1
|
Recent developments in cyclodextrin functionalized monolithic columns for the enantioseparation of chiral drugs. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2016; 130:110-125. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
2
|
Huang X, Yuan D. Recent Developments of Extraction and Micro-extraction Technologies with Porous Monoliths. Crit Rev Anal Chem 2012. [DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2012.629950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
3
|
Namera A, Nakamoto A, Saito T, Miyazaki S. Monolith as a new sample preparation material: Recent devices and applications. J Sep Sci 2011; 34:901-24. [DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2010] [Revised: 01/12/2011] [Accepted: 01/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
4
|
Karenga S, El Rassi Z. Trends in nonpolar polymer-based monolithic columns for reversed-phase capillary electrochromatography. Electrophoresis 2010; 32:90-104. [PMID: 21171116 DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2010] [Revised: 09/30/2010] [Accepted: 10/05/2010] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This review article is concerned with describing the various strategies that have been introduced for the preparation of nonpolar polymer-based monolithic columns for RP-CEC. First, the various traditional ways of generating the EOF that involved the introduction of fixed charges on the surface of the monoliths are reviewed. This is followed by a description of the development of neutral monoliths as the most promising monoliths for the separation of a wide range of neutral and charged species at a relatively moderate to strong EOF in the absence of electrostatic attraction or repulsion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Karenga
- Department of Chemistry, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Svec F. Porous polymer monoliths: amazingly wide variety of techniques enabling their preparation. J Chromatogr A 2010; 1217:902-24. [PMID: 19828151 PMCID: PMC2829304 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2009] [Revised: 09/11/2009] [Accepted: 09/28/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The porous polymer monoliths went a long way since their invention two decades ago. While the first studies applied the traditional polymerization processes at that time well established for the preparation of polymer particles, creativity of scientists interested in the monolithic structures has later led to the use of numerous less common techniques. This review article presents vast variety of methods that have meanwhile emerged. The text first briefly describes the early approaches used for the preparation of monoliths comprising standard free radical polymerizations and includes their development up to present days. Specific attention is paid to the effects of process variables on the formation of both porous structure and pore surface chemistry. Specific attention is also devoted to the use of photopolymerization. Then, several less common free radical polymerization techniques are presented in more detail such as those initiated by gamma-rays and electron beam, the preparation of monoliths from high internal phase emulsions, and cryogels. Living processes including stable free radicals, atom transfer radical polymerization, and ring-opening metathesis polymerization are also discussed. The review ends with description of preparation methods based on polycondensation and polyaddition reactions as well as on precipitation of preformed polymers affording the monolithic materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frantisek Svec
- The Molecular Foundry, E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 67R6110, Berkeley, CA 94720-8139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Núñez O, Nakanishi K, Tanaka N. Preparation of monolithic silica columns for high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2008; 1191:231-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2007] [Revised: 02/07/2008] [Accepted: 02/08/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
7
|
Geiser L, Eeltink S, Svec F, Fréchet JMJ. In-line system containing porous polymer monoliths for protein digestion with immobilized pepsin, peptide preconcentration and nano-liquid chromatography separation coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. J Chromatogr A 2008; 1188:88-96. [PMID: 18342870 PMCID: PMC2435401 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.02.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2007] [Revised: 02/10/2008] [Accepted: 02/15/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The use of two different monoliths located in capillaries for on-line protein digestion, preconcentration of peptides and their separation has been demonstrated. The first monolith was used as support for covalent immobilization of pepsin. This monolith with well-defined porous properties was prepared by in situ copolymerization of 2-vinyl-4,4-dimethylazlactone and ethylene dimethacrylate. The second, poly(lauryl methacrylate-co-ethylene dimethacrylate) monolith with a different porous structure served for the preconcentration of peptides from the digest and their separation in reversed-phase liquid chromatography mode. The top of the separation capillary was used as a preconcentrator, thus enabling the digestion of very dilute solutions of proteins in the bioreactor and increasing the sensitivity of the mass spectrometric detection of the peptides using a time-of-flight mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization. Myoglobin, albumin, and hemoglobin were digested to demonstrate feasibility of the concept of using the two monoliths in-line. Successive protein injections confirmed both the repeatability of the results and the ability to reuse the bioreactor for at least 20 digestions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Geiser
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1460, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Eeltink
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1460, USA
| | - Frantisek Svec
- The Molecular Foundry, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-8139, USA
| | - Jean M. J. Fréchet
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1460, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jungbauer A, Hahn R. Polymethacrylate monoliths for preparative and industrial separation of biomolecular assemblies. J Chromatogr A 2008; 1184:62-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2007] [Revised: 12/04/2007] [Accepted: 12/19/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Guiochon G. Monolithic columns in high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2007; 1168:101-68; discussion 100. [PMID: 17640660 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 618] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2006] [Revised: 05/17/2007] [Accepted: 05/29/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Monolithic media have been used for various niche applications in gas or liquid chromatography for a long time. Only recently did they acquire a major importance in high-performance column liquid chromatography (HPLC). The advent of monolithic silica standard- and narrow-bore columns and of several families of polymer-based monolithic columns has considerably changed the HPLC field, particularly in the area of narrow-bore columns. The origin of the concept, the differences between their characteristics and those of traditional packed columns, their advantages and drawbacks, the methods of preparation of monoliths of different forms, and the current status of the field are reviewed. The actual and potential performance of monolithic columns are compared with those of packed columns. Monolithic columns have considerable advantages, which makes them most useful in many applications of liquid chromatography. They are extremely permeable and offer a high efficiency that decreases slowly with increasing flow velocity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Guiochon
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1600, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Svec F, Kurganov AA. Less common applications of monoliths. III. Gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2007; 1184:281-95. [PMID: 17645884 PMCID: PMC2293291 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2007] [Revised: 07/06/2007] [Accepted: 07/09/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Porous polymer monoliths emerged about two decades ago. Despite this short time, they are finding applications in a variety of fields. In addition to the most common and certainly best known use of this new category of porous media as stationary phases in liquid chromatography, monolithic materials also found their applications in other areas. This review article focuses on monoliths in capillaries designed for separations in gas chromatography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frantisek Svec
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Svec F. Less common applications of monoliths: Preconcentration and solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2006; 841:52-64. [PMID: 16650811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.03.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2006] [Revised: 03/24/2006] [Accepted: 03/27/2006] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Monolithic materials are finding their place in a variety of fields. While liquid chromatography is the most emphasized use of this new category of porous media, some other just as important applications are eclipsed by the success of monolithic columns. This review article describes all current facets of use of monoliths in preconcentration and solid-phase extraction. In addition to the typical off line use that does not seem to be the main stream application for the monolithic materials, in-line connection of the preconcentration with HPLC, electrochromatography, electrophoresis, enzymatic digestion, as well as its applications in microfluidics are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frantisek Svec
- The Molecular Foundry, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-8139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wistuba D, Schurig V. Comparison of monolithic approaches for enantioselective capillary electrochromatography involving cyclodextrins. J Sep Sci 2006; 29:1344-52. [PMID: 16894778 DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200600114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The access to CD-modified monoliths for enantiomeric separation by CEC can be divided into two main approaches. (i) Silica-based monoliths, prepared by either a sol-gel process or by sintering of silica particles, are modified after fabrication by coating with a CD selector. Alternatively the fusion of CD functionalized silica particle via gluing is feasible. (ii) Rigid or homogeneous organic polymer-based monoliths, prepared by polymerization of organic monomers in the presence of a porogen, are modified with the CD selector either by copolymerization or by physical incorporation into the continuous bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Wistuba
- Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Végvári A, Guttman A. Theoretical and nomenclatural considerations of capillary electrochromatography with monolithic stationary phases. Electrophoresis 2006; 27:716-25. [PMID: 16456893 DOI: 10.1002/elps.200500789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
During the past decade, CEC has been one of the few novel achievements in the field of separation science attracting a wide interest. The technology progress permitted the realization of the long-sought idea to employ an electroosmotically driven flow through the columns improving the separations in terms of both resolution and efficiency. The early practical obstacles related to the use of conventional bead-packed columns have been solved by the introduction of continuous beds, also known as monoliths. Hitherto, various synthesis approaches have been successfully developed producing monolithic beds in situ in capillary columns, sharing similar physical structure built up of tiny particles (in the sub-microm range) that are covalently linked together and to the capillary wall. Parallel with the practical column technology studies, the theory of electrochromatography has been continuously developed, focusing on such basic issues as EOF characterization, separation efficiency, and peak dispersion effects. This review provides a short introduction to the theory of CEC with special attention to monolithic separation beds. The paper also summarizes the latest achievements in CEC and discusses the nomenclature, EOF characteristics, and some specific advantages of monolithic column technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akos Végvári
- Department of Biochemistry, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Svec F. Less common applications of monoliths: I. Microscale protein mapping with proteolytic enzymes immobilized on monolithic supports. Electrophoresis 2006; 27:947-61. [PMID: 16470758 DOI: 10.1002/elps.200500661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the recent contributions to the rapidly growing area of immobilized enzymes employing both silica and synthetic polymer-based monoliths as supports. Focus is mainly on immobilized proteolytic enzyme reactors designed for studies in proteomics. Porous monoliths emerged first as a new class of stationary phases for HPLC in the early 1990s. Soon thereafter, they were also used as supports for immobilization of proteins and preparation of both stationary phases for bioaffinity chromatography and enzymatic reactors. Organic polymer-based monoliths are typically prepared using a simple molding process carried out within the confines of a "mold" such as chromatographic column or capillary. Polymerization of a mixture comprising monomers, initiator, and porogenic solvent affords macroporous materials. In contrast, silica-based monoliths are first formed as a rigid rod from tetraalkoxysilane in the presence of PEG and subsequently encased with a plastic tube. Both types of monolith feature large through-pores that enable a rapid flow-through. Since all the solutions must flow through the monolith, the convection considerably accelerates mass transfer within the monolith. As a result, reactors including enzyme immobilized on monolithic support exhibit much higher activity compared to the reactions in solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frantisek Svec
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|