathogens for patients with lower respiratory infections. The interpretation of opportunistic pathogens identified by mNGS is challenging, and needs comprehensive consideration of sequencing data and clinical factors.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

Immunocompromised patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) warrant special attention because they comprise a growing proportion of patients and tend to have poor clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with SCAP, and to investigate the risk factors for mortality in these patients.

Methods

We conducted retrospective observational cohort study of patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic tertiary hospital with SCAP between January 2017 and December 2019 and compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients.

Results

Among the 393 patients, 119 (30.3%) were immunocompromised. Corticosteroid (51.2%) and immunosuppressive drug (23.5%) therapies were the most common causes. Compared to immunocompetent patients, immunocompromised patients had a higher frequency of polymicrobial infection (56.6 vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001), early mortality (within 7 days) (26.1 vs. 13.1%, P = 0.002), and ICU mortality (49.6 vs. 37.6%, P = 0.027). The pathogen distributions differed between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Among immunocompromised patients, Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus were the most common pathogens. Immunocompromised status (OR: 2.043, 95% CI: 1.114-3.748, P = 0.021) was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. Independent risk factors for ICU mortality in immunocompromised patients included age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 9.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.472-56.234, P = 0.018), SOFA score [OR: 1.338, 95% CI: 1.048-1.708, P = 0.019), lymphocyte count < 0.8 × 10⁹/L (OR: 6.640, 95% CI: 1.463-30.141, P = 0.014), D-dimer level (OR: 1.160, 95% CI: 1.013-1.329, P = 0.032), FiO₂ > 0.7 (OR: 10.228, 95% CI: 1.992-52.531, P = 0.005), and lactate level (OR: 4.849, 95% CI: 1.701-13.825, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

Immunocompromised patients with SCAP have distinct clinical characteristics and risk factors that should be considered in their clinical evaluation and management.

The clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in sepsis of immunocompromised patients

Background

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was commonly applied given its ability to identify and type all infections without depending upon culture and to retrieve all DNA with unbiasedness. In this study, we strive to compare outcomes of mNGS with conventional culture methods in adults with sepsis, investigate the differences between the immunocompromised and control group, and assess the clinical effects of mNGS.

Methods

In our study, 308 adult sepsis patients were included. We used both mNGS and conventional culture methods to analyze diagnostic results, pathogens, and sample types. The correlation between some laboratory tests and the frequency of pathogens by groups was also analyzed. Furthermore, the clinical impacts of mNGS were estimated.

Results

308 samples were assigned to an immunocompromised group (92/308,29.9%) and a control group (216/308,70.1%). There was the sensitivity of mNGS considered greater than that of the culture method in all samples (88.0% vs 26.3%; P <​ 0.001), in the immunocompromised group (91.3% vs 26.1%; P <​ 0.001), and the control group (86.6% vs 26.4%; P <​ 0.001), particularly in all sample types of blood (P <​ 0.001), BALF (P <​ 0.001), CSF (P <​ 0.001), sputum (P <​ 0.001) and ascitic fluid (P = 0.008). When examining the mNGS results between groups, Pneumocystis jirovecii (P < 0.001), Mucoraceae (P = 0.014), and Klebsiella (P = 0.045) all showed significant differences. On the whole, mNGS detected more pathogens than culture methods (111 vs 25), found 89 organisms that were continuously overlooked in entire samples by culture methods, and showed a favorable positive clinical effect in 76.3% (235 of 308) of patients. In 185 (60.1%) patients, mNGS prompted a modification in the course of management, which included antibiotic de-escalation in 61(19.8%) patients.

Conclusions

The research discovered that mNGS was more sensitive than the culture method, particularly in samples of blood, BALF, CSF, sputum, and ascitic fluid. When examining the mNGS results, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Mucoraceae were the pathogens seen more commonly in immunocompromised patients with sepsis, which required more attention from clinicians. There was a substantial benefit of mNGS in enhancing the diagnosis of sepsis and advancing patient treatment.

Diagnostic Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Non-HIV Immunosuppressed Patients

Introduction

This study aims to assess the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and its mixed infection in non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunosuppressed patients.

Methods

A total of 198 non-HIV immunosuppressed patients with severe pneumonia were enrolled, including 77 PJP patients and 121 patients infected by other pathogens. BALF-mNGS and traditional detection methods were used.

Results

The positive detection rate of various pathogens of BALF-mNGS was higher than that of the conventional methods, especially for mixed pathogens. The sensitivity and specificity of BALF-mNGS for the diagnosis of PJP were 97.40% and 85.12%, respectively. Compared with traditional methods, the sensitivity of BALF-mNGS was significantly higher than that of blood fungal G (BG)/lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and BALF-microscopy (p<0.05), and its specificity was significantly higher than that of BG/LDH (p<0.05). In addition, the average detection time of BALF-mNGS (32.76 ± 10.32 h) was also significantly shorter than conventional methods (p<0.01), especially for mixed infections that were common in non-HIV immunosuppressed patients. In patients only detected as positive by BALF-mNGS, the underlying diseases mainly manifested as hematological malignancies with agranulocytosis and within 8 months after hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation.

Conclusions

BALF-mNGS technology is faster, more sensitive, and more comprehensive in detecting P. jirovecii and its mixed infection in immunosuppressed patients.