A comparison of performance of various analytical columns in pharmaceutical analysis: conventional C18 and high throughput C18 Zorbax columns

The Development of Spectrophotometric and Validated Stability- Indicating RP-HPLC Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Ephedrine HCL, Naphazoline HCL, Antazoline HCL, and Chlorobutanol in Pharmaceutical Pomade Form

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis, acute nasal congestion and sinusitis are one of the most common health problems and have a major effect on the quality of life. Several medications are used to improve the symptoms of such diseases in humans. Pharmaceutical pomade form containing Ephedrine (EPD) HCl, Naphazoline (NPZ) HCl, Antazoline (ANT) HCl, and Chlorobutanol (CLO) is one of them.

OBJECTIVE

For these reasons, this study includes the development of spectrophotometric and chromatographic methods for the determination of EPD HCl, NPZ HCl, ANT HCl, and CLO active agents in the pharmaceutical pomade.

METHOD

In the spectrophotometric method, third-order derivative of the amplitudes at 218 nm n=5 and the first-order derivative of the amplitudes 254 nm n=13 was selected for the determination of EPD, ANT, respectively while NPZ was determined by the second derivative at 234 nm and n=21. Colorimetric detection was applied for assay analysis of CLO at 540 nm. Furthermore, a reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP- HPLC) method has been developed and optimized by using Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 (75 mm x 3.0 mm, 3.5μm) column. The column temperature was 40°C, binary gradient elution was used and the mobile phase consisted of 15 mM phosphate buffer in distilled water (pH 3.0) and methanol, and the flow rate was 0.6 mL min^-1 and the UV detector was detected at 210 nm. The linear operating range was obtained as 11.97-70, 0.59-3, 2.79-30, and 2.92-200 μg mL^-1 for EPD HCl, NPZ HCl, ANT HCl, and CLO respectively.

RESULTS

The LOD values were found to be 3.95, 0.19, 0.92 and 0.96 μg mL^-1 for EPD HCl, NPZ HCl, ANT HCl, and CLO in the spectrophotometric method, respectively. The linear ranges in the RP-HPLC method were 8.2-24.36 μg mL^-1, 0.083 - 0.75 μg/mL, 2.01-7.5 μg mL^-1 and 2.89-24.4 μg mL^-1 for EPD HCl, NPZ HCl, ANT HCl, and CLO, respectively. The LOD values in the validation studies were 2.7, 0.025, 0.66 and 0.86 μg mL^-1 for EPD HCl, NPZ HCl, ANT HCl, and CLO in RP-HPLC method respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the spectrophotometric and chromatographic methods were compared and no differences were found between the two methods.

Evaluation of liquid chromatographic behavior of lumazinic derivatives, from α-dicarbonyl compounds, in different C18 columns: application to wine samples using a fused-core column and fluorescence detection

Several C18 columns, packed with totally porous particles of different sizes and shell thicknesses, have been compared for simultaneous determination of α-dicarbonyl compounds, previous derivatization to lumazinic derivatives. Chromatographic conditions for the separation have been optimized for each column, and chromatographic parameters have been calculated and exhaustively compared. A core-shell C18 column provided the best results, and a HPLC method with fluorimetric detection has been proposed. The developed method has been validated in terms of linearity, precision, and sensitivity. Detection and quantification limits obtained were comprised between 0.02 and 0.30 and 0.07 and 1.0 ng mL(-1), respectively, while RSD values obtained were lower than 6% and 5% in intraday and interday repeatability studies, respectively. The method has been applied to analysis of the α-dicarbonyl compounds in different types of wines. The higher levels of the total α-dicarbonyl compounds were found in sweet wines and the lower levels in white wines.

Advantages of ultra performance liquid chromatography over high-performance liquid chromatography: Comparison of different analytical approaches during analysis of diclofenac gel

Miniaturization embracing instrumentation, column particle size, and column dimensions is one of the major current trends in separation techniques. This leads to shortening of analysis time and great savings in solvent consumption. Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) is one of the new developments in liquid chromatography. An ultra-high pressure system allows using of small particle-packed columns with small diameter, which has a positive effect on both system efficiency and analysis time. An analytical method for determination of the active substance diclofenac, the degradation product 1-(2,6-dichlorphenyl)-2-indolinone, and the preservatives methylparaben and propylparaben was used for testing and comparing LC systems. Various octadecylsilica-based analytical columns were examined. Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 microm) and (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 microm) were tested for UPLC. The following analytical columns were used in a test for HPLC: Purospher RP 18e (125 x 4.0 mm, 5 microm), Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 (75 x 4.6 mm, 3.5 microm), Zorbax Eclipse SB C18 (50 x 4.6 mm, 1.8 microm), as was a monolithic column (Chromolith Performance RP-18e (100 x 4.6 mm). Results of a System Suitability Test (SST) were calculated and compared for each chromatographic peak. System efficiency and analysis duration were compared with regard to solvent consumption and system maintenance

Domain Size-Induced Heterogeneity as Performance Limitation of Small-Domain Monolithic Columns and Other LC Support Types

We have computed the band broadening and the flow resistance in a series of apparently self-similar porous LC support structures, all having the same mean geometric ratios and external porosity, but with a decreasing scale and disturbed by a scale-independent variance on the size and position of the porous solid zone elements. The study shows in a general and qualitative way that each type of LC support that is produced using a manufacturing process displaying a fixed (i.e., domain-size independent) variance on the size and position of the produced solid zone elements will eventually encounter a limit beyond which a further reduction of the domain size can no longer be expected to yield a significant gain in separation speed. This is currently observed in practice for silica monoliths and could also compromise the performance of photolithographically etched columns.